Skip to main content

Joint Operations and Indo-Pacific Command: Development and Implementation of the Multi-Domain Battle Concept

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
U.S. Indo-Pacific Command

Part of the book series: Evidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies ((EBAPCS,volume 12))

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

U.S. military planners have long said that there is a need to promote jointness among military service branches. However, what is different about the recent debate over Multi-Domain Battle (MDB) from past discussions regarding jointness is that the new thinking assumes that in its future operational environments, the U.S. military will not continue to enjoy superiority in all domains. The U.S. military has more recently assumed an operational environment in which hostile states with similar capabilities are developing the ability to compete across all domains and are also engaged in activities that do not rise to the level of a “conventional war.” In other words, there is a growing understanding that enhancing jointness is no longer a choice but a necessity. This chapter discusses how the U.S. military thinks the operational environment surrounding it is changing today, what kind of operational concept they consider MDB to be, and what form MDB will take in the Western Pacific region, which is INDOPACOM’s area of responsibility. Finally, we explore the implications of the implementation of the MDB concept by the U.S. military and INDOPACOM for Japan's defense policy and the Japan–U.S. alliance. (All descriptions reflect situations a the time of the original writing in 2018.) 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Admiral Harry Harris, “The View from the Indo-Asia-Pacific,” WEST 2017 Conference, February 21, 2017. http://www.pacom.mil/Media/Speeches-Testimony/Article/1089966/west-2017-keynote-the-view-from-the-indo-asia-pacific/. Accessed on September 22, 2017.

  2. 2.

    Admiral Harry Harris, “Keynote at LANPAC 2017,” Association of the United States Army LANPAC Symposium and Exposition, May 24, 2017. http://www.pacom.mil/Media/Speeches-Testimony/Article/1193171/association-of-the-unitedstates-army-lanpac-symposium-and-exposition/. Accessed on September 22, 2017.

  3. 3.

    Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Vision 2010, 1996. http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/4240529/FID378/pdfdocs/2010/Jv2010.pdf. Accessed on January 8, 2018.

  4. 4.

    Memorandum from the Secretary of Defense to Deputy Secretary of Defense et al., “Defense Innovation Initiative,” November 15, 2014. http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/OSD013411-14.pdf. Accessed on September 24, 2017.

  5. 5.

    Robert O. Work, “Army War College Strategy Conference,” April 8, 2015. https://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/606661/army-war-college-strategy-conference/. Accessed on September 27, 2017. Perkins (2017).

  6. 6.

    This chapter will cover initiatives on the operational concept side of national defense innovation, but please refer to the following articles for technical and organizational initiatives. Mori (2017a), Mori (2017b).

  7. 7.

    Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Operating Environment 2035 (JOE2035): The Joint Force in a Contested and Disordered World, July 14, 2016. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/concepts/joe/joe_2035_July16.pdf. Accessed on September 27, 2017.

  8. 8.

    Joint Chiefs of Staff, JOE 2035, pp. 29–30.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., pp. 32–33.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., pp. 35–36.

  11. 11.

    The US Department of Defense, Joint Operational Access Concept –Version 1.0, January 17, 2012, pp. 14–17, 34–35.

  12. 12.

    Air-Sea Battle Office (2013), Schwartz and Greenert (2012).

  13. 13.

    Hammes (2012).

  14. 14.

    Colby (2013), Hammes (2013), Friedberg (2014), Slavin (2014).

  15. 15.

    Hutchens et al. (2017).

  16. 16.

    Hutchens et al., “Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons,” p. 137.

  17. 17.

    United States Army-Marine Corps White Paper, Multi-Domain Battle: Combined Arms for the 21st Century, 11 January 2018, pp. 3–5.

  18. 18.

    United States Army-Marine Corps White Paper, pp. 3–5.

  19. 19.

    US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), Army Capabilities Integration Center, Multi-Domain Battle: Evolution of Combined Arms for the 21 Century, 2025-2040, version 1.0, December 2017. http://www.tradoc.army.mil/multidomainbattle/docs/MDB_Evolutionfor21st.pdf. Accessed on January 8, 2018.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., pp. 21–22.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., pp. 23–24.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., pp. 24–25.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., pp. 25–28.

  25. 25.

    Dries (2017).

  26. 26.

    United States Army-Marine Corps White Paper, p. 16.

  27. 27.

    Admiral Harris's remarks at the outset also suggest the Navy and Air Force's participation in the MDB concept. Dries, “Some New, Some Old, All Necessary,” p. 16.

  28. 28.

    General Robert B. Brown and General David G. Perkins, "Multi-Domain Battle: Tonight, Tomorrow, and the Future Fight," War on the Rocks, August 18, 2017, p. 2. https://warontherocks.com/2017/08/multi-domain-battle-tonight-tomorrow-and-the-future-fight/. Accessed on September 27, 2017.

  29. 29.

    Brown, “The Indo-Asia Pacific and the Multi-Domain Battle Concept,” pp. 6–8.

  30. 30.

    CEC is a command and control network system of the US Navy that centrally aggregates sensor information that exists over a wide area and controls anti-aircraft attacks. US Navy Fact File, “Cooperative Engagement Capability,” http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2100&tid=325&ct=2. Accessed on September 28, 2017.

  31. 31.

    Admiral Harry B. Harris, “Statement of Admiral Harry B. Harris Jr., US Navy Commander, US Pacific Command Before the House Armed Services Committee on US Pacific Command Posture,” April 26, 2017. https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/download/harris_03-15-18. Accessed on September 27, 2017.

  32. 32.

    Schmid (2017).

  33. 33.

    Pomerleau (2017).

  34. 34.

    Brown (2017).

  35. 35.

    Brown, “The Indo-Asia Pacific and the Multi-Domain Battle Concept,” p. 6.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., p. 8.

  37. 37.

    Brown and Perkins, “Multi-Domain Battle: Tonight, Tomorrow, and the Future Fight,” p. 3.

  38. 38.

    Krepinevich (2017), Krepinevich (2015). Similar discussions preceding this are as follows. Holmes (2014), Holmes and Yoshihara (2012).

  39. 39.

    Krepinevich, Archipelagic Defense, pp. 69–70.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., pp. 70–71.

  41. 41.

    For example, General Goldfein, Chief of Staff of the US Air Force, also emphasized the importance of a multi-domain network-oriented command and control system in an interview with a military magazine published by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “An Interview with David L. Goldfein,” Joint Forces Quarterly, Vol. 85, 2nd Quarter 2017, p. 9.

  42. 42.

    For information on the concept behind the US military's introduction of autonomy and its implications, see the aforementioned article, Technology and Security.

  43. 43.

    Admiral Harry Harris, “The View from the Indo-Asia-Pacific.”

References

  • Air-Sea Battle Office. 2013. Air-Sea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access & Area Denial Challenges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Robert B. 2017. The Indo-Asia Pacific and the Multi-Domain Battle Concept. Military Review, March, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, Elbridge. 2013. Don’t Sweat AirSea Battle. The National Interest, July 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dries, William. 2017. Some New, Some Old, All Necessary: The Multi-Domain Imperative. Fires, May–June, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, Aaron L. 2014. Beyond Air -Sea Battle: The Debate over US Military Strategy in Asia. The International Institute for Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammes, Thomas X. 2012. Offshore Control: A Proposed Strategy for an Unlikely Conflict. Strategic Forum 278: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammes, T.X. 2013. Sorry, AirSea Battle is No Strategy. The National Interest, August 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, James R., and Toshi Yoshihara. 2012. Asymmetric Warfare, American Style. Proceedings, Vol. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, James R. 2014. Defend the First Island Chain. Proceedings, Vol. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens, Michael E., William D. Dries, Jason C. Perdew, Vincent D. Bryant, and Kerry E. Moores. 2017. Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons: A New Joint Operational Concept. Joint Forces Quarterly 84: 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krepinevich, Andrew. 2015. How to Deter China: The Case for Archipelagic Defense. Foreign Affairs, March/April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krepinevich, Andrew. 2017. Archipelagic Defense: The Japan-US Alliance and Preserving Peace and Stability in the Western Pacific. The Sasakawa Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Satoru. 2017a. Technology and Security: Autonomy in US Defense Innovation. International Affairs 658: 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Satoru. 2017b. The Pursuit of Defense Reform During the Obama Period: The Organizational Aspects of Defense Innovation”, The Journal of International Security, 45(1): 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, David G. 2017. Multi-Domain Battle: Driving Change to Win in the Future. Military Review, July August, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerleau, Mark. 2017. Marines Take Multi-Domain Battle to the Littorals. Modern Day Marine, September 21. http://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/modern-day-marine/2017/09/21/marines-taking-multi-domain-battle-to-the-littorals/. Accessed 27 Sept 2017.

  • Schmid, Joseph. 2017. Cross Domain Fires Executed in Lightning Forge 2017. Fires, July August, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Norton A., and Jonathan W. Greenert. 2012. Air-Sea Battle: Promoting Stability in an Era of Uncertainty. The American Interest Online, February 20, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, Erik. 2014. Analysts: Air-Sea Battle Concept Carries Risks in Possible Conflict with China. Stars and Stripes, September 28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Keio University

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mori, S. (2022). Joint Operations and Indo-Pacific Command: Development and Implementation of the Multi-Domain Battle Concept. In: Tsuchiya, M., Roy, D. (eds) U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. Evidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5268-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics