Skip to main content

Adoption of Smart Homes in the UK: Customers’ Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering

Abstract

A smart home, also referred to as connected homes, is a house equipped with sensors that enable its occupants to remotely control home devices and appliances. Smart homes have security benefits, health benefits and allows its user to manage energy efficiently. However, despite the numerous benefits of smart home devices, the number of people using smart homes devices in the UK is low. Therefore, this research aims to investigate the factors that affect the adoption rate of smart homes in the UK from the customer’s perspective using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. A quantitative research method was employed for this study and primary data was collected by snowball sampling through an online survey. 53 responses were collected and analysed using appropriate software. Findings show that the UTAUT constructs (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions) influence the behavioural intention of customers to adopt smart homes as well as the actual level of usage. A regression analysis was also carried out to check the influence of moderating factors like the age, gender and smart home awareness on the developed UTAUT model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergeron F, Bouchard K, Gaboury S, Giroux S (2018) Tracking objects within a smart home. Expert Syst Appl 113:428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shuhaiber A, Madhal I (2019) Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technol Soc 58:101110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hargreaves T, Wilson C, Hauxwell-Baldwin R (2018) Learning to live in a smart home. Build Res Inf 46(1):127–139

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nikou S (2019) Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: an empirical assessment. Telematics Inform 45:101283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghaffarianhoseini A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Omrany H, Fleury A, Naismith N, Ghaffarianhoseini M (2017) The essence of smart homes: application of intelligent technologies towards smarter urban future. In: Connor AM, Marks S (eds) Handbook of research on creative technologies for multidisciplinary applications. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 334–376

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balta-Ozkan N, Davidson R, Bicket M, Whitmarsh L (2013) The development of smart homes market in the UK. Energy 60:361–372

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno V, Ruiz ML, Malagon J, Duboy MA, Linden M (2016) The role of smart homes in intelligent homecare and healthcare environments. In: Dobre C, Garcia N, Mastorakis G, Mavromoustakis C, Goleva R (eds) Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments. Butterworth-Heinemann, Cambridge, pp 345–394

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mehrotra S, Dhande R (2015) Smart cities and smart homes: from realization to reality. In: International conference on green computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT). IEEE, pp 1236–1239

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission (2015) Towards an integrated strategic energy technology (SET) plan: accelerating the European energy system transformation. European Commission, Brussels, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. HMG (2009) The UK low carbon transition plan: national strategy for climate and energy. HM Government, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlan T, Brown M, Mortier R, Houghton RJ, Goulden M, Lawson G (2012) Exploring acceptance and consequences of the Internet of Things in the home. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on green computing and communications, pp 148–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quart 27(3):425–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rice S, Winter SR, Doherty S, Milner M (2017) Advantages and disadvantages of using internet-based survey methods. J Aviat Technol 7(1):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malhotra N (2006) Questionnaire Design and Scale Development. In: Grover R, Vriens M (eds) The handbook of marketing research: uses, misuses, and future advances. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 84–94

    Google Scholar 

  15. Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 4th edn. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart 19(2):189–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang A (2012) UTAUT and UTAUT 2: a review and agenda for future research. Winners 13(2):106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghalandari K (2012) The effect of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions on acceptance of E-Banking services in Iran: the moderating role of age and gender. Middle-East J Sci Res 12(6):801–807

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tan PJB (2013) Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of English e-learning websites in Taiwan. Sage Open, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moussaid M, Kammer JE, Analyirs PP, Neth H (2013) Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. Centre for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alshehri MA (2012) Using the UTAUT model to determine factors affecting acceptance and use of e-government services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ph.D. thesis, Griffith University. Available at: https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/1c7cab3e-da14-452a-8379-95387756bd56/1/Alshehri_2013_02Thesis.pdf. Accessed on 07 Jan 2020

  22. Phichitchaisopa N, Naenna T (2013) Factors affecting the adoption of healthcare information technology. EXCLI J 12:413–436

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y-S, Wu M-C, Wang H-Y (2009) Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Br J Edu Technol 40(1):92–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu M-Y, Yu P-Y, Weng Y-C (2012) A study on user behaviour for I pass by UTAUT: using Taiwan’s MR as an example. Asian Pac Manag Rev 17(1):91–111

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khechine H, Lakhal S, Pascot D, Bytha A (2014) UTAUT model for blended learn: the role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisc J E-Learning Learn Objects 10:33–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukund Janardhanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oyinlola Ayodimeji, Z., Janardhanan, M., Marinelli, M., Patel, I. (2021). Adoption of Smart Homes in the UK: Customers’ Perspective. In: Kumar, N., Tibor, S., Sindhwani, R., Lee, J., Srivastava, P. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9956-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics