Keywords

1 Early Diagnosis of Glaucoma

1.1 OCT Thickness Analysis

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices can provide objective and reproducible thicknesses of each retinal layer including the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL). The measurement data are compared with the internally built-in normative database and color coded accordingly as green (normal range), yellow (< 5 percentile), red (< 1 percentile), or white (thicker than normal range). These thickness profiles can be utilized to detect early-glaucomatous structural damage.

1.1.1 RNFL Thickness

OCT-measured peripapillary RNFL thickness has been shown to be effective in discriminating preperimetric glaucoma from glaucoma-suspect eyes (Lisboa et al. 2012). Figure 1 provides a representative case of early diagnosis of glaucoma from peripapillary RNFL thickness. The inferotemporal RNFL defect in the red-free RNFL photography is well reflected in the OCT thickness profiles. The sectoral analysis of RNFL thickness returned the red-color code for the inferior quadrant. The 12 clock-hour sectoral analysis returned the yellow-color code for the 6 and 7 o’clock sectors. The patient, who had a within normal range visual field, showed progressive visual field defect in the corresponding superior hemifield. As shown in Fig. 1, peripapillary RNFL thickness effectively detects early structural glaucomatous damage prior to the presence of visual field defect. However, several studies have reported unsatisfactory sensitivity of peripapillary RNFL thickness, when averaged in quadrants or clock-hour sectors, for detection of localized RNFL defects in preperimetric glaucoma (Jeoung and Park 2010; Rao et al. 2013; Jeoung et al. 2014). One reported sensitivity for localized RNFL defect was 59.5% (Jeoung et al. 2014). Earlier studies reported that RNFL defects with narrow angular width are less likely to be detected on sector maps (Jeoung and Park 2010; Nukada et al. 2011). This phenomenon often occurs when clinicians solely look at the color coded sector map but not the TSNIT thickness profile graph from the OCT printout. Jeoung et al. (2014) demonstrated substantial improvement of sensitivity (up to 83.8%) for localized RNFL defect when using the TSNIT thickness graph. Figure 2 provides a representative case of preperimetric glaucoma with inferotemporal RNFL defect. In this case, the quadrant map showed “within normal range” and the 12 clock-hour sector map showed “only yellow color” at the 8 o’clock sector. However, the TSNIT thickness graph clearly demonstrated the focal defect in the inferotemporal region.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Peripapillary RNFL thinning in preperimetric glaucoma. Optic disc cube scan of 40-year-old male with preperimetric glaucoma. The inferotemporal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect in the red-free RNFL photography is well reflected in the optical coherence tomography (OCT) thickness profiles. The sectoral analysis of RNFL thickness revealed the red-color code (less than 1 percentile relative to normative database) in the inferior quadrant. The 12-hour sectoral analysis revealed the yellow-color code (less than 5 percentile of normative database) in the 6 and 7 o’clock sectors. Subsequent visual field loss appeared after 3 years, showing a superior arcuate defect

Fig. 2
figure 2

TSNIT graph for early detection of glaucoma. Optic disc cube scan of 45-year-old female with preperimetric glaucoma on right eye. Note the optic disc rim narrowing and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect (yellow triangle) in the inferotemporal region. The quadrant map showed within the normal range, and the 12-hour sector map showed only yellow color in the 8 o’clock sector. However, the TSNIT thickness graph clearly demonstrated a focal defect (thickness 42 μm) in the inferotemporal region (light blue solid line)

1.1.2 Macular Parameters

The latest OCT devices provide measurement of macular ganglion cell complex (GCC, sum of macular RNFL, GCL, and IPL thickness) or ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness (sum of macular GCL and IPL). The macular parameters are also known to be effective in discriminating early-glaucomatous structural damage from healthy eyes. Several studies have reported that macular GCIPL or GCC showed comparable diagnostic ability for early glaucoma (Mwanza et al. 2012; Akashi et al. 2013; Jeoung et al. 2013). Mwanza et al. (2012) reported that minimum GCIPL thickness was the best parameter for discriminating early-glaucomatous change from normal eyes. Inferotemporal macular GCIPL thickness is known to be the best parameter for discriminating myopic preperimetric glaucoma from healthy myopic eyes (Seol et al. 2015). A representative case of preperimetric glaucoma with macular damage in the inferotemporal region is provided in Fig. 3. This case featured the inaugural use of the 12 × 9 mm2-sized wide-field map from swept-source OCT (SS-OCT), which enables combined macular parameter/peripapillary RNFL thickness analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Macular damage in preperimetric glaucoma. Wide-field analysis for macular and peripapillary region of 54-year-old female with preperimetric glaucoma. The 12 × 9 mm2-sized wide-field maps for GCL++ (upper row) and GCL+ (bottom row) from swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) are provided. The wide-field map can also provide a combined SuperPixel map of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular GCL++/GCL+ map (second column). Note the significant thinning in the inferotemporal sectors of both GCL++ and GCL+ at the baseline, and the progressive superior visual field defect 1 year later. GCL++: sum of macular retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL); GCL+: sum of macular GCL and IPL

