Abstract
The role of the government is essential in securing both the right to livelihood and the right to safety. Women’s safety in public places increases when streets are occupied by women—whether they be women commuters, women idling and passing time or women street vendors. Drawing from Shirin Rai’s argument that a multiplicity of strategies of struggle are needed to use state fractions for advancing women’s rights, this paper will argue for linking the right to safety of women in public places with the rights of street hawkers to earn a livelihood. The safety of women increases with a vibrant street life. The rights of male and female street vendors should not be seen in isolation from the rights of women to use safe public places. Therefore, the process of negotiating rights to use public spaces for livelihood needs to be linked with eradicating violence against women.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Rai (1995), based on a case study of 40 Gujarati women street vendors protecting their right to trade on a pavement in Delhi, argues in favour of a strategy that is both in and against the state.
References
Jagori and UN Women. (2011). Safe Cities Free of Violence against Women and Girls Initiative: Report of the Baseline Survey Delhi 2010. http://www.jagori.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Baseline-Survey_layout_for-Print_12_03_2011.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2022.
Mody, Z. (2013). Home on the range: The emergence of ‘second generation rights’ like housing. In 10 Judgments that Changed India” India: Penguin Random House.
National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India. (2019). Statistics. https://ncrb.gov.in/en/crime-india-2019-0 Accessed 3 May 2021.
National Association of Street Vendors of India (NASVI). https://nasvinet.org/.
PRS Legislative Research. (2013). Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law. https://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Justice%20verma%20committee/js%20verma%20committe%20report.pdf (“Justice Verma Committee Report”). Accessed 3 May 2021.
Rai, S. (1995). Women Negotiating boundaries: Gender, law and the Indian state. Social Legal Studies, 4.
Roever and Skinner. (2016). “Street Vendors and Cities” International Institute for Environment and Development. https://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Roever-Skinner-streetvendors-cities-2016.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2021.
Sharma and Konwar. (2014). Struggles for space: Everyday life of a woman street vendor in Delhi. The Delhi University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 54.
Judgments
Almitra Patel vs. Union of India. (2000). 2 SCC 166.
Dharam Chand vs. NDMC and Ors. (2015). 10 SCC 612.
Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and Anr vs. Municipal Corporation, Greater Mumbai and Ors AIR (2004) SC 416.
Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) SCC 3 545.
Sodan Singh vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee and Others (1989) 4 SCC 155.
Vyapari Kalyan Mandal Main Pushpa vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (High Court of Delhi, 3rd July 2017). https://indiankanoon.org/doc/70463837/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, G. (2022). Negotiating Rights for Street Vendors: The Importance of Incorporating a Gender Perspective. In: Patel, V., Mondal, N. (eds) Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9973-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9974-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)