Abstract
Recently, a significant portion of the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases has become treatable with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). UBE surgery shows a more magnified view compared to a microscope and has a clear-bloodless surgical field and unrestricted use of conventional surgical instruments. Far-out syndrome (FOS) is one type of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) and is featured by the hypertrophy of L5 transverse process and sacral ala. Therefore, the exiting L5 nerve root is compressed and the patient complains of severe radiating leg pain and tingling sensation. This chapter introduces the detailed technique of far-out syndrome decompression using UBE. We hope that surgeon will learn this technique and treat the far-out syndrome sufficiently.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Far-out syndrome (FOS) is one type of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). LSTV is a various anatomical variant of lumbosacral junctional area. There are four types of LSTV [1, 2]. Among them, type 2 shows the pseudo-articulation between L5 transverse process and sacral ala, and in addition, the foraminal height is decreased than normal structure. Therefore, FOS is defined as the compression of L5 nerve root in the far-out area by the pseudo-articulation of the L5 transverse process and the sacral ala (Fig. 11.1). The gold standard treatment of FOS is a conventional microscopic decompression surgery or lumbar fusion surgery [3,4,5,6]. However, due to the development of endoscopic surgery system, we can treat this lesion sufficiently using unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique. Basically, this surgical approach is the same as the Wiltse approach that contains enough decompression far laterally [7].
2 Indications and Contraindications
Indication and contraindication are very similar with conventional microscopic decompression surgery. The FOS lesion combined with foraminal stenosis at L5/S1 level and the recurrent FOS can also be treated by this technique. However, grade 2 or higher spondylolisthesis and segmental instability are contraindicated in this technique.
3 Special Instruments
Zero-degree endoscope is most commonly used in UBE surgery. Radiofrequency (Arthrocare®) probe is essential to control intraoperative bleeding. The arthroscopic drill system with saline drain portal and high-speed electrical drill is commonly used to drill out the bony structure (Fig. 11.2). The scope-retractor is also useful in preventing nerve root damage. The curved Kerrison punch is very useful to decompress the foraminal lesion. All conventional surgical instruments are available in this technique (Fig. 11.3).
4 Anesthesia and Position
Both endotracheal general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia are available in this surgery. The authors prefer epidural anesthesia because it is a less invasive procedure and less loading on cardio-pulmonary function than general anesthesia. The patient is always placed on a Wilson frame in the prone position. In addition, less lumbar lordosis using elevation of Wilson frame can make the operation comfortable because this induces the widening of foraminal area and it also reduces the intra-abdominal pressure. In addition, the compression stockings prevent thrombosis in the lower extremities during the surgery. The Foley catheter is usually inserted to check the perioperative urine output (Fig. 11.4).
5 Surgical Steps
-
1.
Identify the location of two portals and make portals (left side approach) ( Fig. 11.5 )
Setting the true anteroposterior (A-P) image under fluoroscopic guidance is the first step for this surgery. Especially, the L5-S1 level has the most lordotic angle, it is very important to apply the fluoroscopic device a cranial angle to get the accurate A-P image (Fig. 11.6). The UBE surgery utilizes two portals, one is an endoscopic portal for endoscope and the other is an instrumental portal for surgical instruments. We describe the surgical steps as the point of view of the left side approach. First, we identify the L5 and S1 pedicles and disc space, and also the lateral margin of vertebral body on A-P view. The skin incision is made 1–2 cm laterally to the lateral margin of vertebral body. This location will be more lateral than UBE paraspinal approach. Because, the target of paraspinal approach is the facet joint or isthmus, on the contrary, the target of FOS surgery is pseudo-articulation of transverse process (TP) - sacral ala. The instrumental portal is made 1 cm below the intervertebral foramen level and the endoscopic portal is made 1 cm above this level. Usually, the distance of two portals is about 2–2.5 cm and the size of incision is about 1 cm. We always make instrumental portal firstly and it is very important that the incision should penetrate the fascial layer to maintain the continuous outflow of the irrigation saline during the surgery. After incision, serial dilators are inserted sequentially. At this point, the landing point of first dilator is very important. The aim of FOS decompression surgery is removal of the pseudo-articulation of TP and sacral ala, the dilator should touch the sacral ala or sacral notch initially where the interspace of superior articular process (SAP) of S1 and sacral ala (Fig. 11.7). After finishing the instrumental portal making, the endoscopic portal is made in the same manner. The first dilator inserted in endoscopic portal should also touch the sacral ala or sacra notch. The triangulation of two portals is a cornerstone of this technique (Fig. 11.8).
-
2.
Making initial working space
To obtain good initial operative visualization, the meticulous dissection and detachment of muscular ending and soft tissue around the surface of sacral alar or sacral notch are essential. The initial working space of FOS decompression surgery is the inter-space filled with irrigation saline between the surface of bony structure and soft tissue. This space is very narrow, but we can gradually obtain wider space by ablating or coagulating the soft tissue using RF device. The stage of initial working space is finished until clearly identifying the bony surface of SAP lateral aspect, sacral alar, and lower border of TP. The triangle zone of these three structures is a true working space. In addition, we can also easily identify the lateral aspect of isthmus and sacral notch (Fig. 11.9).
-
3.
Removal of bony structures and soft tissue
After full exposure of these bony structures, we usually start the drilling to sacral alar, lateral aspect of SAP, and inferior border of TP. The exposure of cancellous bone sometimes induces severe bony bleeding and this can be controlled by bone wax or RF probe. When drilling out in the lateral direction of TP and alar, pseudo-articulation is observed. This lesion should be removed as laterally as possible, because the exiting nerve root runs under this pseudo-articulation (Fig. 11.10a). Drilling to the lower portion of L5 TP and lateral aspect of SAP and alar area, combined further removal of soft tissue using RF device allow identification of the ligamentum flavum covering the exiting nerve root (Fig. 11.10b).
-
4.
Identify the exiting nerve root and alar resection
After dissecting the lower part of the TP and along the fissure of the ligament flavum, we can figure out the exiting nerve root immediately (Fig. 11.11a). Then, using a small Kerrison punch or angled curette, the ligamentum flavum can be removed easily and safely (Fig. 11.11b). Now, the foraminal portion of exiting nerve root is entirely exposed. We also identify the annulus of intervertebral disc located just below the nerve root (Fig. 11.12a). In order to completely decompress the extra-foraminal portion of exiting nerve root, the medial part of Alar as well as pseudo-articulation part must be further removed by drilling out or Kerrison punch (Fig. 11.12b).
-
5.
Finish the decompression and wound closure
In the case of severe bulging disc or disc herniation, the discectomy is also performed using pituitary forceps or Kerrison punch for fully ventral decompression of the nerve root. (Fig. 11.13a). It is also very important that clarify the ventral decompression of the nerve root to improve the prognosis after surgery. All decompression procedure is successfully completed when the root confirmed freely passes through alar and enters the abdominal cavity. In the final image, we can check the details including foraminal portion and extra-foraminal portion of exiting nerve root (Fig. 11.13b). A drain catheter is always inserted through the instrumental portal before skin closure (Fig. 11.14). After approximation of subcutaneous layer using absorbable suture material, skin stapler or a point of non-absorbable suture is applied to close the skin.
6 Illustrated Case
6.1 Case 1 (Left Side Approach, Video 11.1)
A female patient complained of severe radiating pain in the left lower extremities with L5 dermatome. This patient had undergone microscopic lumbar L4/5 decompression surgery 7 years ago at another hospital. Her symptoms have recently worsened and selective nerve block did not improve the symptoms, and she has been unable to lie down due to the pain. Preoperative MRI showed severe extra-foraminal stenosis on the left side of L5/S1, and UBE surgery was performed to relieve the pain (Fig. 11.15). The description of the surgical method is replaced by the main text of the surgical steps in this chapter. The sufficient decompression of the exiting nerve root is well observed in the postoperative MRI images and the final endoscopic image showed full decompression of nerve root from foraminal portion to extra-foraminal portion (Fig. 11.16). The patient was discharged on the fifth day after surgery without any complication.
6.2 Case 2 (Right Side Approach, Video 11.2)
A male patient complained of radiating pain and tingling sensation in the right lower extremities with L5 dermatome. He also complained of neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) on left leg, so he could not walk for more than 5 min. There was no response to the selective nerve block and the gait was very uncomfortable, so the UBE decompression surgery was performed. Preoperative MRI showed severe foraminal and extra-foraminal stenosis on the right side of L5/S1 and the exiting L5 nerve root is severely compressed (Fig. 11.17). Under the epidural anesthesia, UBE far-out decompression with right side approach was performed. After identifying the triangle zone in the initial working space, drilling out the bony structures is performed and the pseudo-articulation is well exposed (Fig. 11.18). The exiting nerve root can be identified by uncovering the yellow ligament, and the pseudo-arthosis is sufficiently removed to decompress the extra-foraminal lesion (Fig. 11.19). To decompress the ventral portion of nerve root and foraminal portion, a discectomy could be added. After full decompression along the nerve root from foraminal portion to extra-foraminal portion, the operator confirms that there are no remaining lesions, inserts a drain catheter, and can finish the surgery (Fig. 11.20). Postoperative MRI showed a completely decompression state of far-out lesion and did not show paraspinal muscle edema or hematoma (Fig. 11.21).
7 Complications and Their Management
-
1.
Intraoperative bleeding
The radicular artery around the facet joint is a common cause of intraoperative bleeding [8]. In far-out syndrome, this artery usually runs over the sacral notch. Gentle dissection and approach to sacral notch are very important to prevent arterial bleeding. If arterial vessels are not recognized, severe bleeding may occur. In this case, the endoscope must be closely attached to identify the bleeding site. Thereafter, RF device can be used to control the bleeding (Fig. 11.22).
-
2.
Dural tear or root injury
Because FOS is an extra-foraminal lesion, the dural tear or damage in spinal canal rarely occurs. However, the exiting nerve root injury can occur. Most of the time, it happens when the Kerrison punch or pituitary forceps are used deeply without the exiting nerve fully identified. In this case, the dura mater surrounding the exiting nerve may be damaged and the nerve rootlets can be exposed (Fig. 11.23a–b). To repair dural defect, the injured area was packed and covered with Tachocomb® (Fig. 11.23c–d).
8 Surgical Tips, and Pitfall
-
1.
Postoperative nerve root swelling and dysesthesia
After UBE decompression surgery, residual symptoms such as radiating pain and paresthesia in the index lower extremities sometimes remain. Young male patient underwent UBE FOS decompression surgery to treat the severe radiating pain in the left lower extremities. The lower extremity symptoms improved for a few days after surgery, but the pain worsened again after 1 month, and the MRI study was retaken. It showed significant swelling of nerve root ganglion (Fig. 11.24). Porchet et al reported that in 27% of patients who underwent far-lateral approach for extra-foraminal lumbar disc herniation showed fair or poor outcomes after surgery [9]. In order to reduce these complications, the gentle manipulation of nerve root is very important.
-
2.
Retroperitoneal fluid collection
Continuous saline irrigation is essential to UBE surgery. To treat the far-out syndrome, removal of pseudo-articulation around the ala is most important and this may cause damage to the boundary between the paraspinal muscle and retroperitoneum [10]. Retroperitoneal fluid collection can cause abdominal discomfort and pain and can be diagnosed by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. In most cases, it can be resolved with conservative treatment, but sometimes lead to serious complications.
References
Jancuska JM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. A review of symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: Bertolotti's syndrome. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:42.
Holm EK, Bünger C, Foldager CB. Symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebra: a review of the current literature and clinical outcomes following steroid injection or surgical intervention. Sicot-J. 2017;3:71.
Watanabe K, Yamazaki A, Morita O, Sano A, Katsumi K, Ohashi M. Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: preoperative diagnosis and surgical strategy. Clin Spine Surg. 2011;24(3):137–41.
Li Y, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Mroz TE, Steinmetz MP. Minimally invasive tubular resection of the anomalous transverse process in patients with Bertolotti’s syndrome: presented at the 2013 joint spine section meeting. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(3):283–90.
Sasaki M, Aoki M, Matsumoto K, Tsuruzono K, Akiyama C, Yoshimine T. Middle-term surgical outcomes of microscopic posterior decompression for far-out syndrome. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2014;75(02):079–83.
Iwasaki M, Akiyama M, Koyanagi I, Niiya Y, Ihara T, Houkin K. Double crush of L5 spinal nerve root due to L4/5 lateral recess stenosis and bony spur formation of lumbosacral transitional vertebra pseudoarticulation: a case report and review. NMC Case Rep J. 2017;4(4):121–5.
Wiltse L, Guyer R, Spencer C, Glenn W, Porter I. Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome. Spine. 1984;9(1):31–41.
Yang H-S, Lee N, Park J-Y. Current status of biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal stenosis: endoscopic partial facetectomy and outcome factors. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2021;6:157–63.
Porchet F, Chollet-Bornand A, de Tribolet N. Long-term follow up of patients surgically treated by the far-lateral approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg Spine. 1999;90(1):59–66.
Heo DH, Sharma S, Park CK. Endoscopic treatment of extraforaminal entrapment of L5 nerve root (far out syndrome) by unilateral biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary clinical results. Neurospine. 2019;16(1):130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Right side UBE approach for right-sided extra-foraminal entrapment of L5 nerve root (MP4 158311 kb)
Left side UBE approach for left-sided far-out syndrome (MP4 79507 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, N., Park, S.H., An, J.W. (2022). Far-out Syndrome Decompression Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy. In: Heo, D.H., Park, C.W., Son, S.K., Eum, J.H. (eds) Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8201-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8201-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8200-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8201-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)