However, some researchers have reported that macular GCIPL thickness showed only moderate diagnostic ability for discriminating preperimetric glaucoma from healthy eyes, and in fact, that it had even less diagnostic power than that of peripapillary RNFL or optic nerve head (ONH) parameters (Rao et al. 2013; Lisboa et al. 2013; Begum et al. 2014). This phenomenon possibly arose from the fact that macular scanning is limited to a 6 × 6 mm2 area centered around the fovea, and as such, cannot detect any localized RNFL defect beyond this scanning area. It has been demonstrated that the diagnostic utility of GCIPL improves significantly if the RNFL defect is closer to the fovea (Kim et al. 2014; Hwang et al. 2014). A recent study compared the diagnostic ability of macular parameters between spectral-domain OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT, Triton DRI OCT, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) for glaucomatous structural damage in myopic eyes. It confirmed that SS-OCT, with a larger macular scan area than that of SD-OCT, had better glaucoma-diagnostic performance (Kim et al. 2020a).

1.1.3 Neuroretinal Rim Parameters

The neuroretinal rim parameters such as Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) in Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) or three-dimensional neuroretinal rim thickness (3D-NRT) in Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) are other essential OCT parameters for glaucoma diagnosis. The BMO-MRW is defined as the minimum distance between the Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) and the internal limiting membrane. Cirrus HD-OCT detects the minimum area of a surface from the optic disc margin (defined as the BMO) to the vitreoretinal interface (VRI) based on 3D volume scan data. The 3D-NRT is defined as the distance between the BMO and VRI, which is associated with the minimum cross-sectional rim area in the given direction. These parameters are known to have comparable diagnostic ability for glaucoma (Chauhan et al. 2013; Kim and Park 2018). Figure 4 shows a representative case of early glaucoma with BMO-MRW thinning.

Fig. 4
figure 4

BMO-MRW thinning in early glaucoma. Left eye of 43-year-old female with early open-angle glaucoma (mean deviation of visual field, –0.41 dB). Note the Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) as well as the decreased retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the inferotemporal region

There is no doubt that the peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular parameters are essential for OCT diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. However, false-positive signs for these parameters are encountered in real clinical practice. False-positive rates have been reported to be as high as 30.8% for peripapillary RNFL thickness and 40.4% for macular GCIPL thickness (Kim et al. 2011, 2015a). In these studies, greater axial length and small disc area were associated with false-positive red signs for peripapillary RNFL thickness, and greater axial length and fovea-disc angle were determined to be risk factors for false positivity in macular GCIPL thickness (Kim et al. 2011, 2015a). The neuroretinal rim parameters, alternatively, can be referenced as to reduce false positives in glaucoma diagnosis, particularly in myopic eyes (Kim and Park 2018; Malik et al. 2016). Figure 5 shows the examples of false-positive red signs of peripapillary RNFL thickness in a myopic eye. The BMO-MRW from Spectralis OCT, however, revealed an intact neuroretinal rim within the normal range. This parameter is less affected by temporal migration of major vessels or scan-circle misalignment in myopic eyes. In this light, the neuroretinal rim parameters can be used complementarily to peripapillary RNFL or macular GCIPL thicknesses in detecting early-glaucomatous damage with improved specificity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

False positives of RNFL thickness in myopic eyes. Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) and Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) scan of 27-year-old healthy male with high myopia in right eye. His refraction was –11 diopters and the axial length was 30.47 mm. Optic disc and red-free retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photography showed no abnormalities (left column). The RNFL deviation map as well as the quadrant and clock-hour maps showed red signs (central column). However, the Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) from Spectralis OCT was revealed to be within the normal range. The red-sign indications of RNFL thickness may have originated from migration of RNFL peaks and major vessels in the temporal direction

1.2 OCT Topographical Analysis

Recent advances in OCT scanning speed have enabled topographical analysis of glaucomatous damage from thickness or deviation maps of peripapillary RNFL and macular GCIPL. The peripapillary RNFL deviation map significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity for glaucoma and provided additional spatial information for RNFL damage (Leung et al. 2010). Another study reported that the RNFL thickness map demonstrated the best diagnostic ability in detecting localized RNFL defects (Hwang et al. 2013). The temporal raphe sign from the macular GCIPL thickness map, a straight line on the horizontal raphe longer than one-half of the length between the inner and outer annulus in the temporal elliptical area, can discriminate glaucomatous damage even in challenging cases such as highly myopic eyes (Kim et al. 2015b, 2016). Figure 6 shows a representative case that highlights the usefulness of the peripapillary RNFL thickness map in detecting early-glaucomatous change. In this case, the quadrant and clock-hour RNFL maps as well as the TSNIT thickness graph showed normal ranges of measurements, but the RNFL thickness map exhibited the localized defect in the inferotemporal region. The 3D-NRT and GCIPL thickness maps further confirmed the structural damage in this case.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Utility of OCT thickness map in detecting early-glaucomatous damage. Optic disc and macular cube scans of 40-year-old male with preperimetric glaucoma in right eye. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) quadrant and clock-hour thickness maps showed no red signs. However, the RNFL thickness and deviation maps showed RNFL defect in the inferotemporal region (black arrows). This finding is further confirmed by the three-dimensional neuroretinal rim thickness (3D-NRT, dark red arrow) and the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning in the inferotemporal region. Note the straight line on the horizontal raphe longer than one-half of the length between the inner and outer annulus in the temporal elliptical area on the GCIPL thickness map (temporal raphe sign, white arrow)

The latest commercially available SS-OCT (DRI OCT Triton, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) can capture a wider area of the retina (12 × 9 mm2) in a single scan, thus providing a “wide-field map.” The wide-field thickness and SuperPixel map has been shown to be effective in discriminating preperimetric and early-perimetric glaucoma from healthy eyes (Lee et al. 2017a). The wide-field Superpixel map was superior even to that of the RNFL deviation map from Cirrus HD-OCT (Lee et al. 2018a). The wide-field thickness surface map is displayed in 3D for selected layers (RNFL, GCL++, or GCL+) and can be rotated or zoomed in and out by mouse operation. This map enables detection of localized RNFL defects intuitively easy. Figure 7 shows the benefits of the wide-field map when detecting a localized superior-hemifield RNFL defect that most conventional SD-OCT macular scans would not find.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Utility of wide-field map in detecting early-glaucomatous damage. Wide-field map scanned from 49-year-old male with early glaucoma in left eye (mean deviation of visual field, –3.11 dB). The wide-field map detected the localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect in the superotemporal region (black and white arrows). However, scans from the same eye by spectral-domain OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) did not detect any structural damage, due possibly to the limited scan area (green box)

2 Detection of Progression

Glaucoma progression varies greatly from person to person, ranging from rapid to slow (Heijl et al. 2009, 2013). It can continue to show progression despite treatment, even within the normal range of intraocular pressure (Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group 1998). Therefore, tonometry alone cannot be sufficient in monitoring glaucoma. OCT is a reliable tool for detection of structural progression and monitoring of the rate of change. Although glaucoma progression analysis is focused mainly on the peripapillary RNFL, recent OCT devices, such as BMO-MRW and 3D-NRT, also provide tools for monitoring of macular GCIPL or neuroretinal rim thickness.

2.1 RNFL Progression Analysis

Progressive RNFL thinning in glaucoma can be assessed on OCT scans either by comparing RNFL thickness between the baseline and selected follow-up images (event-based analysis) or by estimating the rate of RNFL thinning in a linear regression model from a series of OCT scans (trend-based analysis). While these kinds of analysis can be done manually by individual clinicians, they can be prohibitively time-consuming in a busy clinical setting. The latest OCT devices provide automated proprietary software tools for progression analysis, but different OCT brands have slightly different features. Guided Progression Analysis (GPATM) from Cirrus HD-OCT is unique in that it provides topographical event-based RNFL thickness change over the 6 × 6 mm2 peripapillary region (Fig. 8). It allows the user to analyze between 3 and 8 exams and determines if statistically significant change has occurred. The earliest two exams are set as the baselines, and later exams are compared with them for determination of any significant change. Follow-up scans are aligned to the baselines based on the blood vessels or center of optic disc identified in the en face images (Cirrus HD-OCT User Manual). In event-based analysis, “Possible Loss” is declared and encoded in yellow when the individual plot has changed, relative to the two baseline exams, by a greater extent than the test-retest variability for a single visit. “Likely Loss” is declared and encoded in red when significant change has been detected on two visits in a row. “Possible Increase” is declared and encoded in lavender when the rate of gain is significant. In trend-based analysis, the slope is estimated by linear regression and is displayed in “μm/year” with the 95% confidence interval. This will be provided whenever at least 4 exams spanning at least 2 years are loaded. The linear regression line is plotted on each graph whenever there is both “Likely Loss” and a significant linear trend (P < 5%). Other OCT brands can also automatically estimate and report the slope of RNFL thinning with statistical significance. Statistically significant P-values do not always mean that there is clinically significant “progression.” Even small, clinically insignificant changes can be statistically significant in a series of large-scale OCT scans; and, vice versa, if the number of OCT images is small and of poor quality, a clinically significant change can be determined as insignificant (P > 0.05).

Fig. 8
figure 8

RNFL progression analysis. Guided Progression Analysis (GPA™) from Cirrus HD-OCT detects event-based RNFL thickness change over the 6 × 6 mm2 peripapillary region and estimates trend-based rates of change for average, superior, and inferior peripapillary RNFL thicknesses. The serial optic disc scans from a 57-year-old female with open-angle glaucoma and a history of recurrent disc hemorrhage showed significant progression (“Likely Loss”) at the superotemporal, inferotemporal, and temporal regions. The rate of average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning was –1.30 ± 0.91 μm/year

Monitoring of peripapillary RNFL thickness with OCT has been shown to be effective in detecting glaucomatous damage prior to the appearance of visual field defect (Kuang et al. 2015). Furthermore, OCT has been reported to be more sensitive than standard automated perimetry in detecting progression in the early stages of glaucoma (Wollstein et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2017). It is therefore imperative to monitor progressive RNFL thinning by OCT, the findings of which are informative for prediction of future visual field loss in glaucoma (Yu et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2017).

2.2 GCIPL Progression Analysis

Progression analysis for macular GCIPL is also available in both event- and trend-based modes. Glaucoma patients who had shown progression on serial red-free RNFL photographs or automated perimetry had a significantly faster thinning rate of macular GCIPL than that of non-progressors (Lee et al. 2017b, c). In a dynamic range-normalized analysis, the rate of peripapillary RNFL thinning was faster than that of macular GCIPL (Hammel et al. 2017). Nevertheless, progressive macular GCIPL thinning and progressive peripapillary RNFL thinning were found to be mutually predictive, and were both indicative of visual field progression (Hou et al. 2018; Shin et al. 2020). In this sense, integrating progressive peripapillary RNFL and macular GCIPL thinning may be advantageous to progression analysis in glaucoma (Lee et al. 2018b, c; Wu et al. 2020).

Monitoring the macular GCIPL thickness in a topographical manner has improved our understanding of macular damage patterns in glaucoma. Macular GCIPL defect in one study was most commonly found in the inferotemporal region relative to the fovea (Shin et al. 2018). In that investigation, GPATM analysis showed that the region toward the fovea and optic disc from the initial inferotemporal GCIPL defect was the most frequent site for progression. The most common pattern of progressive thinning, meanwhile, was widening of GCIPL defect, followed by deepening and newly developed GCIPL (Shin et al. 2018).

Monitoring macular GCIPL is advantageous to detection of progression in advanced glaucoma eyes when peripapillary RNFL thickness reaches the measurement floor (Hammel et al. 2017; Shin et al. 2017; Lavinsky et al. 2018). Figure 9 demonstrates the utility of monitoring progressive macular GCIPL thinning in advanced glaucoma eyes. The macular damage that causes GCIPL thinning might occur in the later stages of disease and at a different rate relative to peripapillary RNFL thinning. But given that a floor effect on macular GCIPL may also exist, the utility of macular GCIPL monitoring in advanced glaucoma may be limited for some patients.

Fig. 9
figure 9

GCIPL progression analysis. Guided Progression Analysis (GPA™) of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses from 53-year-old male with advanced glaucoma (baseline mean deviation of visual field [VF], –18.79 dB). Note the progressive thinning of the macular GCIPL (“Likely Loss” at superior parafovea) and note also the fact that the diffuse atrophied RNFL reached to the measurement floor and did not show any significant change (“floor effect”). The VF progressed significantly from –18.79 to –23.17 dB during the observation period

2.3 BMO-MRW Progression Analysis

Spectralis OCT provides progression analysis reporting for BMO-MRW. Figure 10 shows a representative case with progressive BMO-MRW thinning in an open-angle glaucoma eye with recurrent disc hemorrhage. In a longitudinal analysis of glaucoma eyes with disc hemorrhage, the BMO-MRW showed progressive thinning, and the inferotemporal sector showed the highest rate of change (Cho and Kee 2020). Cirrus HD-OCT’s 3D-NRT also showed a faster rate of thinning at the site of hemorrhage than in the other sectors (Kim et al. 2020b). The clinical utility of analyzing progressive change of neuroretinal rim parameters requires further elucidation in terms of glaucoma monitoring.

Fig. 10
figure 10

BMO-MRW progression analysis. Spectralis OCT scan from 57-year-old female with open-angle glaucoma and history of recurrent disc hemorrhage in inferotemporal region of left eye. The progression analysis demonstrated significant thinning of the BMO-MRW (rate of change, –9.4 μm/year, P < 0.01)