Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Development Mapping: Practical Application Beer and Nigel Roome Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Casebook of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Toyota is one of the highly appreciated companies for CSR performance in India. The central theme of this research paper is to apply Beer’s and Nigel Roome model of sustainability to the Japanese automobile manufacturer operating in India. In the first part of analysis, we have discussed the relevance of Beer’s model to the Toyota CSR activity. In the second part of analysis, we make an effort to take forward the work of Basavaraj et al. (2018) who framed the questionnaire to map the Nigel Roome model to Toyota CSR case. The contribution of this case is to bring the new dimension in data presentation and analysis of Roome theoretical model on weak sustainability versus strong sustainability. The case analysis provides new insights for CSR managers to map their performance pictorially using Tableau software. Finally, we conclude, Toyota follows significant components of cybernetic model. Due to conscious effort of Toyota, India has positioned itself substantially well in the CSR ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1999). Ackoff ’s best: His classic writings on management. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, W. S. (2006). The Triple Bottom Line. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted & S. Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 19–24). Greenleaf, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashish, G. (2014). India’s most admired companies. Fortune India’s Survey, in Partnership with the Hay Group. India: Fortune India & Hay Group. https://www.fortuneindia.com/macro/indias-most-admired-companies-2/100901

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/256210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ay, N., Der, R., & Prokopenko, M. (2012). Guided self-organisation: Perception–action loops of embodied systems. Theory in Biosciences, 131(3), 125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, D. (2010). CSR: An opportunity for SMEs. In C. Louche, S. Idowu, & W. Filho (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation (pp. 84–101). Greenleaf Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuva, R. (2014). India’s most admired companies, Fortune India’s third annual ranking. Fortune India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D., & Erlandson, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility website representations: A longitudinal study of internal and external self-presentations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baret, P. (2006). Chapitre 6. L’évaluation contingente de la Performance Globale des Entreprises : une méthode pour fonder un management sociétalement responsable ? In Corporate Social Responsiblity (p. 152). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/DBU.ROSE.2006.01.0135

  • Basavaraj, Santosh, Ravi, A., Van Cranenburgh, K., & Vikkraman, P. (2018). CSR activities of a Japanese company operating in India - Strong or weak sustainability: A theory testing of a Cybernetic model. International Journal of Management Practice, 11(3), 284–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2018.092854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the system for organizations. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1959). What has cybernetics to do with operational research? OR, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A critical introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. 43(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “ Our common future.” UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, M., & Quairel, F. (2004). Mythes et Re´alite´s de l’Entreprise Responsable. La De´couverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlos, G., Péter, C., Péter, É., Helena, K., & Alexander, L. (2013). The past, present and future of cybernetics and systems research. Systema, 1(3), 04–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P., & Wood, R. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2011). Collaborative strategic improvement through network action learning: The path to sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniela, G. (2013). A cybernetic decision model of market entry. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 44(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2012.732794

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. In Commission of the European Communities. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_en.pdf

  • Ekta, B. (2014, March 10). An overview of CSR Rules under Companies Act, 2013. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from www.business-standard.com: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/an-overview-of-csr-rules-under-companies-act-2013-114031000385_1.html

  • Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, G., Chaime, M., Vessela, M., & Philip, N. (2003). Journal of Sociocybernetics., 4(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. (2005). Building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of management Journal, 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 15(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility–a PR invention. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25, 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale Univ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman publisher, Series in Business and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York times Magazine, 32(13), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frishammar, J., & Parida, V. (2018). Circular Business Model Transformation: A Roadmap for Incumbent Firms: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0008125618811926, 61(2), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618811926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, G. (2003). A systems approach to sustainability and sustainable development: Vol. 64 of Serie Medio ambiente y desarrollo. ECLAC, Sustainable Development and Human Settletments Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson, C. (2007). Design and Control of Self-organizing Systems. In Sensors Peterborough NH (Vol. 132). CopIT ArXives. http://scifunam.fisica.unam.mx/mir/copit/TS0002EN/TS0002EN.html

  • Gershenson, C. (2007). Design and control of self-organizing systems. CopIt Arxives. Retrieved from www.tinyurl.co: http://tinyurl.com/DCSOS2007

  • Giordano-Spring, S., & Rivière-Giordano, G. (2008). Reporting sociétal et IFRS: Quelle cohérence? Revue Française De Gestion, 6, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorte, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Close to victory. 14(3), 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D., & Turban, D. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (1996). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 7, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.5840/IABSPROC1996746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2016). Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce: 39(3), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI. (2012, January). www.globalreporting.org. Retrieved from Global Reporting Guidelines G3.1: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf/

  • Hall, J., & Vredenburg, H. (2005). Managing stakeholder ambiguity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D. (2003). The science of synthesis: Exploring the social implications of general systems theory. University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Freeman, R. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal, Special Research Forum on Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance, 42(5), 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D., Bishop, S., Conte, R., Lukowicz, P., & McCarthy. . (2012). FuturICT: Participatory computing to understand and manage our complex world in a more sustainable and resilient way. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 24(1), 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, M. K. (2014). Sustainable backyard polyculture: Designing for ecological resiliency. Smashwords ebook edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P., & Demetrious, K. (2006). Engaging with stakeholders or constructing them? The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 23, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • IANS, N. D. (2014, April 3). India now only country with legislated CSR | Business Standard News. Business Standard. https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/india-now-only-country-with-legislated-csr-114040300862_1.html

  • Jahdi, K., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility: Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jozica, K.-R., Matjaz, M., & Robert, G. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from the viewpoint of systems thinking. Kybernetes, 35, 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kably, L. (2015, May 20). ICAI issues norms for CSR accounting by cos. Retrieved from timesofindia.indiatimes.com: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/ICAI-issues-norms-for-CSR-accounting-by-cos/articleshow/47349754.cms

  • Khetarpal, S. (2020, Febraury 20). India Inc spent just Rs 8,691 crore on CSR in FY19. Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.in/: https://www.businesstoday.in/current/corporate/companies-spend-a-whopping-rs-8691-crore-on-csr-in-fy19/story/396623.html

  • Knez-Riedl, J., Mulet, M., & Dyck, R. G. (2006). Corporate social responsibility from the viewpoint of systems thinking. Kybernetes, 35(3/4), 441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture. Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos. . (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, N., & Scheubel, V. (2010). Corporate Community Involvement : What it is, what it is not. Corporate Community Involvement: The Definitive Guide to Maximizing Your Business’ Societal Engagement, 44(0), 0–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauring, J., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Collective ideals and practices in sustainable development: managing corporate identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, A. (2008). Integrating sustainability practices using the viable system model. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(5), 643–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lougee, B., & James, W. (2008). The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) trend. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(1), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luis A, P.-B., Jonathan P. D., Van V. M., & Michael J. P. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2008). Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics 2008 87:1, 87(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-008-9804-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maani, K., & Cavana, R. (2000). Systems thinking and modeling–understanding change and complexity. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, S. (2003). A cybernetic model to enhance organizational intelligence. Systems Analysis Modelling Simulation, 43(1), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J., & Berman, S. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings dat. Business and Society, 45(1), 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for english language teachers. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). The role of money managers in assessing corporate social reponsibility research. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L., & Webb, D. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S., Tae, K., & Jae Il, K. (2012). CSR for sustainable development: CSR beneficiary positioning and impression management motivation. Corporate Social Responsiblity and Environmental Management, 21(1), 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1(1), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyeen, A., & West, B. (2014). Promoting CSR to foster sustainable development. Asia - Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(2), 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility : Partners for Progress - OECD. In Cancel edits CSR Case Add REFERENCE TYPE Web Page TITLE Corporate Social Responsibility : Partners for Progress - OECD AUTHORS. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/corporatesocialresponsibilitypartnersforprogress.htm

  • Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D., & Waldman, D. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society, 50(1), 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, D. (2015, May 8). www.business-standard.com. Retrieved from Companies can collaborate with each other for CSR: https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/companies-can-collaborate-with-each-other-for-csr-115012200165_1.html

  • Perrin, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persaix, E. (2002). L’e´cologie comme atout strate´gique: Une validation de l’approche resources par la me´thode PLS. Finance Controle Strategie, 5(3), 95–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., Berman, S., Elms, H., & Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8(2), 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar, R., & Mishra, S. (2013). A study of corporate social responsibility in Indian organization: An-Introspection. In Proceedings of 21st International Business Research Conference. Ryerson University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopenko, M. (2009). Guided self-organization. HFSP Journal, 3(5), 287–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebernik, M., & Mulej, M. (2000). Requisite holism, isolating mechanisms and entrepreneurship. Kybernetes, 29(9–10), 1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920010342198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005 60/1. 2005 World Summit Outcome, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N. (1994). Taking responsibility: Promoting sustainable practice through higher education curricula—management and business. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N. (1997). Corporate environmental responsibility. In T. Bansal & E. Howard (Eds.), Business and the natural environment (pp. 40–62). Butterworth-Heinemann MBA Series, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N. (2004). Innovation, global change and new capitalism: A fuzzy context for business and the environmen. Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 277–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N. (2011). Looking back, thinking forward: Distinguishing between weak and strong sustainability. In T. Bansal & A. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 620–629). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N. (2012). A cybernetic model of corporate responsibility–sensing changes in business and society. International Journal of Technology Management, 60(1/2), 4–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N., & Louche, C. (2016). Journeying Toward Business Models for Sustainability: A Conceptual Model Found Inside the Black Box of Organisational Transformation. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615595084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., Soresi, S., Van Esbroeck, R., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporate sustainability. In H. Folmer & T. T. Edward Elgar (Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (2006). The quest for ecological sustainability: A multi-level issue. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. The Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stites, J., & Michael, J. (2011). Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: Relationships with corporate social performance. Business & Society, 50(1), 50–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 1998 17:2, 17(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005784421547

  • Supriya, K., Narayana, M. G. P. L., & Chopra, S. K. (2012). A systemic framework to define sustainable and measurable corporate social initiatives: Leveraging Corporate Core Competence for a better society.

    Google Scholar 

  • TCS. (2015, April 29). www.tcs.com. Retrieved from www.tcs.com: https://www.tcs.com/tcs-gri-collaborates-sustainability-reporting-india

  • Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study: The qualitative report. The Qualitative Report, 3(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umpleby, S. (2010). From complexity to reflexivity: The next step in the systems sciences. Cybernetics and systems, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umpleby, S., & Vallée, R. (2000). Kibernetika nictega, prvega, drugega in tretjega reda.

    Google Scholar 

  • UMPLEBY, S. A. (2010). CYBERNETICS OF CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/019697297125886, 28(8), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/019697297125886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée, R. (2003). Cybernetics and systems, from past to future. Kybernetes, 32(5–6), 853–857. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920210443923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding : essays on cybernetics and cognition. 362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veney, J. E., & Kaluzny, A. D. (2005). Evaluation and decision making for health services. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J., & North, W. (2005). Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, I. (2000). The new rules: Ethics, social responsibility and strategy. Strategy & Leadership, 20(3), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, F., & R, B. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Integrating a business and societal governance perspective. The RARE project ’s approach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL, USA. Retrieved from http://www.wolframscience.com/thebook.html

  • Wright, S., & Shore, C. (1997). Anthropology of policy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuniarta, G., & Purnamawati, I. (2017). The impact implementation of mapping model of corporate social responsibility funds in Bali. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainal, Z. (2007). Case Study As a Research Method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1). https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/165

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Management, CHRIST (Deemed To Be University), Bangalore, India

    Santosh Basavaraj & Sreelakshmi. P

Authors
  1. Santosh Basavaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sreelakshmi. P
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Basavaraj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Plantation Management, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

    Ananda Das Gupta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basavaraj, S., P, S. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Development Mapping: Practical Application Beer and Nigel Roome Model. In: Das Gupta, A. (eds) A Casebook of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5719-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation