Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of Multi-objective Hybrid DE-PSO Optimization Technique for Network Congestion Management Through Distributed Energy Storage System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 916))

Abstract

Transmission congestion is one of the prevailing limitation present in the current scenario employing the restructured power system. It is the scarcity of transmission capacity to deliver the power to all the prioritized load transactions at transmission and distribution end. Several other issues rather than obstruction to continuous power flow have risen due to the congested network such as market inefficiency, market power and security. Transmission line parameters will be exceeded beyond its stability limits effecting voltage and thermal limits of the entire transmission system. Congestion management is a methodology that helps us to resolve the issues prevailing in the network owing to restriction in path of power flow through transmission lines having certain power flow limits. Management of power flow congestion in huge electric power system remains a challenging and tough task which can be achieved by introducing Distributed Energy Storage System (DESS) in the congested line. Optimized definite location and size of DESSs are necessary before placing it for maximizing the social welfare function which is nothing but profit to both the producers and consumer of electricity. Consequently, in this work, congestion management for ‘24 h’ time frame has been proposed. It manages the network congestion by selecting preeminent site and size of DESS with in ‘24 h’ time frame. Transmission Congestion Rent (TCR) is used to find the preeminent site for Distributed Generator (DG) whereas hybrid combination of Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique for optimal DG size. In this work, Solar PV along with Energy Storage System (ESS) is utilized as Distributed Energy Storage System (DESS). ESS along with DG is used to store surplus energy during off-load period which will be utilized at peak load thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of the system. Real 24 h’ solar irradiance and temperature data of Delhi are taken to mathematically model the power generated from Solar PV. The suggested methodology is verified on standard IEEE 30 bus system with certain modifications. At the meantime, 24 h’ demand data is created by considering 25% load of the original IEEE 30 bus demand data. The efficacy of proposed methodology is assessed by matching the proposed system results with PSO technique based system results as available in the literature. After analysis it is observed that hybrid optimization technique outperforms the PSO optimization technique in managing resources and congestion problem in the network for the ‘24 h’ time frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.ferc.gov/

  2. http://www.caiso.com/Pages/default.aspx

  3. http://www.nyiso.com/public/index.jsp

  4. J. Hazra, A.K. Sinha, Congestion management using multi-objective particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22(4), 1726–1734 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B.K. Talukdar, A.K. Sinha, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. Bose, A computationally simple method for cost-efficient generation rescheduling and load shedding for congestion management. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 27(5–6), 379–388 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Kumar, R.K. Mittapalli, Congestion management with generic load model in hybrid electricity markets with FACTS devices. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 57, 49–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Shao, V. Vittal, Corrective switching algorithm for relieving overloads and voltage violations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20, 1877–1885 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.S. Salkuti, Congestion management based on optimal rescheduling of generators and load demands using swarm intelligent techniques. Adv. Electrical Electronic Eng. 15(5), 713–723 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kumar, S.C. Srivastava, S.N. Singh, A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(1), 554–562 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Singh, N.P. Padhy, J.D. Sharma, Social welfare maximization considering reactive power and congestion management in deregulated environment. Int. J. Electric Power Component Syst. 38, 50–71 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Dutta, S.P. Singh, Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23(4), 1560–1569 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Li, C. Jiang, Short-term operation model and risk management for wind power penetrated system in electricity market. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(2), 932–939 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Gope, A. Goswami, P. Tiwari, S. Deb, Rescheduling of real power for congestion management with integration of pumped storage hydro unit using firefly algorithm. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 83, 434–444 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Subhasish, G. Sadhan, A.K. Goswami, Congestion management considering wind energy sources using evolutionary algorithm. Int. J. Electric Power Component Syst. 43, 723–732 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Dutta, S.P. Singh, Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 23, 1560–1569 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kumar, S.C. Srivastava, S.N. Singh, A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19, 554–562 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gerbex, R. Cherkaoui, A.J. Germond, Optimal location of multi-type FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16(3), 537–544 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.N. Singh, A.K. David, Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management. Electric Power Syst. Res. 58(2), 71–79 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Acharya, N. Mithulananthan, Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electric Power Syst. Res. 77, 352–360 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Jeerapong, W. Ongsakul, Optimal placement of multi-type FACTS devices for total transfer capability enhancement using hybrid evolutionary algorithm. Electric Power Components Syst. 35, 981–1005 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Ghahremani, I. Kamwa, Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28(2), 764–778 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.G. Douglas, G.T. Heydt, Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 13(1), 60–65 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Asija D. Abhishek, P. Choudekar, Y. Manganuri, Series smart wire—managing load and congestion in transmission line, in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2017), p. 516

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Singh, V.K. Yadav, N.P. Padhy, J. Sharma, Congestion management considering optimal placement of distributed generator in deregulated power system networks. Electric Power Components Syst. 42, 13–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Afkousi-Paqaleh, A.F. Abbaspour-Tehrani, M. Rashidinejad, Distributed generation placement for congestion management considering economical and financial issues. Electrical Eng. 92(6), 193–201 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Ghosh, S.P. Ghoshal, S. Ghosh, Optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation in a network system. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 32, 849–856 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Kashyap, S. Kansal, Hybrid approach for congestion management using optimal placement of distributed generator. Int. J. Ambient Energy 39(2), 132–142 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Nayanatara, J. Baskaran, D.P. Kothari, Hybrid optimization implemented for distributed generation parameters in a power system network. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 78, 690–699 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M.F. Akorde, H. Nizam, I. Aris, M.Z.A. Abkadir, A review of strategies for optimal placement of distributed generation in power distribution systems. Res. J. Appl. Sci. 5(2), 137–145 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Gautam, N. Mithulananthan, Locating distributed enerator in the LMP-based electricity market for social welfare maximization. Electric Power Components Syst. 35, 489–503 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Gautam, M. Nadarajah, Influence of distributed generation on congestion and LMP in competitive electricity market. Int. J. Electrical Power Eng. 3(4), 228–235 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Sarwar, A.S. Siddiqui, An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in de-regulated electricity market. Front. Energy 10(2), 240–248 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Smriti et al., Special issue on intelligent tools and techniques for signals, machines and automation. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35(5), 4895–4899 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N.K. Nandan et al., Solving nonconvex economic thermal power dispatch problem with multiple fuel system and valve point loading effect using fuzzy reinforcement learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35(5), 4921–4931 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-169776

  35. H. Malik et al., PSO-NN-based hybrid model for long-term wind speed prediction: a study on 67 cities of India, in Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 697 (2018), pp. 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1822-1_29

  36. T. Mahto et al., Load frequency control of a solar-diesel based isolated hybrid power system by fractional order control using particle swarm optimization. J. Intelli. Fuzzy Syst. 35(5), 5055–5061 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. T. Mahto et al., Fractional order control and simulation of wind-biomass isolated hybrid power system using particle swarm optimization, in Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Engineering, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 698 (2018), pp. 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1819-1_28

  38. M. Saravanan, S.M.R. Slochanal, P. Venkatesh, J.P.S. Abraham, Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electric Power Syst. Res., 276–283 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  39. N.K. Yadav, Rescheduling-based congestion management scheme using particle swarm optimization with distributed acceleration constants. Soft Comput., 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Bhattacharya, S. Kumar, Loadability enhancement with FACTS devices using gravitational search algorithm. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 78, 470–479 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. R. Hooshmand, M. Morshed, M. Parastegari, Congestion management by determining optimal location of series FACTS devices using hybrid bacterial foraging and Nelder mead algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 28, 57–68 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J. Jeslin Drusila Nesamalar, P. Venkatesh, S. Charles Raja, Managing multi-line power congestion by using hybrid Nelder-Mead—Fuzzy Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization (HNM-FAPSO). Appl. Soft Comput. J. 43, 222–234 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Jalili, N. Ghadimi, Hybrid harmony search algorithm and fuzzy mechanism for solving congestion management problem in an electricity market. Complexity 21, 90–98 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. N.A. Khan, G.A.S. Sidhu, F. Gao, Optimizing combined emission economic dispatch for solar integrated power systems. IEEE Access 4, 3340–3348 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. Asija, K.M. Soni, S.K. Sinha et al., Multi-objective optimization and network security enhancement for congestion management in wholesale electricity market. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8, 1775–1782 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, in International Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings, IEEE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Storn, K. Price, Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, pp. 1–15 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  48. U. Chakraborty, Advances in Differential Evolution (Springer, Heidelberg, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. O. Alsac, B. Stott, Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. PAS-93, No. 3, pp. 745–751 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  50. https://www.wunderground.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, UP, India

    Divya Asija & Pallavi Choudekar

Authors
  1. Divya Asija
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pallavi Choudekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya Asija .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ICE Division, NSUT, Delhi, India

    Hasmat Malik

  2. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Qatar, Qatar

    Atif Iqbal

  3. Electrical Engineering Department, Rajkiya Engineering College, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Puneet Joshi

  4. Electrical Engineering Department, Rajkiya Engineering College, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Sanjay Agrawal

  5. Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, India

    Farhad Ilahi Bakhsh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Asija, D., Choudekar, P. (2021). Application of Multi-objective Hybrid DE-PSO Optimization Technique for Network Congestion Management Through Distributed Energy Storage System. In: Malik, H., Iqbal, A., Joshi, P., Agrawal, S., Bakhsh, F.I. (eds) Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 916. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7571-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation