Skip to main content

Specific Approaches to Robotic Milking with Different Cow Movement Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agriculture Digitalization and Organic Production

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 331))

  • 369 Accesses

Abstract

Livestock farming is the most important and strategic industry for our country’s food security. In recent years, the techniques and technologies of livestock production have changed significantly. Robotic feeding, milking, harvesting and processing systems are being introduced. High-quality products require impeccable milk quality. Robotics in the process management and control systems are becoming more sophisticated and increasingly affordable. The dairy industry is changing dramatically. An integrated approach to the rational conduct of dairy business allows agricultural enterprises to advance to a more efficient level of production organization (Abeni et al. in J Dairy Sci 88:3542–3552, 2005). Robotic milking is widely accepted, especially in Western Europe, as a way to reduce workforce on dairy farms, increase production per cow and improve the lifestyle of dairy farm families milking 40–250 cows (De Koning in Automatic milking–common practice on dairy farms. pp. 52–67, 2010). The growing popularity of this technology can be seen in its rapid rate of implementation. In 2009, the estimated number of robotic dairy farms worldwide was 8000 (De Koning in Automatic milking–common practice on dairy farms. pp. 52–67, 2010). Only 6 years later (Barkema et al. in J Dairy Sci 98:7426–7445, 2015), it was suggested that this number had more than tripled to 25,000 dairy farms worldwide. The percentage of herds milked with this technology is highest in Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands (Barkema et al. in J Dairy Sci 98:7426–7445, 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abeni, F., Calamari, L., Calza, F., Speroni, M., Bertoni, G., Pirlo, G.: Welfare assessment based on metabolic and endocrine aspects in primiparous cows milked in a parlor or with an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 88(10), 3542–3552 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Koning, C.J.: Automatic milking–common practice on dairy farms. In: First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Progressive Dairy Operators, pp. 52–67 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barkema, H.W., von Keyserlingk, M.A., Kastelic, J.P., Lam, T.J., Luby, C., Roy, J.P., LeBlanc, S.J., Keefe, G.P., Kelton, D.F.: Invited review: changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 98(11), 7426–7445 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach, A., Devant, M., Igleasias, C., Ferrer, A.: Forced traffic in automatic milking systems effectively reduces the need to get cows, but alters eating behavior and does not improve milk yield of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 92(3), 1272–1280 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathijs, E.: Socio-economic aspects of automatic milking. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harms, J., Wendl, G., Schon, H.: Influence of cow traffic on milking and animal behavior in a robotic milking system. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American Conference on Robotic Milking, Toronto, Canada, pp. 9–14. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodenburg, J., Wheeler, B.: Strategies for incorporating robotic milking into North American herd management. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American Conference on Robotic Milking, Toronto, Canada, pp. 18–32. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billon, P.: Les robots de traite en France; impact sur la qualité du lait en le système de production. Proceedings: Il Robot di Mungitura in Lombardia (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoogeveen, H., van Lent, A.J.H., Jagtenberg, C.J.: Free and one-way cow traffic in combination with automated milking. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Dairy Housing Conference, St. Louis, MO, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, pp. 80–87 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Land Van’t, Van Lenteren, A.C., Van Scooten, E., Bouwmans, C., Gravesteyn, D.J., Hink, P.: Effects of husbandry system on the efficiency and optimization of robotic milking performance and management robotic milking. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Lelystad, the Netherlands, pp. 167–176. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gygax, L., Neuffer, I., Kaufmann, C., Hauser, R., Wechsler, B.: Comparison of functional aspects in two automatic milking systems and auto-tandem milking parlors. J. Dairy Sci. 90(9), 4265–4274 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermans, G.G., Ipema, A.H., Stefanowska, J., Metz, J.H.: The effect of two traffic situations on the behavior and performance of cows in an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 86(6), 1997–2004 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melin, M., Hermans, G.G., Pettersson, G., Wiktorsson, H.: Cow traffic in relation to social rank and motivation of cows in an automatic milking system with control gates and an open waiting area. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96(3–4), 201–214 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thune, R.O., Berggren, A.M., Gravas, L., Wiktorsson, H.: Barn layout and cow traffic to optimize the capacity of an automatic milking system. In: Proceedings of the First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, Toronto, Canada, pp. 45–50. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs, J.A., Siegford, J.M.: Lactating dairy cows adapt quickly to being milked by an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 95(3), 1575–1584 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wenzel, C., Schönreiter-Fischer, S., Unshelm, J.: Studies on step–kick behavior and stress of cows during milking in an automatic milking system. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83(2–3), 237–246 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gygax, L., Neuffer, I., Kaufmann, C., Hauser, R., Wechsler, B.: Milk cortisol concentration in automatic milking systems compared with auto-tandem milking parlors. J. Dairy Sci. 89(9), 3447–3454 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Keyserlingk, M.A., Rushen, J., de Passillé, A.M., Weary, D.M.: Invited review: the welfare of dairy cattle—key concepts and the role of science. J. Dairy Sci. 92(9), 4101–4111 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Croney, C.C., Anthony, R.: Invited review: ruminating conscientiously: scientific and socio-ethical challenges for US dairy production. J. Dairy Sci. 94(2), 539–546 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodenburg, J.: Robotic milking: technology, farm design, and effects on work flow. J. Dairy Sci. 100(9), 7729–7738 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klungel, G.H., Slaghuis, B.A., Hogeveen, H.: The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 83(9), 1998–2003 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meijering, A., Hogeveen, H., de Koning, C.J.: Automatic Milking, a Better Understanding: A Better Understanding. Wageningen Academic Publishers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Melin, M., Wiktorsson, H., Christiansson, A.: Teat cleaning efficiency before milking in DeLaval VMSTM versus conventional manual cleaning, using Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores as marker. In: First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, Toronto, Canada (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slaghuis, B.: Source and significance of contaminants on different levels of raw milk production. In: Symposium on Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk, Wolfpassing (Austria), 19–27 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sumner, J.: Farm production influences on milk hygiene quality. In: Symposium on Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk. Wolfpassing (Austria), 13–15 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rifat Sadikov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sadikov, R., Vetrov, A., Morozova, N., Sadikov, R. (2023). Specific Approaches to Robotic Milking with Different Cow Movement Systems. In: Ronzhin, A., Kostyaev, A. (eds) Agriculture Digitalization and Organic Production . Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 331. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7780-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics