Skip to main content

Manchu Archery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chinese Archery Studies

Part of the book series: Martial Studies ((MS,volume 1))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the archery tradition of the Qing dynasty, the last major phase of military archery traditions in China which lasted from 1636 to 1912. Founded and ruled by the Manchus, the Qing was the last empire to still use bows and arrows on a large scale, up until the early nineteenth century, to great effect. It will address obvious questions that arise, among others, why they adhered to archery for warfare for so long, and how they managed to frequently come out victorious against modern weapons. The Manchu bow is a very distinctive bow with some advantages and also some obvious shortcomings. By looking at the cultural background of the people that would later become the Manchus, this paper attempts to shed light on exactly why the bow was designed the way it was. As it turns out, the bow probably originated among groups of hunters in Manchuria who were primarily known for their prowess in hunting big game. Much of their experience could be directly applied in warfare, and so we see the application of hunting tactics combined with the use of very large arrows that would also have been used for hunting big game. This method of warfare relied on swift horsemanship and a high level of accuracy with very heavy bows. The slow-firing muskets were initially no match for the well-honed Manchu military machine that relied on horseback archery, so the Qing did not see any reason to modernize until the nineteenth century when breech-loading firearms finally made this method of warfare, which had lasted for millennia, obsolete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    As shown by a 1736 inspection report by Fusen, who was the Garrison General at Hangzhou at the time. See Mark C. Elliott, The Manchu Way (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001), 442.

  2. 2.

    Both Mark C. Elliott, op. cit., and Pamela Kyle Crossley’s Orphan Warriors have made a good case, through first-hand examples, against the theory of full Sinicization.

  3. 3.

    The ring-hunt and the use of its tactics and formations in warfare were not exclusive to the Manchus but were noted among many central Asian peoples over several millennia. See Thomas T. Allsen, The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History for an excellent survey of this phenomenon.

  4. 4.

    See the chapter “My Service in the Army” by Dzengseo in Nicola Di Cosmo’s The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-century China. See among others his account of March 21, 1681, p. 63. Also see an account of the Battle of Sarhū in Fresco Sam-Sin, ed., Debtelin 2 (Den Haag: Manchu Foundation Publishing, 2018), 132–170.

  5. 5.

    For the emperor Qianlong’s hunting exploits, see Elliott 2009.

  6. 6.

    Guinness World Records, “Heaviest longbow draw weight,” achieved by Mark Stretton on 15 Aug. 2004 in the UK. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/heaviest-longbow-draw-weight/

  7. 7.

    See Xu 2008 for a good overview of bows and arrows produced in the imperial workshops during this period.

  8. 8.

    Such formations can be found on the battle paintings produced by artists in imperial service to commemorate these events as well as in eye-witness reports like Dzengseo’s diary.

  9. 9.

    Contrary to the popular belief that the Mongolian archery tradition was ended by Manchu regulation, it seems that the Mongols themselves gave up the bow in favor of firearms which became available to them through trade. See among others Peter Perdue, China Marches West (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2010).

  10. 10.

    Edict from the Qianlong emperor, 15th year. “Qing Gaozong shilu” [Records of the Qing Gaozong emperor Qianlong], in Qing shilu [Veritable records of the Qing dynasty] (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1986). See also “Solon Archery Tradition” in this volume.

  11. 11.

    See an account of the Battle of Sarhū in Sam-Sin 2018, 132–170.

  12. 12.

    A similar trend can be seen in the design of official ranking badges that started to incorporate more and more auspicious designs over the same period of time. See Hugus 2000.

  13. 13.

    Most design changes incorporating clouds dated from his 13th reign year, corresponding to 1748.

  14. 14.

    The Kangxi emperor’s bow is published in Xu 2008. The Shenyang bow was on display in the Shenyang Palace Museum. The example in the Metropolitan Museum, dating from the nineteenth century, remains unpublished. It was bequeathed to the museum in 1936 by well-known collector George Cameron Stone.

  15. 15.

    The longest I have ever seen was 60 cm, on an arrow that was about 100 cm in length. This was at a shop in Beijing in 2005. I still regret not buying it on the spot.

  16. 16.

    See Huangchao liqi tushi [Illustrated regulations on the ceremonial paraphernalia of the dynasty] for an excellent period list of arrows, their sizes, materials, and intended use.

  17. 17.

    The Kangxi emperor wrote in his memoirs about enjoying shooting fish from the stern of a fast-moving sailing boat.

  18. 18.

    References of high draw weights are ubiquitous in the literature can among others be found in Hommel 1937, 127; Elliott 2001, 179–180; Mason 1988, 132. Averaging at 70–100 pounds, 130 pounds was the minimum for participation of the imperial hunts. A particularly strong archer once won a national archery competition among the 100 best archers with a 240-pound bow during the early eighteenth century.

  19. 19.

    For Liu Qi, see Selby 2000. For a complete translation of Qanggiyūn, see Sam-Sin, 2018.

  20. 20.

    Justin Ma is co-author, with Jia Tian of the Way of Archery, an annotated translation of a Ming dynasty book on archery by Gao Ying.

  21. 21.

    See Ma and Tian 2015 for a very good explanation of this basic style.

References

  • Allsen, Thomas Theodore. 2006. The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 1990. Orphan Warriors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, Pamela Kyle 1997. The Manchus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cosmo, Nicola. 2006. The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-century China. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvernay, Thomas. 2007. Korean Traditional Archery. Pohang: Handong Global University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Mark C. 2009. Emperor Qianlong: Son of Heaven, Man of the World. London & New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Mark C. 2001. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinness World Records. “Heaviest longbow draw weight.” Achieved by Mark Stretton on 15 August 2004 in the United Kingdom. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/heaviest-longbow-draw-weight/

  • Hommel, Rudolf. 1937. China at Work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugus, David. 2000. Ladder to the Clouds. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowicz, Adam. 2008. Ottoman Turkish Bows. Self-published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Justin, and Tian Jie. 2015. Way of Archery. Atglen, PA: Schiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, George Henry. 1988. Views of Eighteenth Century China: Costumes, History, Customs. Reprint. London: Studio Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, W.F. “A bow from the Far East.” Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries 9 (1966): 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, Peter. 2010. China Marches West. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Qing Gaozong shilu” 清高宗實錄 [Records of the Qing Gaozong emperor Qianlong]. 1986. In Qing shilu 清實錄 [Veritable records of the Qing dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju 中華書局.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Qing Taizu Gao Huangdi shilu” 清太祖高皇帝實錄 [Records of the Qing Taizu Gao emperor Nurhaci]. 1986. In Qing shilu 清實錄 [Veritable records of the Qing dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju 中華書局.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam-Sin, Fresco, and Peter Dekker, eds. 2018. Debtelin 2. Den Haag: Manchu Foundation Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, Stephen. 2000. Chinese Archery. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sir George Thomas Staunton. 1821. Narrative of the Chinese Embassy to the Khan of the Tourgouth Tartars, in the Years 1712, 13, 14, and 15. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Jonathan. 1974. Emperor of China, Self-portrait of K’ang-Hsi. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, George Cameron. 1934. Glossary of the Construction, Decoration, and Use of Arms and Armor in All Countries and in All Times. New York: Jack Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swope, Kenneth. 2014. The Military Collapse of China's Ming Dynasty, 1618–44. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T’an Tan-Chiung. 1981. “Investigative Report on Bow and Arrow Manufacture in Chengtu.” In Soochow University of Chinese Art History Vol. XI, translated by the Society of Archer Antiquaries, 143–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Jing-shen. 1977. The Jurchen in Twelfth-century China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, Ulrich. 2013. War Finance and Logistics in the Late Imperial China, a Study of the Second Jinchuan Campaign (1771–1776). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Qixian. 2008. “Armaments and Military Provisions.” In The Complete Collection of the Treasures of the Palace Museum, volume 56. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun Lu, ed. 1766. Huangchao liqi tushi 皇朝禮器圖式 [Illustrated regulations on the ceremonial paraphernalia of the dynasty]. Woodblock Edition in 1766. n.p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Dekker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dekker, P. (2023). Manchu Archery. In: Chao, H., Ma, L., Kim, L. (eds) Chinese Archery Studies. Martial Studies, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8321-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics