Abstract
Commercial surrogacy in India is currently practised amidst an ambiguous, uncertain legal landscape (Kotiswaran, Indian Law Review 5(1)85–105, 2020). While some scholars argue that commercial surrogacy must be understood as informal labour (Saravanan, A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India, 2018), some others have argued that it replicates colonial labour relations (Vora, 2015). Some others have also called for a ban on commercial surrogacy, citing either unchecked commodification of women’s bodies (Rao, Economic and Political Weekly 47(21):15–17 2012), or that it would reduce women to a ‘breeder class’ (Raymond, The Hastings Center Report 20:7–11, 1990). The state argues that commercial surrogacy must only be altruistic in nature, to protect women against trafficking or exploitation. Arguing against the logic of altruism which produces the false dichotomy of selfless surrogates versus ‘baby brothels’, the paper locates surrogacy within a framing of paid and unpaid labour relations. The paper begins by looking at how relations of altruism either seek to devalue women’s reproductive labour as work or maligns it through moralising comparisons to baby selling and womb-renting. Through this critique of altruism, the paper will draw from ethnographic findings to look at the ways in which surrogate mothers position their own labour—at the intersections of familial and financial obligations—to articulate their own roles within the process of commercial surrogacy. The latter part of the essay then looks at structural inequalities that constrain and enforce these labour practices, to understand how gendered, racial and casteist divisions of labour limit women’s access to safe and equitable opportunities for employment and work. Through the lens of paid and unpaid forms of work, the paper hopes to able to shed light on the indeterminacies between public and private, ‘free’ and coerced forms of labour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Select Committee, Rajya Sabha, Report on The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019, para 4.8, p. 22.
- 2.
Select Committee, Rajya Sabha, Report on The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019, para 4.11, p. 23.
References
Ahluwalia, S. (2008). Reproductive Restraints: Birth Control in India, 1877–1947. University of Illinois Press.
Banerjee, S., & Kotiswaran, P. (2020). Divine labours, devalued work: The continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation. Indian Law Review, 5(1), 85–105.
Colen, S. (1995). ‘Like a mother to them’: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In F. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction (pp. 78–108). University of California Press.
Corea, G.(1985). The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. Harper & Row.
Deomampo, D. (2013a). gendered geographies of reproductive tourism. Gender and Society, 27(4), 514–537.
Deomampo, D. (2013b). Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 167–188.
Federici, S. (2019). Social reproduction theory: History, issues and present challenges. Radical Philosophy (blog), RP 2.04 (Spring).
Foucault, M. (2003). “Society Must be Defended” Lecture Series at the Collège de France, 1975–76.
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. University of California Press.
Gopal, M. (2013). Ruptures and reproduction in caste/gender/labour. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(18), 91–97.
Gopal, M. (2012). Caste, sexuality and labour: The troubled connection. Current Sociology, 60(2), 222–238.
Grover, S. (2011). ‘Purani aur nai shaadi’: Separation, divorce, and remarriage in the lives of the urban poor in New Delhi. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(1), 67–99.
Hochshild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Hochschild, A., & Ehrenreich, B. (2004). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Henry Holt and Company.
Jeffreys, S. (2008). The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade. London: Routledge.
Kahn Martha, S. (2000). Reproducing jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Duke University Press.
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.
Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 381–404.
Majumdar, 2018.Majumdar, A. (2018). Conceptualizing surrogacy as work-labour. Journal of South Asian Development, 097317411877848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174118778481.
Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press.
Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A critique of political economy. Vintage Books.
Mies, M. (1998). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. Zed Books Ltd.
Nussbaum, M. (1998). “whether from reason or prejudice”: Taking money for bodily services. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1086/468040
Pande, A. (2009). Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’: Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2), 141–173.
Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs, 35(4), 969–992.
Pande, A. (2011). Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: Gifts for global sisters? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23(5), 618–625.
Ragoné, H. (1996). Chasing the blood Tie: Surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and fathers. American Ethnologist, 23(2), 352–365.
Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception In the heart. Routledge.
Rajan, R. S. (2011). The prostitution question(s): Female agency, sexuality and work’. In P. Kotiswaran (Ed.), Sex work (pp. 118–156). Women Unlimited.
Rao, M. (2012). Why all non-altruistic surrogacy should be banned. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(21), 15–17.
Rao, M. (2020). Dalit feminist voices on reproductive rights and reproductive justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(40).
Raymond, J. (1990). Reproductive gifts and gift giving: The altruistic woman. The Hastings Center Report, 20(6), 7–11.
Roberts, D. (2009). Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? Signs, 34(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1086/597132
Roberts, D. (1998). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. Vintage.
Rudrappa, S., & Collins, C. (2015). Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers: Moral framing of transnational surrogacy. Gender and Society, 29(6), 937–959.
Shah, S. P. (2014). Street corner secrets: Sex, work, and migration in the city of Mumbai. Duke University Press.
Sharmila Rege. (1998). Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‘Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.
Sangari, K. (2015). Solid: Liquid: A (Trans)National Reproductive Formation. Tulika Books.
Saravanan, S. (2018). A transnational feminist view of surrogacy Biomarkets in India. Springer.
Sassen, S. (2005). The global city: Introducing a concept. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43.
Sewell, C. (2013). Mammies and matriarchs: tracing images of the black female in popular culture 1950s to present. Journal of African American Studies, 17(3), 308–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandran, A. (2022). Gender, Labour and the Social Reproduction of Motherhood: A Study of Commercial Surrogacy in Mumbai. In: Patel, V., Mondal, N. (eds) Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9973-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9974-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)