Skip to main content
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

Rural development is not simply an offshoot of policies and programmes initiated by the Indian State and public-sector agencies and NGOs. It is far more inclusive and comprehensive as the rural people themselves aspire for their betterment and put efforts to that end. Undoubtedly, the constitutional provisions, policies and programmes for rural upliftment have weakened some of the institutional bottlenecks, and granted a voice to the deprived and excluded sections of rural India. ‘Urban bias’ is one such potent factor, obstructing egalitarian rural development. Onslaught on traditional obstructive institutional social arrangements has paved a way for ‘new actors’, individuals and families to assert for their shares in the process of development. That led rural development to proceed in an inclusive form, both materially and socio-culturally, ensuring incorporation of all sections of society, particularly the poor and the deprived people. Thus, it is both a policy and a process, encompassing activities in public and private domains. Therefore, rural development is a change for a desired type of society and hence, has a human face as well. The above insight is drawn by the author from his study of Six Villages in Rajasthan in the 1960s and again after half a century in 2015-16, with a view to grasp the nature and direction of social change and development. A comparative analysis of the same villages, covering a period of five decades, indicates that ‘inclusive development’ is the real concern of the people, implying access to assets, markets and opportunities on an equal basis, reduction in disparity of income, maximum benefits for the poor, increased focus on agriculture, employment, health care and education, and equitable sharing of public goods and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, S. (2007). Can India grow without bharat?. Academic Foundation: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byres, T. J. (1977). Agrarian transition and the Agrarian question. Journal of Peasant Studies, 4(3), 258–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, B. R. (2009). Rural life: Grass roots perspectives. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. S. (1968). Notes on the history of the study of Indian society and culture. In S. Milton & B. S. Cohn (Eds.), Structure and change in Indian society. Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, B. S. (1969). Structural change in Indian rural society: 1596–1885. In R. E. Frykenberg (Ed.), Land control and social structure in Indian history (pp. 53–121). Wisconsin: Regents of the University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, G. (2012). The elephant paradigm, India wrestles with change (pp. 187–203). New Delhi: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, L. (1970). Homo hierarchices. London: Paladin Granda Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, T. S. (1962). Economic development and social change in South India. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, H. A. (1967). Priest and contra—Priest: A structural analysis of Jajmani relations in the Hindu Plains and the Nilgiri Hills. Contributions to Indian Sociology (New Services), No. 1, pp. 26–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (2008). India: After Gandhi (pp. 605–719). Picador: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (2005). Wither the Indian village: Culture and agriculture in rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(8), 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (2009). The caged phoenix: Can India fly?. New Delhi: Penguin/Viking/Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, Irfan. (1974). Social distribution of landed property in the Pre-British India: A historical survey. In R. S. Sharma (Ed.), Indian society: Historical probings (pp. 264–316). New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. (1982). Capitalism and peasant farming, Agrarian structure and ideology in Northern Tamil Nadu, Bombay/Delhi. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Z. (2009). Politics of inclusion: Castes, minorities and affirmative action. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • India Rural Development Report, 2013 (2012–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, D. S. (2015). The age of sustainable development. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolenda, P. (2009). Micro ideology and micro utopia in Khalapur: Changes in the discourse on caste over thirty years. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(2), 1833–1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieton, G. K. (2003). Power, politics and rural development: Essays on India. Maohar: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: A study of urban bias in world development. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama (Vol. I). New Harmonda-worth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narain, I., & Mathur, P. C. (1990). The thousand year Raj: Regional isolation and Rajput Hinduism in Rajasthan before and after 1947. In F. R. Frankel & M. S. A. Rao (Eds.), Dominance and state power in modern India: Decline of a social order (Vol. II, pp. 1–58). Oxford University Press: Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: MA Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, L., & Llyod, S.H. (1984). Essays on Rajasthan. Concept Publishing Company: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). The three R’s of reform. Economic and political weekly, 40(19), 1971–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A.M. (1991). The rural-urban-networks in India. In K.L. Sharma & D. Gupta (Eds.), Country-town Nexus (pp. 11–42). Rawat Publications: Jaipur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, G. (1998). Caste sentiments, class formation and dominance in Gujarat. In K. L. Sharma (Ed.), Caste and class in India (reprint). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. L. (1974). The changing rural stratification system (a comparative study of six villages in Rajasthan). Orient Longman: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. L. (1983). Agrarian stratification: Old issues new explanations and new issues and old explanations. Economic and Political Weekly (Vol. 18, Nos. 42 & 43).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. L. (1998). Caste, feudalism and peasantry: The social formation of Shekhawati (pp. 26–43). Manohar: Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. L. (2014). Introduction: Reconceptualising the Indian village. In K. L. Sharma (Ed.), Sociological probings in rural society (Vol. 2, pp. XXI–XL). Sage: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. L. (2019). Caste, social inequality and mobility in Rural India (Chapter 15, pp. 302–332). Sage: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1964). Land reforms in Rajasthan (a study of evasion, implementation and socio-economic effects of land reforms). New Delhi: Planning Commission of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Y. (2009). Social Praxis, conceptual categories and social change: Observations from a Village study. Sociological Bulletin, 58(2), 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S., & Umakant. (2004). Introduction. In S. Thorat & Umakant (Eds.), Caste, race and discrimination, discourses in international context (pp. XIII–XXXV). Rawat Publications: Jaipur and New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumin, M. M. (1952). Caste in a peasant society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004) Cited from Anand Kumar, 2014, “People, power and paradigm shift”. In S. Yogendra (Ed.), Indian sociology (Vol. I, pp. 377–380). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, K.L. (2021). Explaining Rural Development in Contemporary India: A Paradoxical Situation. In: Verma, M.K. (eds) Environment, Development and Sustainability in India: Perspectives, Issues and Alternatives. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6248-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6248-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6247-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6248-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics