Skip to main content

Policy Burden, Industry Competition, and Corporate Risk-Taking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Decision Science and Management (ICDSM 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1391))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1448 Accesses

Abstract

This paper takes the data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share-listed companies from 2009 to 2016 as the research sample to test whether the policy burden will affect corporate risk-taking and the regulating effect of industry competition. The results show that: First, policy burden has a significant negative effect on corporate risk-taking. Second, industry competition reduces the negative impact of policy burden on corporate risk-taking. After subdividing the policy burden into social burden and strategic burden, it is found that the industry competition weakens the relationship between social burden and corporate risk-taking, but the regulating effect is not significant between strategic burden and corporate risk-taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Younas, Z.I., and A. Zafar. 2019. Corporate risk taking and sustainability: A case of listed firms from USA and Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility 10 (1): 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Habib, A., and M.M. Hasan. 2015. Firm life cycle, corporate risk taking and investor sentiment. Accounting and Finance 57 (2): 465–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen, M., T. Knudsen, U.W. Nash, et al. 2020. Industry competition and firm conduct: Joint determinants of risk–return relations. Strategic Management Journal 41 (12): 2315–2338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Younas, Z.I., C. Klein, T. Trabert, et al. 2019. Board composition and corporate risk-taking: A review of listed firms from Germany and the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 20 (4): 526–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cain, M.D., and S.B. McKeon. 2016. CEO personal risk-taking and corporate policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51 (1): 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, J.Y., and Z. Li. 2008. Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constrain. Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (1): 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jian, J., H. Li, L. Meng, et al. 2020. Do policy burdens induce excessive managerial perks? Evidence from China’s stated-owned enterprises. Economic Modelling 90: 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheng, S., K.Z. Zhou, and J.J. Li. 2011. The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing 75 (1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park, J.H., J. Lee, and J. Cho. 2019. Political ties and firm performance: The mediating role of competitive action. Journal of Strategic Management 22 (3): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kun Su, Liuchuang, et al. 2017. Ultimate ownership, risk-taking and firm value: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review 23 (1): 10–26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farag, H., and C. Mallin. 2018. The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. European Journal of Finance 24 (16–18): 1528–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouslah, K., José Liñares-Zegarra, B. M'Zali, et al. 2017. CEO risk-taking incentives and socially irresponsible activities. British Accounting Review 50 (1): 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yost, B.P. 2018. Locked-in: The effect of CEOs’ capital gains taxes on corporate risk-taking. Accounting Review 93 (5): 325–358.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerini, M., P. Harting, and M. Napoletano. 2020. Governance structure, technical change and industry competition. GREDEG Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John, K., L. Litov, and B. Yeung. 2008. Corporate governance and risk-taking. Journal of Finance 63 (4): 1679–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Díez-Esteban, José María, García-Gómez, Conrado Diego, López-Iturriaga, Félix Javier, et al. 2017. Corporate risk-taking, returns and the nature of major shareholders: Evidence from prospect theory. Research in International Business and Finance 42: 900–911.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, X., Gao, B., Li, S. (2022). Policy Burden, Industry Competition, and Corporate Risk-Taking. In: Wang, T., Patnaik, S., Ip, A.W., Tavana, M. (eds) Advances in Decision Science and Management. ICDSM 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1391. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2502-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics