Abstract
Rural development is not simply an offshoot of policies and programmes initiated by the Indian State and public-sector agencies and NGOs. It is far more inclusive and comprehensive as the rural people themselves aspire for their betterment and put efforts to that end. Undoubtedly, the constitutional provisions, policies and programmes for rural upliftment have weakened some of the institutional bottlenecks, and granted a voice to the deprived and excluded sections of rural India. ‘Urban bias’ is one such potent factor, obstructing egalitarian rural development. Onslaught on traditional obstructive institutional social arrangements has paved a way for ‘new actors’, individuals and families to assert for their shares in the process of development. That led rural development to proceed in an inclusive form, both materially and socio-culturally, ensuring incorporation of all sections of society, particularly the poor and the deprived people. Thus, it is both a policy and a process, encompassing activities in public and private domains. Therefore, rural development is a change for a desired type of society and hence, has a human face as well. The above insight is drawn by the author from his study of Six Villages in Rajasthan in the 1960s and again after half a century in 2015-16, with a view to grasp the nature and direction of social change and development. A comparative analysis of the same villages, covering a period of five decades, indicates that ‘inclusive development’ is the real concern of the people, implying access to assets, markets and opportunities on an equal basis, reduction in disparity of income, maximum benefits for the poor, increased focus on agriculture, employment, health care and education, and equitable sharing of public goods and services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, S. (2007). Can India grow without bharat?. Academic Foundation: New Delhi.
Byres, T. J. (1977). Agrarian transition and the Agrarian question. Journal of Peasant Studies, 4(3), 258–274.
Chauhan, B. R. (2009). Rural life: Grass roots perspectives. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
Cohn, B. S. (1968). Notes on the history of the study of Indian society and culture. In S. Milton & B. S. Cohn (Eds.), Structure and change in Indian society. Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago, IL.
Cohn, B. S. (1969). Structural change in Indian rural society: 1596–1885. In R. E. Frykenberg (Ed.), Land control and social structure in Indian history (pp. 53–121). Wisconsin: Regents of the University of Wisconsin.
Das, G. (2012). The elephant paradigm, India wrestles with change (pp. 187–203). New Delhi: Penguin Books.
Dumont, L. (1970). Homo hierarchices. London: Paladin Granda Publishing Ltd.
Epstein, T. S. (1962). Economic development and social change in South India. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Gould, H. A. (1967). Priest and contra—Priest: A structural analysis of Jajmani relations in the Hindu Plains and the Nilgiri Hills. Contributions to Indian Sociology (New Services), No. 1, pp. 26–55.
Guha, R. (2008). India: After Gandhi (pp. 605–719). Picador: New Delhi.
Gupta, D. (2005). Wither the Indian village: Culture and agriculture in rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(8), 751–758.
Gupta, D. (2009). The caged phoenix: Can India fly?. New Delhi: Penguin/Viking/Oxford University Press.
Habib, Irfan. (1974). Social distribution of landed property in the Pre-British India: A historical survey. In R. S. Sharma (Ed.), Indian society: Historical probings (pp. 264–316). New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.
Harriss, J. (1982). Capitalism and peasant farming, Agrarian structure and ideology in Northern Tamil Nadu, Bombay/Delhi. Oxford University Press.
Hasan, Z. (2009). Politics of inclusion: Castes, minorities and affirmative action. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
India Rural Development Report, 2013 (2012–13).
Jeffrey, D. S. (2015). The age of sustainable development. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kolenda, P. (2009). Micro ideology and micro utopia in Khalapur: Changes in the discourse on caste over thirty years. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(2), 1833–1838.
Lieton, G. K. (2003). Power, politics and rural development: Essays on India. Maohar: New Delhi.
Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: A study of urban bias in world development. London: Temple Smith.
Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama (Vol. I). New Harmonda-worth: Penguin Books.
Narain, I., & Mathur, P. C. (1990). The thousand year Raj: Regional isolation and Rajput Hinduism in Rajasthan before and after 1947. In F. R. Frankel & M. S. A. Rao (Eds.), Dominance and state power in modern India: Decline of a social order (Vol. II, pp. 1–58). Oxford University Press: Delhi.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: MA Harvard University Press.
Rudolph, L., & Llyod, S.H. (1984). Essays on Rajasthan. Concept Publishing Company: New Delhi.
Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2005). The three R’s of reform. Economic and political weekly, 40(19), 1971–1974.
Shah, A.M. (1991). The rural-urban-networks in India. In K.L. Sharma & D. Gupta (Eds.), Country-town Nexus (pp. 11–42). Rawat Publications: Jaipur.
Shah, G. (1998). Caste sentiments, class formation and dominance in Gujarat. In K. L. Sharma (Ed.), Caste and class in India (reprint). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
Sharma, K. L. (1974). The changing rural stratification system (a comparative study of six villages in Rajasthan). Orient Longman: New Delhi.
Sharma, K. L. (1983). Agrarian stratification: Old issues new explanations and new issues and old explanations. Economic and Political Weekly (Vol. 18, Nos. 42 & 43).
Sharma, K. L. (1998). Caste, feudalism and peasantry: The social formation of Shekhawati (pp. 26–43). Manohar: Delhi.
Sharma, K. L. (2014). Introduction: Reconceptualising the Indian village. In K. L. Sharma (Ed.), Sociological probings in rural society (Vol. 2, pp. XXI–XL). Sage: New Delhi.
Sharma, K. L. (2019). Caste, social inequality and mobility in Rural India (Chapter 15, pp. 302–332). Sage: New Delhi.
Singh, D. (1964). Land reforms in Rajasthan (a study of evasion, implementation and socio-economic effects of land reforms). New Delhi: Planning Commission of India.
Singh, Y. (2009). Social Praxis, conceptual categories and social change: Observations from a Village study. Sociological Bulletin, 58(2), 178–195.
Thorat, S., & Umakant. (2004). Introduction. In S. Thorat & Umakant (Eds.), Caste, race and discrimination, discourses in international context (pp. XIII–XXXV). Rawat Publications: Jaipur and New Delhi.
Tumin, M. M. (1952). Caste in a peasant society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
World Bank (2004) Cited from Anand Kumar, 2014, “People, power and paradigm shift”. In S. Yogendra (Ed.), Indian sociology (Vol. I, pp. 377–380). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, K.L. (2021). Explaining Rural Development in Contemporary India: A Paradoxical Situation. In: Verma, M.K. (eds) Environment, Development and Sustainability in India: Perspectives, Issues and Alternatives. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6248-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6248-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6247-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6248-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)