Abstract
Epidemiological and animal experimental studies have shown that early imbalance of intrauterine nutrition leads to permanent changes in body physiology and metabolism, which may later result in the development of adult chronic diseases such as obesity, type II diabetes, high blood pressure, and coronary disease in offspring. This process takes place at a specific “window period,” known as DOHaD, of fetal development. Another investigation has shown that changes can be observed in their offspring escaped from being exposed to a similar environment. The epigenetic mechanism is a cardinal significance, since the continuous progress of the genetic mechanism of cross-representation opens up a new world for us. Through a series of studies, we hope that we can get inspiration and prevent the disease from its source.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
For the past few years, the national economy has been booming on people’s living conditions, especially on the way of development. The incidence of some metabolic diseases like obesity has increased. At the same time, diseases like neurodegeneration and mental diseases are seriously threatening human health. The emergence of the developmental origins of health and disease theory provides a feasible means for disease prevention and treatment, and the relationship between the theory and transgenerational inheritance has attracted the attention and discussion of researchers.
2 Development History of DOHaD
In the 1970s, Forsdahl was the first to report that the risk of death which resulted from coronary heart disease has something to do with poverty and prosperity and indicated that a close relationship has been seen between permanent damage to the body caused by nutritional deficiency during pregnancy and such a phenomenon. Subsequently, studies launched by Barker and his colleagues showed that nutritional deficiency during pregnancy was closely related to the occurrence of cardiovascular risks, high blood pressure, abnormal blood fat, and central obesity along with disordered glucose metabolism in later generations [1]. Based on this research, the hypothesis of FOAD was used to portray the possible relationship between adult disease and fetal period. Further studies found that fetal growth restriction and postnatal growth patterns caused by an adverse intrauterine environment has significant effects on adult onset. Thus, the study of the origin of health and disease was formally introduced in 2003.
Currently, with modern medicine and some related disciplines growing rapidly beneath our eyes, DOHaD theory has been constantly improved, and harmful factors are unfolded before people’s eyes gradually. Definitely, maternal pregnancy has a greater influence on the health and disease of one’s offspring than paternal factors [2]. According to animal models and epigenetic theory, fathers also contribute to disease and health of the offspring [3]. However, people still have a shallow understanding of the impact of fathers on the health of their offspring. At the Latsis Symposium 2017 seminar, this issue was in depth discussed and much attention should be taken by the field of public health. Early-life exposure is mainly transmitted through maternal exposures or traits [4, 5].
3 Intergeneration Effect and Transgenerational Inheritance
3.1 Intergenerational Effect
Genetic information independent of DNA sequence, acknowledged as epigenetic data, tends to be inherited between adjacent generations [6, 7]. Through animal models, researchers call the complex information layer outside the DNA sequence epigenetic markers. This marker can be passed from parent to child through gametes for intergenerational inheritance [8]. Moreover, nutritional conditions during uterine development have a permanent impact on the subsequent development of the fetus, such as metabolic diseases mentioned above [9] (Table 1).
Although epidemiological studies and related animal model studies support the hypothesis of “thrifty phenotype,” to date, most studies have focused on epigenetic effects between generations rather than on epigenetic effects represented by segregation. Studies have shown that exposure to pollutants, alcohol, tobacco, and other environments can affect the normal development of the fetus, and even the improper experiences of young children during their development may have a great impact on their mental health in adulthood [2, 9, 17].
3.2 Transgenerational Inheritance
It has been found that some of the epigenetic markers are essentially removable [10]; however, epigenetic modifications are not invariably eliminated thoroughly within generations [11, 12]. Reproductive cell reprogramming is an important stage of biological development for intergenerational inheritance. Sperms carries its genetic modification into the egg, and few times after fertilization, the epigenetic modification except for the imprinted region is removed [13, 14]. The ICM cells begin to differentiate, and the epigenetic modification is implanted. When primordial germ cells and somatic cells diverge, almost all of the epigenetic modifications, including imprinted regions, are removed together. Finally, epigenetic modifications are implanted during sperm development.
There are two threads for the strict transgenerational inheritance effects. First, in males, the F0 generation is exposed to specific toxins and nutrients that can induce epigenetic effects, and the second generation (F2 generation) may acquire epigenetic effects; second, while in females, the third generation (F3 generation) may acquire epigenetic effects ultimately. The reason is that the above exposure environment will affect the male and reproductive lines of F0 generation, and also affect the female and reproductive lines of F0 generation and F1 generation. Therefore, the epigenetic characteristics acquired by these generations are not truly segregated to represent epigenetic inheritance. This review screens and distinguishes intergenerational and transgenerational inheritance (Fig. 1).
Does the DOHaD theory have something to do with transgenerational inheritance? The answer is yes. Substantial experiments of animal models indicate that DOHaD has transgenerational and multigenerational effects [15]. Morrison et al. [16] conducted a guinea pig model experiment and it is noteworthy that the F0 generation did not show the corresponding epigenetic characteristics, while the F2 and F3 generations showed the epigenetic characteristics. DDT has been shown to give impetus to transgenerational inheritance in adult diseased rats. Stephanie et al. exposed pregnant F0 female rats to DDT for a short time and then measured the incidence of some diseases in the subsequent F1, F2, and F3 generations. The finding was that in F2 generations, testicular diseases were more common in males than in adolescents, and in F3 generations, ovarian and kidney diseases increased [17]. Similarly, Anway and Skinner et al. [18, 19] used EDCs like vinclozolin to induce sperm epigenetic mutation to elucidate that epigenetic effects exist in the genesis and development of reproductive lines which may be related to transgenerational diseases.
But in the final analysis, the transgenerational genetic mechanism cannot be separated from the support of epigenetics, especially DNA methylation, histone modification, and the role of ncRNA [20] (Table 2).
4 Epigenetic Mechanism
4.1 What Is Epigenetic
In 1957, Conrad Waddington put forward the theory of “Waddington’s epigenetic landscape” to clarify the concept of developmental biology. This theory has been processed and perfected by later generations, thus becoming epigenetics that we are now familiar with [21]. This theory implies that genetic changes occur when the nucleotide sequence of a gene does not change [22,23,24]. The term “epigenetics” does not refer to an additional layer above a gene; rather it is a process of gene development in which genes are expressed by different choices to gradually construct individuals [25]. Epigenetics has been used for a proper explanation of the difficult and incomprehensible problems of biology. Also it can be used to explain a long-standing mystery. By revealing how gene expression is regulated, we can better understand how genetic and non-genetic factors coordinate to determine our characteristics [26, 27]. The non-genetic factors are mainly regulated by a series of epigenetic markers. Currently, many researchers associate epigenetics with many complex diseases, such as methylation in DNA as well as RNA analysis in peripheral blood cells of patients with some diseases [28] and have made some breakthroughs, which provide a new perspective for looking at aging and various diseases [29]. Of course, the explanation of the DOHaD theory is inseparable from the study of epigenetics. At present, epigenetic studies have been carried out in areas such as neurodegeneration, cancer, metabolic diseases, and allergic diseases, which have renewed understanding and insights into the occurrence and treatment of diseases [30,31,32,33,34,35].
Epigenetic mechanisms mainly include DNA methylation, regulation of ncRNA, and histone modification. These mechanisms make a great difference in DOHaD [36,37,38,39].
4.2 DNA Methylation
Enzymes that produce, distinguish, or clear DNA methylation are classified into three categories: writers, erasers, and readers. The writer catalyzes methyl addition to cytosine residues, eraser modifies and removes methyl, and the reader recognizes and binds to methyl to affect gene output. It is through these mechanisms that DNA methylation affects DOHaD [40,41,42].
DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B can directly add methyl to DNA in the DNMT (methyltransferase) family that compiles DNA methylation [43]. DNMT1 has its particularity that tends to methylate semi-methylated DNA in the process of DNA replication. DNMT1 methylate, according to the pre-replication methylation mode, can repair methylation, thus maintaining the stability of methylation of a gene [44, 45]. However, it is still unclear how methyltransferases target specific gene loci.
DNA methylation reduces the expression of some gene fragments by blocking the combination of transcriptional activators. It is worth investigating thoroughly that DNA methylation can be recognized by three family proteins: MBD protein, UHRF protein, and zinc finger protein. When methylation is recognized by these proteins, gene transcription is suppressed [46, 47].
4.3 Histone Modification
Modification of histone can be multifarious, especially when propionylation, methylation, and acetylation are included. Abnormal histone modification can lead to various pathological changes [48].
The interaction of DNA methylation and histone modification on mitochondria results in genomic imprinting. It is due to the epigenetic modification of the allele derived from a parent or its chromosome that the two alleles from different parents express differently in progeny cells [49,50,51] (Fig. 2).
4.4 Noncoding RNA
Through improved methodologies, researchers have found that parts of the genome that do not encode proteins do transcribe a lot, but are initially misunderstood as “transcriptional that has a firm foothold beside proteins.” However, their different roles cannot be ignored [52,53,54]. Studies have confirmed that ncRNAs can silence multiple genes by binding to chromatin and recruiting modification elements. This counts a lot in the process of random inactivation of the X chromosome and can also be seen in DNA damage repair. An increasing number of studies have found that ncRNAs function by forming nucleic acid-protein interactions [55, 56].
4.5 Other Mechanisms
These three mechanisms are the most widely studied. Besides, researchers continue to seek breakthroughs from other perspectives. Maternal effects, dormant transposon activation, and some other mechanisms [57, 58] are not the points of this review. Last but not least, many diseases are not caused unilaterally by one mechanism, but by the abnormal occurrence of multiple mechanisms.
5 Development Prospects and Clinical Significance
In the past 50 years, modern medicine has developed by leaps and bounds. However, some non-communicable chronic diseases are still a thorny problem. As a result, the DOHaD theory has appealed to many people’s eyes. Researchers in the field of public health around the world are trying to curb the development of diseases from the source. Many cases have confirmed that malnutrition during pregnancy can lead to a series of metabolic disorders such as diabetes and abdominal obesity in offspring [59]. In most countries that are developing or hard to develop themselves, the general level of economic development is not high, accompanied by material shortage and other adverse conditions, which has caused indelible harm to pregnant children, even through epigenetic mechanisms to the next generation [60]. Due to global resources distributing unevenly, the environmental exposure of young children during embryonic and early development varies from region to region [61]. Pertinent departments try their best to adapt to local conditions and analyze specific problems to improve the living standards of local inhabitants, the youth accounting for a large proportion particularly along with women in pregnancy. At the same time, children around the world should be educated about the DOHaD theory and improve their understanding of some important concepts. Only by understanding the role of early experience in promoting adult diseases can children improve their awareness of prevention and do a good job in preventing some chronic diseases [62, 63].
We should monitor these diseases with the help of large clinical data to facilitate further research [64]. Embryonic and early childhood development are “windows of opportunity” for intervention from the source of disease. On one hand, continuous intervention in the living environment of pregnant women and children during this period can help to prevent diseases [65]; on the other hand, by analyzing the environmental exposure of fetuses and young children in early stage, we can predict the risk of related diseases and be able to timely prevent and control them [66].
References
Barker DJ, Winter PD, Osmond C, Margetts B, Simmonds SJ (1989) Weight in infancy and death from ischeamic heart disease. Lancet 2(8663):577–580
Sharp GC, Lawlor DA, Richardson SS (2018) It’s the mother!: how assumptions about the casual primacy of maternal effects influence research on the developmental origins of health and disease. Soc Sci Med 213:20–27
Soubry A (2018) Epigenetics as a driver of developmental origins of health and disease:did we forget the fathers? BioEssays 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201700113
Soubry A (2018) POHaD: why we should study future fathers. Environ Epigenet 4(2):dvy007
Soubry A, Hoyo C, Jirle RL, Murphy SK (2014) A paternal environmental legacy: evidence for epigenetic inheritance through the male germ line. BioEssays 36(4):359–371
Wei Y, Schatten H, Sun QY (2015) Environmental epigenetic inheritance through gametes and implications for human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 21(2):194–208
Wei Y, Yang CR, Wei YP, Zhao ZA, Hou Y, Schatten H, Sun QY (2014) Paternally induced transgenerational inheritance of susceptibility to diabetes in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(5):1873–1878
Duffle R, Ajjan S, Greenberg MV, Zamudio N, Escamilla del Arenal M, Iranzo J, Barbaux S, Fauque P, Bourc’his D (2014) The Gpr1/Zdbf2 locus provides new paradigms for transient and dynamic genomic imprinting in mammals. Genes Dev 28(5):463–478
Roseboom TJ (2019) Epidemiological evidence for the developmental origins of health and disease: effects of prenatal undernutrition in humans. J Endocrinol 242(1):T135–T144
Kim BJ, Kim Y, Hong EP, Jeon JP, Yang JS, Choi HJ, Kang SH, Cho YJ (2019) Correlation between altered DNA methylation of intergenic regions of ITPR3 and development of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with subarachnoid Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 130:e449–e456
Heard E, Martienssen RA (2014) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157(1):95–109
Wang L, Zhang J, Duan J, Gao X, Zhu W, Lu X, Yang L, Zhang J, Li W, Zhou Q, Aluru N, Tang F, He C, Huang X, Liu J (2014) Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in mammals. Cell 157(4):979–991
Remy JJ (2010) Stable inheritance of an acquired behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 20(20):R877–R878
Leitch HG, Tang WW, Surani MA (2013) Primordial germ-cell development and epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Curr Top Dev Biol 104:149–187
Hanson MA, Skinner MK (2016) Developmental origins of epigenetic transgenerational inheritance. Environ Epigenet 2(1). pii: dvw002
Morrison JL, Botting KJ, Darby JRT, David AL, Dyson RM, Gatford KL, Gray C, Herrera EA, Hirst JJ, Kim B, Kind KL, Krause BJ, Matthews SG, Palliser HK, Regnault TRH, Richardson BS, Sasaki A, Thompson LP, Berry MJ (2018) Guinea pig models for translation of the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis into the clinic. J Physiol 596(23):5535–5569
King SE, McBirney M, Beck D, Sadler-Riggleman I, Nilsson E, Skinner MK (2019) Sperm epimutation biomarkers of obesity and pathologies following DDT induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease. Environ Epigenet 5(2):dvz008
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK (2005) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science 308(5727):1466–1469
Skinner MK, Nilsson E, Sadler-Riggleman I, Beck D, Ben Maamar M, McCarrey JR (2019) Transgenerational sperm DNA methylation epimutation developmental origins following ancestral vinclozolin exposure. Epigenetics 14(7):721–739
Sarkies P (2019) Molecular mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance: Possible evolutionary implications. Semin Cell Dev Biol S1084-9521(18):30148–30144
Deichmann U (2016) Epigenetics: the origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Dev Biol 416(1):249–254
Gayon J (2016) From Mendel to epigenetics: history of genetics. C R Biol 339:225–230
Milavetz BI, Balakrishnan L (2015) Viral epigenetics. Methods Mol Biol 1238:569–596
Ladd-Acosta C, Fallin MD (2016) The role of epigenetics in genetic and environmental epidemiology. Epigenomics 8(2):271–283
Moore DS (2017) Behavioral epigenetics. WIREs Syst Biol Med 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1333
Lester BM, Conradt E, Marsit C (2016) Introduction to the special section on epigenetics. Child Dev 87(1):29–37
Nicoglou A, Merlin F (2017) Epigenetics: a way to bridge the gap between biological fields. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 66:73–82
Kim S, Cho YH, Won S, Ku JL, Moon HB, Park J, Choi G, Kim S, Choi K (2019) Maternal exposures to persistent organic pollutants are associated with DNA methylation of thyroid hormone-related genes in placenta differently by infant sex. Environ Int 130:104956
Schacherer J (2016) Beyond the simplicity of Mendelian inheritance. C R Biol 339(7–8):284–288
Aref-Eshghi E, Bourque DK, Kerkhof J, Carere DA, Ainsworth P, Sadikovic B, Armour CM, Lin H (2019) Genome-wide DNA methylation and RNA analyses enable reclassification of two variants of uncertain significance in a patient with clinical kabuki syndrome. Hum Mutat 40(10):1684–1689
Brunet A, Berger SL (2014) Epigenetics of aging and aging-related disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:S17–S20
Hata A, Nakajima T, Matsusaka K, Fukuyo M, Morimoto J, Yamamoto T, Sakairi Y, Rahmutulla B, Ota S, Wada H, Suzuki H, Matsubara H, Yoshino I, Kaneda A (2019) A low DNA methylation epigenotype in lung squamous cell carcinoma and its association with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and poorer prognosis. Int J Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32532
Potaczek DP, Harb H, Michel S, Alhamwe BA, Renz H, Tost J (2017) Epigenetics and allergy: from basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Epigenomics 9(4):539–571
Werner RJ, Kelly AD, Issa JJ (2017) Epigenetics and precision oncology. Cancer J 23(5):262–269
Klein K, Gay S (2015) Epigenetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 27(1):76–82
van der Harst P, de Windt LJ, Chambers JC (2017) Translational perspective on epigenetics in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(5):590–606
Barrertt JR (2017) Programming the future epigenetics in the context of DOHaD. Environ Health Perspect 125(4):A72
Goyal D, Limesand SW, Goyal R (2019) Epigenetic responses and the developmental origins of health and disease. J Endocrinol 242(1):T105–T119
Oblette A, Rondeaux J, Dumont L, Delessard M, Saulnier J, Rives A, Rives N, Rondanino C (2019) DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications in the mouse germline following in- vitro maturation of fresh or cryopreserved prepubertal testicular tissue. Repord Biomed Online 39(3):383–401
Wang K, Tian Y, Zhang Y, Li X, Wei X, Hu H, Xu S (2019) Toxicity mechanism of sevoflurane in neural stem cells of rats through DNA methylation. Exp Ther Med 18(1):237–241
Wiklund P, Karhunen V, Richmond RC, Parmar P, Rodriguez A, De Silva M, Wielscher M, Rezwan FI, Richardson TG, Veijola J, Herzig KH, Holloway JW, Relton CL, Sebert S, Järvelin MR (2019) DNA methylation links prenatal smoking exposure to later life health outcomes in offspring. Clin Epigenet 11(1):97
Moody L, Wang H, Jung PM, Chen H, Pan YX (2019) Maternal and post-weaning high-fat diets produce distinct metabolic pathways within specific genomic contexts. Int J Mol Sci 20(13):e3229
Yen RW, Vertino PM, Nelkin BD, Yu JJ, el-Deiry W, Cumaraswamy A, Lennon GG, Trask BJ, Celano P, Baylin SB (1992) Isolation and characterization of the cDNA encoding human DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res 20(9):2287–2291
Leonhardt H, Page AW, Weier HU, Bestor TH (1992) A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell 71(5):865–873
Mortusewicz O, Schermelleh L, Walter J, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H (2005) Recruitment of DNA methyltransferase I to DNA repair sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(25):8905–8909
Hermann A, Goyal R, Jeltsch A (2004) The Dnmt1 DNA-(cytosine-C5)-methyltransferase to sites of DNA processively with high prefence for hemimethylated target sites. J Biol Chem 279(46):48300–48359
Hendrich B, Bird A (1998) Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 18(11):6538–6547
Taverna SD, Li H, Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Patel DJ (2007) How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14(11):1025–1040
Huang H, Sabari BR, Garcia BA, Allis CD, Zhao Y (2014) SnapShot: histone modifications. Cell 159(2):458–458
Lucca I, Hofbauer SL, Haitel A, Susani M, Shariat SF, Klatte T, De Martino M (2019) Urinary expression of genes involved in DNA methylation and histone modification for diagnosis of bladder cancer in patients with asymptomatic microscopic haematuria. Oncol Lett 18(1):57–62
Li D, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Miao Q, Xu Y, Soares JC, Zhang X, Zhang R (2019) Correlation between the epigenetic modification of histone H3K9 acetylation of NR2B gene promoter in rat hippocampus and ethanol withdrawal syndrome. Mol Biol Rep 46(3):2867–2875
Bergmann JH, Spector DL (2014) Long non-coding RNAs: modulators of nuclear structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 26:10–18
Li YP, Wang Y (2015) Large noncoding RNAs are promising regulators in embryonic stem cells. J Genet Genomics 42(3):99–105
Henikoff S, Greally JM (2016) Epigenetics, cellular memory and gene regulation. Curr Biol 26(14):R641–R666
Wang KC, Chang HY (2011) Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell 43(6):904–914
Panaud O (2016) Horizontal transfers of transposable events in eukaryotes: the flying genes. C R Biol 339(7–8):296–299
Harvey ZH, Chen Y, Jarosz DF (2018) Protein-based inheritance: epigenetics beyond 1 the chromosome. Mol Cell 69(2):195–202
Bianco-Miotto T, Craig JM, Gasser YP, van Dijk SJ, Ozanne SE (2017) Epigenetics and DOHaD: from basics to birth and beyond. J Dev Health Dis 8(5):513–519
Tu’akoi S, Vickers MH, Tairea K, Aung YYM, Tamarua-Herman N, ‘Ofanoa M, Bay JL (2018) The significance of DOHaD for small island developing states. J Dev Orig Health Dis 9(5):487–491
Haas SA, Oi K (2018) The developmental origins of health and disease in international perspective. Soc Sci Med 213:123–133
Macnab AJ, Mukisa R (2018) Priorities for Africa youth for engaging in DOHaD. J Dev Orig Health Dis 9(1):15–19
Oyamada M, Lim A, Dixon R, Wall C, Bay J (2018) Development of understanding of DOHaD concepts in students during undergraduate health professional programs in Japan and New Zealand. J Dev Orig Health Dis 9(3):253–259
Jaddoe VWV (2019) Translational challenges for the developmental origins of health and disease: time to fulfill the promises for innovative prevention strategies. J Dev Orig Health Dis 10(3):260–262
Holder LB, Haque MM, Skinner MK (2017) Machine learning for epigenetics and future medical medical applications. Epigenetics 12(7):505–514
Giordano C, Benyshek DC (2015) DOHaD research with populations in transition: a case study of prenatal diet remote recall with Yup’ik Alaskan women. J Dev Orig Health Dis 6(2):79–87
Connor KL, Bourque SL, Weaver ICG (2019) A Canadian perspective on the developmental origins of health and disease: understanding the past as a way forward. J Dev Orig Health Dis 10(1):1–4
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81673217, 8197140).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wu, W., Wu, P., Tang, Q., Lu, C. (2020). Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. In: Xia, Y. (eds) Early-life Environmental Exposure and Disease. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3797-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3797-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3796-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3797-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)