Abstract
Progressive cone/cone-rod dystrophies (CRD) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by early deterioration of visual acuity and color vision, and in some cases nystagmus. The prevalence is estimated to be 1/40,000. Patients usually present in childhood or early adult life. In later life, patients with cone dystrophies can progress to have rod dysfunction. Hence CRD may be a more appropriate terminology, to reflect widespread retinal dysfunction, with cones usually more affected than rods. When there is involvement of both cone and rod systems, it may be difficult clinically to differentiate CRD from retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Therefore, electrophysiology can be helpful, as reduction or absence of cone ERG responses, with less reduction in rod responses would indicate CRD. However, in advanced disease, both cone and rod ERG responses may become undetectable. Compared to rod-cone dystrophies, CRD are less often associated with syndromes, but CRD may be part of Bardet–Biedl syndrome and spinocerebellar ataxia type 7.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Progressive cone/cone-rod dystrophies (CRD) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by early deterioration of visual acuity and color vision, and in some cases nystagmus. The prevalence is estimated to be 1/40,000. Patients usually present in childhood or early adult life. In later life, patients with cone dystrophies can progress to have rod dysfunction. Hence CRD may be a more appropriate terminology, to reflect widespread retinal dysfunction, with cones usually more affected than rods. When there is involvement of both cone and rod systems, it may be difficult clinically to differentiate CRD from retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Therefore, electrophysiology can be helpful, as reduction or absence of cone ERG responses, with less reduction in rod responses would indicate CRD. However, in advanced disease, both cone and rod ERG responses may become undetectable. Compared to rod-cone dystrophies, CRD are less often associated with syndromes, but CRD may be part of Bardet–Biedl syndrome and spinocerebellar ataxia type 7.
Etiopathogenesis
Autosomal dominant, recessive, and X-linked inheritance patterns have been described in CRD (Moore 1992). Many different genetic mutations have been described to cause CRD, with more being identified as technology for genetic sequencing improves (Roosing et al. 2014). Major genes include ABCA4, CRX, GUCY2D, and RPGR (Hamel 2007). CRD has been found to be associated with mutations in the gene GUCY2D, and cone dystrophy-3 (COD3) has been associated with mutations in GUCA1A (Payne et al. 1998; Wilkie et al. 2001). GUCY2D and GUCA1A encode the retina-specific guanylate cyclase (RETGC-1) (Kelsell et al. 1998) and its activating protein guanylate cyclase activating protein-1 (GCAP-1), respectively. GCAPs play an important role in regulating the function of RETGC-1 in a calcium-dependent manner. However, it is unclear how defects in these proteins result in degeneration which is limited to cones.
Clinical Features
Clinical features include photophobia, nystagmus, color vision defects, and visual field abnormalities. Various visual field defects have been reported, which include central scotoma, peripheral field loss, generalized loss of sensitivity, and ring scotoma (Simunovic and Moore 1998). In later stages of the disease when the rod photoreceptors are involved, night blindness may also become a prominent symptom.
Fundus examination findings can range from a normal macula to bull’s eye configuration in late disease (Roosing et al. 2014). White flecks at the level of RPE, and tapetum-like sheen have also been described (Simunovic and Moore 1998). When there is widespread retinal involvement, there can be presence of bone spicules resembling RP. Late stages of CRD may be indistinguishable from RP.
Here we showcase various forms of cone and cone rod dystrophies (Figs. 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6).
Investigations
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristic of cone dystrophy in the early stages may be subtle, such as loss of interdigitation zone (IZ) with or without foveal cavitation. There is a less distinct border in the periphery between the EZ and the ELM with lower intensity and thinning of the EZ band. At the macula, the EZ band can show irregular foveal loss or segmental foveal loss. Another pattern of OCT abnormality that has been observed in cone dystrophy is central foveal thickening with irregular perifoveal loss of the EZ band. In the later stages, the ELM and EZ may be completely lost at the macular region but preserved in the peripheral regions of the fundus. There is also generalized thinning of the RPE layer. Overall, cone and cone-rod dystrophy show characteristic changes on OCT that affects predominantly the macula area in the early stages and correlates with the level of visual impairment.
Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) findings in cone/cone-rod dystrophy can be variable and may depend on the stage of disease. A ring of hyperautofluorescence surrounded by an area of macula RPE atrophy has been described (Robson et al. 2010) (Fig. 4.4b).
Fluorescein angiography may show hyperfluorescence at the macula due to RPE atrophy. However, this finding is not specific to cone/cone-rod dystrophy.
Macular dysfunction can be detected using multifocal electroretinogram (ERG), which can also document the areas of dysfunction topographically. Full-field ERG typically shows poor photopic and 30 Hz flicker responses, with relatively preserved scotopic (rod-derived) responses. Variable disturbance in rod responses may also be seen in later stages (Roosing et al. 2014). ERG is particularly informative as they may be abnormal before distinguishable clinical signs appear. For patients with Bull’s eye maculopathy (as in Figs. 4.5 and 4.6), ERG is able to distinguish cone dystrophy from macular dystrophy.
Management and Prognosis
A holistic treatment approach is recommended for patients with cone and CRD. Management is generally conservative and use low vision aids when appropriate. Genetic testing to characterize the mode of inheritance is important for genetic counseling. Current research has been focusing on identifying the genetic basis of cone dystrophies, with the hope that in the future gene therapy might be possible (Roosing et al. 2014).
The clinical course of CRD is more severe than RP, leading to early legal blindness and disability.
Abbreviations
- CRD:
-
Cone-rod dystrophy
- ELM:
-
External limiting membrane
- ERG:
-
Electroretinogram
- EZ:
-
Ellipsoid zone
- FAF:
-
Fundus autofluorescence
- IZ:
-
Interdigitation zone
- mfERG:
-
Multifocal electroretinogram
- OCT:
-
Optical coherence tomography
- RP:
-
Retinitis pigmentosa
- RPE:
-
Retinal pigment epithelium
- SD-OCT:
-
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography
References
Hamel CP. Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:7.
Kelsell RE, Gregory-Evans K, Payne AM, et al. Mutations in the retinal guanylate cyclase (RETGC-1) gene in dominant cone-rod dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(7):1179–84.
Moore AT. Cone and cone-rod dystrophies. J Med Genet. 1992;29(5):289–90.
Payne AM, Downes SM, Bessant DA, et al. A mutation in guanylate cyclase activator 1A (GUCA1A) in an autosomal dominant cone dystrophy pedigree mapping to a new locus on chromosome 6p21.1. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(2):273–7.
Robson AG, Webster AR, Michaelides M, et al. “Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod electroretinogram”: a comprehensive genotype/phenotype study including fundus autofluorescence and extensive electrophysiology. Retina. 2010;30(1):51–62.
Roosing S, Thiadens AA, Hoyng CB, Klaver CC, den Hollander AI, Cremers FP. Causes and consequences of inherited cone disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;42:1–26.
Simunovic MP, Moore AT. The cone dystrophies. Eye (Lond). 1998;12(Pt 3b):553–65.
Wilkie SE, Li Y, Deery EC, et al. Identification and functional consequences of a new mutation (E155G) in the gene for GCAP1 that causes autosomal dominant cone dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(3):471–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsai, A., Koh, A., Mathur, R., Cheung, G.C.M. (2020). Progressive Cone/Cone-Rod Dystrophy. In: Cheung, G. (eds) Hereditary Chorioretinal Disorders. Retina Atlas. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0414-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0414-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0413-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0414-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)