Abstract
Predicting medication (drug) adverse reactions is a crucial aspect of drug development. Using simulation techniques to customize medication response predictions to identify the optimal medication holds enormous potential for improving a patient’s probability of successful treatment. Unfortunately, the statistical effort of forecasting medication reaction is extremely difficult, partly due to dataset limitations and also due to algorithms flaws. Medications are organic molecules that are ingested by humans as well as cause a response in the body through engaging to target proteins. These medications can reduce positive or negative effects inside the organisms. The undesirable modifications in medications cause adverse reactions inside the human organism generally referred to as medication side effects. Such adverse effects might vary from mild occurrences like a migraine to more significant ones involving heart failure, malignancy, or perhaps even mortality. The medications are put through a series of tests in the laboratories to see if they have any negative health effects. Such tests, unfortunately, are both expensive and time-consuming. Numerical techniques can be used as a replacement for experimental research. Numerous computational strategies for detecting drug adverse reactions have recently been published. In this paper, several existing techniques of drug response prediction are surveyed. The Pearson correlation coefficient value of existing techniques is compared graphically and find that SRMF technique had attained the best results. The existing methods are examined with the help of various databases. The most essential databases for drug adverse reactions prediction are BIO-SNAP, SIDER, DART, etc. The sets of data associated with drug adverse reactions, as well as the parameters used to evaluate drug adverse events prediction techniques, have been described. For the evaluation of drug adverse reactions prediction techniques PCC, precision, accuracy, etc., parameters are used. For the prediction of drug side effects, several methods are used such as docking-based methods, network-based methods, machine learning-based methods, and various miscellaneous methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dey S, Luo H, Fokoue A, Hu J, Zhang P (2018) Predicting adverse drug reactions through interpretable deep learning framework. BMC Bioinform 19(21):1–13
Güvenç Paltun B, Mamitsuka H, Kaski S (2021) Improving drug response prediction by integrating multiple data sources: matrix factorization, kernel and network-based approaches. Brief Bioinform 22(1):346–359
Guan NN, Zhao Y, Wang CC, Li JQ, Chen X, Piao X (2019) Anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using weighted graph regularized matrix factorization. Mol Therapy-Nucleic Acids 17:164–174
Sakellaropoulos T, Vougas K, Narang S, Koinis F, Kotsinas A, Polyzos A, Gorgoulis VG (2019) A deep learning framework for predicting response to therapy in cancer. Cell Rep 29(11):3367–3373
Choi J, Park S, Ahn J (2020) RefDNN: a reference drug based neural network for more accurate prediction of anticancer drug resistance. Sci Rep 10(1):1–11
Wang L, Li X, Zhang L, Gao Q (2017) Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization. BMC Cancer 17(1):1–12
Emdadi A, Eslahchi C (2021) Auto-HMM-LMF: feature selection based method for prediction of drug response via autoencoder and hidden Markov model. BMC Bioinform 22(1):1–22
Moughari FA, Eslahchi C (2020) ADRML: anticancer drug response prediction using manifold learning. Sci Rep 10(1):1–18
Liu C, Wei D, Xiang J, Ren F, Huang L, Lang J, Tian G, Li Y, Yang J (2020) An improved anticancer drug-response prediction based on an ensemble method integrating matrix completion and ridge regression. Mol Therapy-Nucleic Acids 21:676–686
Zhang N, Wang H, Fang Y, Wang J, Zheng X, Liu XS (2015) Predicting anticancer drug responses using a dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model. PLoS Comput Biol 11(9):e1004498
Liu H, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Chen X (2018) Anti-cancer drug response prediction using neighbor-based collaborative filtering with global effect removal. Mol Therapy-Nucleic Acids 13:303–311
Suphavilai C, Bertrand D, Nagarajan N (2018) Predicting cancer drug response using a recommender system. Bioinformatics 34(22):3907–3914
Zitnik M, Sosic R, Leskovec J (2018) BioSNAP datasets: stanford biomedical network dataset collection. Note: http://snap.stanford.edu/biodata Cited by 5(1)
Kuhn M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork P (2016) The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D1075–D1079
Ji ZL, Han LY, Yap CW, Sun LZ, Chen X, Chen YZ (2003) Drug adverse reaction target database (DART). Drug Saf 26(10):685–690
Pinzi L, Rastelli G (2019) Molecular docking: shifting paradigms in drug discovery. Int J Mol Sci 20(18):4331
Chen YZ, Zhi DG (2001) Ligand–protein inverse docking and its potential use in the computer search of protein targets of a small molecule. Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf 43(2):217–226
Asgaonkar KD, Patil SM, Chitre TS, Ghegade VN, Jadhav SR, Sande SS, Kulkarni AS (2019) Comparative docking studies: a drug design tool for some pyrazine-thiazolidinone based derivatives for anti-HIV activity. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 15(3):252–258
Zhang F, Wang M, Xi J, Yang J, Li A (2018) A novel heterogeneous network-based method for drug response prediction in cancer cell lines. Sci Rep 8(1):1–9
Zhao J, Zhang XS, Zhang S (2014) Predicting cooperative drug effects through the quantitative cellular profiling of response to individual drugs. CPT: Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 3(2):1–7
Dorel M, Barillot E, Zinovyev A, Kuperstein I (2015) Network-based approaches for drug response prediction and targeted therapy development in cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464(2):386–391
Qiu K, Lee J, Kim H, Yoon S, Kang K (2021) Machine learning based anti-cancer drug response prediction and search for predictor genes using cancer cell line gene expression. Genomics Inform 19(1)
Zhang J, Li C, Lin Y, Shao Y, Li S (2017) Computational drug repositioning using collaborative filtering via multi-source fusion. Expert Syst Appl 84:281–289
Wang Y, Zeng J (2013) Predicting drug-target interactions using restricted Boltzmann machines. Bioinformatics 29(13):i126–i134
Sachdev K, Gupta MK (2020) A comprehensive review of computational techniques for the prediction of drug side effects. Drug Dev Res 81(6):650–670
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, D.P., Gupta, A., Kaushik, B. (2023). Anti-Drug Response and Drug Side Effect Prediction Methods: A Review. In: Buyya, R., Hernandez, S.M., Kovvur, R.M.R., Sarma, T.H. (eds) Computational Intelligence and Data Analytics. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 142. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3391-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3391-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3390-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3391-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)