Abstract
On 1 February, the National Government promulgated the Civil Procedure Law of the Republic of China, in which Articles 352 and 358 stipulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The National Government (国民政府), “Civil Procedure Law of the Republic of China (中华民国民事诉讼法)”, Judicial Gazette (司法公报), No. 21, 1935. The full stop is hereby added in accordance with the publishing format.
- 2.
The National Government (国民政府), “The Order (令)”, Judicial Gazette (司法公报), No. 40, 1935.
- 3.
The National Government (国民政府), “The Order (令)”, Judicial Gazette (司法公报), No. 47, 1935.
- 4.
The National Government (国民政府), “The Order (训令) (No. 592)”, National Government Gazette (国民政府公报), No. 1805, 1935.
- 5.
Judicial Yuan (司法院), “Provisional Rules on Notarization (公证暂行规则)”, Judicial Gazette (司法公报), No. 57, 1935.
- 6.
Ministry of Judicial Administration (司法行政部), “The Order (训令) (Xun-Zi No. 4403) (训字第四四〇三号)”, Judicial Gazette (司法公报), No. 62, 1935.
- 7.
The Manchurian Regime (伪满洲国), “Instruction of the Head of the Civil Division (民事司长指示)”, in the Clerical Section of the General Affairs Department of the Ministry of Justice of the Manchurian Regime (伪满洲国司法部总务司文书科) (ed.), Records of the Fourth National Judicial Conference (第四次全国司法会议记录), (1935) Clerical Section of the General Affairs Department of the Ministry of Justice of the Manchurian Regime, at p. 28. The specific time of the Conference has not been found yet. As recorded on pages 1 and 11 of the former book, the Conference was held by the Chairman Feng Han-ching (冯涵清), Minister of Justice of the Manchurian Regime. In case of absence, Masao Gutian (古田正武), Director-General of the Ministry of Justice of the Manchurian Regime, would act on his behalf. No punctuation marks were used in the original text, which are now added to facilitate readers’ understanding.
- 8.
Liaoyang District Court of the Manchurian Regime (伪满洲国辽阳地方法院), “The Notary System Should Be Implemented as Early as Possible”, in ibid., at p. 88. No punctuation marks were used in the original text and the blank space was used, which are now added to facilitate readers’ understanding.
- 9.
The Manchurian Regime (伪满洲国), “Answers of the Civil Division of the Ministry of Justice (司法部民事司解答)”, in the Clerical Section of the General Affairs Department of the Ministry of Justice of the Manchurian Regime (ed.), Records of the Fourth National Judicial Conference (第四次全国司法会议记录), (1935) Clerical Section of the General Affairs Department of the Ministry of Justice of the Manchurian Regime, at p. 88. No punctuation marks were used in the original text and the blank space was used, which are now added to facilitate readers’ understanding.
- 10.
Judicial Yuan (司法院) (ed.), Report on the Work of the Judicial Yuan (司法院工作报告), (1935) The Judicial Yuan, at p. 20.
- 11.
See the “Administrative Report of Shanxi Provincial Government in December (山西省政府十二月份行政报告)”, in the Secretariat of Shanxi Provincial Government (山西省政府秘书处) (ed.), Administrative Report of Shanxi Provincial Government (山西省政府行政报告), (1935) Secretariat of Shanxi Provincial Government, at p. 12. No punctuation marks were used in the original text, which are now added to facilitate readers’ understanding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Shanghai People's Publishing House
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cai, Y. (2023). 1935. In: A Chronicle of China’s Notary History (1902–1979). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1685-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1685-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-1684-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-1685-6
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)