Skip to main content

Pragmatism and Socio-Political Movement Toward Solidarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pragmatism, Spirituality and Society
  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews how two organizations within civic society—LiKEN in Appalachia and FUNDAEC in rural Colombia—are building solidarity and countering the space-time frames of global capitalism by engaging in spiritual pragmatism. Both organizations cultivate fluency in their work addressing human needs and the real-world consequences of human actions. Following this is an analysis of the creative tension that exists between structure and agency, and a beginning theoretical account of how social entities, like LiKEN and FUNDAEC, generate the coherence and the capacity for transformation that is needed to address problematic power complexes and global contradictions. Improvement in social and systemic integration achieved by these organizations emerges relationally, out of the interaction between the causal powers of agency and social structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbab, Farzam. 2000. “Promoting a Discourse on Science, Religion, and Development.” In The Lab, The Temple, and The Market: Reflections at the Intersection of Science, Religion, and Development, ed. Sharon Harper. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahruddin, Azizan. 2000. “Rediscovering the Resources of Religion.” In The Lab, The Temple, and The Market: Reflections at the Intersection of Science, Religion, and Development, ed. Sharon Harper. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baka, A.E. 2016. The Dialectic of the Cave: Self-Determination, Constitution and the Phenomenology of Deprivation, thesis. University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b5731083.

  • Bion, W.R. 1959. Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Teresa. 2000. Exhausting Modernity: Grounds for a New Economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Walter. 1967. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Andrew. 1989. Scientific Realism and Socialist Thought. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, Ronald. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1988a. The Later Works, 1925–1953 Volume 2: 1925–1927. Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, textual ed. Bridget A. Walsh. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1988b.The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 11, 1925–1953: Essays, Reviews, Trotsky Inquiry, Miscellany, and Liberalism and Social Action (Collected Works of John Dewey). Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, textual ed. Bridget A. Walsh. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festenstein, M. 2002. “Pragmatism’s Boundaries.” Millennium—Journal of International Studies 31 (3): 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. “Pragmatism and Two Models of Democracy.” European Journal of Social Theory 7 (3): 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J.C., and N. Hass-Cohen. 2015. Art Therapy and the Neuroscience of Relationships, Creativity, and Resiliency: Skills and Practices. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K., and T. Biddel. 2006. Dynamic Development of Action, Thought and Emotion. In Theoretical Models of Human Development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 1, ed. W. Damon and R.M. Lerner, 313–399. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon. 2012. “Continuous Institutional Innovation and the Pragmatic Conception of Democracy.” Polity 4 (44) (October): 609–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geredien, Julie. 2018. “Transformative Harmony and the Community-Making Process.” In Transformative Harmony, ed. Ananta Giri. New Delhi: Studera Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermass, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, George. 1999. Agent-Centered Morality: An Aristotelian Alternative to Kantian Internalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, Clarissa Rile. 2011. “What Can Political Freedom Mean in a Multicultural Democracy?: On Deliberation, Difference, and Democratic Governance.” Political Theory 39 (4): 468–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbach, David. 1995. “Virtues and Democracy.” In New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions and Communities, ed. Amitai Etzioni. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, Michael. 2017. The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. 1978. Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, Alice. 2007. A Surplus of Living Attention: Celebrating the Life and Ideas of Teresa Brennan, Ed. Alice Jardine, Shannon Lundeen, and Kelly Oliver. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, Paul II. 1987. “Solicitudo Rei Socialis: To the Bishops, Priests Religious Families, sons and daughters of the Church and all people of good will for the twentieth anniversary of Populorum Progressio” found at www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans. 1971. What Is Justice: Justice, Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science: Collected Essay by Hans Kelsen. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, Charles. 1979. Tiv Song: The Sociology of Art in a Classless Society. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Donald. 1991. “Introduction.” In Lectures on Ethics, 1900–1901: John Dewey. Ed. Donald F Koch. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Alain LeRoy. 1989. The Philosophy of Alain Locke: Harlem Renaissance and Beyond. Ed. Leonard Harris. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan, Bernard J. F. 1972. “Insight: A Study of Human Understanding.” Method in Theology, 3–25. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, Joanna. 1991. Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory: The Dharma of Natural Systems. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misak, Cheryl. 2000. Truth, Morality and Politics: Pragmatism and Deliberation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustakova-Possardt, E. 2003. Critical Consciousness: A Study of Morality in Global, Historical Context. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustakova-Possardt, et al. 2014. Toward a Socially Responsible Psychology for a Global Era. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, Darcia. 2014. Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality: Evolution, Culture and Wisdom. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S. 1994. Getting Specific: Postmodern Lesbian Politics. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory. Ed. Nancy J. Hirschmann and Christine DiStefano. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Herbert, and Betsy Taylor. 2010. Recovering the Commons: Democracy, Place, and Global Justice. Springfield: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwering, Markus. 2014, 24 July. “Internet and Public Sphere: What the Web Can’t Do” Reset Dialogues on Civilizations found at www.resetdoc.org/story/internet-and-public-sphere-what-the-web-cant-do/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Daniel. 2012. The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are, Second Edition. London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, Piet. 1999. “Triple Contingency: The Theoretical Problem of the Public in Communication Societies.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Betsy. 2010. “Pollution, Subsistence, Sustainability in USA Nationalism: The Symbolic Construction of ‘Appalachia’ as America’s ‘trash’ People.” In Interrogating Development: Insights from Margins, 62–82. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain. 1995. Critique of Modernity. Cambridge: Blackwell, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geredien, J.M. (2021). Pragmatism and Socio-Political Movement Toward Solidarity. In: Giri, A.K. (eds) Pragmatism, Spirituality and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7114-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics