Abstract
In this chapter, I fill a gap in the crimmigration literature by analysing the gendered dimensions of ‘marriage migration’ to Australia. For this purpose, I describe three case studies: mail order brides 1980s to 2002, human trafficking for marriage from the 2000s, and the legislative response to forced marriage in 2013. I argue that a focus on prevention of conduct and protection of migrant women (and girls) has overshadowed gender as an important aspect of the gatekeeper role of the crimmigration response. I demonstrate that the ‘intersectional’ features of the crimmigration nexus in the context of marriage migration include gender, culture, and identity; that gender is an embodiment of cultural values and is linked to the community, national identity and membership.
This chapter is an outcome of an Australian Research Council (ARC) funded Discovery Project entitled, ‘Development of a Legal Framework for Regulation of International Marriage Migration’ for which Professor Susan Kneebone is Chief Investigator. The support of the ARC is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks also to Reyvi Marinas, Thomas Harré and Sayomi Ariyawansa for extensive and helpful research and editing assistance associated with this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Stumpf 2006, p. 376.
- 2.
Ibid. p. 380.
- 3.
Weber and McCulloch 2018, pp. 1–19, extend Stumpf’s analysis by presenting a comprehensive analysis of three theoretical positions of crimmigration, namely penology, criminology and border control (in particular ‘enemy penology’).
- 4.
This is based on Michael Walzer’s theory of membership, Walzer 1983, pp. 31–35, which is discussed further below.
- 5.
Stumpf 2006, pp. 396-7.
- 6.
Hartry 2012.
- 7.
Ibid. p. 23.
- 8.
And thus distinct from the type of international marriage which results from a voluntary union between two equal individuals of different nationalities. See Irving 2016.
- 9.
Wray et al. 2014. This article analyses the implementation of the Family Reunion and Citizens’ Directives in the EU context, and shows the common concern of states in family reunification and formation in regulating marriage migration.
- 10.
- 11.
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (Trafficking Protocol). The Trafficking Protocol emphasises the position of ‘women and children’ as victims (Art. 2 – ‘Statement of purpose’); Part II of the Protocol is directed at ‘Protection of victims of trafficking …’; Part III deals with ‘Prevention, cooperation and other measures ‘and focuses in particular upon protecting ‘especially women and children’ from ‘revictimization’ (Art. 9(1)(b)) and vulnerability to trafficking (Art. 9(4)). See also, McSherry and Kneebone 2008.
- 12.
Irving 2016.
- 13.
Chung, Kim and Piper 2016.
- 14.
- 15.
Toyota 2008, p. 3.
- 16.
Constable 2005, p. 4.
- 17.
Kim 2012.
- 18.
- 19.
Kneebone and Debeljak 2012, pp. 46–54.
- 20.
I acknowledge the different views on this issue, including the view that sex work is work. These views are discussed in Kneebone and Debeljak 2012, pp. 46–54.
- 21.
- 22.
Kneebone and Debeljak 2012.
- 23.
See also Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (‘Istanbul Convention’); Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women.
- 24.
UNHCR 2002, para. 18.
- 25.
Macklin 2004, p. 176.
- 26.
Kneebone and Debeljak 2012, pp. 73–5.
- 27.
Cunneen and Stubbs 1996, p. 131.
- 28.
Ibid.
- 29.
Kneebone 2017.
- 30.
- 31.
Saroca 2006.
- 32.
Ibid. pp. 75–6, citing Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (“DIMA”) 2005.
- 33.
Saroca 2006, p. 76 citing DIMA 2005. Note the same statistics are cited in Cuneen and Stubbs 1996, p. 134. They do not reveal whether some of the ‘Australian male residents’ were by origin from the Philippines, but the issue of violence within a marriage discussed by both Cuneen and Stubbs and Saroca arose from cases of husbands from a non-Filipino background.
- 34.
Wall 1983, p. 218.
- 35.
Ibid. p. 219.
- 36.
Birrell 1995.
- 37.
Ibid. p. 10.
- 38.
Ibid. p. 9.
- 39.
Ibid.
- 40.
Berg and Crock, p. 181.
- 41.
Birrell 1995, p. 11.
- 42.
Australian Law Reform Commission 2011.
- 43.
Roma 2013.
- 44.
Ibid. p. 209.
- 45.
Ibid.
- 46.
Ibid. p. 232.
- 47.
- 48.
Both judicial and non-judicially determined evidence are acceptable (see Migration Regulations, Division Part 1, Division 1.5). Examples of judicially determined includes an injunction under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), court orders or convictions against the spouse for an act of violence against the visa applicant or members of the family unit.
- 49.
Migration Regulations, reg. 1.21(1).
- 50.
- 51.
Australian Law Reform Commission 2011, p. 21.
- 52.
Betts 2003, p. 178.
- 53.
- 54.
Cunneen and Stubbs 1996, p. 130.
- 55.
Ibid. p. 137.
- 56.
Saroca 2006.
- 57.
Waktins 1982, c.f. Robinson 1982.
- 58.
See Constable 2005, p. 6, who describes a similar discourse in Canada.
- 59.
Wall 1983.
- 60.
Cunneen and Stubbs 1996.
- 61.
See also Saroca 2006, p. 85.
- 62.
Cuneen and Stubbs 1996.
- 63.
Bonifacio 2009.
- 64.
Saroca 2006.
- 65.
Cuneen and Stubbs 1996, table 1, p. 142.
- 66.
Ibid. p. 145–6.
- 67.
R v Schembri (Supreme Court of Victoria, Vincent J, 9 July 1990).
- 68.
Ramilo 1998.
- 69.
Cuneen and Stubbs 1996, p. 153.
- 70.
Ibid. p. 153.
- 71.
Hunt 2002.
- 72.
Following some legislative reform in 1999 and 2002, the government announced a $20 million package to combat trafficking in persons in 2003: see Downer 2013.
- 73.
Kelly et al. 1999, p. 1.
- 74.
AIC 2014.
- 75.
Ibid. pp. 7–8.
- 76.
See R v Kovacs; R v Foad Ali Solaiman.
- 77.
AIC 2014, p. ix.
- 78.
McSherry and Kneebone 2008.
- 79.
See R v Tang, this was the context of the first ‘trafficking’ prosecution which was in fact brought under the then slavery provisions of the Criminal Code.
- 80.
R v Kovacs
- 81.
AIC 2014, box. 3, p. 6.
- 82.
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (‘CTOC’); Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children; Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air (‘Migrant Protocol’).
- 83.
McSherry and Kneebone 2008. The visas have subsequently been renamed but are still essentially tied to participation in the criminal justice system. The fact that a trafficked person cannot apply directly for a visa but must be recommended for one by the Australian Federal Police also underlies the criminal justice objectives of Australia’s protection regime.
- 84.
For example, R v Kovacs.
- 85.
See, Sieders and Yotchomchin. Ironically, the objective was to acquire work rights through a protection visa,
- 86.
VXAJ v MIMIA.
- 87.
Ibid. para. 88.
- 88.
- 89.
Kneebone 2014.
- 90.
Ibid.
- 91.
Sydney Morning Herald 2005.
- 92.
AIC 2014, p. 7.
- 93.
Ibid. p. 42.
- 94.
- 95.
Askola 2018. However, I note that the Coalition Government announced changes to the Support for Trafficked People Program in 2018 that allows victims of forced marriage to access assistance (for an extended period of up to 200 days) without having to participate in the criminal justice process: Australian Government 2018.
- 96.
Bonjour and de Hart 2013.
- 97.
Bredal 2008.
- 98.
Bonjour and de Hart 2013.
- 99.
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 270. 4
- 100.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR’), Art. 4; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (‘ICCPR’); Arts. 8(1), 8(2).
- 101.
- 102.
Shahinian 2012.
- 103.
Ibid. para. 18.
- 104.
Ibid. para. 8.
- 105.
Australian Government 2010, p. 6, citing evidence from the UK.
- 106.
Ibid. p. 16.
- 107.
Ibid.
- 108.
Commonwealth of Australia 2012, p. 6225.
- 109.
Patton 2018, p. 21.
- 110.
Ibid. p. 35.
- 111.
Australian Government 2010, para. 15.
- 112.
Askola 2018.
- 113.
Simmons and Burns 2013.
- 114.
Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Other Measures) Act 2015 (Cth); Askola 2018, p. 989.
- 115.
RMIT University and The Salvation Army Freedom Partnership to End Modern Slavery 2018, p. 14.
- 116.
Kneebone and Teshome 2012.
- 117.
Ibid p. 9
- 118.
RMIT University and The Salvation Army Freedom Partnership to End Modern Slavery 2018, p. 4.
- 119.
Kneebone and Teshome 2012.
- 120.
McGuire 2014.
- 121.
Ibid. p. 10.
- 122.
Marginson and Almarhoun in, McGuire 2014, pp. 56–57.
- 123.
Avdibegovic and Taneski in, McGuire 2014, p. 54.
- 124.
Patton 2018.
- 125.
Centre for Multicultural Youth 2016, pp. 9–10.
- 126.
RMIT University and The Salvation Army Freedom Partnership to End Modern Slavery 2018.
- 127.
- 128.
Zeweri 2018, p. 13.
- 129.
AIC 2018, p. 2.
- 130.
Ibid. pp. 15–8.
- 131.
RMIT University and The Salvation Army Freedom Partnership to End Modern Slavery 2018, see Appendix 2.
- 132.
Zeweri 2018.
- 133.
See also Prattis and El Matrah 2017.
- 134.
- 135.
- 136.
Shahinian 2012, p. 16.
- 137.
See also, Sowey 2017.
- 138.
- 139.
Prattis and El Matrah 2017, p. 1.
- 140.
Sowey 2017, p. 9.
- 141.
Bonjour and de Hart 2013, p. 63.
- 142.
Ibid. p. 61.
- 143.
Bredal 2008, p. 346.
- 144.
Walzer 1983.
- 145.
Ibid. p. 41.
References
Case Law
R v Foad Ali Solaiman [2008] NSWDC 53 (20 March 2008)
R v Kovacs [2009] 2 Qd R 51
R v Schembri (Supreme Court of Victoria, Vincent J, 9 July 1990)
R v Sieders and Yotchomchin [2008] NSWCCA 187
R v Tang (2008) 237 CLR 1
VXAJ v Minister for immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 198 FLR 455
Legislation
Anti-Mail Order Bride Law 1990 (RA 6695)
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act2003 (RA 9208)
Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Other Measures) Act 2015 (Cth)
Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Act 2013 (Cth)
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
International Agreements
Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, signed 11 May 2011, CETS No 10 (entered into force 1 August 2014)
Covenant of the League of Nations (1919)
Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, GA Res 48/104, UN GAOR, 48th sess, 85th plen mtg, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/RES/48/104 (20 December 1993)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 993 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976)
Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea, and Air, opened for signature 12 December 2000, 2241 UNTS 507 (entered into force 28 January 2004)
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Slavery, Servitude, Forced Labour and Similar Institutions and Practices Convention, opened for signature 15 November 2000, 60 LNTS 253 (entered into force 25 Decmber 2003)
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, opened for signature 12 December 2000, 2237 UNTS 319 (entered into force 25 December 2003)
Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, opened for signature 7 September 1956, 226 UNTS 3 (entered into force 30 April 1957)
United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime n.d., 2225 UNTS 209
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217A (III), UN GAOR, Un Doc A/810 (10 December 1948)
Secondary Sources
Allain J (2009) On the curious disappearance of human servitude from general international law. Journal of History of International Law 11:303–332
Askola, Heli (2018) Responding to Vulnerability? Forced Marriage and the Law. UNSW Law Journal 41(3):977
Attorney General’s Department (2004) Australian Government’s action plan to eradicate trafficking in persons. In: Attorney General’s Department. Available via Australian Government. http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/rwpattach.nsf/personal/7ABBC73F994862F6CA256EB500182B3F/$FILE/99+Traffickingplan.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2019
Australian Government (2010) Discussion Paper: Forced and Servile Marriage. In: Attorney-General’s Department. Available via Australian Government. https://www.ag.gov.au/Consultations/Documents/Consultationonforcedandservilemarriage/Discussion%20Paper%20for%20Public%20Release%20forced%20and%20servile%20marriage.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019
Australian Government (2018) Increased Support for Forced Marriage Victims. In: Department of Social Services. Available via Australian Government. https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2018/d18_479015-forced-marriage-stream-trial.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019
Australian Institute of Criminology (2014) Human trafficking involving marriage and partner migration to Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology. Available via Australian Government. https://aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp124. Accessed 24 March 2019
Australian Institute of Criminology (2018) When saying no is not an option: Forced marriage in Australia and New Zealand. In: Australian Institute of Criminology. Available via Australian Government. https://aic.gov.au/publications/rr/rr11. Accessed 24 March 2019
Australian Law Reform Commission (2011) Discussion Paper: Family Violence and Commonwealth Laws—Immigration Law (IP 37). Available via Australian Law Reform Commission. http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/IP37whole.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
Berg L, Crock M (2011) Immigration, Refugees and Forced Migration. Federation Press, Leichhardt
Betts K (2003) Immigration policy under the Howard Government. Australian Journal of Social Issues 38(2):169–192
Birrell B (1995) Spouse migration to Australia. People and Place 3(1):9–16
Bonifacio G (2009) Activism from the margins: Filipino marriage migrants in Australia. Frontiers 30(3):142–168
Bonjour S, de Hart B (2013) A proper wife, a proper marriage: Constructions of ‘us’ and ‘them’ in Dutch family migration policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies 20(1):61–76
Bredal A (2008) Tackling forced marriages in the Nordic countries: between women’s rights and immigration control. In: Welchman L, Hossain S (eds) Honour: crimes, paradigms and violence against women. Zed Books, London, p, 332–353
Cabilao-Valencia M (2015) Filipina marriage migration. SOSIOHUMAINKA 8(2):161–169
Centre for Multicultural Youth (2016) I Don’t. A forum addressing forced marriage in Victoria. Forum Report. Copy on file with the author.
Chang H (2015) Marital power dynamics and well-being of marriage migrants. Journal of Family Issues 37(14):1994–2020
Chung C, Kim K, Piper N (2016) Marriage migration in Southeast and East Asia revisited through a migration-development nexus lens. Critical Asian Studies 48(4):463–472
Chung E, Kim D (2012) Citizenship and marriage in a globalising world: multicultural families and monocultural nationality laws in Korea and Japan. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19(1):195–219
Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Parliamentary Debates. House of Representatives. 30 May 2012
Commonwealth of Australia (2014) National Action Plan to Combat Trafficking and Slavery, 2015–19. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Constable N (2005) Introduction: Cross-border marriages, gendered mobility, and global hypergamy. In: Constable N (ed) Cross-Border Marriages: Gender and Mobility in Transnational Asia. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, p, 1–16
Cunneen C, Stubbs J (1996) Violence against Filipino Women in Australia: Race, class and gender. Waikato Law Review 4(1):131–154
Department of Immigration and Citizenship (2010) Fact Sheet 38: Family Violence Provisions, Canberra
Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2005) The Phillipines-born community, Canberra
Downer A (2013) Australian Government announces major package to combat people trafficking [Media release] 13 October 2003
Edwards A (2007) Traffic in human beings: At the intersection of criminal justice, human rights, asylum/migration and labor. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 36(1):9–53
Edwards A, Ferstman C (2010) Humanising non-citizens: the convergence of human rights and human security. In Edwards A, Ferstman C (eds) Human security and non-citizens: law, policy and international affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p, 3–46
Gallagher A (2010) The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hartry A (2012) Gendering Crimmigration: The Intersection of Gender, Immigration and the Criminal Justice System. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 27(1):1–27
Hsia H (2007) Imaged and imagined threat to the nation: The media construction of the “foreign brides” phenomenon as social problems in Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 8(1):55–85
Hunt D (2002) Filipino community organising on women’s issues in Australia. Paper presented at the STOP THE TRAFFIC SYMPOSIUM: Addressing trafficking in women for prostitution, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 25 February 2002
Iredale R (1994) Patterns of spouse/fiancee sponsorship to Australia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 3(4):547–566
Irving H (2016) Citizenship, alienage and the modern constitutional state: A gendered history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kelly L, Bindel J, Burton S, Butterworth D, Cook K and Regan L (1999) Home Office Research Study 193: Domestic Violence Matters: an evaluation of a development project, London.
Kim H (2012) Marriage migration between South Korea and Vietnam: a gender perspective. Asian Perspective 36(3):531–563.
Kneebone S (2014) Human trafficking and refugee women. In Arbel E, Dauvergne C and Millbank J (eds) Gender equality in refugee law: Are We There Yet? Routledge, Abingdon
Kneebone S (2017) Transnational marriage migrants and nationality: the cases of South Korea and Taiwan. Paper presented at Immigration, Migration, Transnational Networks and Activities in the Asia Pacific Region, Seoul National University, 24 November 2017
Kneebone S, Debeljak J (2012) Transnational crime and human rights: Responses to human trafficking in the greater Mekong Subregion. Routledge, Abingdon
Kneebone S, Teshome A (2012) Submission on the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Bill 2012, Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University
Lyneham S, Bricknell S (2018) When saying no is not an option: Forced marriage in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
Macklin A (2004) At the border of rights: migration, sex work and trafficking. In Gordon N (ed) On the margins of globalization: critical perspectives on human rights. Lexington Books, Lanham, p, 161–192
MacLean D (2014) Marriage migrants and commercial marriage trafficking in South Korea: Mapping the current legal regime and gaps in addressing exploitation. KLRI Journal of Law and Policy 4:1
McGuire M (2014) The right to refuse: Examining forced marriage in Australia. Available via End Slavery. https://endslavery.salvos.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Forced-Marriage-Policy-Research-The-Right-to-Refuse-RSG-Research-Report-2014.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2019
McSherry B, Kneebone S (2008) Trafficking in women and forced migration: Moving victims across the border of crime into the domain of human rights. International Journal of Human Rights 12(2):67–87
Patton C (2018) Racialising domestic violence: Islamophobia and the Australian forced marriage debate. Race and Class 60(2):21–39
Prattis G, El Matrah J (2017). Marrying young: An exploratory study of young muslim women’s decision-making around early marriage. Available via Muslim Women’s Centre for Human Rights. http://ausmuslimwomenscentre.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Marrying-Young-Report.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019.
