Abstract
Bioremediation is the deliberate use of biological mechanisms to clean up pollutants, viz. hydrocarbons, oil, heavy metal, pesticides and dyes, by letting the microbes eat and digest toxic contaminants and consequently transform them into gases, water and other less toxic components. The indispensable habit of using products made out of plastic has led to the pollution havoc in the present day. The physical and chemical degradation methods do not provide an eco-friendly solution to disposal of garbage. Here, the usage of microorganisms has emerged as a key alternative offering solution to the challenges of reifying environment-friendly garbage clean-up. The resiliency of microorganisms to survive even the harshest of environmental conditions and the extreme diversity in microbial communities which comprise as many as 10,000 distinct microbial species per gram of soil make them highly effective in bioremediation of almost all environmental pollutants. As such, bioremediation is a highly promising solution for the degradation, eradication, immobilization and detoxification of chemical and physical waste materials. In addition, the process is also cheaper in equipment and labour costs in comparison to the physical and chemical treatment solutions. So bioremediation has a great contributory role to play in solving many existing and future environmental problems.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The expansion in urbanization, industrialization and population has rapidly increased the human contribution to environmental contamination in our recent century. Today the contamination is dangerous enough to potentially lead to extinction of rare and endangered species and also put our own existence in peril with the contamination of air, water and food sources. Existing chemical and physical treatment solutions for waste products lead to further contamination of environment because of the harmful residuals left after the treatment.
As such, the biotreatment of contaminated areas is increasingly finding leading applications in recent years. The traditional physical method of doing remediation is to dig up the contaminated soil and isolate and remove the areas covering the contaminated sites. These methods introduce risks during the excavation, handling and transportation of hazardous waste materials. Moreover, the cost of performing incineration, excavation, landfilling and storage makes these methods expensive and inefficient. Finding landfill sites for final disposal of contaminated waste materials is not trivial and requires several considerations to be made with security of individuals residing in neighbouring areas (Bollag and Bollag 1995).
Bioremediation offers an eco-friendly waste disposal alternative in order to solve the disadvantages of traditional waste disposal methods. Bioremediation is the method that relies on different microorganisms to degrade the pollutants into less poisonous types. Compared with conventional treatment, the main differentiating advantages of bioremediation are its relatively low cost and high efficiency with no additional nutrient requirement and minimal site disruption, thereby leading to greater public acceptance. However, the application of bioremediation is limited by the availability of microorganisms and also the presence of some chemicals with low water solubility and those which are not amenable to biodegradation (such as heavy metals, some chlorinated compounds, radionuclides).
The process of transforming natural assets accessible in the environment into types suitable for our usage is central to contemporary human activities. This method produces dangerous by products and therefore leads to the current issue of unnecessary air, water and land pollution. As such, any sustainable solution to the disposal of generated wastes in an environmentally safe way must conveniently integrate them back into the environment by reducing the concentration of harmful contaminants. Microorganisms (generally yeasts, bacteria or fungi) must be used. This is achieved by integrating the microorganisms or their products into the substrates to derive industrial products such as bioleaching (biomining), biodetergent, biotreatment of pulp, biotreatment of wastes (bioremediation), biofiltrations, aquaculture treatments, biotreatment of textiles, biocatalysts, biomass fuel production, biomonitoring and so on.
Microbes already play a significant role in safe disposal and reuse of garbage as the natural recycling of all living materials is performed by the microbes. All naturally produced materials are biodegradable. Microbes are nature’s supreme waste dump. It is a testimony to their effectiveness that we, humans, have coerced them to clear up our natural messes for centuries. They have become invaluable and vital in discovering alternatives to several challenging human issues to guarantee the value of our surroundings. They had a beneficial impact on human and pet safety, DNA technology, economic safety and corporate and agricultural disposal methods. Microorganisms have been the catalyst in implementing feasible and cost-effective waste disposal solutions which otherwise would have been impossible via chemical or physical engineering methods.
Microorganisms have amazing metabolism and can develop easily in severe climate circumstances. This dietary adaptability of microorganisms to transform, alter and use poisonous pollutants to acquire power is utilized by bioremediation to biodegrade pollutants.
In contrast to naively gathering the pollutant and increasing the danger by transporting it, the method of bioremediation involves establishing a microbiological well to promote organized microbial growth to break down contaminants and convert damaging chemicals into less poisonous or non-toxic ionic and compound types. Bioremediators are these biological substances used to remediate contaminated locations. Therefore, the bioremediation method can be defined as the biotechnological method incorporating the implementation of microorganisms as bioremediators to remove many pollutant hazards. Typical primary bioremediators are bacteria, archaea and fungi, and their use is recommended to restore the initial natural environment and prevent further destruction (Vidali 2001; McKinney 1957).
1.1 Principles of Bioremediation
Bioremediation is the most efficient instrument for managing the polluted atmosphere, where organic waste is biodegraded to an innocuous state under regulated circumstances. Microorganisms, in fact, are able to destroy, degrade and even absorb damaging organic and nitrogen compounds (Jain and Bajpai 2012). Higher vegetation was also recorded to prevent such pollutants, mainly through the capacity to collect them in their bodies (Kumar et al. 2011). Bioremediation aims to encourage microorganisms to operate by providing optimum concentrations of oxygen and other chemicals necessary for their development to detoxify materials that are harmful to the atmosphere and human objects (Rathore 2017). Enzyme mediated all cellular responses. These relate to oxidoreductase, hydrolase, lyase, transferase, isomerase and ligase classes. Because of their non-specific and particular surface binding, many enzymes have extremely broad degradation ability. Bioremediation can also only be efficient if environmental circumstances permit microbial development; its implementation often includes manipulating environmental parameters to enable microbial development and degradation to continue at a quicker pace (Vidali 2001).
Bioremediation is based on natural attenuation, identified as natural procedures (mostly microbes but may also include fungi, algae and higher plants) in the environment that operate without human interference to decrease the quantity or toxicity of contaminants (Sharma 2011–2012).
Environmental biotechnology has been used to create effective solutions to solve difficult problems faced by humans in recent century. The steep advancement of molecular biology and biotechnology has allowed us to exploit the biological processes more efficiently to clean up polluted water and land areas through biological process. Biotechnological methods to handle garbage before or after it is carried into the surroundings are elements of biotechnological management techniques. Biotechnology can also be used industrially to develop goods and procedures that produce less cost, use less resources and require less power.
Recombinant DNA engineering has enhanced pollution reduction options and claims to further develop bioremediation (Vandevivere et al. 1998). Bioremediation utilizes real environment organisms, fungi and vegetation where the enzymes generated by these microbes target the contaminants and then transform these into non-toxic materials. To be efficient, environment conditions should promote microbial development (Mrozik et al. 2003). Bioremediation effectiveness relies on many variables, including the chemical type and intensity of pollutants, the physicochemical properties of the environment and their accessibility to microorganisms (El Fantroussi and Agathos 2005). Besides, microbes and pollutants do not distribute evenly in the surroundings. Many variables make monitoring and optimizing bioremediation procedures a complicated process.
Since this method is a challenging job, it includes three primary components – the environment, contaminants and microorganisms. Appropriate climate, humidity composition, pH, water availability and ion acceptors such as oxygen for aerobic microorganisms promote biological behaviour in the ecosystem (Fritsche and Hofrichter 2008).
1.2 Use of Microorganisms in Waste Management
Bacteria, fungi, algae and other microorganisms can be used for industrial waste treatment. Their use and efficiency relies on the sort of chemical pollution, environmental circumstances and microbial development supporting variables like resource accessibility and temperature, pH, humidity and availability of electron acceptors such as oxygen. These microorganisms are categorized as follows.
1.3 Use of Bacteria
Bacteria are the most used microorganism in any disposal scheme. They have different biochemical characteristics and metabolize most organic material in any industrial waste. Many microorganisms even eat exclusively on hydrocarbons (Yakimov et al. 2007). Biodegradation of hydrocarbons can happen under aerobic and anaerobic circumstances, as is the situation with Pseudomonas sp. and Brevibacillus sp. (Grishchenkov et al. 2000). Wiedemeier et al. (1995), however, indicate that anaerobic biodegradation may be much more essential. Among the hydrocarbon-degrading organisms isolated from the coastal environment (Floodgate 1984), the organisms corresponding to the ten species: Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Shigella, Alcaligens, Acinetobacter, Escherichia, Klebsiella and Enterobacter were selected (Kafilzadeh et al. 2011) and Bacillus species was found to be the highest degrading organisms among all. Bacterial species capable of degrading organic hydrocarbons have been consistently extracted, primarily from land. These are generally Gram-negative bacteria, mostly belonging to the Pseudomonas genus. Biodegrading processes were also reported in the species Mycobacterium, Corynebacterium, Aeromonas, Rhodococcus and Bacillus (Mrozik et al. 2003). Although many bacteria can metabolize natural pollutants, one bacterium doesn’t have the enzymatic capacity to deteriorate all or even most toxic chemicals in a polluted land. Mixed microbial populations have the most important biodegrading ability because more than one organism’s genome data is crucial to degrade complicated mixtures of natural compounds in contaminated fields (Fritsche and Hofrichter 2005). Aerobic and anaerobic fungi can biotransform PCBs. Higher chlorinated PCBs are dehalogenated by anaerobic microorganisms, and lower chlorinated biphenyls are oxidized by aerobic bacteria (Seeger et al. 2001). Research on indigenous aerobic fungi has concentrated primarily on Gram-negative species of the species Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Ralstonia, Achromobacter, Sphingomonas and Comamonas. However, several studies on PCB-degrading behaviour and gene identification of microbes involved in PCB degradation also suggested PCB-degrading ability of some Gram-positive species (genera Rhodococcus, Janibacter, Bacillus, Paenibacillus and Microbacterium) (Petric et al. 2007). Aerobic catabolic pathway for PCB degradation seems to be very similar for most of the bacteria and comprises four steps catalysed by the enzymes biphenyl dioxygenase (BphA), dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (BphB), 2, 3-dihydroxybihenyl dioxygenase (DHBD) (BphC) and hydrolase (BphD) (Taguchi et al. 2001).
Effective removal of pesticides by adding bacterium was noted earlier for many compounds, including atrazine (Struthers et al. 1998). Recent findings concerning pesticide-degrading bacteria embrace the chlorpyrifos-degrading bacterium Providencia stuartii isolated from agricultural soil (Surekha et al. 2008) and isolates Bacillus, Staphylococcus and Stenotrophomonas from cultivated and uncultivated soil able to degrade dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) (Kanade et al. 2012) (Table 14.1).
1.4 Fungi
In the waste management scheme, fungi that can metabolize several organic compounds may also be employed. Except under uncommon environmental circumstances, they dominate the bacteria. Phanerochaete chrysosporium fungi can degrade a wide variety of permanent or toxic environmental pollutants. Straws, sawdust or cobs are commonly used substrates. Fungi are most effective, particularly when the natural polymeric compounds break down, and are equipped with extracellular enzyme systems. They can also quickly colonize and enter substrates and transport and redistribute nutrients into their mycelium through their hyphal systems (Matavuly and Molitoris 2009). Mycorrhiza is a symbiosis between a fungus and vascular crop roots. The fungus colonizes the roots of the host plant in a mycorrhizal association, both intracellularly such as in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) mushrooms and extracellularly, for instance, in ectomycorrhizal fungi. They are also a key element in soil life and chemistry. Mycorrhizal biological remedial treatment is called mycorrhizal remediation (Khan, 2006). Fungi have significant degrading functions that affect the recycling of recalcitrant materials (e.g. lignin) and the disposal of environmentally hazardous waste (Fritsche and Hofrichter 2005).
1.5 Algae
Algae that use sunlight as an energy source may also be used to manage inorganic waste such as ammonia, carbon dioxide, magnesium, potassium, iron, calcium, sulphate, phosphate and sodium. Algae and bacteria can be used together for the same waste components. Organic waste components are metabolized into inorganic components by bacteria, which are then used by the algae.
Species of Chlorella, Anabaena inaequalis, Westiellopsis prolifica, Stigeoclonium lenue and Synechococcus withstand heavy metals. A number of species of Chlorella, Anabaena and marine algae have been employed in the suppression of heavy metals, but operational circumstances restrict their practical implementation (Dwivedi 2012). Metals are absorbed by adsorption of algae. Unicellular algae have recorded metal chelation. Biosorption of heavy metals by brown algae is known for a long period, including the extraction of heavy metals by a variety of cell wall elements like alginate and fucoidane of heavy metals. Most study has been conducted in this field on marine and land algae (Davis et al. 2003). It has been indicated that the microalga S. incrassatulus can be used to remove Cr(VI), Cd(II) and Cu(II) in continuous cultures (Pena-Castro et al. 2004). Heavy metal bioremediation was also recorded for green algae, for instance, C. sorokiniana for Cr(III) removal (Akhtar et al. 2008).
1.6 Protozoa
Protozoa are the most basic types of microorganisms to be used in waste disposal processes. The protozoa may assist in the decrease of the population of useless bacteria instead of being the primary part of treatment system. They therefore help to produce a clear effluent. The protozoans are the primary grazer for degrading bio-pollutants, which affects the relation of the protozoa with degrading bacteria. In order to examine the impact of protozoan flagellate Heteromita in the biodegradation of benzene and methylbenzene, Mattison and Harayama (2015) have developed a model for the food chain. The study discovered that the degrading rates of benzene and methylbenzene were 8.5 times better in bacteria than before during the logarithmic increasing population of the flagella population. The protozoa infusors clearly can speed the biodegradation of heterogeneous materials such as PAH. For instance, the naphthalene degradation speed can be four times higher than before.
The protozoa process that accelerates the biodegradation of organic contaminants can be expected to include several feasible hypotheses, primarily six of which are:
-
1.
Mineralisation of nutrients that increases nutrient turnover
-
2.
Activation of bacteria that regulates the amount, destroys old cells and excretes an active ingredient
-
3.
Selective grazing, which decreases resource and space competition and is therefore useful for the development of degrading bacteria
-
4.
Physical disruption that can boost the level of oxygen and the degrading matter surface
-
5.
Direct degradation that can excrete specific degradation enzymes
-
6.
Sym-metabolism that provides bacteria with energy and carbon resources during degradation (Chen et al. 2007)
1.7 Factors of Bioremediation
The management and optimization of procedures of bioremediation have many complicated variables: the presence of a pollutant-degrading microbial population, the accessibility of contaminants and the environmental variables (type of soil, temperature, pH, the presence of oxygen or other electron acceptors and nutrients) (Table 14.2).
1.7.1 Biological Factors
The biotic variables influence organic degradation through the competition between microorganisms for restricted carbon supplies, antagonistic relationships or protozoan predation of microorganisms. Contaminant degradation speed often depends on contaminant density and the quantity of “catalyst” available. In that regard, both the number of organisms able to metabolize contaminants and the quantity of enzymes created within each cell are represented as the “catalyst” amount (Madhavi and Mohini 2012). Expression of particular enzymes can boost or reduce contaminant degradation. The magnitude of the contaminant metabolism should also involve particular enzymes, and the contaminant’s “affinity” to them as well as their accessibility is essential. The major biological factors are as follows: mutation, horizontal gene transfer, enzyme activity, interaction (competition, succession and predation), its own growth until critical biomass is reached, population size and composition (Boopathy 2000).
1.7.2 Environmental Factors
The metabolic characteristics of the microorganisms and physicochemical properties of the targeted contaminants determine possible interaction during the process. The actual effective interaction between the two, however, relies on the site’s environmental conditions. Microorganism reproduction and activities are influenced by pH, heat, humidity, land composition, water solubility, nutrients, location features, redox ability and oxygen material, absence of qualified human capital in this sector and pollutant bioavailability (contaminant quantity, form, solubility, chemical composition and poisoning). These above variables determine kinetics of degradation (Adams et al. 2015). Biodegradation can happen under a wide pH range; however, in most marine and land environments, pH 6.5–8.5 is usually ideal for biodegradation. Moisture affects contaminant consumption frequency because it affects the type and quantity of soluble products, as well as the osmotic stress and pH of natural and freshwater environments (Cases and De Lorenzo 2005). Most environmental variables are discussed below.
1.7.3 Availability of Nutrients
Adding oxygen adjusts the vital nutritional equilibrium for microbial development, as well as affects biodegradation frequency and efficiency. Nutrient mixing, particularly by supplying vital proteins such as N and P, can enhance the biodegradation effectiveness by optimizing the C:N:P proportion. Microorganisms need several elements such as carbon, oxygen and phosphorus to sustain and maintain their microbial operations. Adding a suitable amount of nutrients is a good approach to increase the cellular function of microorganisms and consequently the biodegradation speed in harsh settings (Couto et al. 2014; Phulia et al. 2013). Aquatic biodegradation is similarly restricted by nutrient accessibility (Thayasi et al. 2011). Like other species’ dietary requirements, oil-eating microbes also demand adequate nutrients for their growth and development (Macaulay 2015).
1.7.4 Temperature
Among the most significant physical variables to determine microorganism longevity is heat (Das and Chandran 2011). In harsh freezing settings such as the Arctic, oil degradation through normal produces is very low, putting more stress on the microbes to clear up accumulated petroleum. The under-zero temperature of the water is responsible for the suppression or even freezing of the full cytoplasm of transportation canals in microbial bodies, thereby making most inactive (Yang et al. 2009). Moreover, the degradation of different compounds requires different temperatures. Temperature also speeds or slows down bioremediation processes as microbial physiological characteristics are extremely influenced. Microbial activity speed rises with heat, reaching its highest amount at optimum heat. It abruptly declines with higher or lower heat and ultimately stops after approaching a particular heat.
1.7.5 Concentration of Oxygen
Some bacteria need oxygen to improve their biodegradation level. Other species however require no oxygen for biodegradation. Biological degradation occurs aerobically and anaerobically, as for most living organisms, air is necessary for survival. In most cases, the presence of oxygen could improve the metabolism of hydrocarbons (Macaulay 2015).
1.7.6 Moisture Content
To achieve their growth, microorganisms necessitate sufficient oxygen. Biodegradation inhibitors and the soil humidity content have the most negative impact.
1.7.7 pH
pH for a substance, defined mainly as acidity, basicity and alkalinity, has its own effect on metabolic activity as well as influences removal process. Soil pH measurement could show microbial growth potential (Enim 2013). Lower or higher pH values have shown less metabolic processes (Wang et al. 2011).
1.7.8 Site Characterization and Selection
Enough remediation work should be done in order to properly characterize the magnitude and extent of contamination before a bioremediation solution is proposed. The following factors should at least be covered in this job. The horizontal and vertical extent of contamination should be completely determined, the sites must be specified and the justification for choosing them should be listed and the techniques for sampling and analysis should be well described.
1.7.9 Metal Ions
In tiny quantities, metals are essential for bacteria and fungi, but they prevent the metabolic activity of cells in large quantities. Metal compounds can affect the degradation rate directly and indirectly.
1.7.10 Toxic Compounds
The decontamination by microorganisms if slowed down when the concentration of toxic contaminants is high. The toxicity level and processes depend on the particular toxicants, concentration and microorganisms being exposed. Some organic and inorganic substances can be poisonous to specific types of microorganisms (Madhavi and Mohini 2012).
1.7.11 Prospects for Increasing the Effectiveness of Bioremediation
The efficacy and variety of the microorganisms used in the method directly affect bioremediation. The variety of microorganism communities enables the overall use of bioremediation techniques to restore sites contaminated with various pollutants. As a result, better knowledge of the role of catabolic paths and microbial metabolic functions facilitates improving the efficiency of bioremediation procedures. The restricted supply of nutrients is another significant factor that affects the efficacy of bioremediation techniques. The addition of nutrients is known as biostimulation and is a strategy to improve the efficiency of microbial operations. The indigenous microbes reveal a rise in their activity when biostimulation is applied and can resist the degrading impacts of extremely concentrated pollutants. However, it is also suggested that nutrients not be overused (Wang et al. 2012). The promotion of microbial population growth and diversity is an orthogonal strategy to increase the accessibility of nutrients. This strategy is known as “bioaugmentation” and benefits from the synergy among the various metabolic microbial procedures (Silva-Castro et al. 2012; Bhattacharya et al. 2015).
1.8 Bioremediation Strategies
1.8.1 Ex Situ Bioremediation
The pollutants are excavated and transferred to another site for processing in this method. The use of this method depends, for instance, on the circumstances at the contaminated site: is the pollutant deeply contaminating the soil, is it extremely concentrated, is the pollution costly to treat on the ground (Philp and Atlas 2005).
1.8.2 Biopile
This method excavates the pollutant over the floor into stacks and then adds nutrients to boost the development and activity of microbials. Bioremediation is also improved by aeration that increases the microbial activity. This is an economical method for supporting efficient biodegradation when sufficient amounts of nutrients and aerating exist (Whelan et al. 2015). It also avoids the gassing into the environment of low molecular weight (LMW) pollutants. The technology can be used also in cold areas (Whelan et al. 2015; Dias et al. 2015; Gomez and Sartaj 2014).
1.8.3 Windrows
The piled polluting soil is regularly shifted to improve bioremediation in this method. This ensures uniformity of the microbial population, pollutant concentration, water and aeration and nutrient accessibility throughout the polluted site (Barr 2002). Windrow is more efficient in the removal of hydrocarbons compared to biopiles. It is used, however, until the soil type is more friable (Coulon et al. 2010). The drawback is that greenhouse gases are released when anaerobic areas begin to grow in stacked areas (Hobson et al. 2005).
1.8.4 Bioreactor
This vessel is designed to provide microbial biological responses against contaminants that are fed as slurry. This technique offers closer control over parameters such as temperature, pH and aeration other than ex situ procedures, thereby efficiently improving biological responses to decrease bioremediation time. Furthermore, bioreactor also can be used to treat volatile organic compound contamination such as benzene.
1.8.5 Land Farming
The method can be considered either as ex situ or in situ depending on the pollutant concentration at the treatment location and is a low-price and extremely economical method. The treatment is in situ if excavated soil is processed at the same site; otherwise it is ex situ. If it is in situ and if the contaminant does not reach the depths of the soil, then it is not necessary to excavate polluted soil (Nikolopoulou et al. 2013). The groundwater pollute is stored after excavation over the floor to enable indigenous microbes to aerobically biodegrade (Philp and Atlas 2005; Paudyn et al. 2008; Volpe et al. 2012; Silva-Castro et al. 2015). Tillage and irrigation are the main activities of agriculture. Tilling enhances the accessibility of aeration and nutrients. This stimulates the operations and increases bioremediation of autochthonous microorganisms.
1.8.6 In Situ Bioremediation Technique
The polluted soil is not dug in this method; instead, contaminants are handled at the site with very less soil distortion. It is a cost-effective method because of reduced excavation costs. However, some construction and on-site machinery costs are involved for its efficient implementation. It is applied for the treatment of chlorinated solvents, dyes, heavy metals and polluted hydrocarbon locations (Folch et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2014; Frascari et al. 2015).
1.8.7 Bioventing
Bioventure takes place through regulated manipulation of the airflow to deliver oxygen to the unsaturated (vadosic) area and to boost indigenous microbial processes. In order to enhance bioremediation, nutrients and humidity are introduced (Philp and Atlas 2005). It is usually supplemented by other on-site techniques of bioremediation. It may be used to recover petroleum-polluted locations (Hohener and Ponsin 2014).
1.8.8 Bioslurping
This is a mixture of bioventing and vapour processing. It supplies an indirect source of oxygen (Gidarakos and Aivalioti 2007) and draws liquid in a stream by means of a pumping system. The biological procedures in this treatment refer to the aerobic biological degradation of hydrocarbons in the unsaturated area when air is introduced (Kim et al. 2014).
1.8.9 Biosparging
This technique is like bioventure. By better aeration, microbial activity is increased. Unlike bioventure, more ventilation is carried out in the saturated zone to allow those compounds that are volatile to move into the unsaturated area, promoting biodegradation (Philip and Atlas 2005).
1.8.10 Special Features of Bioremediation
-
It is an environmentally friendly method with low labour, time and facility costs. It is secure. It is widely accepted by the public for treatment of waste at contaminated soils. It is risk-free as the amount of microbes decreases by itself when contaminant is removed. The residuals of the therapy are therefore completely harmless.
-
The benefit of low cost and applicability over most polluted sites results in minimal disturbance to ordinary operations around the polluted site. There is no need to carry waste off-site, so any health and environmental risks that could occur from carrying toxic contaminants can be minimized.
-
It guarantees that the pollutants are completely destroyed and that dangerous compounds are converted into harmless substances without any potential burden for processing and disposal of contaminated material.
-
No dangerous chemicals need be introduced on the polluted site. The nutrients added to aid the development of microbes are only fertilizers commonly used in lawns and gardens that are not harmful.
1.9 Limitations of Bioremediation
-
Only those compounds that are biodegradable are restricted to the applicability of bioremediation. Not all compounds can be degraded quickly and completely.
-
Highly site-specific factors affecting the efficiency of biological restoration include the existence of metabolically competent microbial communities, appropriate circumstances for microbial growth and suitable concentrations of nutrients and pollutants.
-
Further study is necessary to bioremediate complicated contaminant mixtures as biodegradation variables in this situation are not yet been well known.
-
Finally, bioremediation is limited by the longer processing time than standard alternatives, such as soil excavation and extraction or incineration.
References
Adams GO, Fufeyin PT, Okoro SE (2015) Bioremediation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation: a review. Int J Environ Bioremed Biodegrad 3(1):28–39
Akhtar N, Iqbal M, Iqbal ZS, Iqbal J (2008) Biosorption characteristics of unicellular green alga Chlorella sorokiniana immobilized in loofa sponge for removal of Cr(III). J Environ Sci 20:231–239
Barr D (2002) Biological methods for assessment and remediation of contaminated land: case studies. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London
Bhattacharya M, Guchhait S, Biswas D, Datta S (2015) Waste lubricating oil removal in a batch reactor by mixed bacterial consortium: a kinetic study. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:2095–2106
Bollag JM, Bollag WB (1995) Soil contamination and the feasibility of biological remediation. In: Skipper HD, Turco RF (eds) Bioremediation: science and applications: Soil Science Society of America. American Society of Agronomy, and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, p 1
Boopathy R (2000) Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol 74:63–67
Cases I, De Lorenzo V (2005) Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them. Int Microbiol 8:213–222
Chen X, Liu M, Hu F, Mao X, Li H (2007) Contributions of soil micro-fauna (protozoa and nematodes) to rhizosphere ecological functions. Acta Ecol Sin 27(8):3132–3143
Coulon F, Al Awadi M, Cowie W, Mardlin D, Pollard S, Cunningham C, Risdon G, Arthur P, Semple KT, Paton GI (2010) When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environ Pollut 158:3032–3040
Couto N, Fritt-Rasmussen J, Jensen PE (2014) Suitability of oil bioremediation in an Artic soil using surplus heating from an incineration facility. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(9):6221–6227
Das N, Chandran P (2011) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnol Res Int:1–13
Davis TA, Volesky B, Mucci A (2003) A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption brown algae. Water Res 37:4311–4330
Dias RL, Ruberto L, Calabró A, Balbo AL, Del Panno MT, Mac Cormack WP (2015) Hydrocarbon removal and bacterial community structure in on-site biostimulated biopile systems designed for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated Antarctic soil. Polar Biol 38: 677–687
Dwivedi S (2012) Bioremediation of heavy metal by algae: current and future perspective. J Adv Lab Res Biol 3(3)
El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN (2005) Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol 8:268–275
Enim AE (2013) Factors that determine bioremediation of organic compounds in the soil. Acad J Interdiscipl Stud 2(13):125–128
Floodgate G (1984) The fate of petroleum in marine ecosystems. In: Atlas RM (ed) Petroleum microbiology. Macmillan, New York, pp 355–398
Folch A, Vilaplana M, Amado L, Vicent R, Caminal G (2013) Fungal permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater in an artificial aquifer. J Hazard Mater 262:554–560
Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Danko AS (2015) In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review. J Hazard Mater 283:382–399
Fritsche W, Hofrichter M (2005) Aerobic degradation of recalcitrant organic compounds by microorganisms. In: Jördening H-J, Winter J (eds) Environmental biotechnology: concepts and applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527604286.ch7
Fritsche W, Hofrichter M (2008) Aerobic degradation by microorganisms. In: Rehm H-J, Reed G (eds) Biotechnology set, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH VerlagGmbH, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527620999.ch6m
Gidarakos E, Aivalioti M (2007) Large scale and long term application of bioslurping: the case of a Greek petroleum refinery site. J Hazard Mater 149:574–581
Gomez F, Sartaj M (2014) Optimization of field scale biopiles for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil at low temperature conditions by response surface methodology (RSM). Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 89:103–109
Grishchenkov VG, Townsend RT, McDonald TJ, Autenrieth RL, Bonner JS, Boronin AM (2000) Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by facultative anaerobic bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Process Biochem 35(9):889–896
Hobson AM, Frederickson J, Dise NB (2005) CH4 and N2O from mechanically turned windrow and vermin composting systems following in-vessel pre-treatment. Waste Manag 25:345–352
Hohener P, Ponsin V (2014) In situ vadose zone bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:1–7
Jain PK, Bajpai V (2012) Biotechnology of bioremediation – a review. Int J Environ Sci 3(1):535–549
Kafilzadeh F, Sahragard P, Jamali H, Tahery Y (2011) Isolation and identification of hydrocarbons degrading bacteria in soil around Shiraz Refinery. Afr J Microbiol Res 4(19):3084–3089
Kanade SN, Ade AB, Khilare VC (2012) Malathion degradation by Azospirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Sci Res Rep 2(1):94–103
Kang JW (2014) Removing environmental organic pollutants with bioremediation and phytoremediation. Biotechnol Lett 36(6):1129–1139
Khan AG (2006) Mycorrhizoremediation an enhanced form of phytoremediation. J Zhejiang Univ (Sci) 7(7):503–514
Kim S, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Kim J-O, Chung J (2014) Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites by DNA diagnosis-based bioslurping technology. Sci Total Environ 497:250–259
Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD (2011) Review on bioremediation of polluted environment: a management tool. Int J Environ Sci 1(6):1079–1093
Macaulay BM (2015) Understanding the behavior of oil-degrading micro-organisms to enhance the microbial remediation of spilled petroleum. Appl Ecol Environ Res 13(1):247–262
Madhavi GN, Mohini DD (2012) Review paper on – parameters affecting bioremediation. Int J Life Sci Pharma Res 2(3):77–80
Matavuly MN, Molitoris HP (2009) Marine fungi degraders of poly-3-hydroxyalkanoate based plastic materials. Proc Nat Sci Publ Matica Srpska 116:253–265
McKinney RE (1957) Activity of microorganisms in organic waste disposal. Appl Microbiol 5:00311–00033
Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Labuzek S (2003) Bacterial degradation and bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Pol J Environ Stud 12(1):15–25
Nikolopoulou M, Pasadakis N, Norf H, Kalogerakis N (2013) Enhanced ex situ bioremediation of crude oil contaminated beach sand by supplementation with nutrients and rhamnolipids. Mar Pollut Bull 77:37–44
Paudyn K, Rutter A, Rowe RK, Poland JS (2008) Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:102–114
Pena-Castro JM, Martínez-Jeronimo F, Esparza-Garcia F, Canizares-Villanueva RO (2004) Heavy metals removal by the microalga Scenedesmus incrassatulus in continuous cultures. Bioresour Technol 94:219–222
Petric I, Hrak D, Fingler S, Vonina E, Cetkovic H, Kolar BA, UdikoviKoli N (2007) Enrichment and characterization of PCB-degrading bacteria as potential seed cultures for bioremediation of contaminated soil. Food Technol Biotechnol 45(1):11–20
Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp JC (eds) Bioremediation: applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington, DC, pp 139–236
Phulia V, Jamwal A, Saxena N (2013) Technologies in aquatic bioremediation. In: Kumar P, Zaki BMSA, Chauhan A (eds) Freshwater ecosystem and xenobiotics. Discovery Publishing House PVT. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 65–91
Rathore AK (2017) Bioremediation: current research and application. IK International Publisher, New Delhi. ISBN:978-93-85909-60-3
Seeger M, Camara B, Hofer B (2001) Dehalogenation, denitration, dehydroxylation, and angular attack on substituted biphenyls and related compounds by a biphenyl dioxygenase. J Bacteriol 183:3548–3555
Sharma PD (2011–12) Ecology and environment, 11th edn. Rastogi Publications, Meerut, pp 346–374
Silva-Castro GA, Uad I, Gónzalez-López J, Fandiño CG, Toledo FL, Calvo C (2012) Application of selected microbial consortia combined with inorganic and oleophilic fertilizers to recuperate oil-polluted soil using land farming technology. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:719–726
Silva-Castro GA, Uad I, Rodríguez-Calvo A, Gónzalez-López J, Calvo C (2015) Response of autochthonous microbiota of diesel polluted soils to land-farming treatments. Environ Res 137:49–58
Struthers JK, Jayachandran K, Moorman TB (1998) Biodegradation of atrazine by Agrobacterium radiobacter J14a and use of this strain in bioremediation of contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3368–3375
Surekha Rani M, Lakshmi V, Suvarnalatha Devi KP, Jaya Madhuri R, Aruna S, Jyothi K, Narasimha G, Venkateswarlu K (2008) Isolation and characterization of a chlorpyrifos degrading bacterium from agricultural soil and its growth response. Afr J Microbiol Res 2:026–031
Taguchi K, Motoyama M, Kudo T (2001) PCB/biphenyl degradation gene cluster in Rhodococcus rhodochrousK37, is different from the well-known bph gene clusters in Rhodococcus sp. P6, RHA1, and TA42. RIKEN review. 42. Focused on ecomolecular science research
Vandevivere PC, Bianchi R, Verstraete W (1998) Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: review of emerging technologies. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 72:289–302
Vidali M (2001) Bioremediation – an overview. Pure Appl Chem 73(7):1163–1172
Volpe A, D’Arpa S, Del Moro G, Rossetti S, Tandoi V, Uricchio VF (2012) Fingerprinting hydrocarbons in a contaminated soil from an Italian natural reserve and assessment of the performance of a low-impact bioremediation approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:1773–1782
Wang Q, Zhang S, Li Y (2011) Potential approaches to improving biodegradation of hydrocarbons for bioremediation of crude oil pollution. Environ Prot J 2:47–55
Wang X, Wang Q, Wang S, Li F, Guo G (2012) Effect of biostimulation on community level physiological profiles of microorganisms in field-scale biopiles composed of aged oil sludge. Bioresour Technol 111:308–315
Whelan MJ, Coulon F, Hince G, Rayner J, McWatters R, Spedding T, Snape I (2015) Fate and transport of petroleum hydrocarbons in engineered biopiles in polar regions. Chemosphere 131:232–240
Wiedemeier TH, Miller RN, Wilson JT (1995) Significance of anaerobic processes for the intrinsic bioremediation of fuel hydrocarbons. In: Proceedings of the petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in groundwater – prevention, detection, and remediation conference, November 29–December 1, 1995, Houston, TX
Yakimov MM, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN (2007) Obligate oil-degrading marine bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(3):257–266
Yang SZ, Jin HJ, Wei Z (2009) Bioremediation of oil spills in cold environments: a review. Pedosphere 19(3):371–381
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rana, S., Sharma, A., Rana, R.S. (2020). Microbial Clean-Up Strategy for Eating Garbage. In: Sharma, S., Sharma, N., Sharma, M. (eds) Microbial Diversity, Interventions and Scope. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4099-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4099-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4098-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4099-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)