Abstract
Mild sunburn is quite frequent in Sri Lanka, commonly among school children and young mothers. Schooling hours in Sri Lanka are 7.30 am to 1.30 pm. Young mothers who come to pick-up pre-school children do not use any method of sun protection. Therefore school children, young mothers, and manual laborers are the most vulnerable.
Broad classification of photodermatoses is shown below. Out of all more than 90% we see are polymorphic light eruptions (PLE). Mostly PLE is mild or moderate being asymptomatic to mild itching. Commonest clinical presentation is hypopigmented patches on the face and the forearms.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Mild sunburn is quite frequent in Sri Lanka, commonly among school children and young mothers. Schooling hours in Sri Lanka are 7.30 am to 1.30 pm. Young mothers who come to pick-up pre-school children do not use any method of sun protection. Therefore school children, young mothers, and manual laborers are the most vulnerable.
Broad classification of photodermatoses is shown below. Out of all more than 90% we see are polymorphic light eruptions (PLE). Mostly PLE is mild or moderate being asymptomatic to mild itching. Commonest clinical presentation is hypopigmented patches on the face and the forearms.
(photographed by Dr. Ranthilaka R. Ranawaka)
-
1.
Mother of this 8 year-old boy is worried about this asymptomatic hypopigmented patches on the face for 3 months which were worsening.
-
(a)
What is your diagnosis?
-
(b)
How do you manage this condition?
-
(a)
(photographed by Dr. Ranthilaka R. Ranawaka).
-
2.
A 32-year-old woman came with itchy hypopigmented patches on her both forearms which were worsening over 6 months. On direct inquiry, we found that she is a mother of two primary school children, and she rides a scooter for transportation.
-
(a)
What is your diagnosis?
-
(b)
Why information on direct inquiry is important in management?
-
(c)
In addition to treatments what advice would you give her?
-
(a)
(photographed by Dr. Ranthilaka R. Ranawaka).
-
3.
An 11-year-old boy came with this mildly itchy hypopigmented patches on the face. He is a member of school swimming team.
-
(a)
What is your diagnosis?
-
(b)
What advice would you give him?
-
(a)
(photographed by Dr. Ranthilaka R. Ranawaka).
-
4.
A 48-year-old man’s these skin patches become itchy and erythematous on sunlight exposure.
-
(a)
What is your clinical diagnosis?
-
(b)
How do you confirm the diagnosis?
-
(c)
What advice would you give regarding sunlight exposure?
-
(a)
Answers
-
1.
Polymorphic light eruption
Reassurance, mild topical steroid twice daily and sunscreen cream on day time
-
2.
Polymorphic light eruption
Pre-school children are picked-up at 12 noon (highest sunlight exposure), and mostly mothers ride scooters without over-coats/jerkins. We have to find the possible predisposing factors.
Educate the woman on predisposing factors, proper sun protection using sunscreen and clothing.
-
3.
Polymorphic light eruption
He has to use water proof SPF >50 sunscreen during swimming
-
4.
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE)
Skin biopsy for histopathology
DLE exacerbate on sunlight exposure. Therefore he has to use sunscreens SPF >50 during the day time.
2 Idiopathic Photodermatosis
2.1 Polymorphic Light Eruption (PLE)
PLE is a recurrent, delayed-onset, abnormal reaction to sunlight (or artificial UVR source) that resolves without scarring. It is common and has a wide range of severity but can markedly affect quality of life. PLE is much commoner in women (Roelandts 2000).
Clinical Features
PLE presents as pruritic erythematous or hypopigmented papular rash on exposed sites, mainly neck forearms and legs. Several morphological types including papules, plaques, papulovesicular, vesicularbullous, haemorragic, and erythema mutiforme like lesions described (Ibbotson and Dawe 2016; Lehman et al. 2011; Srinivas et al. 2012).
Diagnosis
Mostly clinical
Management
Sun avoidance and protective measures, broad-spectrum high SPF sunscreens, and topical or systemic corticosteroid therapy are sufficient in mild to moderate PLE.
Prophylactic phototherapy/photochemotherapy is the main second-line therapy used.
Long-term immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine and ciclosporin for refractory cases (Figs. 10.1–10.12).
2.2 Hydroa Vacciniformae
Characterized by vesicles and crust formation after sun exposure. Lesions typically occur on photoexposed sites and may persist several weeks and heal with varioliform scarring. Usually presents in childhood with spontaneous improvement during adolescence. This type is not seen in Sri Lanka.
2.3 Chronic Actinic Dermatitis (CAD)
CAD is a persistent or recurring dermatitis predominantly affecting photo-exposed sites. There is evidence of photosensitivity. Typically occurs in elderly men who worked in outdoor exposed to hot sunlight, e.g., farmers, manual laborers. All patients have abnormal photosensitivity, and most of them have multiple contact allergies.
Clinical presentation ranges from dermatitis, depigmentation, and erythroderma (Wolverton et al. 2014; Henry et al. 1994).
Differential Diagnosis
Airborne contact dermatitis, photoaggravated atopic or seborrhoeic eczema, drug-induced photosensitivity, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Management
Very potent/potent topical corticosteroids, topical tacrolimus or pimecrolimus, PUVA, UVB phototherapy can be effective.
In-patient nursing behind visible- and UV-absorbing window film may be required in extensive cases.
Hydroxychloroquine, ciclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxycarbamide, etretinate, danazol, thioguanine, topical nitrogen mustard, thalidomide, infliximab, and INF-α have been reported to be effective but only in small case series and case reports (Paek and Lim 2014; Ibbotson and Dawe 2016).
The avoidance of combined photo (chemo) therapy and systemic immunosuppressant, particularly ciclosporin, is advised due to photo-carcinogenic risk (Figs. 10.13–10.18) (Lenane & Murphy 2001).
2.4 Solar Urticaria
Immediate type of hypersensitivity reaction usually to UVA and visible light, less often to UVB. Characterized by itching, erythema, and whealing over exposed sites. Usually idiopathic but can be seen association with medication (Fig. 10.19) (Botto & Warshaw 2008; Perez-Ferriols et al. 2017).
2.5 Actinic Prurigo
Uncommon acquired idiopathic photodermatosis. Usually manifest in childhood. Pruritis is a common feature. They develop patchy edematous erythema with papules, occasionally vesicles. Later transform into chronic excoriated prurigo lesions often with nodules and plaques. Maximum on exposed sites, heals leaving scarring (Fig. 10.20).
3 Photocontact Dermatitis
3.1 Drug-Induced Photosensitivity
There are number of groups of drugs which can cause photosensitivity. Range of reactions can vary widely and can give rise to various clinical manifestations including urticaria, erythema, blisters, eczematization, and lupus-like and lichenoid reactions.
Some of common drugs responsible for photosensitivity are tetracyclines, griseofulvin, thiazides, isotretinoin/acitretin, phenothiazines, psoralens, and NSAIDS (Fig. 10.21).
3.2 Photoaggravated Dermatosis
There are some diseases which can be aggregated by exposure to light.
Classical: Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, lupus erythematosis, Jessner lymphocytic infiltrate, dermatomyositis, lymphocytoma cutis, actinic lichen planus, erythema multiformae, acne vulgaris, pemphigus, Darier disease, transient acantholytic dermatosis, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis, pellagra, and viral exanthems including herpes simplex.
Other photoaggravated dermatosis are allergic contact dermatitis, seborrhoeic dermatitis, rosecea, melasma, mycosis fungoides, vitiligo, bullous pemphigoid, linear IGA disease, dermatitis herpitiformis, chronic ordinary urticaria, facial telangiectasia, pityriasis rubra, reticulate erythematosis musinosis, keratosis pillaris, actinic granuloma (Figs. 10.22–10.38) (Kerker & Morison 1990).
3.3 Phytophotodermatitis
Naturally occurring chemicals from plants when come in contact with skin and are subsequently irritated by sunlight producing characteristic clinical features. Lesions are mainly distributed on face, V area on the neck, arms, and sometimes trunk and legs depending on the types of clothing they wear. Some plants will produce phototoxic reactions, while some will produce photoallergy.
Citrus family can produce characteristic pigmentation on exposure to sunlight. Sandalwood can be included in beauty regimes and can cause hyperpigmentation and eczematization. As a cure for some skin diseases people use to wash their bodies in herbs boiled water which can cause severe photodermatitis (Figs. 10.39–10.42) (Moreau et al. 2014; Pfurtscheller & Trop 2014).
References
Botto NC, Warshaw EM (2008) Solar urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol 59(6):909–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.020
Henry W et al (1994) Chronic actinic dermatitis- an analysis of 51 patients evaluated in the United States and Japan. Arch Dermatol 130(10):1284–1289
Ibbotson S, Dawe R (2016) Cutaneous photosensitivity diseases. In: Rook’s textbook of dermatology, 9th edn. Wiley-Blackwell Science, UK, pp 127.2–127.13
Kerker BJ, Morison WL (1990) The photoaggravated dermatoses. Semin Dermatol 9(1):70–77
Lehman P et al (2011) Photodermatoses: diagnosis and treatment. Dtsh Anzel int 108(9):135–141
Lenane P, Murphy GM (2001) Sunscreens and the photodermatoses. J Dermatolog Treat 12(1):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/095466301750163608
Moreau JF, English JC 3rd, Gehris RP (2014) Phytophotodermatitis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 27(2):93–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2013.11.001
Paek SY, Lim HW (2014) Chronic actinic dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 32(3):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2014.03.007
Pérez-Ferriols A, Barnadas M, Gardeazábal J et al (2017) Solar urticaria: epidemiology and clinical phenotypes in a Spanish series of 224 patients. Urticaria solar. Epidemiología y fenotipos clínicos en una serie española de 224 pacientes. Actas Dermosifiliogr 108(2):132–139
Pfurtscheller K, Trop M (2014) Phototoxic plant burns: report of a case and review of topical wound treatment in children. Pediatr Dermatol 31(6):e156–e159. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12396
Roelandts R (2000) The diagnosis of photosensitivity. Arch Dermatol 136(9):1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.136.9.1152
Srinivas CR, Sekar CS, Jayashree R (2012) Photodermatoses in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 78(Suppl 1):S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.97349
Wolverton JE, Soter NA, Cohen DE (2014) The natural history of chronic actinic dermatitis: an analysis at a single institution in the United States. Dermatitis 25(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Silva, H. (2021). Photodermatosis. In: Ranawaka, R.R., Kannangara, A.P., Karawita, A. (eds) Atlas of Dermatoses in Pigmented Skin. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5483-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5483-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5482-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5483-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)