Abstract
Gender equity in science education entails that all students of any sex, regardless of their culture, caste, disability, linguistic and ethnic background, be given the required support to become successful in learning science and eventually aspiring to do science in future. In this paper, an analytical framework is used based on the feminist critique of science. It has been seen that girls despite showing high levels of interest in studying science take fewer science courses in colleges. This paper discusses three approaches to accomplish gender equity in science. These three different approaches are based on understanding the role of gender in shaping students’ approaches to science education. These approaches are gender neutral science education on the premise of equality feminism, female-friendly science education based on difference feminism and gender-sensitive science education on the premise of postmodern feminism. It also discusses a few strategies to accomplish gender equity in Indian science classrooms. Also, examples are elucidated from the NCERT science textbooks of 6th and 8th classes for the science teachers to inculcate these ideas while teaching in the classroom to cater to the issue of gender inequity in an Indian science classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nedha. 2011. Difference Between Equity and Equality: Key Difference—Equity vs Equality. Retrieved from file:///D:/DESK3/CONCORDIA/ASSIGNMENTS/COURSE3-EDGR595 Community%20of%20Learners/week1/Equity%20Matters%20(1).pdf . Accessed on 13 October 2020.
Elizabeth, Wood, Martin Levinson, Keith Postlethwaite, and Alison Black. 2011. Equity Matters. Education International: University of Exeter. Retrieved from file:///D:/DESK3/CONCORDIA/ASSIGNMENTS/COURSE3-EDGR595-Community%20of%20Learners/week1/Equity%20Matters%20(1).pdf. Accessed on 20 September 2020. Accessed on 20 September 2020.
Gorard, Stephen, and Emma Smith. 2004. An international comparison of equity in education systems. School Comparative Education 40(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000184863
Patricia, Murphy, and Elizabeth Whitelegg. 2006. Girls and physics: Continuing barriers to ‘belonging’. The Curriculum Journal 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170600909753
Nancy. W. Brickhouse, Patricia Lowery, and Katherine Schultz. 2000. What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5):441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441: AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
Sadler, P.M., Gerhard Sonnert, Zahra Hazari, and Robert Tai. 2012. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education 96 (3): 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007.
Wang, M.T., and Jessica Degol. 2013. Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review 33: 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001.
Aschbacher, P.R., Erika Li, and Ellen J. Roth. 2010. Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (5): 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353.
Astrid, Sinnes. 2006. Three Approaches to Gender Equity in Science Education. Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education. 3. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.451.10.5617/nordina.451
Harding, Sandra. 1993. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, 49–82. New York and London: Routledge.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1987. Feminism and science. In Sex and Scientific Inquiry, ed. Sandra Harding and Jean F. O’Barr, 233–246. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Calabrese Barton, A. 1998. Feminist Science Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
V. Howes, Elaine. 2002. Connecting Girls and Science. Constructivism, Feminism, and Education Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Buckingham: Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768600600481.
Census. 2011. Primary Census Abstracts, Registrar General of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov
Nash, K. 2000. Equality and difference. In Encylopedia of Feminist Theories, ed. Lorraine Code, 174–176. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195598
S. Franklin. 2000. Science. In Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories, ed. Lorraine Code, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195598
Rosemarie, Tong. 2000. Cultural feminism. In Encylopedia of Feminist Theories, ed. Lorraine Code, 113–115. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195598
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0887536700010175.
Rosser, S.V. 1990. Female friendly science. Applying women’s studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1992. How the women’s movement benefits science: Two views. In Inventing women. Science, technology and gender, eds. G. Kirkup, & L. S. Keller, 57–72. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80005-6
Shiva, Vandana. 2001. Democratizing biology. Reinventing biology from a feminist, ecological and Third World perspective. In The gender and science reader, eds. Ingrid Bartsch and Muriel Lederman, 447–465. London and New York: Routledge.
McPherson, Kathryn. 2000. First-wave/second-wave feminism. In Encylopedia of feminist theories, ed. Lorraine Code, 208–210. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203195598
Haraway, Donna. 2003. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Feminist theory reader. Local and global perspectives, eds. Carole R. McCann, Seung-kyung Kim, Emek Ergun, 391–403. (Original work published in 1988). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001201
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate visions. Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. London and New York: Verso.
Kenway, Jane, and Annette Gough. 1998. Gender and science education in schools: A review “with attitude.” Studies in Science Education 31: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560110.
Eisenhart, Margaret A., and Elizabeth Finkel. 2001. Women need (still) not apply. In The gender and science reader, ed. Ingrid Bartsch and Muriel Lederman, 13–23. London and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yadav, N. (2022). Achieving Gender Equity: A Case for Science Education in India. In: Mahajan, V., Chowdhury, A., Kaushal, U., Jariwala, N., Bong, S.A. (eds) Gender Equity: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0460-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0460-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0459-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0460-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)