Skip to main content

ShExMap and IPSM-AF—Comparison of RDF Transformation Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications

Abstract

RDF is growing in popularity for enterprise data harmonization software (e.g. Virtuoso, or Corporate Memory). Interoperability techniques, e.g. query rewriting, and language transformation rely on the expressivity and flexibility of RDF. As a meta-model capable of expressing information with the use of a variety of vocabularies or ontologies, RDF enables a range of solutions for the problem of data interoperability. Exploiting RDF for interoperability surfaces the need for transformations between homologous RDF structures. This paper examines two independently developed technologies that enable mapping of RDF graphs: Shape Expressions Mapping Language (ShExMap) and IPSM (Inter Platform Semantic Mediator). We investigate the formal languages used by both, examining their theoretical foundation, peculiarities, and design. We consider two practical examples of transformations and compare effectively equivalent constructs that can be expressed in either approach. We also describe both technologies in broader context of practical applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.w3.org/Submission/SPARQL-Update/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.w3.org/Submission/spin-overview/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.hitachivantara.com/go/pentaho.html.

  7. 7.

    http://silkframework.org/.

  8. 8.

    http://openrefine.org/.

  9. 9.

    https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/.

  10. 10.

    https://www.eccenca.com/en/products/eccenca-corporate-memory.html/.

  11. 11.

    http://www.ibspan.waw.pl/.

  12. 12.

    http://inter-iot.eu.

  13. 13.

    https://github.com/INTER-IoT.

  14. 14.

    https://inter-iot-ipsm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

  15. 15.

    http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/.

  16. 16.

    http://bodycloud.dimes.unical.it/.

  17. 17.

    http://inter-iot.eu/GOIoTP#.

  18. 18.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-iri.

  19. 19.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-str.

  20. 20.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-concat.

  21. 21.

    https://www.hl7.org/fhir/.

  22. 22.

    https://inter-iot-cookbook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/inter-layer/ds2ds/recipes/alignment/.

  23. 23.

    https://inter-iot-ipsm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

  24. 24.

    https://inter-iot-cookbook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

  25. 25.

    http://shex.io/.

References

  1. Achieving Technical Tnteroperability—the ETSI approach. ETSI White Paper No. 3

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Boneva, J.E. Labra Gayo, E. Prud’hommeaux, Semantics and Validation of shapes schemas for rdf (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. Corby, C. Faron-Zucker, F. Gandon, A generic rdf transformation software and its application to an online translation service for common languages of linked data, in International Semantic Web Conference (2015), pp. 150–165

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Corby, C.F. Zucker, STTL: A SPARQL-based Transformation Language for RDF

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Correndo, M. Salvadores, I. Millard, H. Glaser, N. Shadbolt, Sparql query rewriting for implementing data integration over linked data. in 1st International Workshop on Data Semantics (DataSem 2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. David, J. Euzenat, F. Scharffe, C. Trojahn dos Santos, The Alignment API 4.0. Semantic Web 2(1), 3–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Ganzha, M. Paprzycki, W. Pawłowski, P. Szmeja, K. Wasielewska, Alignment-based semantic translation of geospatial data, in 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation (ICACCA), Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ganzha, M. Paprzycki, W. Pawłowski, P. Szmeja, K. Wasielewska, Streaming semantic translations, in 21st International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing ICSTCC, Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.E. Labra Gayo, E. Prud’Hommeaux, I. Boneva, D. Kontokostas, Validating RDF Data. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Makris, N. Bikakis, N. Gioldasis, S. Christodoulakis, Sparql-rw: transparent query access over mapped rdf data sources, in 15th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (2012), pp. 610–613

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Michel, J. Montagnat, C.F. Zucker, A survey of RDB to RDF translation approaches and tools. Tech. rep

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.R. Solbrig, E. Prud’hommeaux, G. Grieve, L. McKenzie, J.C. Mandel, D.K. Sharma, G. Jiang, Modeling and validating HL7 FHIR profiles using semantic web Shape Expressions (ShEx). J Biomed Inform 67, 90–100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Szmeja, M. Ganzha, M. Paprzycki, W. Pawłowski, K. Wasielewska, Declarative ontology alignment format for semantic translation, in 3rd International Conference On Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU’18), Proceedings (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the European Union’s “Horizon 2020” research and innovation programme as part of the “Interoperability of Heterogeneous IoT Platforms” (INTER-IoT) project under Grant Agreement No. 687283.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł Szmeja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Prefixes

Appendix: Prefixes

figure ay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Szmeja, P., Prud’hommeaux, E. (2021). ShExMap and IPSM-AF—Comparison of RDF Transformation Technologies. In: Paprzycki, M., Thampi, S.M., Mitra, S., Trajkovic, L., El-Alfy, ES.M. (eds) Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1353. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0730-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics