Abstract
The motivation to comply or not to comply is considerably influenced by beliefs, attitudes, and social representations of taxpayers. These subjective conceptualizations and evaluations are often not objective or true, but they determine how citizens construct their subjective reality. Attitudes, judgments, and behavior intentions eventually shape people’s behavior which is often more affected by what they think than by what actually is. We first explain what social representations are, how they are related to individual attitudes, and to what extent both social representations and attitudes shape behavior according to the existing psychological literature. In the following section we present three of our own studies on taxpayers’ social representations of taxes and their attitudes towards tax evasion and tax avoidance. These empirical studies identify relevant differences in attitudes between different occupation groups: Self-employed entrepreneurs express less favorable views on taxes and the tax authorities and as a result feel more restricted and hindered in their work, while employed workers focus stronger on the exchange function between tax payments and the resulting provision of public goods. Despite the differences, in all occupation groups tax evasion is not perceived as a severe crime and tax evaders are even judged quite positively and as more intelligent than the typical tax payer. The most recent study suggests that tax evasion might not be evaluated as positive anymore as in earlier studies, but instead tax avoidance seems to be morally accepted and taxpayers engaging in tax avoidance are judged more positive than the typical taxpayer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abric, Jean-Claude. 1984. A Theoretical and Experimental Approach to the Study of Social Representations in a Situation of Interaction. In Social Representations, ed. Robert M. Farr and Serge Moscovici, 223–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Abric, Jean-Claude. 1993. Les Representations Sociales: Aspects Théoriques. In Répresentations Sociales et Pratiques, ed. Jean-Claude Abric. Paris: PUF.
Adams, J.Stacy. 1965. Inequity in Social Exchange. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.
Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.
Ajzen, Icek. 1993. Attitude Theory and the Attitude-behavior Relation. In New Directions in Attitude Measurement, ed. Dagmar Krebs and Peter Schmidt, 41–57. New York: de Gruyter.
Allingham, Michael G., and Agnar Sandmo. 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1: 323–338.
Alm, James, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Friedrich Schneider. 2004. ‘Sizing’ The Problem of the Hard-to-Tax. In Taxing the Hard-to-Tax: Lessons from Theory and Practice, ed. James Alm, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, and Sally Wallace, 11–75. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Alm, James, Isabel Sanchez, and Ana De Jua. 1995. Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance. Kyklos 48 (1): 1–18.
Alm, James, and Benno Torgler. 2006. Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology 27 (2): 224–246.
Andreoni, James, Brian Erard, and Jonathan Feinstein. 1998. Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 818–860.
Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Braithwaite, Valerie. 2003. Dancing with Tax Authorities: Motivational Postures and Non-compliant Actions. In Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion, ed. Valerie Braithwaite, 15–39. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Brehm, Jack W. 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Burton, Hughlene A., Stewart Karlinsky, and Cindy Blanthorne. 2005. Perception of a White-collar Crime: Tax Evasion. The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research 3 (1): 35–48.
Chan, Chris W., Coleen S. Troutman, and David O’Bryan. 2000. An Expanded Model of Taxpayer Compliance: Empirical Evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 9 (2): 83–103.
Cullis, John G., and Alan Lewis. 1997. Why People Pay Taxes: From a Conventional Economic Model to a Model of Social Convention. Journal of Economic Psychology 18 (2–3): 305–321.
Rosa, De, and S. Annamaria. 1995. Le „Réseau d’Associations“ comme Methode d‘Etude dans la Recherche sur les Representations Sociales: Structure, Contenus et Polarite du Champ Semantique. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 15: 145–157.
Dornstein, M. 1976. Compliance with Legal and Bureaucratic Rules: The Case of Self-employed Taxpayers in Israel. Human Relations 29 (11): 1019–1034.
Duveen, Gerard, and Barbara Lloyd. 1990. Introduction. In Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge, ed. G. Duveen and B. Lloyd. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Elffers, Henk, Russell H. Weigel, and Dick J. Hessing. 1987. The Consequences of Different Strategies for Measuring Tax Evasion Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 8 (3): 311–337.
Farr, Robert M. 1996. The Roots of Modern Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fetchenhauer, Detlef. 2004. Different Perspectives on Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior. Kumulative Habilitation. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Flick, Uwe. 1995. Psychologie des Sozialen. Repräsentationen in Wissen und Sprache. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Gangl, Katharina, Barbara Kastlunger, Erich Kirchler, and Martin Voracek. 2012. Confidence in the Economy in Times of Crisis: Social Representations of Experts and Laypeople. Journal of Socio-Economics 41: 603–614.
Groenland, Edward A.G., and Gery M. van Veldhoven. 1983. Tax Evasion Behavior: A Psychological Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 3: 129–144.
Kasper, Matthias, Jerome Olse, Christoph Kogler, Jennifer Stark, and Erich Kirchler. 2018. Individual Attitudes and Social Representations of Taxation, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion. In The Routledge Companion to Tax Avoidance Research, ed. Nigar Hashimzade and Yuliya Epifantseva, 289–303. New York: Routledge.
Kirchler, Erich. 1998. Differential Representations of Taxes: Analysis of Free Associations and Judgments of Five Employment Groups. Journal of Socio-Economics 27: 117–131.
Kirchler, Erich. 2007. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kirchler, Erich, B. Boris Maciejovsky, and Friedrich Schneider. 2003. Everyday Representations of Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, and Tax Flight: Do Legal Differences Matter? Journal of Economic Psychology 24: 535–553.
Lewis, Alan. 1978. Perceptions of Tax Rates. British Tax Review 6: 358–366.
Lewis, Alan. 1982. The Psychology of Taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
McGee, Robert W. 2012. The Ethics of Tax Evasion. New York, NY: Springer.
Moscovici, Serge. 1961. La Psychanalyse, son Image et son Public. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Moscovici, Serge. 1973. Introduction. In Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis, ed. Claudine Herzlich. London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, Serge. 1976. Introduction. In Social Influence and Social Change, ed. Serge Moscovici. London: Academic Press.
Moscovici, Serge. 2001. The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In Social Representations—Explorations in Social Psychology, ed. Serge Moscovici and Gerard Duveen, 18–77. New York: New York University Press.
Nelson, Douglas L., Cathy L. McEvoy, and Simon Dennis. 2000. What is Free Association and What Does It Measure? Memory & Cognition 28: 887–899.
Niemirowski, Pauline, Alexander J. Wearing Steve Baldwin, Brian Leonard, and Chris Mobbs. 2002. The Influence of Tax Related Behaviours, Beliefs, Attitudes and Values on Australian Taxpayer Compliance. Is Tax Avoidance Intentional and How Serious an Offence Is It? Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Orviska, Marta, and John Hudson. 2002. Tax Evasion, Civic Duty and the Law Abiding Citizen. European Journal of Political Economy 19 (1): 83–102.
Peabody, Dean. 1967. Trait Inferences: Evaluative and Descriptive Aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs 7, Whole No. 644.
Peabody, Dean. 1985. National Characteristics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Porcano, Thomas M. 1988. Correlates of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 9 (1): 47–67.
Richardson, Grant. 2008. The Relationship between Culture and Tax Evasion across Countries: Additional Evidence and Extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 17 (2): 67–78.
Schmölders, Günter. 1960. Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schneider, Friedrich, and Dominik H. Enste. 2013. The Shadow Economy: An International Survey. Cambridge University Press.
Stark, Jennifer, Tarek el Sehity, and Erich Kirchler. 2017. Soziale Repräsentationen—soziale Vorstellungen. In Kommunikation, Interaktion und soziale Gruppenprozesse, ed. Hans-Werner Bierhoff and Dieter Frey. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Thibaut, John W., and Harold H. Kelley. 1959. Power and Dependence. The Social Psychology of Groups, 100–125. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Torgler, Benno. 2012. Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes in the USA: An empirical analysis. In The Ethics of Tax Evasion, ed. Robert W. McGee, 269–283. New York, NY: Springer.
Torgler, Benno, and F. Schneider. 2009. The Impact of Tax Morale and Institutional Quality on the Shadow Economy. Journal of Economic Psychology 30 (2): 228–245.
Trivedi, V.Umashanker, Mohamed Shehata, and Stuart Mestelman. 2005. Attitudes, Incentives, and Tax Compliance. Canadian Tax Journal 52: 29–61.
Veit, Otto. 1927. Grundlagen der Steuermoral. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 83: 317–349.
Vergès, Pierre. 1992. L’Evocation de l’Argent: Une Mèthode pour la Définition du Noyau Central d’une Représentation. Bulletin de Psychologie 45: 203–209.
Vogel, Joachim. 1974. Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data. National Tax Journal 27 (1): 499–513.
Voelklein, Corina, and Caroline Howarth. 2005. A Review of Controversies about Social Representations theory: A British Debate. Culture & Psychology 11 (4): 431–454.
Wagner, Wolfgang. 1994. Alltagsdiskurs. Die Theorie sozialer Repräsentationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wagner, Wolfgang, Gerard Duveen Robert Farr, Sandra Jovchelovitch, Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi, Ivana Marková, and Diana Rose. 1999. Theory and Method of Social Representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2: 95–125.
Wagner, Wolfgang, José Valencia, and Fran Elejabarrieta. 1996. Relevance, Discourse and the “Hot” Stable Core of Social Representations-A Structural Analysis of Word Associations. British Journal of Social Psychology 35: 331–352.
Wahlund, Richard. 1992. Tax Changes and Economic Behavior: The Case of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 13 (4): 657–677.
Wallschutzky, I.G. 1984. Possible Causes of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 5 (4): 371–384.
Wärneryd, Karl-Erik, and Bengt Walerud. 1982. Taxes and Economic Behavior: Some Interview Data on Tax Evasion in Sweden. Journal of Economic Psychology 2 (3): 187–211.
Webley, Paul, Michaela Cole, and Ole-Petter Eidjar. 2001. The Prediction of Self-reported and Hypothetical Tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (2): 141–155.
Wilson, Janine L. F., and Steven Sheffrin, S. 2005. Understanding Surveys of Taxpayer Honesty. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 61(2): 256–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kogler, C., Kirchler, E. (2020). Taxpayers’ Subjective Concepts of Taxes, Tax Evasion, and Tax Avoidance. In: van Brederode, R. (eds) Ethics and Taxation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0088-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0089-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)