Abstract
The notion of gender, being a cultural construct, has always been problematic in limiting or curbing individual identities, interests and roles and ‘misrepresenting’ them in imposing binaries; and the privileging of men over other genders cause overpowering physical–psychological dominations every time. Evolution, throughout the years which has been biologically rooted, is an act of nature. The human species might, now, just involve co-evolution with science and technology by constant attempts to push beyond nature-imposed limits and to incorporate technology extensively. Speculations done by scholars and futurists claim that by the mid-twenty-first-century humans will undergo genetic mutation by increased “user-friendly” technological interferences, which can be a boon or a bane and they themselves acknowledge that it is inevitable. Cyborgs and cybernetic systems, right from their outset, seem to have disregarded and dismissed the rigid boundaries and distinctions that existed between “humans” and “animal” and “humans” and “machine”. However, considering gender as an arbitrary and unnecessary limitation on human potential while the applications of neuro-biotechnologies, modern advancements and cybernetic systems seem to incorporate the same, which promotes a gender-neutral environment and eliminates the ‘superiority’ of any gender and works towards a postgender society. In addition, cyborg theory also distorts and configures “language” itself, which has forever been dominated by a phallocentric view and has further intensified distinctions. The paper, thus, not only delineates the oppression and impediments posed by “gender”, but also depicts how the “binaries” of the same are eradicated in a postgender and cybernetic information age.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, Alison. 1998. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. Routledge.
Clynes, Manfred E., and Nathan S. Kline. 1960. Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics. web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Documents/Chapter1/cyborgs.pdf.
Geary, David C. 2006. Male, Female: The Evolution of Sex Differences. American Psychological Association.
Halberstam, Judith. 1991. Automating Gender: Postmodern Feminism in the Age of the Intelligent Machine. Feminist Studies 17 (3): 439–460. Accessed November 15, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/3178281.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1985. Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1998. How Like a Leaf. Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. Routledge.
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Free Association Books.
Hodge, James J. 2014. Gifts of Ubiquity. Film Criticism 39 (2): 53–78. Accessed November 15. www.jstor.org/stable/24777947.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ridley, Matt. 2003. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Harper Perennial.
Wiener, Nobert. 1948. Cybernetics. Scientific American 179 (5): 14–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mathai, A., Jose, J. (2022). Beyond the Binary: A Study on Distorting “Gender” Within a Cybernetic System. In: Mahajan, V., Chowdhury, A., Kaushal, U., Jariwala, N., Bong, S.A. (eds) Gender Equity: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0460-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0460-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0459-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0460-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)