Skip to main content

The Complexities of Learner Agency and Teacher Agency in Foreign Language Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autonomy, Agency, and Identity in Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language
  • 1078 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of agency has been central to language education. The educational goal that learners become capable of independent learning has had a profound impact on learner agency. Learner agency refers to a conscious initiative in learning taken by the learners, rather than the requirements that are imposed to the learners from the teacher, curriculum, and so forth (Biesta et al. in Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21(6):624–640, 2015). In our traditional teaching mode, most of the schools tend to cater for groups of learners with a one size fits all approach. Many students felt disenfranchised or became passive (Mercer in System 39(4):427–436, 2011). Exploring the issue of agency is important, following the continuous call for enhancing learners’ autonomous leaning and teachers’ capacity in taking control of their teaching. This chapter attempts to contribute to a fuller understanding of agency through exploring the components of teachers’ and learners’ agentic systems. This chapter also attempts to explore the complex components related to learner and teacher agency, which pose a challenge for educational theory as to how best language educators can use such insights to help teachers and students to become more effective in English language teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2008). Toward an agentic theory of the self. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential: Dynamic new approaches (pp. 15–49). Charlotte, NV: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2015). How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgement, wisdom and virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on the future of teacher education (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Working paper 5, University of Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 21(6), 624–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. London: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bown, J. (2009). Self-regulatory strategies and agency in self-instructed language learning: A situated view. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (4), 570–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & Sealey, A. (2000). Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland’s future. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a Vengeance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2001). The really, really fundamental attribution error. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. S. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2011). A dynamic account of autonomy, agency and identity in teaching English as a foreign language learning. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy: Exploring their links (pp. 229–246). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Benson, P. (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36, 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, Y. (2012). Reflective teaching in further and adult education (3rd ed.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, V. (2009). Autonomy, authenticity and agency in language education. In R. Jaatinen, V. Kohonen, & P. Moilanen (Eds.), Language education, teacher professionalism and intercultural agency (pp.12–38). Helsinki: OKKA Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 141–158). Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 104–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 812–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S., & Wong, S.-L. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 577–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerhead, S. (2010). Teacher agency and policy response in the adult ESL literacy classroom. TESOL Quarterly , 44(3), 606–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? In R. Kneyber & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up (pp. 134–148). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. M. (2009). A template analysis of teacher agency at an academically successful dual language school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 110–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., & Graham, S. (2008). Agency and conformity in school-based teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1401–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue, C., & Dyrdal-Solbrekke, T. (2011). Professional responsibility: New horizons of praxis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language (Philosophical papers I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticknor, A. S. (2015). Critical considerations in becoming literacy educators: Pre-service teachers rehearsing agency and negotiating risk. Teaching Education, 26(4), 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology & semiotics of language learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to (Mark) Feng Teng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teng, (. (2019). The Complexities of Learner Agency and Teacher Agency in Foreign Language Education. In: Autonomy, Agency, and Identity in Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0728-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0728-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0727-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0728-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics