Abstract
The 3D printed parts made by using the additive manufacturing (AM) process are presently high in demand due to many advantages. This includes well-known features such as the cost-effective method of producing customized parts made of thermoplastic material and having a shorter lead time for a wider range of applications. However, it has also a few limitations like poor dimensional accuracy and resolution. Thus, this technology is not suitable for parts having interior details. So, it is very much essential that the parts being produced using this technology must be characterized and analyzed accordingly so as to increase their potential use in the present market. For this, a review paper has been made in order to study all the main characteristics affecting the rise in demand of parts. Several statistical and optimization techniques have been examined and reviewed. The optimal parameters corresponding to the specific characteristics causing an effect to a large extent have been observed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Additive manufacturing
- Process parameters
- Fused deposition modeling
- Part quality
- Part characteristics
- Mechanical properties
1 Introduction
Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, popularly known by its other names such as rapid prototyping and 3D printing, is a production process used for producing the parts by adding layers in such a manner as one layer placed over another consecutively [1]. The G-codes is exported to the computer numerically controlled 3D printing machine so as to form the object [2]. AM finds its applications when producing complex parts required for medium- to small-sized batches of highly demanding personalized and customized parts and products to have shorter lead times with increased throughput levels [3, 4]. Also, AM helps in reducing the wastage of raw material being used for producing the solid objects, because there is only single operation involved in the building of parts [5]. The art of developing a product rapidly is mainly concerned with the following aspects as development speed, development time, product performance, and development cost [6].
1.1 Methods and Materials
Out of the various 3D printing technologies, FDM 3D printing technology has been found as the field of study because of many advantages like as it can produce neat, clean and complex 3D parts within the stipulated time [7]. The various 3D printing technologies, depending upon the state of input material (solid, liquid, and powder) along with the basic principles on which these technologies are based, are shown in (Fig. 1).
1.2 FDM Process
FDM belongs to the family of material extrusion. In the FDM process, it starts with slicing the CAD data into layers and then this data is imported to the FDM machine. Wherein, the part starts to build up in a layerwise manner as one layer placed onto another over build platform [10]. There is a need of packing the internal structure of the object with the help of outlines or number of contours as per the required response [11].
2 FDM Process Parameters Affecting the Characteristics of 3D Printed Parts
The selection of optimized parameters plays a vital role in fulfilling the following qualities of product such as a reduction in material wastage, improvement in quality, high-dimensional accuracy, increased productivity, and reduced production time and cost [12].
2.1 FDM Process Parameters
The effect of the selection of process parameters has been observed on the part quality and mechanical properties of a specimen prepared using FDM technique [13, 14]. Table 1 shown below lists the following parameters which are attributed to the characteristics of the specimen made of using FDM 3D printing technology.
2.2 Mechanical Properties of FDM Printed Parts
Even though FDM technique has a wide number of applications for which it can be used, but it faces inadaptability to predict its nature of mechanical properties without making the 3D model because of the presence of discontinuity existing in the form of voids in the structure of part [17]. While working on FDM machine for the processing of PEEK material, values of parameters affecting the specimen’s properties must not be taking either too high or too low because it may be responsible for affecting the surface finish in a poor manner [18]. The mechanical properties also affect the level of crystallinity, which is found to be affected by the printing temperature [19].
Tensile Strength of Printed Specimens Using FDM
Parts to have kept at 0° build orientation over build platform, lying down flat in x–y plane, show the maximum tensile strength [20]. The raster angle also causes to noticeable change in the tensile strength of specimen. The parts with 0° raster angle have been examined to have tensile strength more than the parts where fibers arrange themselves to the applied load direction in parallel manner. “Parameters such as low layer thickness and high raster width result in more bonding area, thereby improving the tensile strength of specimens [21].”
Compressive Strength of Printed Specimens Using FDM
From the past published literature, it has been found that higher the layer thickness results in the higher compressive strength of the specimen [22].
Impact or Fracture Strength of Specimens
The study done in this regard indicated that impact strength was found to be affected certainly with many parameters such as percent infill, infill pattern, number of contours, and air gap. For 100% infill, it was found to be at its maximum value [23]. It was reported that the specimen has a higher impact strength for the infill pattern as crisscross [24].
Flexural properties of Specimens
The various input parameters like air gap, contour width, and number of contours, etc., affect the flexural strength of specimens up to a large extent. However, raster angle and raster width parameters have influenced the most to the flexural strength [25].
2.3 Part Quality Characteristics
The smaller value of part orientation and layer height along with the larger value of raster angle reduces wear [26]. From the viewpoint of literature study for the surface finish, it was found that layer height significantly affects the surface finish of the part [27].
Build Time/Printing Time Quality Characteristics
Filling velocity and layer height found to be the significantly affecting parameters to the build time [28].
Dimensional Accuracy Type Characteristics
The effect of extrusion temperature has been observed on dimensional accuracy of the specimen [29]. If this is too high, it causes material degradation.
3 Results and Discussions
Referring to Table 2 discusses the literature survey conducted up to date for optimum parameters selection in the FDM process corresponding to the output characteristics by utilizing different DOE and optimization techniques.
4 Conclusions
The characteristics of thermoplastic materials like PLA, ABS, PC, etc., based on products and the input parameters affecting the characteristics of these thermoplastic-based parts have been studied till now by various researchers. However, there are very few studies on materials such as nylon and composite. Moreover, the attention has been mainly focused only upon the mechanical properties of the specimen made up of using the thermoplastic material. The properties of a specimen such as tensile, compressive, and flexural or bending strength were studied. The input parameters studied were very few. Therefore, there could be a scope to analyze properties with some more parameters (environment factors) that have not been yet tested. Several optimization techniques have been used to find out the optimal process parameter selection and settings as well for the required characteristics of specimen printed using FDM. Thus, there is a need to identify the optimal selection and settings of input parameters required for multipurpose response optimization technique in order to simultaneously investigate the number of outputs at a time.
References
Zhang J, Jung YG (eds) (2018) Additive manufacturing: materials, processes, quantifications and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann
Hashmi S (2014) Comprehensive materials processing. Newnes
Ahuja B, Karg M, Schmidt M (Mar 2015) Additive manufacturing in production: challenges and opportunities. In: Laser 3d manufacturing II, vol 9353. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 935304
Whitney DE (1988) Manufacturing by design. Harv Bus Rev 66(4):83–91
Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Metallic additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art review and prospects. J Mech Industry 13:89–96
Bernard A, Fischer A (2002) New trends in rapid product development. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 51(2):635–652
Srivastava M, Rathee S (2018) Optimization of FDM process parameters by Taguchi method for imparting customized properties to components. Virtual Phys Prototyping 13:203–210
Kruth JP (1991) Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann 40(2):603–614
Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012:1–10
Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyping J
Ning F, Cong W, Wei J, Wang S, Zhang M (June 2015) Additive manufacturing of CFRP composites using fused deposition modeling: effects of carbon fiber content and length. In: International manufacturing science and engineering conference, vol. 56826. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V001T02A067
Mohamed OA, Syed HM, Jahar LB (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Advan Manuf 3(1):42–53
Masood SH (1996) Intelligent rapid prototyping with fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping J
Groza JR, Shackelford JF (2010) Materials processing handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Dey A, Yodo N (2019) A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J Manuf Mater Process 3:64
Moradi M, Meiabadi S, Kaplan A (2019) 3D printed parts with honeycomb internal pattern by fused deposition modeling; experimental characterization and production optimization. Met Mater Int
Coogan TJ, Kazmer DO (2017) Healing simulation for bond strength prediction of FDM. Rapid Prototyping J 23(3):551–561
Deng X et al (2018) Mechanical properties optimization of poly-ether-ether-ketone via fused deposition modeling. Materials 11(2):216
Sun X, Cao L, Ma H, Gao P, Bai Z, Li C (2017) Experimental analysis of high temperature PEEK materials on 3D printing. In: Proceedings of the 2017 9th international conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation. Changsha, China
Sood AK, Chaturvedi V, Datta S, Mahapatra SS (2011) Optimization of process parameters in fused deposition modeling using weighted principal component analysis. J Adv Manuf Syst 10(2):241–259
Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK (2018) Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 4:1–12
Shubham P, Sikidar A, Chand T (2016) The influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties of the 3D printed ABS polymer by fused deposition modeling. In: Key engineering materials, vol 706. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., pp 63–67
Alvarez KL, Lagos RF, Aizpun M (2016) Investigating the influence of infill percentage on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelled ABS parts, Ing e Inv 36(3):110–116
Fatimatuzahraa AW, Farahaina B, Yusoff WAY (2011) The effect of employing different raster orientations on the mechanical properties and microstructure of fused deposition modeling parts, business, engineering and industrial applications (ISBEIA), IEEE symposium. pp 22–27
Gebisa AW, Lemu HG (2018) Investigating effects of fused-deposition modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment. Materials 11(4):500
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2012) Experimental investigation and empirical modeling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J Adv Res 3(1):81–90
Singh R, Singh S, Singh IP, Fabbrocino F, Fraternali F (2017) Investigation for surface finish improvement of FDM parts by vapor smoothing process. Compos B Eng 111:228–234
Dey A, Yodo N (2019) A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J Manuf Mater Process 3(3):64
Ouballouch A, Ettaqi S, Bouayad A, Sallaou M, Lasri L (2019) Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and mechanical behavior of 3D printed reinforced polyamide parts. Procedia Struct Integrity 19:433–441
Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J et al (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. JOM 67:1183–1193
Zaldivar R, Witkin D, McLouth T, Patel D, Schmitt K, Nokes J (2017) Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-printed ULTEM 9085 Material. Addit Manuf 13:71–80
Liu X, Zhang M, Li S, Si L, Peng J, Hu Y (2017) Mechanical property parametric appraisal of fused deposition modeling parts based on the gray Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:2387–2397
Raju M, Gupta MK, Bhanot N, Sharma VS (2019) A hybrid PSO–BFO evolutionary algorithm for optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters. J Intell Manuf 30(7):2743–2758
Srivastava A, Bhaskar J (2020) Experimental investigations of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling-based 3D printers for average surface roughness. In: Advances in additive manufacturing and joining. Springer, Singapore, pp 253–265
Deng X, Zeng Z, Peng B, Yan S, Ke W (2018) Mechanical properties optimization of poly-ether-ether-ketone via fused deposition modeling. Materials 11:216
Fitzharris ER, Watt I, Rosen DW, Shofner ML (2018) Interlayer bonding improvement of material extrusion parts with polyphenylene sulfide using the Taguchi method. Addit Manuf 24:287–297
Zaman UKU, Boesch E, Siadat A et al (2019) Impact of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters on strength of built parts using Taguchi’s design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:1215–1226
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bhayana, M., Singh, J., Singh, B., Singh, J. (2022). Investigation of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Parameters Influencing the Additively Manufactured Part Characteristics: A Review Paper. In: Dubey, A.K., Sachdeva, A., Mehta, M. (eds) Recent Trends in Industrial and Production Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3135-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3135-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3134-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3135-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)