Abstract
This chapter presents an introduction to the book. Following the first, brief introductory section, the chapter is divided into five additional sections. The second defines political debasement as the use of derogatory language, often by employing rhetorical devices as irony, cynicism, sarcasm, mockery, and ridicule, to strongly demean or degrade a certain target in the polity, especially those involved in the political process. The third distinguishes between debasement and incivility, offering specific examples for each type of discourse. The fourth section suggests a detailed account of how to assess and examine political debasement, including its narrow and broad senses, detailing important sub-categories of the latter. This is followed by a discussion on the key aspects at the center of the interaction between debaser(s) and their target(s). The final section of this chapter focuses on a proposed model consisting of eight elements or factors that need to be considered in studying political debasement. These elements are detailed one-by-one, suggesting questions that should be addressed regarding each element in future studies on the function, role, and effect of debasement language in the public sphere. Finally, the chapter details the structure of the book and briefly describes each of the contributions.
Throughout the book, long quotes of politicians appear first in the English language followed by their original language in Roman letters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Personal names are given in the Japanese order i.e., family name first. In Japanese, vowels can either be short or long; a diacritical mark, for example, â, ê, î, ô, or û over the vowel indicates that it is a long vowel.
- 4.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes, regarded as one of the Jewish people’s greatest “villains,” was a Seleucid ruler who issued decrees around 200 BCE forbidding many traditional Jewish practices and began a campaign of persecution against devout Jews, ending in the Maccabee revolt (commemorated by the holiday of Hanukkah).
References
All India. (2017, November 4). Congress like termites, wipe them out, says PM Modi in Himachal. NDTV Elections. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/himachal-pradesh-assembly-elections-2017-congress-like-termites-wipe-them-out-says-pm-narendra-odi-i-1771145
Allsop, J. (2019, May 13). The dangerous power of Trump’s ‘fairy tale’ nicknames. Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump_buttigieg_neuman_nickname.php
Asahi. (2021, April 14). “It’s a meaningless question” heckling 112 times in total. Morning Edition, p. 4 (in Japanese).
Borah, P. (2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212449353
Breuer, E. (2022, October 23). Smotrich in leaked recording: Netanyahu is the “liar of all liars.” Jerusalem Post. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-720390
Brokensha, S. I., & Conradie, M. S. (2017). (In)civility and online deliberation: Readers’ reactions to race-related news stories. Safundi, 18(4), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2017.1335000
Cervone, C., Augoustinos, M., & Maass, A. (2021). The language of derogation and hate: Functions, consequences, and reappropriation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1) 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967394
Chan, C.-H., Chow, C.S.-I., & Fu, K.-W. (2019). Echoslamming: How incivility interacts with cyberbalkanization on the social media in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(4), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1624792
Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2018). Taking North American white supremacist groups seriously: The scope and challenge of hate speech on the Internet. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(2), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i2.517
Daily Buzz. (2013, October 17). Winston Churchill tops poll of history’s funniest insults. Yahoo!News. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/winston-churchill-tops-poll-history-funniest-insults-162350309.html
Druckman, J. N., Gubitz, S. R., Levendusky, M. S., & Lloyd, A. M. (2019). How incivility on partisan media (de)polarizes the electorate. Journal of Politics, 81(1), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1086/699912
Express Web Desk. (2015, December 16). PM Narendra Modi a ‘coward, psychopath,’ says Arvind Kejriwal after CBI raid. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/cbi-raids-my-office-claims-arvind-kejriwal/
Feldman, O. (1998). The political language of Japan: Decoding what politicians mean from what they say. In O. Feldman & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.), Politically speaking: A worldwide examination of language used in the public sphere (pp. 43–55). Praeger.
Feldman, O. (2004). Talking politics in Japan today. Sussex Academic Press.
Feldman, O. (2020). Introduction: Persuasive speaking and evoking political behavior. In O. Feldman (Ed.), The rhetoric of political leadership: Logic and emotion in public discourse (pp. 1–14). Edward Elgar.
