Skip to main content

Generating Game Indefinite Decision Tree in the Banking Sector Using Different Types of Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Second International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 351))

  • 663 Accesses

Abstract

In the banking sector, bank account holders play a crucial role in order to retain a advanced system that is fully functioning in the shortest or longest revolution. As a result, many queries about dedication based on rewards and lifetime maximization strategies have resulted in the integration of Game Indefinite Decision Tree [GIDT] idea. This GIDT technique identifies the association of GIDT with well-chosen fit-out and back to enhance its broad perspective on know-hows. The extensive technique is described by the arrangement of benefit rates, categories and time period. The advantage of the proposed method is higher than the traditional GIDT. Furthermore, as a direct objective of the squandering, all-encompassing model adaption research vocabularies have much lower variance for GIDT than for conventional game. It is discovered to be a crucial application offered to secure a client’s bank account with a different algorithm. In addition, this study examines the group of account holders and advantages for regular setting out in order to enhance the benefits ratio and therefore minimize overall loss and enhance lifetime advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bian F, Wang X (2021) School enterprise cooperation mechanism based on improved decision tree algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(4):5995–6005

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shibu D, Ayekpam IC (2018) A study on efficiency on Assam gramin vikash bank branches. Indian J Appl Res 7(5):115–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu D (2006) Detecting information technology impact on firm performance using DEA and decision tree. Int J Inf Technol Manage 5(2–3):162–174

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aggelopoulos E, Georgopoulos A (2017) Bank branch efficiency under environmental change: a bootstrap DEA on monthly profit and loss accounting statements of Greek retail branches. Eur J Opera Res 261(3)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grmanová E, Ivanová E (2018) Efficiency of banks in Slovakia: measuring by DEA models. J Int Stud 11(1):257–272

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sufian F, Kamarudin F, Nassir AM (2016) Determinants of efficiency in the Malaysian banking sector: does bank origins matter? Intellectual Econ 10(1):38–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kacher F, Larbani M (2006) Solution concept for a non-cooperative game with fuzzy parameters. Int Game Theory Rev 08(03):489–498

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang GN, Ye F (2019) Predicting financial distress in Norway using logistic regression and random forest models. Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galka J, Jaciow P (2019) Speaker identification using fuzzy I-vector tree. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37(4):4937–4949

    Google Scholar 

  10. Titko J, Stankevičienė J, Lāce N (2014) Measuring bank efficiency: DEA application. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(4):739–757

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin L, Sharma S, Maddulety K (2019) Machine learning in banking risk management: a literature review. Risks 7(1):29

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rzepecki L, Jaskowski P (2021) Application of game theory against nature in supporting bid pricing in construction. Symmetry 13:132

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhn M, Weston S, Coulter N, Culp M (2018) C5. 0: C5. 0 decision trees and rule-based models. CRAN, Germany. https://cloud.r-project.org/package=C50

  14. Mu Y, Wang L, Liu X (2020) Dynamic programming based fuzzy partition in fuzzy decision tree induction. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39(5):6757–6772

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamid N, Ramli NA, Hussin SAS (2017) Efficiency measurement of the banking sector in the presence of non-performing loan. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1795

    Google Scholar 

  16. Appiahene P, Missah YAWM (2019) Predicting the operational efficiency of banks in the presence of information technology investment using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the academics world 132nd international conference, Florence Italy, pp 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Appiahene P, Missah YM, Najim U (2019) Evaluation of information technology impact on bank’ s performance: the Ghanaian experience. Int J Eng Bus Manage 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sridevi S, Chithra SM (2020) The system of harvest getting higher using game theory technique in wireless sensor networks. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev (IJMPERD) 10(3):9653–9660 ISSN (P): 2249–6890; ISSN (E): 2249–8001

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sridevi S, Vinoba V (2016) A study on cooperative and non-cooperative game theory techniques in wireless sensor networks. Int J Math Arch 7(9):1–5 ISSN 2229–5046

    Google Scholar 

  20. Havidz SAH, Setiawan C (2015) Bank efficiency and non-performing financing (NPF) in the Indonesian Islamic banks. Asian J Econ Model 3(3):61–79

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun J (2020) Power instability prediction method for wind turbine based on fuzzy decision tree. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39(2):1439–1447

    Google Scholar 

  22. Addison YE (2018) 19 banks meet new capital requirement. https://www.graphic.com.gh/business/business-news/19-banks-meetnew-capital-requirement.html

  23. Addison YE (2018) Banking crisis: BoG’s roadmap for clearing UT, capital bank mess. https://citinewsroom.com/2018/08/14/banking-crisis-bogs-roadmap-for-clearing-utcapital-bank-mess/

  24. Chen Z, Matousek R, Wanke P (2017) Chinese bank efficiency during the global financial crisis: a combined approach using satisficing DEA and support vector machines. North Am J Econ Finance 43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sridevi, S., Chithra, S.M. (2022). Generating Game Indefinite Decision Tree in the Banking Sector Using Different Types of Algorithms. In: Shakya, S., Du, KL., Haoxiang, W. (eds) Proceedings of Second International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems . Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 351. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7657-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics