Skip to main content

Beyond the Binary: A Study on Distorting “Gender” Within a Cybernetic System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gender Equity: Challenges and Opportunities
  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of gender, being a cultural construct, has always been problematic in limiting or curbing individual identities, interests and roles and ‘misrepresenting’ them in imposing binaries; and the privileging of men over other genders cause overpowering physical–psychological dominations every time. Evolution, throughout the years which has been biologically rooted, is an act of nature. The human species might, now, just involve co-evolution with science and technology by constant attempts to push beyond nature-imposed limits and to incorporate technology extensively. Speculations done by scholars and futurists claim that by the mid-twenty-first-century humans will undergo genetic mutation by increased “user-friendly” technological interferences, which can be a boon or a bane and they themselves acknowledge that it is inevitable. Cyborgs and cybernetic systems, right from their outset, seem to have disregarded and dismissed the rigid boundaries and distinctions that existed between “humans” and “animal” and “humans” and “machine”. However, considering gender as an arbitrary and unnecessary limitation on human potential while the applications of neuro-biotechnologies, modern advancements and cybernetic systems seem to incorporate the same, which promotes a gender-neutral environment and eliminates the ‘superiority’ of any gender and works towards a postgender society. In addition, cyborg theory also distorts and configures “language” itself, which has forever been dominated by a phallocentric view and has further intensified distinctions. The paper, thus, not only delineates the oppression and impediments posed by “gender”, but also depicts how the “binaries” of the same are eradicated in a postgender and cybernetic information age.

Humans have been deeply circumscribed and determined by our accidental binary gender assignments. (Geary [3]; Ridley [10])

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, Alison. 1998. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clynes, Manfred E., and Nathan S. Kline. 1960. Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics. web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Documents/Chapter1/cyborgs.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geary, David C. 2006. Male, Female: The Evolution of Sex Differences. American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halberstam, Judith. 1991. Automating Gender: Postmodern Feminism in the Age of the Intelligent Machine. Feminist Studies 17 (3): 439–460. Accessed November 15, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/3178281.

  5. Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1985. Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1998. How Like a Leaf. Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hodge, James J. 2014. Gifts of Ubiquity. Film Criticism 39 (2): 53–78. Accessed November 15. www.jstor.org/stable/24777947.

  9. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ridley, Matt. 2003. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wiener, Nobert. 1948. Cybernetics. Scientific American 179 (5): 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mathai, A., Jose, J. (2022). Beyond the Binary: A Study on Distorting “Gender” Within a Cybernetic System. In: Mahajan, V., Chowdhury, A., Kaushal, U., Jariwala, N., Bong, S.A. (eds) Gender Equity: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0460-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics