Abstract
Petroleum based synthetic plastics are an integral part of our daily life. However, their excessive usage has resulted in environmental pollution. The primary reason for this pollution is due to their non-biodegradable nature. On the other hand, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are biodegradable polymers, which have been shown to be produced by a wide range of bacteria. The unique feature of this bioplastic production is that they can be produced from renewable substrate materials through a unique metabolic route. These PHAs have the potential to replace petroleum based synthetic plastics. PHAs have high commercial value which make them suitable agent for industrial and medical applications. Although simpler and monomeric forms of PHAs have limited biotechnological applications, however, modified forms of PHA can be used in various medical applications such as, drug delivery, biodegradable implants, anticancer agent, and tissue engineering etc. Among all, tissue engineering has emerged globally to improve the current therapeutic approaches, entailing a revolution in clinical practice. PHAs offer several benefits in tissue engineering. These chemically modified biopolymers can be used in tissue repair, regeneration of tissue, scaffolds preparation etc.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
10.1 Introduction
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are biodegradable biopolymers, produced by a diverse range of bacteria under nutrient limiting conditions (Reddy et al. 2003; Porwal et al. 2008; Patel et al. 2011, 2012, 2015a, b, 2016; Kumar et al. 2016; Ray and Kalia 2017a, b). In general, under conditions here high carbon concentration is accompanied by limited quantities of nitrogen, microbes regulate their metabolic pathway in a way that acetyl-CoA gets in to PHAs production pathway rather than going towards TCA cycle (Kumar et al. 2013, 2014, 2015; Singh et al. 2009, 2013, 2015; Ray et al. 2018). These PHAs have gained attention due to the following properties, such as (i) biocompatibility (ii) biodegradability (iii) non-toxicity (iv) cytotoxicity, and (v) non-carcinogenicity as compared to synthetic plastic. Thus, PHAs can be serve as an attractive target for tissue engineering biomaterials (Peppas and Langer 2004; Ray and Kalia 2017c, d; Kalia et al. 2019). Tissue engineering is an emerging field which combines biology, material science and surgical re-construction to help in maintenance and improvement of tissue function through repairing and surgical procedures. Generally, there are three different steps which are being used in engineering of new tissues such as (i) cell substitutes, (ii) materials use to induce tissues, and (iii) use of scaffolds for implantation of cells. Several PHAs, such as poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) P(3HB), poly (3hydroxybutyrate-co-3hydroxyvalerate) P(3HB-co-3HV), poly (4-hydroxybutyrate) P(4HB), poly (3hydroxybutyrate-co-3hydroxyhexanoate) P(3HB-co-3HHx), and poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate) P(3HO) are employed for tissue engineering. The applications involve sutures, wound dressings, scaffolds preparation, bone tissue engineering, subcutaneous tissue engineering, nerve tissue engineering, maxillofacial treatment etc.
10.2 Scaffolds
Tissue engineering involves the scaffold preparation, which helps in the repair and regeneration of defective tissues (Martina and Hutmacher 2007). They provide support for cells to adhere and undergo proliferation process to form an extracellular network (ECM). These scaffolds are composed of bioactive molecules like biodegradable polymers, which play a major role in tissue engineering (Jagur-Grodzinski 2006; Armentano et al. 2010). Scaffolds can be prepared by several methods such as solvent casting, foaming, electro-spinning etc. P (3HB-co-3HV) with pearl powder was prepared for nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning method which promotes cell proliferation (Bai et al. 2015). Curcumin entrapped with polyaniline was conjugated with PHBV for the preparation of scaffold. It was employed in the tissue engineering process. The PHBV scaffolds were characterized by UV−vis and ATR/FT-IR spectrophotometry, thermogravimetry, fluorescence microscopy, and X-ray diffractometric analysis (Pramanik et al. 2016). P (3HB-co-3HV-co-2,3-dHB) produced by recombinant Ralstonia eutropha was exploited for scaffold material by utilizing glycolate as a sole carbon source (Insomphun et al. 2016). Scaffold prepared from P(3HB-co-3HHx) can be used as support material for cartilage tissue engineering (Ye et al. 2009). P (3HB-co-3HHx) can be used as scaffold material for fibroblast growth and capsulation. These scaffolds were also found to be favourable for tarsal repair (Zhou et al. 2010). P(3HB-co-3HHX) scaffold blended with hydroxyapatite (HAP) promoted osteoblast growth, chondrocytes proliferation, migration and cartilage repair (Wang et al. 2005, 2008). P(3HB-co-3HHx) enhances smooth muscle cell proliferation and attachment (Qu et al. 2006a, b) (Table 10.1). P(3HB-co-3HV) when grafted with chitosan or chitooligosachharide showed better antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The scaffold helped in fibroblast attachment and adsorption of protein and cell proliferation (Hu et al. 2003). The utilization of P(3HB-co-3HHx) in the preparation of scaffolds helped in liver tissue engineering. P(3HB-co-3HHx) fibres and tubes were used to treat Achilles tendon injury in rats (Xu et al. 2010; Webb et al. 2013). These scaffolds proved effective in tissue remodelling. Scaffolds prepared from co-polymerization of PHB with bacterial cellulose improved condition of artificial ligaments and tendon repair with high biocompatibility and biodegradable properties. Co-polymerization of PHB and PHO resulted in scaffold formation, which have been used in cartilage repair (Ching et al. 2016). Similarly, co-polymerization of PHB with poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) was used in scaffolds preparation which repaired defective bone tissue (Bonartsev et al. 2016).
10.3 Subcutaneous Tissue Engineering (TE)
PHAs can be used in subcutaneous tissue engineering. P(3HB) was used as the suture material in skin tissue, which showed anti-inflammatory properties (Volova et al. 2003). PHO another class of PHA, when used as grafts in soft tissue reduced inflammation (Stock et al. 2000; Hazer et al. 2009). PHBV, poly (L-lactic acid) and poly (glycerol sebacate) were exploited for the preparation of 3D microfibrous material. As a result, a thick myocardial patch was developed to replace myocardial infarctions (Kenar et al. 2010). Scaffold containing PHB/PHBHHx was seeded along with stem cells derived from differentiated human adipose could produce cartilage -like tissue when it was implanted into the subcutaneous layer of the nude mice (Ye et al. 2009). These scaffolds have also been found effective in vivo tendon repair model (Webb et al. 2013). PHA copolymers of medium chain length (mcl) size, were biosynthesized from frying oil. Combination of mcl-PHA (at more than 10% by wt) and P(3HB) proved effective in improving the brittle properties of P(3HB). Such blended materials have application in soft TE, which requires a material having desired mixture of tensile strength, stiffness and ductility. The soft and flexible blended biopolymer showed higher biocompatibility as evident from the high viability and proliferation of C2C12 mouse myoblast cells (Lukasiewic et al. 2018).
10.4 Nerve Tissue Engineering (TE)
Nerve injuries result in axonal disruption which cause degenerative changes. Thus, gap formation occurs between nerves where repair is not possible. In this case, nerve grafts act as a bridge to support axonal growth (Arslantunali et al. 2014). Several synthetic nerve conduits have been prepared for the repair of peripheral nerve faults. PHAs are modified to improve neural prosthesis. A porous and fibrous type of polymer prosthesis is favourable for neural regeneration (Mosahebi et al. 2002; Bian et al. 2009). P(3HB), as a neuronal conduit exhibited axonal regeneration which showed low level of inflammatory infiltration (Hazari et al. 1999; Mosahebi et al. 2002). P(3HB-co-3HHx) was found to be helpful in neuronal regeneration (Bian et al. 2009). PHA coated films were found to improve the survival rate of neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells and differentiated in to neurons (Lu et al. 2013).
(PHBV-P(L)-PLGA) with (PHBV-PLGA) was used as a nerve conduit which showed good mechanical properties. PHB conduit was found helpful in peripheral nerve regeneration. PHB conduit was composed of glial growth factor and alginate hydrogel resulted in a progressive and sustainable nerve regeneration. P (3HB-co-4HB) was exploited for the preparation of composite nanofibrous membrane. This membrane was developed by electro-spinning of P(3HB-co-4HB) and cellulose acetate blend solution (Zhijiang et al. 2016). P(3HB-co-3HHx) produced by microbial fermentation was found to be a suitable candidate for artificial nerve conduit due to their proper mechanical strength and biodegradability. This helps to repair nerve damage. These nerve conduits are prepared by particle leaching method (Bian et al. 2009). Neural stem cells which were grown on PHA scaffolds were reported to be useful for repairing injury to the central nervous system (Xu et al. 2010).
10.5 Bone Tissue Engineering (TE)
Bone TE is developed to eliminate the risk associated with the bone graft transplantation process, supply of a limited quantity of bone grafts, and pitfalls associated with transmission of the disease. It is a complex process with the migration of osteoprogenitor cells (Table 10.1). The process composed of proliferation, differentiation, matrix formation, mineralization and finally the remodelling of the bone. Scaffolds prepared for bone TE should be osteoconductive which helps to attract the stem cells. In the presence of suitable growth factors, scaffolds containing stem cells differentiate into pre-osteoblasts, which in turn get transformed to osteoblasts and ECM. As a result, bone remodelling occurs with osteocytes formation. Biopolymers are exploited for bone tissue repairing, through metallic parts and antibiotic carriers to the infected site of bone tissues (Jagur-Grodzinski et al. 2006). P(3HB-co-3HV) as graft was found to be the best biomaterial for osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of bone marrow cells. P(3HB-co-3HHx) also showed better attachment, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts. Combination of Hydroxyapatite (HA) and PHA enhances osteoblastic activity and bone integrity. P(3HB-co-3HV) when conjugated with calcium phosphate-reinforcing phases such as HA, submicron-sized calcined hydroxyapatite (cHA) and submicron-sized (β-TCP) showed anti-inflammatory properties and improved osteogenic properties (Cool et al. 2007). PHB composites fabricated with different quantities of zirconium dioxide and herafill (a bone filler loaded with a antibiotics), when implanted in the femora of growing rats proved to have high strain and tensile strength, which were as good as the actual bone (Meischel et al. 2016 ). Different PHA scaffolds as blends or as composites with hybrid materials have also been shown to be effective in bone tissue engineering (Lim et al. 2017 ). Electrospun fiber mesh made up of PHB/PHBV in combination with stem cell derived human adipose tissue proved effective in improving vascularization in engineered bone tissues (Goonoo et al. 2017 ).
10.6 Cartilage Tissue-Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering (TE)
PHAs play a vital role in cartilage tissue engineering. When cartilage tissue is damaged, it results in an osteoarthritis and functional loss of joints. PHA implants help in neocartilage formation. It regenerates hyaline cartilage in the defective site (Hazel Fox and Webb 2013). PHBV matrices cause early cartilage formation. Collagen matrices containing calcium phosphate (Cap-Gelfx) and P (3HB-co-3HV) were designed for novel cartilage by tissue engineering which showed better healing properties (Kose et al. 2004, 2005). P(3HB-co-3HHx) was exploited for producing neocartilage (Ye et al. 2009) (Table 10.1).
10.7 Skin Tissue Engineering (TE)
Skin protects the human body from the surrounding environment by protecting the underlying organs from pathogens. Auto-healing property of skin may be damaged during burns, diabetic wounds etc. Several methods to treat burns have been employed, such as autografts, and allografts. However, these two methods face problems due to the limited availability, disease transmission, risk of donor site morbidity and immune rejection. Thus, there is a need to develop substitutes, which can mimic human skin to replace damaged skin. PHAs and its co-polymers when blended with polysaccharides such as P(4HB) and Hyaluronic acid, increased keratinocyte proliferation rate (Groeber et al. 2011). Electrospun nanofibers have been used as polyvinyl alcohol – PHB scaffolds for engineering skin tissue (Sundaramurthi et al. 2014 ). In vitro study had shown the use of such scaffolds to enhance the proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblast cells (Asran et al. 2011 ).
10.8 Conclusion
PHAs have applications in diverse fields. PHAs and their derivatives are employed in medical purposes which have the highest level of application. PHAs with chemical modifications have great potential in tissue engineering. Various PHA-based tissue engineered products have been employed in several clinical use.
References
Akaraonye E, Filip J, Safarikova M, Salih V, Keshavarz T, Knowles JC, Roy I (2016) Composite scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering based on natural polymers of bacterial origin, thermoplastic poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) and micro-fibrillated bacterial cellulose. Polym Int 65:780–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5103
Ansari NF, Amirul AA (2013) Preparation and characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates macroporous scaffold through enzyme-mediated modifications. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 170:690–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0216-0
Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E, Mattioli S, Kenny JM (2010) Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2126–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007
Arslantunali D, Budak G, Hasirci V (2014) Multiwalled CNT-pHEMA composite conduit for peripheral nerve repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 102:828–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34727
Asran A, Razghandi K, Aggarwal N, Michler GH, Groth T (2011) Nanofibers from blends of polyvinyl alcohol and polyhydroxy butyrate as potential scaffold material for tissue engineering of skin. Biomacromolecules 11:3413–3421. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100912v
Bagdadi AV, Safari M, Dubey P, Basnett P, Sofokleous P, Humphrey E, Locke I, Edirisinghe M, Terracciano C, Boccaccini AR, Knowles JC, Harding SE, Roy I (2016) Poly (3-hydroxyoctanoate), a promising new material for cardiac tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:e495–e512. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2318
Bai J, Dai J, Li G (2015) Electrospun composites of PHBV/pearl powder for bone repairing. Progress Nat Sci Mater Int 25:327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2015.07.004
Bian YZ, Wang Y, Aibaidoula G, Chen GQ, Wu Q (2009) Evaluation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 30:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.036
Bonartsev AP, Zharkova II, Yakovlev SG, Myshkina VL, Makhina TK, Zernov AL, Kudryashova KS, Feofanov AV, Akulina EA, Ivanova EV, Zhuikov VA (2016) 3D-scaffolds from poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) poly (ethylene glycol) copolymer for tissue engineering. J Biomater Tissue Eng 6:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2016.1414
Cheng G, Cai Z, Wang L (2003) Biocompatibility and biodegradation of poly (hydroxybutyrate)/poly (ethylene glycol) blend films. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004004.37103.f4
Ching KY, Andriotis OG, Li S, Basnett P, Su B, Roy I, Stolz M (2016) Nanofibrous poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly (3-hydroxyoctanoate) scaffolds provide a functional microenvironment for cartilage repair. J Biomater Appl 31:77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328216639749
Cool SM, Kenny B, Wu A, Nurcombe V, Trau M, Cassady AI, Grondahl L (2007) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) composite biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro performance assessed by osteoblast proliferation, osteoclast adhesion and resorption, and macrophage proinflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res 3:599–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3099-4
Deng Y, Zhao K, Zhang XF, Hu P, Chen GQ (2002) Study on the three-dimensional proliferation of rabbit articular cartilage-derived chondrocytes on polyhydroxyalkanoate scaffolds. Biomaterials 23:4049–4056. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00136-9
Dias M, Antunes MCM, Santos AR, Felisberti MI (2008) Blends of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly (p-dioxanone): miscibility, thermal stability and biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:3535–3544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3531-1
Getachew A, Berhanu A, Birhane A (2016) Production of sterilized medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates (Smcl-PHA) as a biofilm to tissue engineering application. J Tissue Sci Eng 7:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7552.1000167
Goonoo N, Bhaw-Luximon A, Passanha P, Esteves SR, Jhurry D (2017) Third generation poly(hydroxyacid) composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 105:1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33674
Groeber F, Holeiter M, Hampel M, Hinderer S, Schenke-Layland K (2011) Skin tissue engineering-in vivo and in vitro applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:352–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.005
Hazari A, Johansson-Ruden G, Junemo-Bostrom K, Ljungberg C, Terenghi G, Green C, Wiberg M (1999) A new resorbable wrap-around implant as an alternative nerve repair technique. J Hand Surg Eur 24:291–295. https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.1998.0001
Hazel Fox QC, Webb P (2013) The law of state immunity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hazer DB, Hazer B, Kaymaz F (2009) Synthesis of microbial elastomers based on soybean oily acids. Biocompatibility studies. Biomed Mater 4:035011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/035011
Hu SG, Jou CH, Yang MC (2003) Protein adsorption, fibroblast activity and antibacterial properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) grafted with chitosan and chitooligosaccharide after immobilized with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials 24:2685–2693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00079-6
Insomphun C, Chuah JA, Kobayashi S, Fujiki T, Numata K (2016) Influence of hydroxyl groups on the cell viability of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3:3064–3075. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00279
Jagur-Grodzinski J (2006) Polymers for tissue engineering, medical devices, and regenerative medicine. Concise general review of recent studies. Polym Adv Technol 17:395–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.729
Kalia VC, Patel SKS, Kang YC, Lee JK (2019) Quorum sensing inhibitors as antipathogens: biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 37:68–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechad.2018.11.006
Kenar H, Kose GT, Hasirci V (2010) Design of a 3D aligned myocardial tissue construct from biodegradable polyesters. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:989–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3917-8
Kose GT, Korkusuz F, Korkusuz P, Hasirci V (2004) In vivo tissue engineering of bone using poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) and collagen scaffolds. Tissue Eng 10:1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1234
Kose GT, Korkusuz F, Özkul A, Soysal Y, Özdemir T, Yildiz C, Hasirci V (2005) Tissue engineered cartilage on collagen and PHBV matrices. Biomaterials 26:5187–5197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.037
Kumar P, Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2013) Extending the limits of Bacillus for novel biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv 31:1543–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.007
Kumar P, Singh M, Mehariya S, Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2014) Ecobiotechnological approach for exploiting the abilities of Bacillus to produce co-polymer of polyhydroxyalkanoate. Indian J Microbiol 54:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0457-9
Kumar P, Ray S, Patel SK, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2015) Bioconversion of crude glycerol to polyhydroxyalkanoate by Bacillus thuringiensis under non-limiting nitrogen conditions. Int J Biol Macromol 78:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.046
Kumar P, Ray S, Kalia VC (2016) Production of co-polymers of polyhydroxyalkanoates by regulating the hydrolysis of biowastes. Bioresour Technol 200:413–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.045
Lim J, You M, Li J, Li Z (2017) Emerging bone tissue engineering via Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-based scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 79:917–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.132
Lu XY, Wang LL, Yang ZQ, Lu HX (2013) Strategies of polyhydroxyalkanoates modification for the medical application in neural regeneration/nerve tissue engineering. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 4:731–740. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2013.46097
Lukasiewicz B, Basnett P, Nigmatullin R, Matharu R, Knowles JC, Roy I (2018) Binary polyhydroxyalkanoate systems for soft tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 71:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.027
Martina M, Hutmacher DW (2007) Biodegradable polymers applied in tissue engineering research: a review. Polym Int 56:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2108
Meischel M, Eichler J, Martinelli E, Karr U, Weigel J, Schmöller G, Tschegg EK, Fischerauer S, Weinberg AM, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2016) Adhesive strength of bone-implant interfaces and in-vivo degradation of PHB composites for load-bearing applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53:104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.004
Misra SK, Ansari TI, Valappil SP, Mohn D, Philip SE, Stark WJ, Roy I, Knowles JC, Salih V, Boccaccini AR (2010) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) multifunctional composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 31:2806–2815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.045
Mohanna PN, Young RC, Wiberg M, Terenghi G (2003) A composite poly-hydroxybutyrate–glial growth factor conduit for long nerve gap repairs. J Anat 203:553–565. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00243.x
Mosahebi A, Fuller P, Wiberg M, Terenghi G (2002) Effect of allogeneic Schwann cell transplantation on peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 173:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.2001.7846
Mota C, Wang SY, Puppi D, Gazzarri M, Migone C, Chiellini F, Chern GQ, Chiellini E (2017) Additive manufacturing of poly [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyhexanoate] scaffolds for engineered bone development. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1897
Patel SKS, Singh M, Kalia VC (2011) Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of Bacillus spp. from glucose in two stage system. Indian J Microbiol 51:418–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0236-9
Patel SKS, Singh M, Kumar P, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC (2012) Exploitation of defined bacterial cultures for production of hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from pea-shells. Biomass Bioenergy 36:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.027
Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh S, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2015a) Integrative approach for hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate production. In: Kalia VC (ed) Microbial factories: waste treatment. Springer, New Delhi, pp 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2598-0_5
Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh S, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2015b) Integrative approach to produce hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from biowaste using defined bacterial cultures. Bioresour Technol 176:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.029
Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC (2016) Integrative approach for producing hydrogen and polyhydroxyalkanoate from mixed wastes of biological origin. Indian J Microbiol 56:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0595-3
Peppas NA, Langer R (2004) Origins and development of biomedical engineering within chemical engineering. AICHE J 50:536–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10048
Porwal S, Kumar T, Lal S, Rani A, Kumar S, Cheema S, Purohit HJ, Sharma R, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2008) Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of microbes from diverse habitats by dark fermentative process. Bioresour Technol 99:5444–5451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.011
Pramanik N, Dutta K, Basu RK, Kundu PP (2016) Aromatic π-conjugated curcumin on surface modified polyaniline/polyhydroxyalkanoate based 3d porous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:2365–2377. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00595
Qu XH, Wu Q, Liang J, Zou B, Chen GQ (2006a) Effect of 3-hydroxyhexanoate content in poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) on in vitro growth and differentiation of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2944–2950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.013
Qu XH, Wu Q, Chen GQ (2006b) In vitro study on hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 17:1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856206778530704
Rai R, Roether JA, Knowles JC, Mordan N, Salih V, Locke IC, Michael PG, MnCormick A, Mohn D, Stark WJ, Keshavarz T, Bccaccini AR, Roy I (2017) Highly elastomeric poly (3-hydroxyoctanoate) based natural polymer composite for enhanced keratinocyte regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 66:326–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.1217530
Ray S, Kalia VC (2017a) Co-polymers of substrates by Bacillus thuringiensis regulates polyhydroxyalkanoates co-polymer compositions. Bioresour Technol 224:743–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.089
Ray S, Kalia VC (2017b) Microbial cometabolism and polyhydroxyalkanoate co-polymers. Indian J Microbiol 57:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0622-4
Ray S, Kalia VC (2017c) Biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Indian J Microbiol 57:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-017-0651-7
Ray S, Kalia VC (2017d) Polyhydroxyalkanoate production and degradation patterns in Bacillus species. Indian J Microbiol 57:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-017-0676-y
Ray S, Sharma R, Kalia VC (2018) Co-utilization of crude glycerol and biowastes for producing polyhydroxyalkanoates. Indian J Microbiol 58:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-017-0702-0
Reddy CSK, Ghai R, Kalia VC (2003) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: an overview. Bioresour Technol 87:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00212-2
Salvatore L, Carofiglio VE, Stufano P, Bonfrate V, Calò E, Scarlino S, Nitti P, Centrone D, Cascione M, Leporatti S, Sannino A (2018) Potential of electrospun poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/collagen blends for tissue engineering applications. J Health Eng 2018:6573947. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6573947
Singh M, Kumar P, Ray S, Kalia VC (2015) Challenges and opportunities for customizing polyhydroxyalkanoates. Indian J Microbiol 55:235–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0528-6
Singh M, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2009) Bacillus subtilis as potential producer for polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microb Cell Factories 8:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-8-38
Singh M, Kumar P, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2013) Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate co-polymer by Bacillus thuringiensis. Indian J Microbiol 53:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0294-7
Stock UA, Nagashima M, Khalil PN, Nollert GD, Herdena T, Sperling JS, Moran A, Lien J, Martin DP, Schoen FJ, Vacanti JP (2000) Tissue-engineered valved conduits in the pulmonary circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70008-0
Sundaramurthi D, Krishnan UM, SethuKumaran S (2014) Electrospun nanofibers as scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Polym Rev 54:348–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2014.881374
Volova T, Shishatskaya E, Sevastianov V, Efremov S, Mogilnaya O (2003) Results of biomedical investigations of PHB and PHB/PHV fibers. Biochem Eng J 16:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(03)00038-X
Wang YW, Wu Q, Chen J, Chen GQ (2005) Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds made of blends of hydroxyapatite and poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for bone reconstruction. Biomaterials 26:899–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.035
Wang Y, Bian YZ, Wu Q, Chen GQ (2008) Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds prepared from poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for growth of allogeneic chondrocytes for cartilage repair in rabbits. Biomaterials 29:2858–2868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.021
Webb WR, Dale TP, Lomas AJ, Zeng G, Wimpenny I, El Haj AJ, Forsyth NR, Chen GQ (2013) The application of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds for tendon repair in the rat model. Biomaterials 34:6683–6694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.041
Xu XY, Li XT, Peng SW, Xiao JF, Liu C, Fang G, Chen GQ (2010) The behaviour of neural stem cells on polyhydroxyalkanoate nanofiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 31:3967–3975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.132
Ye C, Hu P, Ma MX, Xiang Y, Liu RG, Shang XW (2009) PHB/PHBHHx scaffolds and human adipose-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30:4401–4406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.001
Young PM, Cocconi D, Colombo P, Bettini R, Price R, Steele DF, Tobyn MJ (2002) Characterization of a surface modified dry powder inhalation carrier prepared by “particle smoothing”. J Pharm Pharmacol 54:1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1211/002235702760345400
Zhijiang C, Jianru J, Qing Z, Shiying Z, Jie G (2016) Preparation and characterization of novel poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose acetate composite fibers. Mater Lett 173:119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.019
Zhou M, Yu D (2014) Cartilage tissue engineering using PHBV and PHBV/bioglass scaffolds. Mol Med Rep 10:508–514. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2145
Zhou J, Peng SW, Wang YY, Zheng SB, Wang Y, Chen GQ (2010) The use of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds for tarsal repair in eyelid reconstruction in the rat. Biomaterials 31:7512–7518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.044
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Brain Pool grant (NRF-2018H1D3A2001746) by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) to work at Konkuk University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ray, S., Patel, S.K.S., Singh, M., Singh, G.P., Kalia, V.C. (2019). Exploiting Polyhydroxyalkanoates for Tissue Engineering. In: Kalia, V. (eds) Biotechnological Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoates. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3759-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3759-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3758-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3759-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)