Skip to main content

Negotiating Rights for Street Vendors: The Importance of Incorporating a Gender Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

The role of the government is essential in securing both the right to livelihood and the right to safety. Women’s safety in public places increases when streets are occupied by women—whether they be women commuters, women idling and passing time or women street vendors. Drawing from Shirin Rai’s argument that a multiplicity of strategies of struggle are needed to use state fractions for advancing women’s rights, this paper will argue for linking the right to safety of women in public places with the rights of street hawkers to earn a livelihood. The safety of women increases with a vibrant street life. The rights of male and female street vendors should not be seen in isolation from the rights of women to use safe public places. Therefore, the process of negotiating rights to use public spaces for livelihood needs to be linked with eradicating violence against women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rai (1995), based on a case study of 40 Gujarati women street vendors protecting their right to trade on a pavement in Delhi, argues in favour of a strategy that is both in and against the state.

References

Judgments

  • Almitra Patel vs. Union of India. (2000). 2 SCC 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharam Chand vs. NDMC and Ors. (2015). 10 SCC 612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and Anr vs. Municipal Corporation, Greater Mumbai and Ors AIR (2004) SC 416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) SCC 3 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodan Singh vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee and Others (1989) 4 SCC 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyapari Kalyan Mandal Main Pushpa vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (High Court of Delhi, 3rd July 2017). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/70463837/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, G. (2022). Negotiating Rights for Street Vendors: The Importance of Incorporating a Gender Perspective. In: Patel, V., Mondal, N. (eds) Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9973-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9974-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics