Abstract
Observer metamerism (OM) is considered the disagreement of color matches due to different color vision between observers. It is a source of uncertainty for color specification and is essential for the design of imaging products. Many experiments have been conducted to quantify the degree of OM. In this paper, two color matching experiments were conducted to study the neutral white on two displays. Based on experiments, 95% ellipses of different SPs and observers were drawn on a*b* plane. Neutrality chromaticity of 2 displays was reported in terms of uāvā. The results of intra-observer and inter-observer variations were reported using mean color difference from a set of mean (MCDM) in terms of CIEDE2000 color differences. Intra-observer variation was calculated using MCDM between 8 repeat matchings. It was found that intra-observer MCDM was 3.9 ranged from 3.1 to 4.4. Inter-observer variation was calculated between observers under each luminance level or SP. It was found that inter- observer MCDM was 5.5 ranged from 4.1 to 7.3. Also, observer variation slightly increased when different SPs were involved.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Observer metamerism refers to the phenomenon that under identical viewing conditions, a metameric pair of colors, that match for one observer, can be mismatched for another observer [1]. In other words, normal color vision observers could still have quite different color perceptions. The color received by human eyes is affected by color matching function (CMF). CMF varies from person to person and is affected by many physiological parameters. [2] The difference between CMFs is one of the reasons for observer metamerism. In 2006, CIE proposed CIEPO06 model [3] to generate CMFs of observers with different ages and field size, and it can be used to evaluate observer metamerism. However, observers with the same age and field size still have different color vision. It is necessary to carry out psychophysics experiments to study and measure the color visional differences between observers.
Various studies were carried out [4,5,6] and their results were reported in terms of MCDM. Each experiment recruited a number of observers to perform color matching experiments. The results were reported in terms of inter- and intra-observer variations. In general, they found that the inter- observer variations (MCDM)were around 2.0ā4.0 CIEDE2000 units and intra-observer variation is smaller by a factor of about 1.5.
The above experiments performed color matching used a white as the external reference. The present work differs from them and is aimed to study the memory color of white perception. In other words, color matching was performed against an internal reference, i.e. each observerās own white perception.
Many studies have been carried out to investigate the chromaticity of neutral white. Huang et al. [7] studied white appearance of a tablet display under 17Ā lighting conditions. 63 observers were asked to judge whether the stimulus can be classified as white and estimate the whiteness percentage. It was found that neutrality centers (using uāvā) under dark and D65 conditions were (0.2001, 0.446) and (0.1976, 0.4451) respectively. Smet et al. [8, 9] studied chromaticity of unique white viewed in object mode and illumination mode under dark adapted conditions. 13 observers conducted unique white setting and unique white rating experiments. Average of neutrality centers in 3Ā luminance levels were (0.2086, 0.4655) and (0.2035, 0.4605) for object mode and illumination mode respectively. In this study, the chromaticity of neutral white was further investigated.
Overall, the goals of this study were to find the neutral chromaticity, to investigate the observer metamerism, including intra-observer and inter-observer variations, and to study the impact of different starting points on observer metamerism.
2 Experimental
The experiment for finding neutrality color was divided into two parts using two displays assessed by two independent groups of observers. The aim was to get a general conclusion of the range of observer variations and to compare the similarities and differences between the two experiments.
2.1 Experiment 1
Experiment 1 was carried out at Zhejiang University on a NEC display, using sRGB to display. Color patterns were presented on a 10-bit āNEC MultiSync PA272Wā LCD display. Observers sat 60Ā cm in front of the display. After chromatic adaptation for 1Ā min, a color patch with black background appeared on the center of screen, which subtended a 4Ā° field of view (FOV). The experiment was carried out in a complete dark room. 25 observers with normal color vision participated in the experiment. Observers used the keyboard to adjust the test stimulus along CCT and Duv directions. There were 2Ā luminance levels (18.42 and 40.75Ā cd/m2) and 4Ā starting points. The two parts of Experiment 1 were named Experiment 1L and Experiment 1H for low and high luminance levels, respectively.
2.2 Experiment 2
Experiment 2 was conducted at home of the first author due to the COVID19 outbreak. The experimental conditions were closely followed those of Experiment 1. A laptop computer by assuming an sRGB display was applied. Ten observers with normal color vision participated in the experiment. When matching neutral white, CIELAB a* and b* were adjusted and lightness was fixed at L* of 61. Each match was started at one of the 4Ā starting points, saturated red, yellow, green and blue. For each starting point, observers repeated 8 times. In total, 320Ā matches were made, i.e. 10 observersāĆā4 SPsāĆā8 repeats.
3 Results and Discussions
The observer metamerism was analysed in 2 parts: intra- and inter- observer variations.
3.1 Intra-observer Variation
Only Experiment 2 results were used to investigate intra-observer variation, because observers in Experiment 1 did not perform the repeated assessments. Table 1Ā shows the MCDM results for each starting point and its mean together with the overall mean, which was calculated to include all the available 320 data. It can be seen that different SPs could impact on observer variation, i.e. observer performed more consistently for the blue SP (3.1) and least consistent for the Yellow SP (4.4) with a mean of 3.9Ā MCDM units. Also, when considering the inclusion of all available data, the observer variation became 4.5, increased by a factor about 1.2.
3.2 Inter-observer Variation
Three sets of experimental results were used to investigate inter-observer variation. Table 2Ā shows the MCDM results for each starting point and its mean together with the overall mean, which was calculated to include all the matching data. Again, it can be found that different SPs seem to impact on inter-observer variation. For example, in Experiment 2, observers performed more consistently for the green and blue SPs than the yellow and red SPs. The results from Experiment 1L and Experiment 2 performed more consistently than those in Experiment 1H. Also, when considering the inclusion of all available data (see overall mean), the observer variation increased by a factor about 1.1.
Observer variations can also be expressed by plotting 95% confidence ellipses in a*b* plane. Figures 1a, b show ellipses for Experiments 1L and 1H respectively. It can be seen that the ellipses in Fig.Ā 1b are in general larger and more scatter than those in Fig.Ā 1a. This means less observer consistency in Experiment 1H than Experiment 1L.
Similar to Fig. 1, Fig. 2 plots the 95% ellipses for the 4 SPs for the Experiment 2 results. Figure 3 plots the ellipses for all 10 observers in Experiment 2. Figure 2Ā showed that all ellipses were very similar in terms of all 3 ellipse parameters, size, shape and orientation, meaning that there was little impact of SPs. It also implies that the results were more consistent in Experiment 2 than those of Experiment 1.
3.3 Neutrality Chromaticity
The goal of the two experiments was to find the neutral chromaticity. For each experiment, all observersā neutrality results were averaged. Figure 4Ā shows the ellipse and neutral center for 2 displays in uāvā chromaticity diagram, and their neutrality chromaticity are listed in Table 3. It can be seen in Fig.Ā 4 that the color centers are reasonably close and the ellipses from the two experiments are different but they all located along the blackbody locus. This implies that observers are more tolerable in yellow & blue direction. The difference between the two centers was about 0.019 in CIE 1976 uāvā units. This discrepancy is due to the observer metamerism together with different display primary sets as reported by Hu et al. [10].
4 Conclusions
In this paper, experiments were conducted to find neutrality chromaticity from 2 displays. The chromatic difference between the two neutrality points are about 0.019 uāvā units but the ellipses were orientated along the blackbody locus.
It was found that there were differences in observer metamerism between the 2 experiments studied, which were measured to quantify the degree of observer metamerism. The results in terms of intra- and inter-observer variations in terms of MCDM CIEDE2000 units were 3.9 and 5.5 CIEDE2000 units, respectively. It could provide reference for the design of displays.The display with less observer metamerism will make observersā color perception more consistent.
References
Xie H, Farnand SP, Murdoch MJ (2020) Observer metamerism in commercial displays. J Opt Soc Am A 37:A61āA69
Asano Y, Fairchild MD, BlondƩ L (2016) Individual colorimetric observer model. Plos One 11
CIE, Fundamental Chromaticity Diagram with Physiological AxesāPart I, CIE 170ā1:2006, Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna, 2006
Cho YJ, Cui G, Luo MR et al (2019) The impact of viewing conditions on observer variability for cross-media colour reproduction. Color Technol 135(3):234ā243
Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blond L et al (2014) Observer variability in color image matching on a LCD monitor and a laser projector. In: Color and Imaging Conference, 22nd Color and Imaging Conference Final Program and Proceedings, pp 1~6
Stiles WS, Burch JM et al (1959) Colour-matching investigation: final report. J Modern Optics 6(1):1ā26
Huang HP, Wei M, Ou LC (2018) White appearance of a tablet display under different ambient lighting conditions. Opt Express 26(4):5018ā5030
Smet K, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P (2014) Chromaticity of unique white in object mode. Opt Express 22:25830ā25841
Smet K, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P (2015) Chromaticity of unique white in illumination mode. Opt Express 23:12488ā12495
Hu Y, Wei M, Luo MR (2020) Observer metamerism to display white point using different primary sets. Opt Express 28:20305ā20323
Acknowledgements
The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 61775190).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fan, H., Hu, Y., Luo, M.R. (2021). Observer Metamerism for Assessing Neutrality on Displays. In: Zhao, P., Ye, Z., Xu, M., Yang, L., Zhang, L., Zhu, R. (eds) Advances in Graphic Communication, Printing and Packaging Technology and Materials. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 754. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0503-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0503-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0502-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0503-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)