Abstract
Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) is generated in large quantities during production, processing, and consumption. Several conventional methods are used for treating the FVW, such as incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion, and composting. Compared to these methods, vermicomposting has the advantages of effective stabilization of the organic wastes like FVW through joint action of earthworms and microorganisms in decomposition of the easily decaying organic constituents and of higher reuse value for its final product as organic fertilizer. However, treating fresh FVW directly by vermicomposting is difficult to be conducted because of higher water content and C/N ratio of FVW. Excess activated sludge (EAS), as the main by-product of sewage treatment process, is also an organic waste consisting of microorganisms that can be treated by vermicomposting. Vermicomposting of fresh FVW with the addition of EAS is not only reported as a feasible option to solve the problem caused by the higher water content and C/N ratio of FVW but also can enhance the treatment process. The rich content of microorganisms, nitrogen, and phosphorus in EAS can promote the growth of earthworms and enhance the microbial activity, thus improving the decomposition efficiency of FVW and improving the utilization value of the final product as fertilizer. The present chapter summarizes the several conventional treatment methods of FVW and proposes a more feasible and sustainable treatment method of FVW by vermicomposting with the addition of EAS.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
With the rapid economic development, the lack of resources and energy and environmental issues have become more serious. The concept of recovery, recycling, and reuse from waste resources has been widely accepted for the sustainable treatment of wastes in large quantities and attracted the attention of many researchers. The fruit and vegetable waste (FVW), as one of the major components of wastes, is generated in large quantities during production, processing, and consumption. The FVW is characterized by high water content and rich biodegradable organic substances, normally with water content of about 90 and 85% corresponding to organic matters (Edwiges et al. 2018). These characteristics indicate that the FVW may contribute to negative environmental issues without proper treatment (e.g., leachate and greenhouse gas) and provide a great potential for reuse, recycling, and recovery (Hartmann and Ahring 2006; Plazzotta et al. 2017). Therefore, it is important to find a sustainable method for the treatment and recycling of FVW.
Several conventional methods are used for treatment and recycling of FVW, such as incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion, and composting. Compared to these conventional methods, vermicomposting has the advantage of effective stabilization of the organic wastes through the joint function of earthworms and microorganisms in decomposition of easily decaying organic constituents and of high utilization value for its final product as fertilizer. On the other hand, excess activated sludge (EAS), as the main by-product of sewage treatment process, is an organic waste mainly consisted of microorganisms which can be treated by vermicomposting. Li et al. (2020) proposed that the wide variety of microorganisms presented in EAS can enhance the microbial activity and positively contribute to the decomposition of FVW since the complex microbial communities play a key role during the vermicomposting (Chen et al. 2018a, b). In addition, the rich content of nitrogen and phosphorus in EAS can promote the growth of earthworms and specific bacterial species, thus improving the stabilization efficiency of FVW and will also improve the utilization value of the final product.
Accordingly, the main objectives of this chapter are to summarize several conventional treatment methods for FVW and to propose a more feasible and sustainable method for treating FVW with the addition of EAS by vermicomposting.
2 Fruit and Vegetable Waste
2.1 Generation and Characteristics of Fruit and Vegetable Waste
About 1.3 billion tons of food that accounts for 32% of the total food produced for human consumption across the whole food supply chain is lost and wasted every year in the world (Du and Li 2016). The FVW, which account for the largest proportion (45%) of the total lost and wasted food (Abubackar et al. 2019a), are also generated in large quantities along with the entire food supply chain, from production, processing to the consumption. According to the statistical data published by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), about 1.8, 6.5, 32, and 15 million tons of FVW are produced each year in India, the Philippines, China, and the United States, respectively (FAO 2013). From the same information source, it is reported that at least 15% of fruits and 25% of vegetables are wasted at the bottom of the food supply chain globally (FAO 2014). Diverting our attention to the FVW from households, approximately ten million tons of FVW are generated every year in Japan alone (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan 2012). All the statistical data indicate that the FVW are a very important class of wastes since they are produced in great amounts from all wholesale markets and other activities in the world (Scano et al. 2014).
The characteristics of FVW can be highly variable depending on its source and are closely dependent on the eating habits of consumers (Cerda et al. 2018). In general, the FVW are characterized by high water content and rich biodegradable organic substances (e.g., carbohydrates, lipids, and organic acids), normally with water content about 90 and 85% (Edwiges et al. 2018; Li et al. 2020). Thi et al. (2015) also reported that the FVW contains 74–90% of water and has a volatile solid to total solid ratio (VS/TS) of 80–97% and a C/N ratio of 14.7–36.4. Edwiges and Frare (2017) investigated the physical and chemical characteristics of FVW sampled monthly during 1 year in Brazil, as summarized in Table 9.1. These characteristics indicate that the FVW has a great potential for reuse, recycling, and recovery (Plazzotta et al. 2017) and should be treated with proper methods.
2.2 Treatment Methods of Fruit and Vegetable Waste
The FVW is well-known as liquid and/or semi-liquid waste due to high water content. These kinds of wastes are conventionally disposed by non-scientific methods such as transported to landfill or incineration plants mixed with other municipal solid waste (Liu et al. 2012). In most industrialized countries, incineration is widely used to treat burnable municipal solid waste including FVW (Du and Li 2017). The exhaust gas and ash generated in incineration plant during burning have serious dangerous effects on the human health and the environment (Cangialosi et al. 2008). Moreover, the incineration plant is also recognized as a pollution source of heavy metals for the surrounding environment. In many developing countries, however, landfill and direct dumping are still practiced. The landfill and dumping can deteriorate the soil and water environments. Direct dumping to urban rivers or garbage collection stations near domestic areas may cause foul smelling and leachate that affect the living environment of humans (Du and Li 2017). Therefore, it is necessary to overcome the relevant defects of landfill or incineration for treatment and recycling of FVW, concurrently developing an environment-friendly method which can convert FVW to high value products.
Currently, anaerobic digestion and composting are recognized as two efficient and environmentally friendly methods to recycle/recover available resources from organic waste and are used extensively worldwide (Cerda et al. 2018). Diverting organic waste like FVW from landfill or incineration to anaerobic digestion or composting has many environmental benefits, such as reduction of greenhouse gas emission and improvement of soil properties through the application of compost (Bernstad Saraiva Schott et al. 2016). Anaerobic digestion is a biological process in which stabilization of organic waste is achieved by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen. The main products of this process are biogas (a mixture of CH4, H2, and other gases) and the digested sludge as the main by-product (Moukazis et al. 2018). The biogas can be used to generate heat and/or electricity or can be used as transport fuel or injection into the natural gas system (Singh et al. 2010). However, it is reported that the required range of pH, carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, and moisture for anaerobic digestion are around 7.0 (Khalid et al. 2011), 20–30, and 70–80% (Hernández-Berriel et al. 2008), respectively. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a pretreatment process for FVW before the anaerobic digestion. Composting, as one of the most sustainable options for the treatment of organic waste including the FVW, can not only cut down the volume of organic waste but also produce a useful product as fertilizer (Lou and Nair 2009; Cerda et al. 2018). Since the composting is an aerobic biochemical process via the function of thermophilic microorganisms, it is important to maintain the requirements for the growth of microorganisms. Some environmental factors that may influence the microbial activity, like temperature, oxygen concentration, pH, water content, C/N ratio, and particle size, need to be adjusted by a pretreatment process before composting (An Ceustermans et al. 2009). Besides these two methods, some other sustainable treatment methods are being developed (e.g., fermentation, microbial fuel cell). Table 9.2 summarizes some published investigations on the treatment of FVW by using different methods.
Vermicomposting is attracting researchers’ attention in recent years owing to the reason that it can degrade organic wastes like FVW and can recycle and convert the valuable nutrients into organic fertilizer (Li et al. 2020). Compared to composting, vermicomposting has more effective functions of biodegradation and stabilization of the organic wastes through the joint action of earthworms and microorganisms (Domínguez 2004). In general, there are two operation systems that are widely used for vermicomposting, namely, mixed system and separated system. The substrate and bed material are mixed together in the mixed system, while the substrate and bed material are simply separated into two layers or separated by using a mesh with holes in the separated system (Li et al. 2020). Many researchers investigated the vermicomposting of FVW with different operation systems and conditions which are summarized in Table 9.3. It is worth to note that these previous studies used dry FVW or the addition of other bulking materials for earthworms. The pretreatment for drying the fresh FVW usually takes 7–21 days before vermicomposting process (Li et al. 2020). This kind of pretreatment not only increases the whole time needed for vermicomposting but also leads to the loss of significant amounts of nutrients through leachate (Huang et al. 2012). Moreover, limited literatures related to the vermicomposting of fresh FVW reported that the earthworms cannot live in the fresh FVW due to the high water content and high electrical conductivity of the generated leachate (Gunadi and Edwards 2003; Huang et al. 2012; Li et al. 2020). Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the efficiency of the treatment of FVW by vermicomposting; owing to that, the sustainable treatment methods are regarded as one of the key approaches to achieve the urban sustainability by recycling resources and recovering energy (Wang et al. 2020).
The excess activated sludge (EAS) is a kind of organic waste generated from wastewater treatment process and can be treated by vermicomposting. However, it is reported that the high content of nitrogen in EAS can give rise to a higher ammonia concentration environment, thus leading to the death of earthworms (Fu et al. 2015; Li et al. 2020). To solve this problem, a pretreatment is required to adjust the C/N ratio by mixing some bulking materials with rich carbon content, such as paper mulch (Ndegwa et al. 2000), straw (Contreras-Ramos et al. 2005), and sawdust (Zhao et al. 2018). Adding these kinds of bulking materials can not only improve the living environment for earthworms by increasing the C/N ratio but also cause a longer decomposition process (non-degradable substrate) and lower utilization value (lower nitrogen content) of final product as fertilizer (Li et al. 2020). Moreover, other pretreatment methods like air drying, airing, creating pellet, and pre-composting could also increase the whole period of vermicomposting. On the other hand, Li et al. (2020) suggested that the high content of nitrogen in EAS not only has negative effects but also has some positive effects if co-vermicomposted with the FVW. The EAS can promote the growth of earthworms and specific bacterial species, thus improving the decomposition efficiency, and could improve the nutritional content of the final products as fertilizer (Li et al. 2020). Moreover, the EAS consists of microorganisms with large population and diversity, for example, various nitrogen-fixing bacteria and the phosphate-accumulating bacteria, which can enhance the microbial activity and the decomposition process of FVW, thus accelerating the nitrification and mineralization process and leading to higher content of nitrogen and phosphorus in the final product (Li et al. 2020). This novel idea has been proven to be a more feasible and sustainable method for treating FVW and EAS at the same time.
3 Effects of Excess Activated Sludge on Vermicomposting of Fruit and Vegetable Waste
To clarify the effects of EAS on vermicomposting of FVW, comparative experiment was conducted by Li et al. (2020). A novel vermireactor consisting of substrate and bed compartment was used for treating five types of FVW (banana peels, cabbage, lettuce, carrot, and potato) with and without the addition of EAS. The operation condition could be found in Table 9.3, and the vermireactor conditions are displayed in Table 9.4.
The addition of EAS obviously increased the total nitrogen, total phosphorus, copy numbers of 16S rDNA, and the dehydrogenase activity of substrates (FVW) before starting the vermicomposting, as could be seen in Table 9.5. It is well-known that the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in the initial substrate strongly affects the nutrient value of the final product as fertilizer (Huang et al. 2012; Li et al. 2020). Furthermore, the great number and high activity of bacteria in the initial substrate inoculated through the addition of EAS could enhance the vermicomposting since the complex microbial communities are reported to play a key role during vermicomposting (Chen et al. 2018a, b). On the other hand, Zhao et al. (2018) reported that the healthy growth status of earthworms directly reflects a successful vermicomposting since the earthworms are considered as crucial drivers of the process. Body weight changes of the earthworms were monitored over vermicomposting, as displayed in Fig. 9.1. In general, earthworms in the treatment of FVW with the addition of EAS showed a better capability of weight gain compared to the treatment of FVW alone. Moreover, Li et al. (2020) also reported that the cocoon production of earthworms was also promoted by adding EAS.
The total carbon in the substrate compartment of the treatment with addition of EAS was lower than that of the treatment for FVW alone (except for cabbage), as could be seen in Fig. 9.2. The possible reasons of lower total carbon are explained as the better growth of earthworms and higher microbial activity caused by the addition of EAS. However, no significant changes in the total carbon were demonstrated in bed compartments (except for cabbage). The mass reduction rate of substrate in each vermireactor was calculated for better understanding of the decomposition state of substrates. The calculation equation is described as the following (Li et al. 2020):
A significantly higher mass reduction rate was recorded in the treatment with the addition of EAS (Fig. 9.3). The conversion of substrates into earthworms cast/excreta or body and the production of CO2 emission closely related to the higher mass reduction (de Lima Rodrigues et al. 2017; Li et al. 2020). It is reported that the dehydrogenase activity (DHA), as a parameter reflecting total microbial activity, showed an increasing trend in the beginning followed by a decreasing trend at the end of vermicomposting in substrate compartments. Overall, the DHA in substrate compartment of the treatment for FVW with the addition of EAS was markedly higher than the treatment for FVW alone (except for carrot). The enrichment of microbial population and activity by adding EAS can lead to a rapid turnover of microorganisms and the nitrogenous substrates or the encouraged grooming of earthworms (e.g., mucus or casts), thus enhancing the decomposition efficiency of FVW (Li et al. 2020).
As displayed in Fig. 9.4, the addition of EAS significantly increased the content of total nitrogen in both substrate and bed compartments, except the bed compartment of the treatment for carrot. Similar results of the total phosphorus were also revealed. The mineralization of the higher content of nitrogen and phosphorus in substrate brought about by the addition of EAS, faster mass reduction rate of substrate with the addition of EAS, the higher microbial activity, etc. are the main reasons for the higher fertilizer value of the final product (Li et al. 2020).
4 Conclusion
The large amounts of FVW generated during the whole food supply chain should be treated, recycled, and recovered properly. The vermicomposting is considered as one of the most sustainable methods for the treatment of FVW. However, the vermicomposting of fresh FVW without any pretreatment still has some problems due to the higher water content and C/N ratio of FVW. The addition of EAS could be a feasible option to solve the problems and enhance the vermicomposting of FVW. The EAS can promote the growth and cocoon production of earthworms and the microbial activity, thus enhancing the decomposition efficiency of FVW. Moreover, the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in final product as fertilizer can also be improved by the addition of EAS.
References
Abubackar HN, Keskin T, Arslan K, Vural C, Aksu D, Yavuzyılmaz DK, Ozdemir G, Azbar N (2019a) Effects of size and autoclavation of fruit and vegetable wastes on biohydrogen production by dark dry anaerobic fermentation under mesophilic condition. Int J Hydro Energy 44:17767–17780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.106
Abubackar HN, Keskin T, Yazgin O, Gunay B, Arslan K, Azbar N (2019b) Biohydrogen production from autoclaved fruit and vegetable wastes by dry fermentation under thermophilic condition. Int J Hydro Energy 44:18776–18784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.068
Bernstad Saraiva Schott A, Wenzel H, La Cour Jansen J (2016) Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management—an analytical review. J Clean Prod 119:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079
Cangialosi F, Intini G, Liberti L, Notarnicola M, Stellacci P (2008) Health risk assessment of air emissions from a municipal solid waste incineration plant—a case study. Waste Manag 28:885–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.006
Cerda A, Artola A, Font X, Barrena R, Gea T, Sánchez A (2018) Composting of food wastes: status and challenges. Bioresour Technol 248:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.133
Ceustermans An, Coosemans J, Ryckeboer J (2009) Compost microbial activity related to compost stability. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783642040436
Chen C, Mitchell NJ, Gratz J, Houpt ER, Gong Y, Egner PA, Groopman JD, Riley RT, Showker JL, Svensen E, Mduma ER, Patil CL, Wu F (2018a) Exposure to aflatoxin and fumonisin in children at risk for growth impairment in rural Tanzania. Environ Int 115:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.001
Chen Y, Chang SKC, Chen J, Zhang Q, Yu H (2018b) Characterization of microbial community succession during vermicomposting of medicinal herbal residues. Bioresour Technol 249:542–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.021
Contreras-Ramos SM, Escamilla-Silva EM, Dendooven L (2005) Vermicomposting of biosolids with cow manure and oat straw. Biol Fertil Soils 41:190–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0821-8
de Lima Rodrigues AS, Mesak C, Silva MLG, Silva GS, Leandro WM, Malafaia G (2017) Organic waste vermicomposting through the addition of rock dust inoculated with domestic sewage wastewater. J Environ Manag 196:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.072
Domínguez J (2004) State-of-the-art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research. In: Earthworm Ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039719
Du H, Li F (2016) Effects of varying the ratio of cooked to uncooked potato on the microbial fuel cell treatment of common potato waste. Sci Total Environ 569–570:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.023
Du H, Li F (2017) Enhancement of solid potato waste treatment by microbial fuel cell with mixed feeding of waste activated sludge. J Clean Prod 143:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.104
Edwiges T, Frare LM (2017) Use of mathematical models to fast predict biochemical methane potential of fruit and vegetable waste, pp 2–6
Edwiges T, Frare L, Mayer B, Lins L, Mi Triolo J, Flotats X, de Mendonça Costa MSS (2018) Influence of chemical composition on biochemical methane potential of fruit and vegetable waste. Waste Manag 71:618–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.030
FAO (2013) Utilization of fruit and vegetable wastes as livestock feed and as substrates for generation of other value-added products
FAO (2014) Food wastage footprint: fool cost-accounting
Fernández-Gómez MJ, Nogales R, Insam H, Romero E, Goberna M (2010a) Continuous-feeding vermicomposting as a recycling management method to revalue tomato-fruit wastes from greenhouse crops. Waste Manag 30:2461–2468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.005
Fernández-Gómez MJ, Romero E, Nogales R (2010b) Feasibility of vermicomposting for vegetable greenhouse waste recycling. Bioresour Technol 101:9654–9660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.109
Fu X, Huang K, Chen X, Li F, Cui G (2015) Feasibility of vermistabilization for fresh pelletized dewatered sludge with earthworms Bimastus parvus. Bioresour Technol 175:646–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.007
Garg VK, Gupta R (2011) Optimization of cow dung spiked pre-consumer processing vegetable waste for vermicomposting using Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.09.015
Gunadi B, Edwards CA (2003) The effects of multiple applications of different organic wastes on the growth, fecundity and survival of Eisenia fetida (Savigny) (Lumbricidae). Pedobiologia (Jena) 47:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00196
Hanc A, Chadimova Z (2014) Nutrient recovery from apple pomace waste by vermicomposting technology. Bioresour Technol 168:240–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.031
Hartmann H, Ahring BK (2006) Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: an overview. Water Sci Technol 53:7–22. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.231
Hernández-Berriel MC, Márquez-Benavides L, González-Pérez DJ, Buenrostro-Delgado O (2008) The effect of moisture regimes on the anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste from Metepec (México). Waste Manag 28:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.021
Huang K, Li F, Li J, Helard D, Hirooka K (2012) Rapid vermicomposting of fresh fruit and vegetable wastes using earthworm Eisenia Foetida. J Japan Soc Civ Eng Ser G (Environmental Res. 68, III_113-III_120). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.68.iii_113
Hussain N, Singh A, Saha S, Venkata Satish Kumar M, Bhattacharyya P, Bhattacharya SS (2016) Excellent N-fixing and P-solubilizing traits in earthworm gut-isolated bacteria: a vermicompost based assessment with vegetable market waste and rice straw feed mixtures. Bioresour Technol 222:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.115
Hussain N, Das S, Goswami L, Das P, Sahariah B, Bhattacharya SS (2018) Intensification of vermitechnology for kitchen vegetable waste and paddy straw employing earthworm consortium: assessment of maturity time, microbial community structure, and economic benefit. J Clean Prod 182:414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.241
Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag 31:1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021
Li W, Ahmad S, Li J, Cui G, Wei Y, Yamada T (2020) Effect of excess activated sludge on vermicomposting of fruit and vegetable waste by using novel vermireactor. Bioresour Technol 302:122816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122816
Liu X, Gao X, Wang W, Zheng L, Zhou Y, Sun Y (2012) Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction. Renew Energy 44:463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.092
Lou XF, Nair J (2009) The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions—a review. Bioresour Technol 100:3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.006
Martí-Herrero J, Soria-Castellón G, Diaz-de-Basurto A, Alvarez R, Chemisana D (2019) Biogas from a full scale digester operated in psychrophilic conditions and fed only with fruit and vegetable waste. Renew Energy 133:676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.030
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (2012). https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/consumer_policy/information/food_loss/conference/pdf/121005kaigi2_1.pdf
Moukazis I, Pellera FM, Gidarakos E (2018) Slaughterhouse by-products treatment using anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag 71:652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.009
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, Das KC (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 71:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00055-3
Plazzotta S, Manzocco L, Nicoli MC (2017) Fruit and vegetable waste management and the challenge of fresh-cut salad. Trends Food Sci Technol 63:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.02.013
Rich N, Bharti A, Kumar S (2018) Effect of bulking agents and cow dung as inoculant on vegetable waste compost quality. Bioresour Technol 252:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.080
Scano EA, Asquer C, Pistis A, Ortu L, Demontis V, Cocco D (2014) Biogas from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: experimental results on pilot-scale and preliminary performance evaluation of a full-scale power plant. Energy Convers Manag 77:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.004
Singh A, Smyth BM, Murphy JD (2010) A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an emphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.004
Suthar S (2009) Vermicomposting of vegetable-market solid waste using Eisenia fetida: impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and decomposition rate. Ecol Eng 35:914–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.019
Thi NBD, Kumar G, Lin CY (2015) An overview of food waste management in developing countries: current status and future perspective. J Environ Manag 157:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.022
Varma VS, Yadav J, Das S, Kalamdhad AS (2015) Potential of waste carbide sludge addition on earthworm growth and organic matter degradation during vermicomposting of agricultural wastes. Ecol Eng 83:90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.050
Wang D, Tang YT, Long G, Higgitt D, He J, Robinson D (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England. Waste Manag 102:452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009
Yang F, Li Y, Han Y, Qian W, Li G, Luo W (2019) Performance of mature compost to control gaseous emissions in kitchen waste composting. Sci Total Environ 657:262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.030
Zhao C, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wu F, Zhang J, Cui R, Wang L, Mu H (2018) Insights into the role of earthworms on the optimization of microbial community structure during vermicomposting of sewage sludge by PLFA analysis. Waste Manag 79:700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.041
Zhi-wei S, Tao S, Wen-jing D, Jing W (2019) Investigation of rice straw and kitchen waste degradation through vermicomposting. J Environ Manag 243:269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, W., Bhat, S.A., Wei, Y., Li, F. (2020). Vermicomposting Treatment of Fruit and Vegetable Waste and the Effect of the Addition of Excess Activated Sludge. In: Bhat, S., Vig, A., Li, F., Ravindran, B. (eds) Earthworm Assisted Remediation of Effluents and Wastes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4522-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4522-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4521-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4522-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)