Skip to main content

Abstract

The gaze movement from a driver represents specific skills related to safe driving. Driving maneuvering evaluation is to know driving fitness. We found that gaze movement entropy is highly sensitive to visual behavior demands while driving a vehicle and the workload level. Entropy measures were more sensitive, more robust, and easier to calculate than gaze established measures. The gaze movement measures were collected using a driving simulator, using five different simulate routes and tree different workload scenarios; one route of familiarization was used to create a baseline. Because the workload became more difficult, drivers looked more at the central part of the road for more extended periods, the gaze movement entropy values decreased when the workload was increased, and the results show differences between two levels of workload. Also, the entropy result is compared against the classical analysis of the spatial distribution of gaze.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J., Ramsey, D. (2006). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data (Technical Report No. DOT HS 810 594).: NHTSA. Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engström, J.A., Johansson, E., Östlund, J.: Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp. Res. Part F 8, 97–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pincus, S.M., Goldberger, A.L.: Physiological time series analysis: what does regularity quantify? American J. Physiol. (Heart. Circul. Physiol.) 266, H1643–H1656 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiferaw, B.A., Downey, L.A., Westlake, J., Stevens, B., Rajaratnam, S.M.W., Berlowitz, D.J., et al.: Stationary gaze entropy predicts lane departure events in sleep-deprived drivers. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–10 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tole, J.R., Stephens, A.T., Vivaudou, M., Harris, R.L., Ephrath, A.R.: Entropy, Instrument Scan and Pilot Workload. IEEE, New York, NY, USA (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krejtz, K., Duchowski, A., Szmidt, T., Krejtz, I., González Perilli, F., Pires, A, et al.: Gaze transition entropy. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept TAP 13(1), 4:1–4:20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allsop, J., Gray, R.: Flying under pressure: effects of anxiety on attention and gaze behavior in aviation. J. Appl. Res. Memory Cognit. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Brocklehurst, N., Underwood, J., Crundall, D.L Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers. Ergonomics 139 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y., Bao, S., Du, W., Ye, Z., Sayer, J.R.: Examining drivers’ eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix. J. Safety Res. 1(63), 149–155 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mikula, L., et al.: Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator (2020). https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.23.309559

  11. Michaels, J., et al.: Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: a comparative study of different driver age groups. PLoS One 12, 1–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Victor, T., Harbluk, J.L., Engström, J.A.: Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transp. Res. Part F 8(2), 167–190 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mejia-Romero S., et al.: An effective filtering process for the noise suppression in eye movement signals (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mejia-Romero S., et al. “Dynamic performance of gaze movement, using spectral decomposition and phasor representation (2019b)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly funded by an NSERC Discovery grant and Essilor Industrial Research Chair (IRCPJ 305729-13), Research and development cooperative NSERC-Essilor Grant (CRDPJ 533187 - 2018), Prompt

Author Contribution

M-R.S. led the design of the research method and implemented the data analysis. M-R.S participated in preparing of the conclusions based on the results. MJ collected the raw data on how to work for his Ph.D. research. All authors took part in the paper preparation and edition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest. We express that the sponsors had no role in the design of the study, analysis, and writing of the manuscript and the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Mejia-Romero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mejia-Romero, S., Michaels, J., Eduardo Lugo, J., Bernardin, D., Faubert, J. (2021). Gaze Movement’s Entropy Analysis to Detect Workload Levels. In: Kaiser, M.S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Mahmud, M., Ray, K. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1309. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4673-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics