Skip to main content

Respectful Maternity Care: A Cornerstone for Improving Maternal Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Unequal Gender Relations in India and Beyond

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

Respectful maternity care (RMC) is a universal human right that is due to every childbearing woman in every health system around the world. A woman’s relationship with maternity care providers and the maternity care system during pregnancy and childbirth is vitally important. RMC is an integral part of quality of care (QoC), which is increasingly recognized internationally as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health agenda. It is recognized that high coverage alone is not enough to reduce maternal mortality. Increased coverage should be accompanied by improved quality throughout the continuum of care. At the best of times, frontline health workers in resource-constrained settings are confronted with system deficiencies that create conditions which can contribute to the mistreatment of women and the violation of their human rights. In times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline health workers and decision-makers may believe that the rights of childbearing women and their newborns are secondary to concerns of security, safety, or emergency resource management. But human rights are universal and inalienable and protecting them contributes to positive health outcomes. This chapter covers the role of socioeconomic inequalities underpinning women’s experiences of obstetric care. Through this lens, the authors look at how women perceive, internalize, and justify the poor care they receive which reflects entrenched gender discrimination and oppression within homes, communities, and wider societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pulling Back the Curtain on Disrespect and Abuse: The Movement to ensure respectful maternity care. Hastings, 2015.

References

  1. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. White Ribbon Alliance; 2011. https://www.healthpolicyproject.com/pubs/46_FinalRespectfulCareCharter.pdf

  2. Gupta SK, Pal DK, Tiwari R, Garg R, Shrivastava AK, Sarawagi R, Patil R, Agarwal L, Gupta P, Lahariya C. Impact of Janani Suraksha Yojana on institutional delivery rate and maternal morbidity and mortality: an observational study in India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30(4):464–471. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v30i4.13416

  3. Rosen HE, Lynam PF, Carr C, Reis V, Ricca J, Bazant ES, Barlett LA. Direct observation of respectful maternity care in five countries: a cross-sectional study of health facilities in East and Southern Africa. BioMed Central Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0728-4

  4. Kruk ME, Paczkowski M, Mbaruku G, de Pinho H, Galea S. Women’s preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(9):1666–1672. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724466/

  5. Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Freedman LP, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Kruk ME. Association between disrespect and abuse during childbirth and women’s confidence in health facilities in Tanzania. Maternal Child Health J. 2015;19(10):2243–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1743-9

  6. Nawab T, Erum U, Amir A, Khalique N, Ansari MA, Chauhan A. Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth and its sociodemographic determinants—a barrier to healthcare utilization in rural population. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(1):239–245. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_247_18

  7. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care Charter. White Ribbon Alliance. https://whiteribbonalliance.org/resources/rmc-charter/

  8. Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):42–44. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)60859-X/fulltext?rss%3Dyes

  9. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Confederation of Midwives, White Ribbon Alliance, International Pediatric Association, World Health Organization, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Mother-baby friendly birthing facilities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Official Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;128(2):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.013

  10. Hastings MB. Pulling back the curtain on disrespect and abuse: the movement to ensure respectful maternity care. Health Policy Project; 2015 Sep 01. https://www.healthpolicyproject.com/index.cfm?id=publications&get=pubID&pubId=5877

  11. Freedman LP, Ramsey K, Abuya T, Bellows B, Ndwiga C, Warren CE, Kujawski S, Moyo W, Kruk ME, Mbaruku G. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(12):915–917. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/271621

  12. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: Report of a landscape analysis. Maternal Health Task Force; 2014 May 19. https://www.mhtf.org/document/exploring-evidence-for-disrespect-and-abuse-in-facility-based-childbirth-report-of-a-landscape-analysis/

  13. Asefa A, Bekele D. Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility-based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0024-9

  14. Grilo Diniz CS, Rattner D, Lucas d’Oliveira AFP, de Aguiar JM, Niy DY. Disrespect and abuse in childbirth in Brazil: social activism, public policies and providers’ training. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502019

  15. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

  16. Sharma G, Penn-Kekana L, Halder K, Filippi V. An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y

  17. Lukasse M, Schroll A-M, Karro H, Schei B, Steingrimsdottir T, Van Parys A-S, Ryding EL, Tabor A, Group BS. Prevalence of experienced abuse in healthcare and associated obstetric characteristics in six European countries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015;94(5):508–517. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25627169/

  18. Forssén ASK. Lifelong significance of disempowering experiences in prenatal and maternity care: interviews with elderly Swedish women. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(11):1535–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312449212

  19. International Confederation of Midwives. Midwives’ voices, midwives’ realities. International Confederation of Midwives; 2016. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/partners-and-collaborations/collaborations/midwives-voices,-midwives-realities.html

  20. Govender V, Penn-Kekana L. Gender biases and discrimination: a review of health care interpersonal interactions. Glob Public Health. 2008;3:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690801892208

  21. Sen G, Reddy B, Iyer A. Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173

  22. Diniz SG, Chacham AS. “The Cut Above” and “the Cut Below”: the abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil. Reprod Health Matters. 2004;12(23):100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23112-3

  23. Reis V, Deller B, Carr C, Smith J. Respectful maternity care. Country experience. Alliance francophone pour l’accouchement respecté (AFAR); 2012 Nov. https://afar.info/id=2681/en

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparajita Gogoi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gogoi, A., Ravi, T. (2023). Respectful Maternity Care: A Cornerstone for Improving Maternal Health. In: Pachauri, S., Verma, R.K. (eds) Transforming Unequal Gender Relations in India and Beyond. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4086-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4086-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4085-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4086-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics