Abstract
Although there is a variety of technology available in 21st century, the way classes and lesson being conducted are still mostly remaining the same which is teaching via one-way communication. One-way communication teaching process surfastces issues like lack of interaction where minimal discussion is going on during teaching session, Since the interaction between teachers and students are fairly poor, limited classroom activity can be expected such as “Question and Answer” which lead to the increment of boredom in classes and lessons among students. As the teaching process is leaning towards instructional, students’ feedback is usually being overlooked. Hence, since the availability of educational technology is getting more common nowadays, the integration of technology in classroom is encouraged changing the teaching and learning environment including knowledge delivery method from teacher perspective. Introducing mobile interactive system allows teachers deliver their knowledge differently, however, they are required to adapt and get familiar with the educational technology for improving teaching experience. Therefore, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework is applied in this paper to assess teachers using the seven elements of the framework. This paper is aimed to address the issues faced by conventional classroom and identify the effectiveness of teachers conducting classes using educational technology with the application of TPACK framework. Proposed TPACK framework is formed with the integration of three elements which are teachers’ efficiency, students’ performance and students’ engagement representing the outcome of current TPACK framework.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Teacher and student engagement
- Mobile interactive system
- Teaching and learning environment
- Pedagogical framework
- Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework
1 Introduction
The conventional classroom is undergoing major and rapid changes from past till now. Many technologies are invented throughout these years in various sectors including education sector. Due to the availability of technology nowadays, students are more preferred to stay connected with each other using technology [1]. Moreover, with the assistance of modern technology enabled work to be done more efficiently, effectively, convenient and most importantly it makes thing easier [2]. However, the way teachers and students used to communicate remained one-way communication where it leads to the lack of students’ engagement in the classroom. The lack of student engagement leads to the drop of courses especially online courses that involved far less interaction between teachers and students [3]. Furthermore, the closeness of relationship between teachers and students plays an important role as the closer their relationship the better academic outcomes and self-esteem from students can be achieved [4]. Additionally, one-way communication serves two purposes which are sharing information and as a reminder of teachers’ existence. Generally, subject like mathematics practices conventional way of teaching where teachers are dominant over students [5]. Besides, students are disallowed to express their thoughts and opinions because teachers wanted to gain full-control of the classroom [6]. Hence, gaining feedback from students’ end is difficult. Without students’ feedback, teachers might face difficulties in planning and preparing teaching materials that in-line with students’ needs and capabilities.
Mobile application is introduced and accepted by majority of the society as it is a very commonly owned technological device. By integrating mobile technology into classroom, students can establish better communication with classmates and teachers [7]. Moreover, with the aids of technology in blended learning can boost up student engagement, enjoyment as well as academic achievement [8]. Nowadays, the interaction between human and computer had gone through tremendous changes due to the influence of computational devices that supporting touch [9]. Likewise, mobile devices are capable to be used as writing tools and incorporate into classroom [9]. Therefore, on-screen writing pad is introduced granting teachers with better mobility and flexibility in teaching with screen sharing.
1.1 Engagement Between Teachers and Students
In this paper, the engagement between teachers and students is being studied and related to recent education changes. In England, during 19th century, the education system neglected character-building quality and not creating intellectual curiosity [10]. In fact, having joy in the classroom was prohibited and integration of teacher’s personalities was forbidden [11]. Hence, the enjoyment of learning cannot be achieved due to minimal interaction in the classroom. With the evolution of technology, the possibility of integrating technology into education sector is promising. According to Malik, the core changes brought by ICT in society has called for research on specific new forms of learning and epistemological issues regarding how learning occurs and how knowledge emerges beyond the borders of traditional systems of education [12]. The availability of these technologies allows teaching and learning becoming more interactive and interesting. According to Hussin, Generation-Z who are revolutionised by technology happened to act positively towards challenges, prefer group discussion and interactive learning environment [13]. Furthermore, the learning materials are required to be synchronised with the needs of learning process for better understanding regarding the concepts of subjects [14]. Moreover, teachers are playing a vital role as they will affect students’ desire and developing their self-learning capability directly [15]. Additionally, student who spend more time in schooling tends to have lower dropout rate [16]. This is why John Dewey, an Educational Philosopher, mentioned more than a century ago, “If we teach today as we taught yesterday, we rob our children of tomorrow” [17]. Furthermore, technology is known to be the catalyst in communication, collaboration, innovation and problem solving in 21st century. Hence, the introduction of mobile interactive system as educational technology into schools and universities is imperative. It has the potential to be implemented in class activities increasing the interactivity between teachers and students [18]. Furthermore, mobile application also helps in refining and improving students’ academic achievement as well as their learning capability [19]. It boosts up students’ curiosity in terms of knowledge seeking makes them more attracted and interested in classroom activity. [20]. In fact, technology has the capability to increase student engagement as well as their understanding level towards learning content [21]. Through screen sharing, students can see the screen mirroring from teacher’s computer screen where live-collaboration is happening at the same time [22]. The interactivity is improved because teachers are no longer required to reach out whiteboard or blackboard back and forth illustrating their ideas to students. Screen sharing is able to helps teachers showing their writing from on-screen writing pad to students in synchronised manner with the writing content in the mobile interactive system without sacrificing teachers’ mobility.
Teacher is known to be a professional who responsible for delivering knowledge to students, however, the knowledge sometimes can be forgotten over time. Students tend to be more interested in lesson taught by their favourite teacher than the one that they dislike. Along with teaching methods, the image of the teacher attaches great importance in the process of forming knowledge [23]. From the perspective of students, it is very clear that teacher plays an important role in their learning process. Besides, teacher is also known as a leader in guiding students throughout lessons [24]. As a teacher, he or she does not only require to teach students but also understand their behaviour and desire as well as improving their learning ability and capability [25]. Therefore, teacher’s qualities are vital when attempting to bond with students as teacher’s attributes shaped his or her image reflecting how students see teacher from their perspective.
According to Dakhane, the presence and popularity of mobile devices and mobile applications are common amongst students [26]. Education sector is assisted by various educational technologies to improve student engagement in classes especially in higher education. It brings positive impact in affecting student’s experience in learning. Moreover, conventional teaching method is ineffective when it comes to student engagement as teacher can hardly focusing on students where teachers’ attention is constantly diverted. In conventional classroom, teacher is the only active person who control the entire classroom activities and expecting students concentrate in classroom but it proven otherwise [27]. With the help of technological devices, teachers are given better flexibility and mobility. High flexibility and mobility allow teachers to pay more attention and interact with students effectively. Putra mentioned that teaching and learning process is an interaction between teachers and students which are two different things but form a unity [28]. Compared to conventional method, teaching and learning are conducted differently these days. Teaching and learning can be conducted through mobile devices, online, augmented reality, virtual reality and other state-of-art technology [29]. These technologies create new possibilities for teacher implementing a variety of methods turning teaching and learning environment become more interaction-oriented. It allows teachers have better interaction with students by using educational technology. Educational technology boosts students’ curiosity driving students to further explore and gaining interest in learning.
1.2 Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Theoretical Framework
Pedagogical framework is a structure created based on the philosophy of teaching and learning. It serves as guidelines for teacher to do evaluation and refinement when they facilitate classes. This set of guidelines is rather well-known among colleges and universities for its consistency. The pedagogical framework is meant to be a supportive medium to assist teacher delivering and transforming knowledge to students maintaining a high-quality content for both teaching and learning based on best practices [30]. With the help of pedagogical framework, teachers are able to address students with the most effective way of absorbing the knowledge being taught. According to Fairholme College, the pedagogical framework has to be coordinated with a few principles which are safe, supportive, connected and inclusive learning environment, student-centered planning, evidence-based decision making, targeted and scaffolded instruction, alignment of curriculum pedagogy and assessment as well as high expectation [31]. According to Fazidah Naziri, teachers need to equip themselves with a transformation in knowledge and technology to educate Z generation today [32]. Besides, Utami et al. also mentioned that technological involvement in learning activities cannot be avoided as technology integration in teaching is considered as a more effective approach [33]. The concept of pedagogical content knowledge theoretical framework, TPACK reflects the status of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge of educators [34]. Based on TPACK model, lecturers’ knowledge about technology and experience the successful integration of collaborative tools in teaching and learning environment are the keys for effective adoption of new technologies [35]. The combination of knowledge and pedagogy with the involvement of information technology enabled teachers in developing pedagogical knowledge, skills and enhancing students’ learning [36]. Student learning capability will be improved presuming teacher himself or herself is willing to refine their technological knowledge and integrate it into their content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge [37]. Teachers are expected to demonstrate how technology can be implemented in supporting the learning content, how specific pedagogies best support with the use of and facilitate learning. Additionally, TPACK is also reflecting the interdependence of three contributing knowledge domains which are Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), and Technology Knowledge (TK) in a better picture [38]. From teacher perspective, mastering TPACK from the aspects of knowledge, skills and technology is necessary. Being innovative in teaching allows teachers to be in line with up-to-date technological world in educating the next generation.
1.3 Mobile Interactive System
TPACK framework is applied in this study due to the substantial involvement of technology in teaching and learning. As advanced technologies also offer interactivity, these known technologies were focused by other studies [32,33,34, 37, 38] while this study is focusing on delivery method which is also referring as mobile interactive system. Solomon et al. mentioned that the specifications of current smartphones are well-equipped with high-end memory, processor, display and battery which are capable to serve learners, teachers and researchers with more possibilities [39]. Stathopoulou et al. also mentioned that mobile devices are having the potential to alter the classroom from conventional to a more interactive and engaging [40]. Due to the massive and hasty growth of the usage of mobile technology in campuses, learning activities and research will be depending on mobile technology in future classroom [41]. In this study, mobile interactive system is a mobile application that emphasises on high mobility and low hardware requirement where expensive or external equipment are not required. It can mitigate one-way communication between teachers and students. It also can change teachers’ teaching experiences from various aspects. The most spectacular change is the teaching environment where two-way communication is established instead of one-way communication. Teachers can maintain interaction with students by making use of other existing technologies with features provided by the mobile interactive system simultaneously. Moreover, teachers and students can bring it to any classes that require the use of it without any hassle. Therefore, the objectives of this study are as follows:
-
1.
Identify current trend in education sector which addresses the conventional classroom issues.
-
2.
Identify the effectiveness of teachers conducting classes using educational technology with the application of TPACK framework.
2 Literature Review
In this paper, the literature review is being done based on two major aspects which are interactive learning and on-screen writing pad with screen sharing. These two aspects are able to illustrate interactivity better as interactive whiteboard is already being introduced as educational technology and implemented in classroom [42]. Hence, in-depth understanding about these two aspects is essential to cater with current trend of educational technology. As mentioned earlier, having more interactivity in the classroom tend to result in better engagement between teachers and students [43,44,45]. Thus, interactive learning is one of the key aspects involving how teachers apply technology changing the teaching and learning environment. Similar to interactive whiteboard, on-screen writing pad with screen sharing serves teachers with lower cost and higher portability [46]. This study aimed to mitigate one-way communication teaching in classroom by introducing more instructiveness into classroom activities.
2.1 Mobile Interactive System
Sahronih et al. mentioned that interactive learning media is having the capability of describing teachers’ message to student forming a two-way communication [47]. Hence, interactive learning has a strong bond with educational technology. The use of the interactive learning method alongside with educational technology creates more possibilities in learning process which motivates students and creates less confusion and difficulty in both teaching and learning process [48]. According to Wang et al., traditional personal computer will be replaced by mobile devices slowly within the next few years and becoming the main learning equipment especially in tertiary education [49]. Educational technology is a toolkit that creates educational contents with appropriate technology making an interactive learning environment. Therefore, students should not be passive in exploring and accepting new information. It is vital for classroom studies to be carried out in an interactive environment as it helps learner developing their independence.
Oluwajana et al. stated that students’ active participation in learning process is achievable via interactive learning [50]. Interactive learning method consists of two types of interaction which are cooperation and competition, rivalry [51]. Alexandrovna mentioned that cooperation is meant for promoting teamwork and aiming for achieving one goal whereas competition, rivalry is meant for opposition of goal and opinions [51]. The implementation of interactive learning helps students to be more engaged in classroom, improves their problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the dependence of oneself towards smartphone has becoming a norm where online learning is doable other than serving solely as a communication platform [52]. In contrast with Multimedia Interactive Learning Online (MILO) suggested in the research of Pakyuan et al., proposed mobile interactive for this study is focusing on delivery method rather than content itself. However, both of the studies share similar aim which is maintaining the function of teacher in learning process [52]. Nina and Heru also mentioned that the innovation in mobile devices making smartphone ideal for both learning and education [53]. They also mentioned that the difficulties like formulas and calculations in learning physics can be resolved with the use of technology because it helps to improve learners in understanding diagrammatic and argumentative representation with better efficiency [53].
2.2 On-Screen Writing Pad with Screen Sharing
Recently, interactive whiteboard (IWB) has been a trend in education sector where IWB serves as an educational tool [54, 55]. It is commonly found in Western schools. The IWB is a large touch screen with the capability of replacing the conventional setup in classroom. It enhances teaching environment by introducing interactivity and creating visual impact in the classroom. Tsai (2019) mentioned that the difficulties faced by teachers in using interactive whiteboard are the lack of computer competency and insufficient technical support [56]. Moreover, further training for teachers is needed as the technical support is insufficient and ineffective [57]. Moreover, the implementation of IWB in conventional classroom does not lead to negative effect to the teaching method which favored by most teachers.
Comparing IWB to the on-screen writing pad introduced in this study, from the perspective of hardware, IWB is more hardware dependent as it requires the use of special made whiteboard to be installed and configured whereas on-screen writing pad is less dependent on hardware as teachers only require to operate the system using Android smartphone and a computer for server hosting. According to Andy (2018), the utilisation of IWB’s main purpose, interactivity for teaching and learning is ambiguous. In the meantime, since IWB has smaller size compared to traditional projection screen, the proposed mobile interactive system has an edge because its screen sharing feature can be projected through the ordinary projection screen without sacrificing the mobility of teachers as the proposed mobile interactive system can control the connected computer from distance [58]. Additionally, IWB requires teachers’ prior knowledge in designing teaching plans and materials based on IWB capabilities to allow students interact with IWB and learning materials [59]. The difference between IWB and proposed mobile interactive system from previous context is the ease of use of the technology. As proposed mobile interactive system is an Android application installed in the smartphone, the learning curve for teacher to use the system is relatively low compared to IWB.
3 Methodology
In this paper, a systematic literature review (SLR) is being carried out with the use of Multimedia University Library Integrated Access (MULIA) 3.0 and Google Scholar in getting relevant sources for the study. The relevant sources are being searched based on keywords. This paper adopted the search procedure mentioned in [60]. The research questions of this paper are RQ1_How mobile interactive system enhances teachers and students’ engagement in classroom? and RQ2_How TPACK framework affects teaching and learning environment? Firstly, keywords are being formulated based on research questions including teacher and student engagement, mobile interactive system, teaching and learning environment and TPACK theoretical framework. These words are then undergoing a process called Systematic Search Procedure which is stated in [60]. In Systematic Search Procedure, there are several substages where it begins with a set of search words which are obtained from thesaurus based on formulated keywords for semantic criteria search. The semantic structure of the paper title is taken into consideration when searching for specific papers. Next, making use of appropriate search script by referring to syntax of various databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar and other similar databases. With proper search script applied, relevant papers are then selected from databases relatively. At last, a list of papers as search results are discovered to be further reviewed. The process of systematic search procedure will be continued until research questions are being answered.
3.1 Systematic Literature Review
Systematic literature review is also known as SLR in which research questions can be identified. Additionally, SLR is also crucial for the justification of future research for that sector. SLR is important to those who are newly started in their specified fields to learn and explore for up-to-date information and work which is related to the field of study [60]. The information gathered includes the method that has been implemented and results which are beneficial for students having more insights about the area of interest in terms of study. Information that is commonly acquired via SLR is the databases of the work, publications of work presented and research centres of certain work. The gathered information is presented statistically. Since researchers are not always familiar with the fields of study, they usually face circumstances such as the lack of related knowledge and identification of journals. From the perspective of researchers from similar research fields, they might share their findings in addressing or resolving similar problems as well as objectives. Their findings include their progress, result, approaches, networks and so forth. As a researcher, interaction and contribution are involved when conducting research study. Difficulties and challenges such as key words of search, inclusion and exclusion criteria for filtering search results will be faced due to the unfamiliarity of certain research fields. Therefore, mentefacto conceptual is one of the mandatory tools that leads to good reading and learning [60]. In this study, four questions are required to be answered which are what characterises it, in essence? In what group of things include it? What are your differences with similar objects? and, are there subtypes of yours? By answering these questions, four groups of thoughts are formed resulting in isoordinated, superordinated, excluded and infraordinated.
4 Expected Outcome
4.1 Proposed TPACK Framework
TPACK is also known as technological pedagogical and content knowledge which require teachers to have a thorough understanding about the knowledge, skills and technology so as to improve teachers’ efficiency in teaching. In 21st century, teachers are required to adapt to the latest technological trends in order to be accord with 4th Industrial Revolution. In such revolution, Information and Communication Technology is becoming a very important medium in between teachers and students. The TPACK framework was being introduced and enhanced by Mishra and Koehler in year 2006. It is provided for educators a more rounded experience of teaching [61]. In TPACK, it consists three major elements, technological knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge which symbolise the combination of knowledge and pedagogy with the implementation of information technology. A total of seven elements can be found in TPACK framework. The major elements of TPACK consist of three major area of knowledge which are technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK) and content knowledge (CK). TK is the knowledge or the cognition of various technologies regardless the tier of those technologies to improve teaching efficiency. PK is thorough knowledge of process or method of teaching and learning which became the value of education to improve students’ engagement in classroom, CK is the subject that needed to be taught and learned to enhanced students’ performance academically, Hence, the interrelation element of TK and PK is TPK which is also known as technological pedagogical knowledge. TPK is the knowledge of pedagogical activities of teachers with proper understanding of technology implementation that is best suited for desired teaching and learning experiences. TPK is referring to teachers’ understanding in making use of mobile interactive system and its features to assist them in changing teaching and learning experiences according to their preferences. Also, the interrelation element of TK and CK is TCK which is also stands for technological content knowledge. TCK is the knowledge of representing the concept of technology into a subject. It is referring to teachers’ understanding on how the subjects can be best represented and influenced by technology which is referring to mobile interactive system with on-screen writing in this study. Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is the interrelation element of PK and CK. It is teachers’ ability in modifying their content knowledge to fit in teaching approach appropriately. It is also referring to teachers’ understanding in choosing the appropriate method in delivering CK in different level in terms of grade as teachers; teaching practices can be improved with the assistance of thorough understanding in PCK. As for TPACK, it is the combination of all three knowledge which utilises the state-of-art technology that can cope with the needs and wants of students.
In this study, the proposed TPACK framework in Fig. 1 consists of additional elements which are teacher’s efficiency, students’ performance and students’ engagement. Teacher’s efficiency in this study is referring to the efficiency of teacher using technology in the teaching process. Therefore, it involves elements that related to TK which are TK, TCK, TPK and TPACK. The level of teachers’ understanding about technology will be assess and reflects how efficient are they when lessons are taught with the integration of technology in classroom activities. As for students’ performance, it is assessed with CK related elements. CK related elements include CK, TCK, PCK and TPACK. The relevancy of teaching materials prepared by teachers will affect students’ performance either positively or negatively. As for students’ engagement, PK related elements such as PK, PCK, TPK and TPACK will be taken into consideration for assessment. The interactivity and effectiveness of teachers’ delivery method for the subjects he or she taught will be recorded and serves as input for determining students’ engagement in the classroom.
5 Conclusion
The current paper proposes a mobile interactive system for learning by integrating pedagogical framework with technology. The research questions of this study are being identified through SLR whereby justification for the future research of current study can be made. The system is intended to eliminate conventional teaching method which is conducting through one-way communication which resulting in less student engagement and interaction.in classes. Two-way communication is proposed by mobile interactive system to address classroom communication issue whereby two-way communication is more effective in teaching as it involves both parties which are referring to teachers and students in this context. Having a more effective communication in classroom leads to higher student engagement. Besides educational technology, which is referring to proposed mobile interactive system, teachers are also required to come out with a well-prepared teaching plan and teaching materials with the help of TPACK. The proposed TPACK framework is having the intention allowing teachers to tailor their teaching content according to students’ performance and capability, one should also have in-depth understanding about the content, knowledge and specific pedagogies as well as knowing how to use the latest technology and integrate the technology into teaching. Without prior knowledge in any one of the stated elements which are referring to pedagogical knowledge, technological knowledge and content knowledge, teachers’ teaching experience and performance will be affected.
References
Hoffmann MM, Ramirez AYF (2018) Students’ attitudes toward teacher use of technology in classrooms. In: Multicultural education. Caddo Gap Press. LNCS, vol 9999, pp 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg
Wang LYK, Lew SL, Lau SH, Leow MC (2019) Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788
Hussain M, Zhu W, Zhang W, Abidi SMR (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Comput Intell Neurosci https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186
Xerri MJ, Radford K, Shacklock K (2018) Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. High Educ 75(4):589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9
Milenković A, Dimitrijević S (2019) Advantages and disadvantages of heuristic teaching in relation to traditional teaching-the case of the parallelogram area. European Mathematics Society. https://dms.rs/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Zbornik-ERME.pdf#page=75
Otukile-Mongwaketse M (2018) Teacher centered dominated approaches: their implications for todays inclusive classrooms. Int J Psychol Counselling 10(2):11–21. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijpc2016.0393
Dobbins C, Denton P (2017) MyWallMate: an investigation into the use of mobile technology in enhancing student engagement. TechTrends 61(6):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0188-y
Morris NP, Lambe J, Ciccone J, Swinnerton B (2016) Mobile technology: students perceived benefits of apps for learning neuroanatomy. J Comput Assist Learn 32(5):430–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12144
Ebrahim AA, Tawfik AE (2018) Mobile applications for education. Int J Learn Teach 251–254. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.4.3.251-254
Dey S (2019). Elementary education in 19th-century Bengal education policy of the British. Econ Polit Weekly 54(30):37–44.2
Smith V, Wortley A (2017) “Everyone’s a comedian”. No really, they are: using humor in the online and traditional classroom. J Instruct Res 6(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.3
Malik RS (2018) Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. J Sustain Dev Educ Res 2(1):9. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266
Hussin A (2018) Education 4.0 made simple: ideas for teaching. Int J Educ Literacy Stud 6(92). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
Krishnasamy S, Ling LS, Kim TC (2020) Improving learning experience of probability and statistics using multimedia system. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 15(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11349
Guerra A, Spliid CM (2018) Pedagogical development for course change and academic staff expectations. In: Engineering 2030: conceptualization of Industry 4.0 and its implications for engineering education, 7th edn. pp 572–582. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/302786154/2018_IRSPBL_Proceedings_Innovation_PBL_and_Competence.pdf#page=562
Zerihun Z, Kassahun A, Wassie C, Ebrie S, Rebso M (2019) Students’ academic performance in conventional and alternative schooling: field based evidence. Eur J Altern Educ Stud 4(2). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3572787
Dewey J (1916) Democracy and Education. Free Press, New York http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/dewey.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2005
Çimşir BT, Uzunboylu H (2019) Awareness training for sustainable development: development, implementation and evaluation of a mobile application. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030611
Etcuban JO, Pantinople LD (2018) The effects of mobile application in teaching high school mathematics. Int Electron J Math Educ 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906
Fabian K, Topping KJ, Barron IG (2018) Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Educ Technol Res Dev 66(5):1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3
Khan M, JeyaGopi R (2019) Evaluating readiness in using mobile devices for educational purposes among educators and students. In: International conference on innovation and technopreneurship 2019, vol 2019, no 007. http://eprints.intimal.edu.my/1280/1/vol.2019_007.pdf
Sarwate A, Tsuchiya T, Freeman J (2018) Collaborative coding with music: two case studies with EarSketch. In: Monschke J, Guttandin C, Schnell N, Jenkinson T, Schaedler J (eds.) Proceedings of the international web audio conference. TU Berlin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qBVSCRpggg
Gulnar A (2018) Modern teacher role for increasing the students’ competence in pedagogical specialty. Opcion
Warren LL (2018) Behaviors of teacher leaders in the classroom. Psychol Behav Sci 7(6):104–108. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180706.12
Bih Ni L, Rabe Z, Asyikin Hassan N (2018) World academy of science, engineering and technology. Int J Educ Pedagogical Sci Teach Leadersh Dimension Hist Learn 12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329771175_Teachers_Leadership_Dimension_in_History_Learning
Dekhane S, Xu X, Tsoi MY (2013) Mobile app development to increase student engagement and problem solving skills. J Inf Syst Educ 24(4):299–308
Zaheer Abdul Ghafoor YA (2018) Integrating MALL into english flipped classroom at the tertiary level. India’s High Educ Authority UGC Approv List J Ser Number 18(2):98–108. www.languageinindia.com
Putra CA (2018) Enhanced learning outcomes using interactive edutainment learning method. In: Proceedings international conference BKSPTIS 2018
Rahman MA, Ling LS, Yin OS (2020). Augmented reality for learning calculus: a research framework of interactive learning system. In: Lecture notes in electrical engineering. Springer, vol 603, pp 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0058-9_47
Raju B (2020) Innovations and best practices towards quality education. Aayushi Int Interdiscip Res J (AIIRJ)., 40(50):2258–2262. https://archives.tpnsindia.org/index.php/sipn/article/view/3710/3593
Fairholme College Fairholme College Pedagogical Framework of Learning and Teaching (2018). https://www.fairholme.qld.edu.au/module/documents/download/1537
Naziri F, Rasul MS, Affandi HM (2019) Importance of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in design and technology subject. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 9(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i1/5366
Utami P, Pahlevi FR, Santoso D, Fajaryati N, Destiana B, Ismail ME (2019) Android-based applications on teaching skills based on TPACK analysis. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/535/1/012009
Rahman SMM, Krishnan VJ, Kapila V (2017) Exploring the dynamic nature of TPACK framework in teaching STEM using robotics in middle school classrooms. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-28336
Vasodavan V, Dewitt D, Alias N (2019) TPACK in higher education: analysis of the collaborative tools used by lecturers. Asia Pac J Curriculum Teach 7:9–17
Malik S, Rohendi D, Widiaty I (2019) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: a literature review. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114
Karns SJ (2019) Pairing a learning activity types short course with collaborative curriculum design: an approach to impact teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge. Cyberlaw Global E-business. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-828-4.chtpg
Nurhadi D, Purwaningsih E, Masjkur K, Nyan-Myau L (2019) Using TPACK to map teaching and learning skills for vocational high school teacher candidates in Indonesia. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.9
Oyelere SS, Suhonen J, Wajiga GM, Sutinen E (2018) Design, development, and evaluation of a mobile learning application for computing education. Educ Inf Technol 23(1):467–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9613-2
Stathopoulou A, Karabatzaki Z, Tsiros D, Katsantoni S, Drigas A (2019) Mobile apps the educational solution for autistic students in secondary education. Int J Interact Mob Technol 13(2):89–101. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i02.9896
Karabatzaki Z, Stathopoulou A, Kokkalia G, Dimitriou E, Loukeri PI, Economou A, Drigas A (2018) Mobile application tools for students in secondary education. An evaluation study. Int J Interact Mob Technol 12(2):142–161. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i2.8158
Şengül M, Türel YK (2019) Teaching Turkish as a Foreign language with interactive whiteboards: a case study of multilingual learners. Technol Knowl Learn 24(1):101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9350-z
Zimmermann P, Stallings L, Pierce R, Largent D (2018) Classroom interaction redefined: multidisciplinary perspectives on moving beyond traditional classroom spaces to promote student engagement. J Learn Spaces 7(1):45–61
Kaewunruen S (2019) Enhancing railway engineering student engagement using interactive technology embedded with infotainment. Educ Sci 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020136
Cronhjort M, Filipsson L, Weurlander M (2018) Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teach Math Appl 37(3):113–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/TEAMAT/HRX007
Kukulska-Hulme A, Viberg O (2018) Mobile collaborative language learning: state of the art. British J Educ Technol Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
Lew SL, Ooi SY, Muthukumar Y, Rahman A (2018) Improving interactivity via icontrol: a presentation mobile app. In: Proceedings of the European conference on e-learning, ECEL, vol 2018, pp 308–315. Academic Conferences Limited
Putra CA (2018) Enhanced learning outcomes using interactive edutainment learning method. In: Proceedings international conference Bksptis 2018, pp 219–224. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/bksptis/article/view/3576/2614
Ruihu W, Guoli Y (2019) Exploration and Practice of Mobile InteractiveInternent Classroom Teaching Based on UMU. EasyChair. https://wvvw.easychair.org/publications/preprint_open/qJh5
Dokun O, Nat C, Muesser, Samson F (2019) An investigation of student’s interactivity in the classroom and interactivity within learning management system to improve learning outcomes. Croatian J Educ—Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje 21. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i1.3085
Alexandrovna RN (2018) Development of Independence among future primary school teachers by applying interactive learning methods. J Educ E-Learn Res 5(2):118–121 https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2018.52.118.121
Woo P, Shahril AM, Azmi E, Rosli H (2019) Interactive learning online: a case study of front office teaching and learning in higher learning institution in Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i15/5101
Liliarti N, Kuswanto H (2018) Improving the competence of diagrammatic and argumentative representation in physics through android-based mobile learning application. Int J Instruct 11(3):106–122. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1138a
Kutluca T, Yalman M, Tum A (2019) Use of interactive whiteboard in teaching mathematics for sustainability and its effect on the role of teacher. Discourse Commun Sustain Educ 10(1):113–132. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2019-0009
Olivares DD, Castillo RR (2018) ICT in the classroom: primary education student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum. Educ Inf Technol 23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4
Tsai C-C (2019) A study of taiwanese elementary school english as a foreign language: teachers’ beliefs, advantages, and difficulties of using interactive whiteboards. Asia-Pac Soc Sci Rev 19:87–99
Benoit A (2018) Investigating the impact of interactive whiteboards in higher education: a case study. J Learn Spaces 7(1):76–90
Ahmad W, Ali Z (2019) Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) effectiveness in vocabulary achievement and motivation: Saudi EFL learners’ perceptions and insights. Bull Adv Eng Stud 2(2):90–103. https://doi.org/10.31559/baes2019.2.2.5
Olivares DD, Castillo RR (2018) ICT in the classroom: primary education student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum. Educ Inf Technol 23(6):2309–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4
Torres-Carrion PV, Gonzalez-Gonzalez CS, Aciar S, Rodriguez-Morales G (2018) Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education. In: IEEE global engineering education conference, EDUCON, vol 2018, pp 1364–1373. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363388
Adams C (2019) TPACK model: the ideal modern classroom. In: Technology and the curriculum: summer (2019). https://techandcurr2019.pressbooks.com/chapter/tpack-modern-classroom/
Acknowledgements
This research was funded and supported by Multimedia University and Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lai, D., Ling, L.S., Yin, O.S. (2021). A Pedagogical Framework with Integration of TPACK for Mobile Interactive System in Teaching Mathematics. In: Alfred, R., Iida, H., Haviluddin, H., Anthony, P. (eds) Computational Science and Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 724. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4069-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4069-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4068-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4069-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)