Feldman, O. (2021a). Introduction: Assessing cultural influences on political leaders’ discourse. In O. Feldman (Ed.), When politicians talk: The cultural dynamics of public speaking (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3579-3_1
Feldman, O. (2021b). Decoding Japanese politicians’ rhetoric: Socio-cultural features of public speaking. In O. Feldman (Ed.), When politicians talk: The cultural dynamics of public speaking (pp. 203–220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3579-3_12
Feldman, O. (Ed.). (2022a). Adversarial political interviewing: Worldwide perspectives during polarized times. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0576-6
Feldman, O. (2022b). Introduction: Political interviews—An analytical model. In O. Feldman (Ed.), Adversarial political interviewing: Worldwide perspectives during polarized times (pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0576-6_1
Feldman, O., & Kinoshita, K. (2017). Do important questions demand respectful replies? Analyzing televised political interviews in Japan. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 27(1), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.27.1.07fel
Feldman, O., & Kinoshita, K. (2019). Political communicators and control in political interviews in Japanese television: A comparative study and the effect of culture. In O. Feldman & S. Zmerli (Eds.), The psychology of political communicators: How politicians, culture, and the media construct and shape public discourse (pp. 31–55). Routledge.
Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2008). The dimensions of negative messages. American Politics Research, 36(5), 694–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08316448
Gervais, B. T. (2019). Rousing the partisan combatant: Elite incivility, anger, and antideliberative attitudes. Political Psychology, 40(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12532
Gorrell, G., Bakir, M. E., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M. A., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Which politicians receive abuse? Four factors illuminated in the UK general election 2019. EPJ Data Science, 9, 18. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00236-9
Hameleers, M. (2020). They are lying to us! The rhetoric of direct communication by populist politicians and its effects on the electorate: Evidence from the Netherlands. In O. Feldman (Ed.), The rhetoric of political leadership: Logic and emotion in public discourse (pp. 196–213). Edward Elgar.
Hanson, P. [@PaulineHansonOz]. (2022, September 9). Your attitude appals and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/PaulineHansonOz/status/1568118251640750083?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1568118251640750083%7Ctwgr%5Ea5c1ea7cf6687ae6f8199c41c0d11b468c1b92e9%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sbs.com.au%2Fnews%2Farticle%2Fwhy-a-tweet-from-pauline-hanson-could-be-referred-to-the-human-rights-commission%2Fvsdxipyjr
Jamieson, K. H., & Tausig, D. (2017). Disruption, demonization, deliverance, and norm destruction: The rhetorical signature of Donald J. Trump. Political Science Quarterly, 132(4), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12699
Kan. (2022, October 26). From the other side with Guy Zohar. YouTube. https://www.kan.org.il/program/?catid=1416&page=3 (in Hebrew).
Keller-Lynn, C. (2022, September 11). Liberman: Netanyahu employs ‘exact methods’ of Nazi propagandist Goebbels. The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liberman-netanyahu-employs-exact-methods-of-nazi-propagandist-goebbels/
Kokkinidis, T. (2022, September 28). German politician calls Erdogan “sewer rat,” sparking Turkey’s fury. Greek Reporter. https://greekreporter.com/2022/09/28/german-politician-erdogan-sewer-rat-turkey-fury/
Krasner, M. A. (2019). The new American electoral politics: How invited behavior and Reality TV explain Donald Trump’s victory. In O. Feldman & S. Zmerli (Eds.), The psychology of political communicators: How politicians, culture, and the media construct and shape public discourse (pp. 13–30). Routledge.
Krasner, M. A. (2020). Battling for America’s soul: Donald Trump, invited behavior, and the midterm elections of 2018. In O. Feldman (Ed.), The rhetoric of political leadership: Logic and emotion in public discourse (pp. 86–103). Edward Elgar.
Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
Lopez, G. (2015, September 10). Donald Trump on Carly Fiorina: Look at that face. Would anyone vote for that? Vox. https://www.vox.com/2015/9/10/9302321/donald-trump-carly-fiorina
Maisel, L. S. (2012). The negative consequences of uncivil political discourse. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42(3), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000467
Makabe, T. (2020, February 12). Forced to apologize! Prime Minister Abe Shinzô: “That’s a stupid question. It’s a meaningless question,” he heckled at Diet Member Tsujimoto Kiyomi on February 12, 2020, House of Representatives Budget Committee meeting. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JG2uHTD9sA (in Japanese).
Massaro, T. M., & Stryker, R. (2012). Freedom of speech, liberal democracy and emerging evidence on civility and effective democratic engagement. Arizona Law Review, 54, 375–441. https://arizonalawreview.org/pdf/54-2/54arizlrev375.pdf
Meltzer, K. (2015). Journalistic concern about uncivil political talk in digital news media: Responsibility, credibility, and academic influence. The International Journal of Press/politics, 20(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214558748
Muddiman, A. (2013). The instability of incivility: How news frames and citizen perceptions shape conflict in American politics. The University of Texas.
Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton University Press.
Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
Navera, G. S. (2021). The president as macho: Machismo, misogyny, and the language of toxic masculinity in Philippine presidential discourse. In O. Feldman (Ed.), When politicians talk: The cultural dynamics of public speaking (pp. 187–202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3579-3_11
Neshkovska, S., & Trajkova, Z. (2020). Rhetorical violence in political discourse and its implications. In International Scientific Conference “Hate speech and the concept of hate crimes: Acts of perception and compulsory social conformism.” Conference Proceedings (pp. 98–113). University “St. Kliment Ohridski,” Faculty of Law.
O’Grady, S. (2016, April 15). Rwandan who called Tutsis ‘cockroaches’ in 1992 gets life sentence. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/15/rwandan-who-called-tutsis-cockroaches-in-1992-gets-life-sentence/
Oster, M. (2012, May 28). Israeli lawmaker Miri Regev apologizes for calling African migrants a ‘cancer.’ Jewish Telegraphic Agency. https://www.jta.org/2012/05/28/israel/israeli-lawmaker-miri-regev-apologizes-for-calling-african-migrants-a-cancer
Otto, L. P., Lecheler, S., & Schuck, A. R. (2020). Is context the key? The (non-)differential effects of mediated incivility in three European countries. Political Communication, 37(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663324
Parker, A. (2016, September 6). Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton doesn’t have ‘a presidential look.’ New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/us/politics/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-doesnt-have-a-presidential-look.html
POLITICO Staff. (2016, September 27). Full transcript: First 2016 presidential debate. Politico. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/full-transcript-first-2016-presidential-debate-228761
Rains, S., Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Harwood, J. (2017). Incivility and political identity on the Internet: Intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12191
Rucker, P. (2018, June 10). “Dotard” meets “little rocket man:” Trump, Kim rivals with similarities. Washington Post. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/dotard-meets-little-rocket-man-trump-kim-rivals-with-similarities-1865312
Sinha, P. (2021). Social media and political mobilization in India. Learning Community, 12(01), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.30954/2231-458X.01.2021.6
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
Stoil, R. A. (2010, June 3). Knesset goes wild over Zoabi: Arab and Jewish MKs fight in the aisle until ushers separate them. Jerusalem Post. https://www.jpost.com/Israel/Knesset-goes-wild-over-Zoabi
Stoll, A., Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2020). Detecting impoliteness and incivility in online discussions: Classification approaches for German user comments. Computational Communication Research, 2(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2020.1.005.KATH
Stryker, R., Conway, B. A., & Danielson, J. T. (2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monographs, 83(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207
Szabó, G., Kmetty, Z., & Molnár, E. K. (2021). Politics and incivility in the online comments: What is beyond the norm-violation approach? International Journal of Communication, 15, 1659–1684. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16411
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2016). A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens’ uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259
Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Ekdale, B. (2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903225571
TOI Staff. (2022, September 4). Liberman calls Netanyahu ‘scum of the human race’ for alleged smear campaign. The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liberman-calls-netanyahu-scum-of-the-human-race-for-alleged-smear-campaign/
UK Parliament. (2020, June 10). Hansard. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-06-10/debates/CB6F3393-C230-472D-BAC8-7DF53DD9A37D/PrimeMinister
Walter, A. S. (Ed.). (2021). Political incivility in the parliamentary, electoral and media arena: Crossing boundaries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003029205
Wang, S. (2020). The influence of anonymity and incivility on perceptions of user comments on news websites. Mass Communication and Society, 23(6), 912–936.
Warshof, J. (2015, April 19). The Begin phenomenon. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/begin-phenomenon
Williams, R. (2013, October 14). ‘My dear you are ugly, but tomorrow I shall be sober and you will still be ugly’: Winston Churchill tops poll of history’s funniest insults. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/my-dear-you-are-ugly-but-tomorrow-i-shall-be-sober-and-you-will-still-be-ugly-winston-churchill-tops-poll-of-history-s-funniest-insults-8878622.html
Wolf, M. R., Strachan, J. C., & Shea, D. M. (2012). Forget the good of the game: Political incivility and lack of compromise as a second layer of party polarization. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(12), 1677–1695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000509
Zimmer, B. (2019, July 29). What Trump talks about when he talks about infestations: The frightening political history of the word “infest.” Politico Magazine. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/07/29/trump-baltimore-infest-tweet-cummings-racist-227485/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feldman, O. (2023). Assessing the Politics of Debasement: From Impoliteness to Demonization in Political Communication. In: Feldman, O. (eds) Political Debasement. The Language of Politics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0467-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0467-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-0466-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-0467-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)