Skip to main content

A Framework for Studying Coordinated Behaviour Applied to the 2019 Philippine Midterm Elections

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 236))

Abstract

This paper covers a hybrid framework for studying coordinated social media behaviour. The study focuses on social media activity during the 2019 Philippine National and Local Elections. With the use of social media information obtained from the CrowdTangle platform, the research is able to extract necessary post detail information that can be used to determine coordinated behaviour. The study tags posts are coordinated if they have shared media content between five or more posts within a 1-minute period. This should point to a high degree of coordination. The results are then visualized using the Fruchterman–Reingold algorithm using the Networkx library to see the various clusters. This gives us a reasonable amount of data to further explore and act upon. This framework was able to extract a number of Facebook accounts that showed a high degree of coordinated behaviour. These accounts refer to media that are no longer available which is not characteristic of reputable content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradshaw S, Howard P (2018) Challenging truth and trust: a global inventory of organized social media manipulation. The computational propaganda project, 1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benkler Y (2019) Cautionary notes on disinformation and the origins of distrust. Soc Sci Res Council https://doi.org/10.35650/MD.2004.d

  3. Miniwatts Marketing Group (2020) Asia internet use, population statistics data, and facebook data—June 30 2020. Miniwatts Marketing Group. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm

  4. Social Weather Stations (2019) First wuarter 2019 social weather survey: 1 of 5 adult Pinoys use facebook daily as a source of news. Social Weather Stations. https://www.sws.org.ph/swsmain/artcldisppage/?artcsyscode=ART-20190629182313

  5. Gleicher N (2020) Removing coordinated inauthentic behavior. Facebook, Menlo Park, California, United States. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/10/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-september-report/

  6. Alvisi L , Clement A, Epasto A, Lattanzi S, Panconesi A (2013) Sok: the evolution of sybil defense via social networks . 2013 IEEE symposium on security and privacy, Berkeley, CA, 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2013.33

  7. Boshmaf Y, Muslukhov I, Beznosov K, Ripeanu M (2011) The socialbot network: When bots socialize for fame and money. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual computer security applications conference, Orlando, Florida, 5–9 December, pp 93–102

    Google Scholar 

  8. CrowdTangle Team (2020) CrowdTangle. Facebook, Menlo Park, California, United States. https://apps.crowdtangle.com/admuscienceengfacebook/lists/pages

  9. McKinney W (2010). ata structures for statistical computing in python. In: Proceedings of the 9th python in science conference (Vol 445, pp 51–56)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J (eds) Proceedings of the 7th python in science conference (SciPy2008), (Pasadena, CA USA), pp 1–15, Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  11. Facebook Team (2020) A guide to sharing for webmasters. Facebook, Menlo Park, California, United States. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/webmasters/

  12. Boyd D (2017) Hacking the attention economy. Data and Society: Points. Available at: https://points.datasociety.net/hacking-the-attention-economy-9fa1daca7a37

  13. Giglietto F, Righetti N, Rossi L, Marino G (2020) It takes a village to manipulate the media: coordinated link sharing behavior during 2018 and 2019 Italian elections. Commun Soc Inf, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Emmanuel S. Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yu, W.E.S. (2022). A Framework for Studying Coordinated Behaviour Applied to the 2019 Philippine Midterm Elections. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 236. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics