Skip to main content

An Approach of Feature Subset Selection Using Simulated Quantum Annealing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management, Analytics and Innovation

Abstract

Feature selection is one of the important preprocessing steps in machine learning and data mining domain. However, finding the best feature subsets for large datasets is computationally expensive task. Meanwhile, quantum computing has emerged as a new computational model that is able to speed up many classical computationally expensive problems. Annealing-based quantum model, for example, finds the lowest energy state of an Ising model Hamiltonian, which is the formalism for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Due to its capabilities in producing quality solution to the hard combinatorial optimization problems with less computational effort, quantum annealing has the potentiality in feature subset selection. Although several hard optimization problems are solved, using quantum annealing, not sufficient work has been done on quantum annealing based feature subset selection. Though the reported approaches have good theoretical foundation, they usually lack required empirical rigor. In this paper, we attempt to reduce classical benchmark feature evaluation functions like mRMR, JMI, and FCBF to QUBO formulation, enabling the use of quantum annealing based optimization to feature selection. We then apply QUBO of ten datasets using both Simulated Annealing (SA) and Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA) and compared the result. Our empirical results confirm that, for seven in ten datasets, SQA is able to produce at most equal or less number of features in all selected subset compared to SA does. SQA also results in stable feature subsets for all datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar, V., & Minz, S. (2014). Feature selection. SmartCR, 4, 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goswami, S., Chakrabarti, A., & Chakraborty, B. (2018). An empirical study of feature selection for classification using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 10, 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, J., Alelyani, S. & Liu, H. (2014). Feature selection for classification: A review. Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R. P., Tang, J., et al. (2017). Feature selection: A data perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 50, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mueller, F., Dreher, P., & Byrd, G. (2019). Programming quantum computers: a primer with IBM Q and D-Wave exercises. In: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, p. 451.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, H., Huang, Y. & Wu, B. (2018). Exact equivalence between quantum adiabatic algorithm and quantum circuit algorithm. Chinese Physics Letters, 35, 110303.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. (2002). Quantum computation and quantum information. American Journal of Physics, 70, 558–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Havlíček, V., Córcoles, A. D., Temme, K., Harrow, A. W., Kandala, A., Chow, J. M., et al. (2019). Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567, pp. 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ushijima-Mwesigwa, H., Negre, C. F. A. & Mniszewski, S. M. (2017). Graph partitioning using quantum annealing on the D-wave system. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Post Moores Era Supercomputing. Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crosson, E. & Harrow, A. W.(2016). Simulated quantum annealing can be exponentially faster than classical simulated annealing. In: 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 714–723.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, G., Pocock, A., Zhao, M.-J., & Luján, M. (2012). Conditional likelihood maximisation: A unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 27–66.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding, “Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, pp. 1226–1238, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, H. & Moody, J. (1999). Feature selection based on joint mutual information. In: Proceedings of International ICSC Symposium on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, L. & Liu, H. (2003). Feature selection for high-dimensional data: A fast correlation-based filter solution. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03), pp. 856–863.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ciliberto, C., Herbster, M., Ialongo, A. D., Pontil, M., Rocchetto, A., Severini, S., et al. (2018). Quantum machine learning: A classical perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 474, 20170551.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017). Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549, 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neukart, F., Compostella, G., Seidel, C., von Dollen, D., Yarkoni, S. & Parney, B. (2017). Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer. Frontiers in ICT, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ising, E. (1925). Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik, 31, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He, Z., Li, L., Huang, Z., & Situ, H. (2018). Quantum-enhanced feature selection with forward selection and backward elimination. Quantum Information Processing, 17, 154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Milne, A., Rounds, M., & Goddard, P. (2018). Optimal feature selection using a quantum annealer. In: High-Performance Computing in Finance, (Ed): Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp. 561–588.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tanahashi, K., Takayanagi, S., Motohashi, T., & Tanaka, S. (2018, 2019). Global mutual information based feature selection by quantum annealing. https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/qubits2018_mifs_ver2.pdf.

  22. Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Aarts, E. H. (1987). Simulated annealing. In: Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications, (Ed). Springer, pp. 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kadowaki, T., & Nishimori, H. (). Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Physical Review E, 58, 5355–5363.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dua, D., Casey, G. (2017, 2019). UCI machinle learning repository. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php.

  25. Shinmorino, S. M. (April 15 2019). Solvers/annealers for simulated quantum annealing on CPU and CUDA(NVIDIA GPU). https://github.com/shinmorino/sqaod.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This is to acknowledge that the present work is supported by DST-JSPS (Indo-Japan) Bilateral Open Partnership Joint Research Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basabi Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mandal, A.K., Panday, M., Biswas, A., Goswami, S., Chakrabarti, A., Chakraborty, B. (2021). An Approach of Feature Subset Selection Using Simulated Quantum Annealing. In: Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, A., Balas, V., Martinovic, J. (eds) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1174. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5616-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics