Skip to main content

Aristotle and Bioethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risks and Regulation of New Technologies

Abstract

In bioethics Aristotle’s ethics is often reevaluated as representative of so-called ‘virtue ethics’ as alternative position to current modern ethical theories (esp. utilitarianism and deontology). However, most of these approaches are free reconstruction of his theory or idea. This paper considers what we can say from Aristotle’s text in itself. Through this consideration I present the following points; (i) the central notion of Aristotle’s ethics is eudaimonia (flourishing life), rather than virtue (aretê) and then his ethics should be characterized as eudemonics above all, rather than virtue ethics. (ii) His notion of eudaimonia can justify some euthanasia, but does not demonstrate doctor’s obligation to accept patient's request for euthanasia. (iii) Aristotle’s view of moderate unity of ethics gives a hint about the problem unity of bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    e.g. Foot [1, 2].

  2. 2.

    As to my reference to Aristotle’s texts, I point out relevant part of Becker Version according to the convention.

  3. 3.

    Kass [3].

  4. 4.

    Beauchamp and Childress [4].

  5. 5.

    Jonsen et al. [5].

  6. 6.

    e.g. Foot [1, 2], Hursthouse [6,7], Sandel [8].

  7. 7.

    e.g. Rachels [9].

  8. 8.

    Foot [2].

  9. 9.

    e.g. Drane [10].

References

  1. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foot, P. (1977). Euthanasia. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(2), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kass, L. R. (1989). Neither for love nor money: Why doctors must not kill. Public Interest, 94, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beauchamp, T. O., & Childress, F. C. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jonsen, A. R, Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2002). Clinical ethics (5th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hursthouse, R. (1991). Virtue theory and abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Summer, 20(3), 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hursthouse, R. (2011). Applying virtue ethics to our treatment of the other animals. In Beauchamp, T. L. & Frey, R. G. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of animal ethics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandel, M. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rachels, J. (1975). Active and passive euthanasia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 292(January 9), 78–80

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drane, J. F. (1995). Becoming a good doctor: The place of virtue and character in medical ethics (2nd ed.). Sheed & Ward

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoto Chatani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Kobe University

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chatani, N. (2021). Aristotle and Bioethics. In: Matsuda, T., Wolff, J., Yanagawa, T. (eds) Risks and Regulation of New Technologies. Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8689-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8689-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8688-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8689-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics