Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis of Unsupervised Link Prediction Algorithms in Weighted Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing: Theories and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 627))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Complex relationships in many real-world problems can be represented as networks where nodes represent individuals and relationships among them are represented by links. So, one of the key issues in such networks is the evolution or creation of edges. Link prediction is the solution where it finds the missing links (edges) in a static case (in a given snapshot of a network) or future links in a dynamic case (given several snapshots of networks at different time instants). In this experimental work, we consider the weighted versions of different existing algorithms and showed their performance on several real networks of different domains. We observed that the weighted version of the method path of length 3, i.e. L3-WT outperforms other methods on all four evaluation metrics with some exceptions. LHN1-WT method is the second outperformer on LesMiserables and Netscience datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this article, we use links and edges interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    In the article, we use networks and datasets interchangeably.

  3. 3.

    0.1 Fraction of test data means 10% of the total data is taken as test set.

References

  1. Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2003) The link prediction problem for social networks. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM’03. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 556–559

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar A, Mishra S, Singh SS, Singh K, Biswas B (2020) Link prediction in complex networks based on significance of higher-order path index (shopi). Phys A Stat Mech Appl 545:123790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar A, Singh SS, Singh K, Biswas B (2020) Link prediction techniques, applications, and performance: a survey. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 553:124289

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lü L, Pan L, Zhou T, Zhang Y-C, Stanley HE (2015) Toward link predictability of complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(8):2325–2330

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Al Hasan M, Zaki MJ (2011) A survey of link prediction in social networks. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 243–275

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martínez V, Berzal F, Cubero J-F (2017) A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Comput Surv 49(4):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman MEJ (2001) Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Phys Rev E 64:025102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al Hasan M, Chaoji V, Salem S, Zaki M (2006) Link prediction using supervised learning. In: Proceedings of SDM’06 workshop on link analysis, counterterrorism and security

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barabasi A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinberg JM (2000) Navigation in a small world. Nature 406(6798):845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leskovec J, Kleinberg J, Faloutsos C (2005) Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery in data mining, KDD’05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 177–187

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Q-M, Xiao-Ke X, Zhu Y-X, Zhou T (2015) Measuring multiple evolution mechanisms of complex networks. Sci Rep 5:10350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Du N, Li H, Li K, Gao J, Zhang A (2014) A deep learning approach to link prediction in dynamic networks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM international conference on data mining, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 24–26 Apr 2014, pp 289–297

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M, Chen Y (2017) Weisfeiler-Lehman neural machine for link prediction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Halifax, NS, Canada, 13–17 Aug 2017, pp 575–583

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grover A, Leskovec J (2016) Node2vec: scalable feature learning for networks. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD’16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 855–864

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Variational graph auto-encoders. CoRR, abs/1611.07308

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clauset A, Moore C, Newman MEJ (2008) Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453(7191):98–101

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guimerà R, Sales-Pardo M (2009) Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(52):22073–22078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Getoor L, Friedman N, Koller D, Taskar B (2002) Learning probabilistic models of link structure. J Mach Learn Res 3:679–707

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis J, Goadrich M (2006) The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning. ICML’06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brodersen KH, Ong CS, Stephan KE, Buhmann JM (2010) The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. In: 2010 20th international conference on pattern recognition, pp 3121–3124

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sasaki Y (2007) The truth of the f-measure. Teach Tutor Mater

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Sá HR, Prudêncio RBC (2011) Supervised link prediction in weighted networks. In: The 2011 international joint conference on neural networks, pp 2281–2288

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2003) The link prediction problem for social networks. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM’03. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 556–559

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lada A, Adar E (2003) Friends and neighbors on the web. Soc Netw 25:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou T, Lü L, Zhang Y-C (2009) Predicting missing links via local information. Eur Phys J B 71(4):623–630

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhihao W, Lin Y, Wang J, Gregory S (2016) Link prediction with node clustering coefficient. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 452:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lü L, Jin C-H, Zhou T (2009) Similarity index based on local paths for link prediction of complex networks. Phys Rev E 80:046122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kovács IA, Luck K, Spirohn K, Wang Y, Pollis C, Schlabach S, Bian W, Kim D-K, Kishore N, Hao T, Vidal MAM, Barabási A-L (2018) Network-based prediction of protein interactions. bioRxiv, Calderwood

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leicht EA, Holme P, Newman MEJ (2006) Vertex similarity in networks. Phys Rev E 73:026120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Singh, S.S., Mishra, S. (2023). Empirical Analysis of Unsupervised Link Prediction Algorithms in Weighted Networks. In: Kumar, R., Verma, A.K., Sharma, T.K., Verma, O.P., Sharma, S. (eds) Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 627. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9858-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics