Keywords

1 Introduction

Multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle is manufactured by Vietnam which is the type of equipment that integrates many forest fire fighting functions including cutting trees, cleaning garbage grass, open roads to create a fire isolation corridor; fire sprinkler with wide spray area; formulate high-pressure wind spray on the fire, using sandy soil in place of fire extinguishing. Lead to oscillations can cause high-stress concentration resonance on the frame destruction structure or may cause fatigue on the frame during operation [1,2,3,4,5] (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
A photograph of a fire truck.

Multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicles [1, 2]

Fig. 2
A schematic of the lateral view of the fire truck, featuring the design with the labeled parts.

General design multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicles [1, 2]

According to ISO 2631 [6, 7] smoothness to the user considering the combination of acceleration, frequency, and duration of impact, acceleration can be used as an evaluation criterion: very smooth 1.6 m/s2, smooth 3.15 m/s2, working limit 6.3 m/s2.

2 Building a Oscillating Model

When building a multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle oscillation model, several assumptions must be made. These assumptions make the research and calculation process simpler but do not lose the generality of the problem, ensuring the necessary accuracy. The basic assumptions when building the model are as follows: The mass of the vehicle is distributed symmetrically about the longitudinal plane; on a vehicle full of water in the tank and consider the water in the tank as a solid block because the tank is divided into many small compartments; the sprung mass and unsprung mass is considered to be rigid; the contact of the wheel with the forest ground is point contact; the vehicle moves in a straight line with constant speed; neglect the slip of the wheels (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
An oscillation model of fire fighting vehicle with four segments, each having multiple parallel circuits.

Oscillation model of a multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle [2]

Using Newton–Euler equations to build a system of dynamic equations for a multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle as follows [1, 4, 5]:

$$ \begin{aligned} & m_{0} \ddot{Z}_{0} + 2K_{1} \left( {\dot{Z}_{1} + \dot{\alpha }_{0} l_{1} - \dot{Z}_{s} } \right) + 2C_{1} \left( {Z_{1} + \alpha_{0} l_{1} - Z_{s} } \right) \\ & +\, 2C_{2} \left( {Z_{2} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} - l_{5} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) + 2C_{3} \left( {Z_{3} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{5} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) \\ & +\, 2K_{4} \left( {\dot{Z}_{4} + \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - \dot{Z}_{s} } \right) + 2C_{4} \left( {Z_{4} + \alpha_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) = 0 \end{aligned} $$
(1)
$$ \begin{aligned}& J_{0} \ddot{\alpha }_{0} + 2K_{1} l_{1} \left( {\dot{Z}_{s} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} l_{1} - \dot{Z}_{1} } \right) + 2C_{1} l_{1} \left( {Z_{s} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} l_{1} - Z_{1} } \right)\\ & +\, 2C_{2} \left( {l_{2} - l_{5} } \right)\left( {Z_{2} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} - l_{5} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) + 2C_{3} \left( {l_{2} + l_{5} } \right)\left( {Z_{3} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{5} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) \\ & +\, 2K_{4} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right)\left( {\dot{Z}_{4} + \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - \dot{Z}_{s} } \right) + 2C_{4} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right)\left( {Z_{4} + \alpha_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - Z_{s} } \right) = 0 \end{aligned} $$
(2)
$$ \begin{gathered} J_{0} \ddot{\beta }_{0} + 2K_{1} \left( {{b/2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\dot{\beta }_{1} - \dot{\beta }_{0} } \right) + 2C_{1} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{1} - \beta_{0} } \right) + 2C_{2} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{2} - \beta_{0} } \right) \hfill \\ 2C_{3} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{3} - \beta_{0} } \right) + 2K_{4} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\dot{\beta }_{4} - \dot{\beta }_{0} } \right) + 2C_{4} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{4} - \beta_{0} } \right) = 0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(3)
$$\begin{aligned}& m_{1} \ddot{Z}_{1} + KL_{1} \left( {\dot{h}_{11} + \dot{h}_{12} - 2\dot{Z}_{1} } \right) + CL_{1} \left( {h_{11} + h_{12} - 2Z_{1} } \right) \\ & +\, 2K_{1} \left( {\dot{Z}_{s} - \dot{\alpha }_{0} l_{1} - \dot{Z}_{1} } \right) + 2C_{1} \left( {Z_{s} - \alpha_{0} l_{1} - Z_{1} } \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(4)
$$\begin{aligned}& m_{2} \ddot{Z}_{2} + KL_{2} \left( {\dot{h}_{21} + \dot{h}_{22} - 2\dot{Z}_{2} } \right) + CL_{2} \left( {h_{21} + h_{22} - 2Z_{2} } \right)\\ & +\, 2C_{3} \left( {Z_{s} + \alpha_{0} \left( {l_{2} - l_{5} } \right) - Z_{2} } \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(5)
$$ \begin{aligned}& m_{3} \ddot{Z}_{3} + KL_{3} \left( {\dot{h}_{21} + \dot{h}_{22} - 2\dot{Z}_{2} } \right) + CL_{3} \left( {h_{31} + h_{32} - 2Z_{3} } \right) \\ & +\, 2C_{3} \left( {Z_{s} + \alpha_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{5} } \right) - Z_{3} } \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(6)
$$\begin{aligned}& m_{4} \ddot{Z}_{4} + h_{41} + h_{42} + 2C_{4} \left( {Z_{s} + \alpha_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - Z_{4} } \right) \\ &+\, 2K_{4} \left( {\dot{Z}_{s} + \dot{\alpha }_{0} \left( {l_{2} + l_{3} } \right) - \dot{Z}_{4} } \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(7)
$$\begin{aligned}& J_{1} \ddot{\beta }_{1} + 2K_{1} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\dot{\beta }_{1} - \dot{\beta }_{0} } \right) + 2C_{1} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{1} - \beta_{0} } \right) \\ &+\, KL_{1} \left( {\dot{h}_{12} - \dot{h}_{11} - 2\dot{\beta }_{1} B} \right) + CL_{1} \left( {h_{12} - h_{11} - 2\beta_{1} B} \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(8)
$$\begin{aligned}& J_{2} \ddot{\beta }_{2} + 2C_{2} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{2} - \beta_{0} } \right) + KL_{2} \left( {\dot{h}_{21} - \dot{h}_{22} - 2\dot{\beta }_{2} B} \right) \\ &+\, CL_{2} \left( {h_{21} - h_{22} - 2\beta_{2} B} \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(9)
$$ \begin{aligned}&J_{3} \ddot{\beta }_{3} + 2C_{3} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{2} - \beta_{0} } \right) + KL_{3} \left( {\dot{h}_{31} - \dot{h}_{32} - 2\dot{\beta }_{3} B} \right) \\ &+\, CL_{2} \left( {h_{31} - h_{32} - 2\beta_{3} B} \right) = 0\end{aligned} $$
(10)
$$ J_{4} \ddot{\beta }_{4} + 2K_{4} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\dot{\beta }_{4} - \dot{\beta }_{0} } \right) + 2C_{4} \left( {{b / 2}} \right)^{2} \left( {\beta_{4} - \beta_{0} } \right) - h_{41} + h_{42} = 0 $$
(11)

To evaluate the oscillation of the vehicle, the author uses Matlab-Simulink software to investigate the influence of movement speed and road quality on the acceleration of the body, pitch angle, and roll angle of the body when the vehicle is loaded with water (full load) and vehicle without water (doesn’t load), moving at v = [10, 15, 20] km/h on medium quality (C), bad (D) and very bad (E) roads according to ISO 8608:2016 [8] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
A graph plots h in millimeters versus x in meters, wherein a set of six fluctuating trends ranges between an h value of negative 500 and 650 millimeters and an x value of 0 and 1000 meters.

Road surface according to ISO 8608:2016 standards [8]

3 Verification Survey of Multi-purpose Forest Fire Fighting Vehicle

3.1 Effect of Vehicle Speed

Surveying with different moving speeds of multi-purpose forest fire vehicle, in this study, the survey with 3 speeds is v = 10 km/h; v = 15 km/h and v = 20 km/h, lawn mower working, the vehicle doesn’t load and full load, traveling on type C road according to ISO 8608:2016. The results of the theoretical investigation are shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
A two-part graph plots acceleration versus x depicting the fluctuating waveform from minus 5 to 5. They represent v equals 10, 15, and 20 kilometers per hour.

Survey results of vehicle body oscillation acceleration

Through the survey, we find that when the speed increases, the acceleration of the body oscillation increases, but is still within the allowable range [6, 7], when the vehicle is a full load, the body oscillation acceleration is smaller than when a vehicle doesn’t load. Similar to the vehicle body oscillation acceleration, so the influence of the vehicle's speed on the pitch angle of the vehicle body in two cases: When the vehicle doesn’t load and when the vehicle is a full load and with speeds v = 10, 15 and 20 km/h when the vehicle moves on the road class C according to ISO 8608:2016. The results of the survey on the influence of the vehicle's speed on the pitch angle of the vehicle are shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
A two-part graph plots pitch angle versus x depicting three fluctuating waveforms representing v equals 10, 15, and 20 kilometers per hour. They range from about minus 6 to 7 and minus 7 to 7, respectively.

Survey results to determine the pitch angle of the vehicle body

Through the survey, we found that when the movement speed increased, the pitch angle increased, but with the undulation being surveyed, the pitch angle was still within the allowable range. When the vehicle is a full load, the pitch angle is larger than when the vehicle doesn’t load, which proves that due to the influence of water in the water tank, the pitch angle increases.

Similar to when investigating the influence of speed on vehicle body acceleration and pitch angle, the author also surveyed roll angle 3-speed modes and when the vehicle is a full load, the vehicle doesn’t load, on type C road; lawn mower structure working. The results of the survey are shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7
A two-part graph plots roll angle versus x depicting three fluctuating waveforms representing v equals 10, 15, and 20 kilometers per hour. They range from about minus 6 to 6.

Survey results to determine the roll angle of the vehicle body

Through the survey results, we find that when increasing the vehicle's speed, the roll angle of the body also increases but is still within the allowable range. When the vehicle is a full load, the body roll angle is also greater than when the vehicle doesn’t load due to the influence of water contained in the water tank. From the survey results, we have a statistical table of the maximum vehicle body oscillation acceleration, the maximum pitch angle, and the maximum roll angle as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 The maximum value of vehicle body oscillation acceleration, pitch, and roll angle of the vehicle body when moving at different speeds

Through the survey, we have the following observations: When the vehicle is a full load, the body oscillation acceleration is smaller than when the vehicle doesn’t load, but the pitch and roll angle of the body is larger due to the influence of water in the vehicle fire hydrant. When the speed increases, the acceleration of the body oscillation, and the pitch and roll angles of the body all increase but are still within the allowable range, not affecting the fire fighting operation of the vehicle when running in the forest. Therefore, when the vehicle is traveling on a class C road with an average forest ground roughness of about 0.06 m, the speed of movement is 10, 15, or 20 km/h.

3.2 Effect of Road Quality on Vehicle Oscillation

The road surface roughness has a great influence on the vehicle body oscillation acceleration, pitch, and roll angle. It is very important to choose how the vehicle works with the unevenness of the road surface to ensure the safe and effective operation of the vehicle. The average forest surface roughness of Luot mountain, Hoa Binh province is 0.05 m, the average forest surface roughness of Gia Lai province is 0.1 m and the eucalyptus forest of Kon Tum province is 0.15 m [2]. Therefore, in this survey, the author investigates the influence of roads class D, and E according to ISO 8608:2016 to compare and evaluate the oscillations of the vehicle compared to the case of vehicles traveling on class C roads; moving speed of vehicle v = 10 km/h, v = 15 km/h and v = 20 km/h, the vehicle doesn’t load, a lawn mower is working.

3.2.1 Effect on Vehicle Body Oscillation Acceleration

The survey results on the influence of forest ground roughness on the vehicle body oscillation acceleration are shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
A two-part graph plots acceleration versus x depicting three fluctuating waveforms representing C, D, and E. They range from about minus 7 to5 and minus 10 to 10.

Effect of road quality on vehicle body oscillation acceleration

From the survey results, we have a statistical table of the largest body oscillation acceleration values when changing the road surface roughness as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The maximum value of vehicle body oscillation acceleration when moving on different types of roads with different unevenness

When increasing the road surface roughness, the acceleration of body oscillation increases, the higher the speed of movement, the greater the acceleration of body oscillation. For class D road, when the vehicle speed is below 20 km/h, the vehicle body oscillation acceleration is still within the allowable range. On class E road, the vehicle body oscillation acceleration exceeds the allowable range.

3.2.2 Effect on the Pitch Angle of the Vehicle Body

The results of the survey on the influence of road surface roughness on the vehicle body pitch angle are shown in Fig. 9 and from that survey result, we have a statistical table of the maximum values of the pitch angle of the vehicle body when changing road surface roughness (Table 3).

Fig. 9
A two-part graph plots pitch angle versus x depicting three fluctuating waveforms representing C, D, and E. They range from about minus 7 to 7.

Influence of road quality on pitch angle of the body vehicle

Table 3 The maximum value of pitch angle of the body vehicle when moving on different roads

When the vehicle is traveling on class C road, the pitch angle of the vehicle body is not large, but when the vehicle is moving on class D and E roads, the pitch angle of the vehicle body is large, especially when increasing the vehicle's movement speed. This affects the working of the fire fighting equipment installed on the vehicle.

3.2.3 Effect on the Roll Angle of the Vehicle Body

The survey results on the influence of road surface roughness on the roll angle of the vehicle body are shown in Fig. 10 and also from the survey results, we have a statistical table of the largest roll angle of the vehicle body when changing the road surface roughness (Table 4).

Fig. 10
A two-part graph plots roll angle versus x depicting three fluctuating waveforms representing C, D, and E. They range from about minus 5 to 5.

Effect of road surface roughness on roll angle of the vehicle body

Table 4 Maximum value of body roll angle when moving on roads with different roughness

With low average roughness (class C) and a moving speed, of less than or equal to 10 km/h, the roll angle of the vehicle body is not large, but in the medium roughness of the road surface (class D, E road), the roll angle of the vehicle body is large, especially when the vehicle's speed is increased, this affects the stability of the vehicle. Therefore, on class C roads, the vehicle should be driven at a speed v ≤ 15 km/h, and on class D and E roads, we let the vehicle run at a speed of v ≤ 10 km/h.

4 Conclusion

The paper simulated and investigated the vehicle's oscillations with different modes of vehicle speed movement, different surface roughness to acceleration, pitch angle, and roll angle of the vehicle body. The results determined that the survey was working in a reasonable mode for a multi-purpose forest fire fighting vehicle. The survey results show that the quality of the tree felling system installed at the front of the vehicle depends on the pitch angle of the body, when the pitch angle is large, the cutting edge may be broken. Therefore, to overcome this problem, it is necessary to calculate and redesign the coupling between the chassis and the tree felling system so that the tree felling system is not affected by the body shake angle. Thus, surveying the influence of forest ground roughness on vehicle body oscillation acceleration, pitch angle, and roll angle of the vehicle, shows that depending on the roughness of the forest ground, the vehicle's speed is selected accordingly to ensure the durability of the vehicle's details and the stable operation of the vehicle.