Skip to main content

Gender, Labour and the Social Reproduction of Motherhood: A Study of Commercial Surrogacy in Mumbai

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India
  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

Commercial surrogacy in India is currently practised amidst an ambiguous, uncertain legal landscape (Kotiswaran, Indian Law Review 5(1)85–105, 2020). While some scholars argue that commercial surrogacy must be understood as informal labour (Saravanan, A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India, 2018), some others have argued that it replicates colonial labour relations (Vora, 2015). Some others have also called for a ban on commercial surrogacy, citing either unchecked commodification of women’s bodies (Rao, Economic and Political Weekly 47(21):15–17 2012), or that it would reduce women to a ‘breeder class’ (Raymond, The Hastings Center Report 20:7–11, 1990). The state argues that commercial surrogacy must only be altruistic in nature, to protect women against trafficking or exploitation. Arguing against the logic of altruism which produces the false dichotomy of selfless surrogates versus ‘baby brothels’, the paper locates surrogacy within a framing of paid and unpaid labour relations. The paper begins by looking at how relations of altruism either seek to devalue women’s reproductive labour as work or maligns it through moralising comparisons to baby selling and womb-renting. Through this critique of altruism, the paper will draw from ethnographic findings to look at the ways in which surrogate mothers position their own labour—at the intersections of familial and financial obligations—to articulate their own roles within the process of commercial surrogacy. The latter part of the essay then looks at structural inequalities that constrain and enforce these labour practices, to understand how gendered, racial and casteist divisions of labour limit women’s access to safe and equitable opportunities for employment and work. Through the lens of paid and unpaid forms of work, the paper hopes to able to shed light on the indeterminacies between public and private, ‘free’ and coerced forms of labour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Select Committee, Rajya Sabha, Report on The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019, para 4.8, p. 22.

  2. 2.

    Select Committee, Rajya Sabha, Report on The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019, para 4.11, p. 23.

References

  • Ahluwalia, S. (2008). Reproductive Restraints: Birth Control in India, 1877–1947. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & Kotiswaran, P. (2020). Divine labours, devalued work: The continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation. Indian Law Review, 5(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colen, S. (1995). ‘Like a mother to them’: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In F. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction (pp. 78–108). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corea, G.(1985). The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deomampo, D. (2013a). gendered geographies of reproductive tourism. Gender and Society, 27(4), 514–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deomampo, D. (2013b). Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2019). Social reproduction theory: History, issues and present challenges. Radical Philosophy (blog), RP 2.04 (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). “Society Must be Defended” Lecture Series at the Collège de France, 1975–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, M. (2013). Ruptures and reproduction in caste/gender/labour. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(18), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, M. (2012). Caste, sexuality and labour: The troubled connection. Current Sociology, 60(2), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. (2011). ‘Purani aur nai shaadi’: Separation, divorce, and remarriage in the lives of the urban poor in New Delhi. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(1), 67–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochshild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A., & Ehrenreich, B. (2004). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2008). The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn Martha, S. (2000). Reproducing jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, 2018.Majumdar, A. (2018). Conceptualizing surrogacy as work-labour. Journal of South Asian Development, 097317411877848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174118778481.

  • Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1977). Capital: A critique of political economy. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1998). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. Zed Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1998). “whether from reason or prejudice”: Taking money for bodily services. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1086/468040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2009). Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’: Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2), 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs, 35(4), 969–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2011). Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: Gifts for global sisters? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23(5), 618–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragoné, H. (1996). Chasing the blood Tie: Surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and fathers. American Ethnologist, 23(2), 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragone, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception In the heart. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. S. (2011). The prostitution question(s): Female agency, sexuality and work’. In P. Kotiswaran (Ed.), Sex work (pp. 118–156). Women Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, M. (2012). Why all non-altruistic surrogacy should be banned. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(21), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, M. (2020). Dalit feminist voices on reproductive rights and reproductive justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. (1990). Reproductive gifts and gift giving: The altruistic woman. The Hastings Center Report, 20(6), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2009). Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? Signs, 34(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1086/597132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1998). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudrappa, S., & Collins, C. (2015). Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers: Moral framing of transnational surrogacy. Gender and Society, 29(6), 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. P. (2014). Street corner secrets: Sex, work, and migration in the city of Mumbai. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharmila Rege. (1998). Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‘Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangari, K. (2015). Solid: Liquid: A (Trans)National Reproductive Formation. Tulika Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan, S. (2018). A transnational feminist view of surrogacy Biomarkets in India. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2005). The global city: Introducing a concept. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, C. (2013). Mammies and matriarchs: tracing images of the black female in popular culture 1950s to present. Journal of African American Studies, 17(3), 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chandran, A. (2022). Gender, Labour and the Social Reproduction of Motherhood: A Study of Commercial Surrogacy in Mumbai. In: Patel, V., Mondal, N. (eds) Gendered Inequalities in Paid and Unpaid Work of Women in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9973-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9974-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics