Skip to main content

Temporality of Maternity, Chronic Pain, and Ethics: Challenging Current Narratives on Pain and Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women’s Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 725 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to articulate new ethical possibilities made apparent during experiences of chronic pain, and suggest an ethics of temporality apparent in the mother–child relation. I also aim to bring an understanding of the complexity and diversity of subjectivities in pain and its impact on its social, intersubjective environment. The narratives of mothers who have experienced chronic pain for more than three months help articulate a gap found in the Western model of medical knowledge. I hope to shift attention from the perspective of a patient understood as an objectified object of pain and from pain as a separate object of study to a study of the concrete embodied experiences of mothers in chronic pain. Chronic pain poses a problem both for understanding its medical source but on a more personal level it challenges the very sociality and ethical becoming of subjectivity. The focus in phenomenological approaches to the personal intersubjective dimensions of mothers in pain is usually not considered by the neurobiological model; however, the vulnerability of maternal subjectivity opens a wide range of questions that can target existing gendered gaps in medical sciences and partly in the humanities. Chronic pain in maternal subjectivities illuminates the traumas of not being with- and for-the-child, and the loss of responsibility in modes of diachronic temporality. Mothers are condemned to isolating guilt and shame, but also to their continuous attempts to restore and to hold onto their own ethical becoming, whatever the cost. To address the gender gap is to bring the pain of maternal subjectivity into a common inter-affective dimension, and to accentuate a social organization of affective space. With the help of phenomenology, I aim to reveal a horizon where the gender gap exists—in this case, the complexity of ethical situations that mothers with chronic pain experience, where moral responsibility and the ethical locus of self are questioned, which has been ignored in philosophical and medical knowledge and practice. I draw on the phenomenological methods employed in the works of Edmund Husserl, Emmanuel Levinas, Michel Henry, Arthur Frank, and Cheryl Mattingly to shape the way we understand the meaning of pain. To further support the discussion about the normativity of ethical situation in this chapter, Chapter 13 concentrates on ethical deficiencies of maternal subjectivity as constructed by Western socio-political life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Subjectivity is understood as a genesis of the relation between the self, the other, and the world (see Zahavi 2008).

  2. 2.

    In this paper, I focus primarily on chronic pain since its long-lasting period challenges the ways subjectivity unfolds itself in the lifeworld. The mothers, whose written narratives are taken here as testimonies, are between 35–55 years old and in most cases are from different areas of the United States and Western Europe, mirroring, thus, a Western medical paradigm.

  3. 3.

    Phenomenology explains consciousness as a temporalizing flow that manifests as a duration and is structured as a threshold perceptual organism: retention, protention and urimpression. Urimpression is the first sensory experience, the ability of the mind to discern one sensory experience from another as well as from other background noises. The urimpression corresponds to the experience of the present moment, of ‘now’. One urimpression is followed by another. There arises a certain connection in the row of urimpressions: the first sensory experience has already disappeared but still exists in consciousness, and is retained. Every now-moment points to a connection with a future moment. Retentional consciousness makes possible the prospect of expectation called protention (Husserl 2019).

  4. 4.

    In works by Emmanuel Levinas ‘woman’ is linked to the feminine and to maternity. The feminine is read as hospitality and receptivity which are primordial modalities of ethical relation with the other. The feminine stands for the Eros, the otherness of the beloved one, carnality, erotic embodiment, but also welcome and dwelling. It is an intermediate category which creates foundation for the ethical relation. Another aspect found in woman but does not define her identity is maternity. Maternity discloses a pre-original sensibility and unconditioned being-for-the other. Maternity is both, an empirical experience and a metaphor that discloses ethical subjectivity: “And the other whose presence is discretely an absence, with which is accomplished the primary hospitable welcome which describes the field of intimacy, is the Woman. The woman is the condition of recollection, the interiority of the Home, and inhabitation” (Levinas 2004, p. 155).

  5. 5.

    In Levinas’s (2006) ethics, intersubjective temporality is characterized by diachronical time, which is a rupture in linear time initiated by the address of the other.

References

  • Artaud A (1958) The theatre and its double. Grove, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr D (1986) Time, narrative, and history. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haro AS (2011) Is pain an intentional experience? In: Copoeru I, Kontos P, De Haro AS (eds) Selected essays from the Euro-Mediterranean area. Zeta Books, Budapest, pp 386–395

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haro AS (2012) New and old approaches to the phenomenology of pain. Studia Phaenomenologia 12(1):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan G (2000) Mind-body dualism and the biopsychosocial model of pain: what did Descartes really say? J Med Philos 25(4):485–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA (2014) Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. Am Psychol 69(2):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermath ED (1989) The solitude of woman and social time. In: Forman E, Sowton C (eds) Taking our time: feminist perspective on temporality. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1963/2003) The birth of clinic: archeology of medical perception. Oxon Routledge Classics

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AW (2013) The wounded storyteller. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry M (2008) Material phenomenology. Fordham University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1966) Analysis zur passive Synthesis: Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (2019) The phenomenology of internal time consciousness. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B (1978) Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med 88:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva J (1986) Woman’s time. In: Moi T (ed) The kristeva reader. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 187–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E (1985) Time and the other. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E (1988) Useless suffering. In: Bernasconi R, Wood D (eds) The provocation of Levinas: rethinking the other. Routledge, London, UK, pp 156–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E (2004) Totality and infinity. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E (2006) Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingis A (1986) Sensuality and sensitivity. In: Cohen RA (ed) Face to face with Levinas. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly C (1998) Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rey R (1995) The history of pain. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (1998) Philosophy of the will and action. Scholars Press, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P (1990) Time and narrative, vol 1. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodemeyer LM (2003) Developments in the theory of time-consciousness: An analysis of protention. In: Welton D (ed) The new Husserl: a critical reader. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, pp 125–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry E (1985) The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler M (1963) Schriften zur Soziologie und Weltanschauungslehre in Gesammelte Werke. Francke Verlag, Bern/München

    Google Scholar 

  • Schües C (2011) The power of time: temporal experiences and a-temporal thinking. In C. Schües, D.E. Oklowski, & H.A. Fieldings (Eds.). Time in feminist phenomenology. (pp 60–78). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone A (2012) Feminism, psychoanalysis, and maternal subjectivity. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrancken MAE (1989) Schools of thought on pain. Soc Sci Med 29(3):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi D (2008) Subjectivity and selfhood: investigating the first-person perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Poleshchuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Poleshchuk, I. (2021). Temporality of Maternity, Chronic Pain, and Ethics: Challenging Current Narratives on Pain and Health. In: Fitzgerald, A. (eds) Women’s Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1174-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1174-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1173-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1174-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics