Abstract
The commander of INDOPACOM is often called the “second most powerful man in the world,” the first being the President of the United States. INDOPACOM is the largest of the U.S. military’s regional “combatant commands,” encompassing half of the surface of the earth. INDOPACOM and the other combatant commands sometimes draw criticism for being too autonomous and too powerful. It was said that the generals and admirals leading the regional combatant commands had surpassed U.S. ambassadors, intelligence agencies and corporations in the shaping of U.S. foreign policy and in wielding global influence. Such assessments suggest that INDOPACOM has outgrown the control of its formal supervisory organization, the Office of the Secretary of Defense located in the Pentagon. In fact, the relationship between INDOPACOM and the Pentagon is complicated. INDOPACOM does indeed have considerable authority and autonomy, but senior INDOPACOM officers could quickly point out ways the Pentagon constrains them, often to INDOPACOM’s frustration. The INDOPACOM commander is in large part a diplomat in addition to being a manager and strategist. There is disagreement within the U.S. government over how much effort INDOPACOM should focus on diplomacy as opposed to preparing to win wars.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kohn, Richard H. 2002. The Erosion of Civilian Control of the Military in the United States Today. Naval War College Review LV (3).
Kohut, Andrew, Carroll Doherty, and Richard Wike, 2006. No Global Warming Alarm in the U.S., China. Washington, DC: Pew Global Attitudes Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/pdf/252.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2022.
Larter, David B. 2016. 4-Star Admiral Wants to Confront China. The White House Says not so Fast. Navy Times (September 26). https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2016/09/26/4-star-admiral-wants-to-confront-china-the-white-house-says-not-so-fast/. Accessed June 13, 2022.
Priest, Dana. 2000. A Four-Star Foreign Policy? US Commanders Wield Rising Clout, Autonomy. Washington Post (September 28): A1.
Priest, Dana. 2003. The Mission: Waging War and Keeping Peace with America’s Military, 42, 71. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Ruch, Grace. 2011. Dawn of the ‘Tomodachi Generation?’ Polls Show Historic Support for US-Japan Relationship. In Asia Matters for America, East–West Center-Washington. https://asiamattersforamerica.org/articles/polls-show-historic-support-for-us-japan-relationship. Accessed June 13, 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Keio University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roy, D. (2022). INDOPACOM and the Pentagon. In: Tsuchiya, M., Roy, D. (eds) U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. Evidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5268-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5268-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5267-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5268-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)