Abstract
Liquidity risk has a huge influence on commercial banks. Many scholars have developed and derived different models from different perspectives to measure and prevent liquidity risk of commercial banks. This article selected thirty-seven commercial banks as examples, using their financial data in 2021, and use twelve variables to construct the liquidity risk evaluation index. These selected banks were divided according to their different business natures which included state-owned banks, joint-equity banks, city commercial banks and rural commercial banks. This article uses factor analysis to calculate the liquidity scores, ranks the result and from several perspectives explains the result. Results of factor analysis shows that state owned banks perform worse than non-state-owned banks, but state-owned banks have higher scores on risk resilience, profit and liquidity factors. This article shows different result compared with other scholars’ study, may because of the different macro environments, insufficient data or an imprecise empirical process. This article considers that the special characteristics of years after COVID- 19 and different flexibility of state-owned banks and non-state-owned ones contribute to the result. In the end, this article suggested three aspects, from state owned banks, non-state-owned banks and regulation department to improve or maintain the liquidity situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dybvig, D.: Deposit insurance and liquidity. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 24(3), 401–419 (2000)
Li, M.J.: Study on influencing factors of liquidity of commercial banks. Sci. Techn. Innov. Product. 12, 84–86 (2021)
Wang, C., Wen, X.M., Zhou, Y.L.: Research on measurement and management of bank liquidity risk under the new trend. Res. Finan. Educ. 32(04), 55–61+68 (2019)
Pei, P., Fu, S.: The influence of internet finance development on the liquidity of commercial banks-empirical evidence from 15 listed banks in China. De Econ. 12, 80–87 (2020)
Deng, W., Jiang, N., Song, M.: Do lending facilities improve the liquidity creation of commercial banks in China. Stud. Int. Finan. 07, 58–67 (2022)
Zhang, Y.H.: On liquidity risk evaluation of China’s listed commercial banks based on factor analysis. J. Tongling Univ. 21(01), 33–39 (2022)
Sun, Y.J.: Research on liquidity risk of commercial banks based on stress test model. J Sanmenxia Polytech. 20(01), 124–128 (2021)
Gu, S.H., Chang, Y.: Stress test of liquidity risk of Chinese state-owned banks. J. Shenyang Univ. (Soc. Sci.) 15(06), 756–760 (2013)
Che, M.: Research on liquidity risk of non-state owned commercial banks. CO-Oper. Econ. Sci. 22, 56–57 (2021)
Nie, G.H., Huang, M.Q.: The empirical analysis of the monetary policy and the liquidity of state-owned banks under the background of aging. Res. Finan. Educ. 29(02), 3–9 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shen, C. (2023). Empirical Analysis of Liquidity Risk of Chinese Listed Commercial Banks. In: Dang, C.T., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Li, X. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies. CONF-BPS 2023. Applied Economics and Policy Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6441-3_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6441-3_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6440-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6441-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)