Price CA and Zubrzycki J (1962) Immigrant marriage patterns in Australia. Population Studies 6(2):123–133
Ramilo C (1998) Reviews: Chris Cunneen & Julie Stubbs gender ‘race’ and international relations: Violence against Filipino Women in Australian Institute of Criminology. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 10(1):109–11
RMIT University, The Salvation Army Freedom Partnership to End Modern Slavery (2018) Without Choice: Examining Forced Marriage in Australia. Available via End Slavery. https://endslavery.salvos.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Social-Forced-Marriage-Report-SINGLES-min-1.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019
Robinson K (1982) Filipino brides: Slaves or marriage partners? – A comment. Australian Journal of Social Issues 17(2):166–170
Roma G (2013) Marriage migration in the Philippines: legal and policy provisions, options and limitations. In Cho Y, Im D, Yoshida Y, & Kuo S (eds) Legal systems related to international marriage in Asia: South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam and Cambodia. International Organisation for Migration, p, 205–241
Saroca C (2006) Filipino women, migration, and violence in Australia: Lived Reality and Media Image. Kasarinlan: Philippines Journal of Third World Studies 21(1):75–110
Shahinian G (2012) Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences. Available via United Nations Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-41_en.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2019
Shu-Chin G (2011) A socio-legal analysis of the regulations on foreign spouses in Taiwan. National Taiwan University Law Review 6(2):495–520
Simmons F, Burns J (2013) Without consent: forced marriage in Australia. Melbourne University Law Review 36(3):971–1008
Sowey H (2017) From an emic perspective: Exploring consent in forced marriage law. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 51(2):258–274
Stumpf J (2006) The Crimmigration crisis: immigrants, crime and sovereign power. American University Law Review 56(2):367–420
Sydney Morning Herald (2005) The lies that kept Vivian Alvarez hidden for years. 20 August 2005. Available via the Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/the-lies-that-kept-vivian-alvarez-hidden-for-years-20050820-gdlwu8.html. Accessed 11 March 2019
Toyota M (2008) Editorial introduction: international marriage, rights and the state in East and Southeast Asia. Citizenship Studies 12(1):1–7.
UNHCR (2002) Guidelines on International Protection: Gender Related Persecution within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/GIP/02/01
Wall D (1983) Filipino brides: Slaves or marriage partners? - A Further Comment. Australian Journal of Social Issues 18(1):217–220
Walzer M (1983) Spheres of Justice. Basic Books, Oxford.
Wang H (2011) Immigration trends and policy changes in Taiwan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 20(2):169–194
Watkins D (1982) Filipino brides: Slaves or marriage partners? Australian Journal of Social Issues 17(1):73–84
Weber L, McCulloch J (2018) Penal power and border control: Which thesis? Sovereignty, governmentality, or the pre-emptive state? Punishment & Society 0(0): 1–19
Woelz-Stirling N, Kelaher M and Manderson L (1998) Power and the politics of abuse: Rethinking violence in Filipina-Australian marriages. Health Care for Women International 19(4):289–301
Wray H, Agoston A and Hutton J (2014) A family resemblance? The regulation of marriage migration in Europe. European Journal of Migration and Law 16(2):209–247
Zeweri H (2018) Between consent and coercion: Exploring the politics of family in marriage in Victoria. Australia. Preliminary draft report
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kneebone, S. (2019). Marriage, Migration and Gender: A Site for Crimmigration? An Australian Case Study. In: Billings, P. (eds) Crimmigration in Australia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9093-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9093-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9092-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9093-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)