Skip to main content

Examining Pedagogical Approaches in Developing Employability Skills in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart and Sustainable Technology for Resilient Cities and Communities

Part of the book series: Advances in Sustainability Science and Technology ((ASST))

Abstract

The construction industry today and its employers are gradually coming to terms with the fact that its activities and processes require fully equipped graduates who are furnished with the right skills to succeed after graduation. However, with the continuously evolving nature of the industry coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic, the pressure on higher education to review and revamp its existing curricula has intensified in recent times. The process of developing employability skills among students can be reflected in the pedagogical approaches employed by institutions of higher learning. This research aims to determine the various pedagogical approaches that can be employed by institutions of higher learning to develop employability skills among built-environment students as the world grapples with the after-effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative Delphi approach was adopted to validate these approaches. Fourteen experts completed a two-stage iterative Delphi study process and reached a consensus on all 16 approaches identified. This study found that multidisciplinary teaching approaches, work-integrated learning, and placement opportunities are the most significant approaches in developing employability skills among students. It is recommended that universities across South Africa and beyond continue to ensure the inclusion of these approaches into their existing curricula to not only produce graduates who are academically sound but also produce graduates who will fit easily into the ‘new normal’ prompted by both the COVID-19 pandemic and the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler M, Ziglio E (1996) Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlgren DJ, Verner IM (2013) Socially responsible engineering education through assistive robotics projects: the robowaiter competition. Int J Soc Robot 5(1):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aigbavboa CO (2014) An integrated beneficiary centred satisfaction model for publicly funded housing schemes in South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aigbavboa CO, Aghimien DO, Thwala WD, Ngozwana MN (2021) Unprepared industry meet pandemic: COVID-19 and the South Africa construction industry. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al Hassan IBM (2012) Multidisciplinary curriculum to teaching English language in Sudanese institutions (a case study). Theory Practice Lang Stud 2(2):402

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander RJ (2001) Culture and pedagogy: international comparisons in primary education. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 391–528

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aliu J, Aigbavboa C (2021) Reviewing problem-solving as a key employability skill for built environment graduates. Collaboration and integration in construction, engineering, management and technology. Springer, Cham, pp 399–403

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Aliu J, Aigbavboa C, Oke A (2021) Examining undergraduate courses relevant to the built environment in the 4IR era: a Delphi study approach. Emerging research in sustainable energy and buildings for a low-carbon future. Springer, Singapore, pp 195–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Aliu J, Aigbavboa C, Thwala W (2021) A 21st century employability skills improvement framework for the construction industry. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Aliu J, Aigbavboa C (2021a) Key generic skills for employability of built environment graduates. Int J Constr Manag 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aliu J, Aigbavboa CO (2019) Employers’ perception of employability skills among built-environment graduates. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aliu J, Aigbavboa CO (2020) Structural determinants of graduate employability: impact of university and industry collaborations. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alviento S (2018) Effectiveness of the performance of the student government of North Luzon Philippines State College. Res Pedagogy 8(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anaman KA, Osei-Amponsah C (2007) Analysis of the causality links between the growth of the construction industry and the growth of the macro-economy in Ghana. Constr Manag Econ 25(9):951–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arowoiya VA, Oke AE, Aigbavboa CO, Aliu J (2020) An appraisal of the adoption internet of things (IoT) elements for sustainable construction. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ayarkwa J, Adinyira E, Osei‐Asibey D (2012) Industrial training of construction students: perceptions of training organizations in Ghana. Education+ Training

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bailey R, Hillman C, Arent S, Petitpas A (2013) Physical activity: an underestimated investment in human capital? J Phys Act Health 10(3):289–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartkus KR, Nemelka B, Nemelka M, Gardner P (2012) Clarifying the meaning of extra-curricular activity: a literature review of definitions. Am J Bus Educ 5(6):693–704

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bell S (2010) Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. Clearing House 83(2):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein B (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique, vol 5. Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharjee S, Ghosh S (2013) Usefulness of role-playing teaching in construction education: a systematic review. In: 49th ASC annual international conference, San Luis Obispo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cao J, Thomas D (2013) When developing a career path, what are the key elements to include?

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clanchy K, Sabapathy S, Reddan G, Reeves N, Bialocerkowski A (2019) Integrating a career development learning framework into work-integrated learning practicum debrief sessions. Augmenting health and social care students’ clinical learning experiences. Springer, Cham, pp 307–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Creed PA, French J, Hood M (2015) Working while studying at university: the relationship between work benefits and demands and engagement and well-being. J Vocat Behav 86:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2017) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Doyle DE (2012) Developing occupational programs: a case study of community colleges. J Technol Stud 38(1):53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dustmann C, Van Soest A (2008) Part-time work, school success and school leaving. In: The economics of education and training, pp 23–45. Physica-Verlag HD

    Google Scholar 

  28. Green RA (2014) The Delphi technique in educational research. SAGE Open 4(2):2158244014529773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hall M, Lasby D, Ayer S, Davis WG (2009) Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: highlights from the 2007 Canada survey of giving, volunteering and participating. Minister of Industry, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA (2010) Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J Constr Eng Manag 136(1):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 32(4):1008–1015

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holey EA, Feeley JL, Dixon J, Whittaker VJ (2007) An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 7(52):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Impey C (2020) Coronavirus: social distancing is delaying vital scientific research. The Conversation [Internet]

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kinash S, Crane L, Judd MM, Knight C (2016) Discrepant stakeholder perspectives on graduate employability strategies. High Educ Res Dev 35(5):951–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kinash S, Crane L, Knight C, Dowling D, Mitchell K, McLean M, Schulz M (2014) Global graduate employability research: a report to the Business20 human capital taskforce (draft)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kuijpers MACT, Scheerens J (2006) Career competencies for the modern career. J Career Dev 32(4):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Landrum RE (2015) Career development courses: preparing psychology majors for the workplace

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lavy S, Naama-Ghanayim E (2020) Why care about caring? Linking teachers’ caring and sense of meaning at work with students’ self-esteem, well-being, and school engagement. Teach Teach Educ 91:103046

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leung L (2016) Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. J Fam Med Prim Care 4(3):324 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Levesque LL, O’Neill RM, Nelson T, Dumas C (2005) Sex differences in the perceived importance of mentoring functions. Career Dev Int 10(6/7):429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. MacCallum J, Casey SC (2017) Enhancing skills development and reflective practise in students during their programme of study. New Dir Teach Phys Sci (12)

    Google Scholar 

  42. McIntyre D, Hagger H (2018) Mentoring: challenges for the future. In: Mentors in Schools (1996), pp 144–164. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  43. Osunsanmi TO, Aigbavboa CO, Thwala WDD, Molusiwa R (2021) Modelling construction 4.0 as a vaccine for ensuring construction supply chain resilience amid COVID-19 pandemic. J Eng Des Technol

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oyedotun TD (2020) Sudden change of pedagogy in education driven by COVID-19: perspectives and evaluation from a developing country. Res Globalization 2:100029

    Google Scholar 

  45. Parker J (2018) Undergraduate research, learning gain and equity: the impact of final year research projects. High Educ Pedagogies 3(1):145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Parker EA, Myers N, Higgins HC, Oddsson T, Price M, Gould T (2009) More than experiential learning or volunteering: a case study of community service learning within the Australian context. High Educ Res Dev 28(6):585–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Qing XU (2011) Role-play-an effective approach to developing overall communicative competence. Cross-Cultural Commun 7(4):36–39

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rayens MK, Hahn EJ (2000) Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 1(2):308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rogers MR, Lopez EC (2002) Identifying critical cross-cultural school psychology competencies. J Sch Psychol 40(2):115–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ryder J (2004) What can students learn from final year research projects? Biosci Educ 4(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shaw K, Holbrook A, Bourke S (2013) Student experience of final-year undergraduate research projects: an exploration of ‘research preparedness.’ Stud High Educ 38(5):711–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Talley NL (2018) Soft skill development for generation Z: through strengths based approach to internships. Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Telford RD, Cunningham RB, Fitzgerald R, Olive LS, Prosser L, Jiang X, Telford RM (2012) Physical education, obesity, and academic achievement: a 2-year longitudinal investigation of Australian elementary school children. Am J Public Health 102(2):368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thoonen EE, Sleegers PJ, Oort FJ, Peetsma TT, Geijsel FP (2011) How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educ Adm Q 47(3):496–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Watkins C, Mortimore P (1999) Pedagogy: What do we know. In: Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  56. Westbrook J, Durrani N, Brown R, Orr D, Pryor J, Boddy J (2014) Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practice & teacher education in developing countries. A rigorous literature review

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yousuf MI (2007) Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(1):4

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aliu, J., Aigbavboa, C. (2022). Examining Pedagogical Approaches in Developing Employability Skills in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C., Littlewood, J.R., Balas, M.M. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Technology for Resilient Cities and Communities. Advances in Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9101-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics