Abstract
Over the last two decades, the demand for land in Africa has increased dramatically, due to various factors including population growth, growing interest in farm land from both foreign and local investors, the steady economic growth experienced over the last decade and half. These factors have created immense pressure on the available land resources, especially in areas surrounding major towns and cities, and areas close to developed social and economic infrastructure. In most African countries, the growing pressure on land is directed towards customary land which still constitute the largest portion of the land. In Zambia, as in many other countries, the growing demand for land has brought the policy and practice of converting customary land into leasehold tenure (privatisation) into the spotlight. While this policy is part of the Zambian government’s economic growth and rural development strategy (of ‘opening up’ the countryside to investors), there are huge challenges that this is creating. This paper examines the power relations around customary land in the context of the growing demand for land. The paper argues that the changing power and social relations raise serious questions about the future of customary land and the social fabric of rural communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
There is a more recent draft policy on land which was circulated at the beginning of 2016 for comments, but has not yet been finalised.
- 2.
- 3.
Although Barotseland became a British Protectorate, it retained autonomy over the administration of land under the Lozi paramount Chief Lewanika as stipulated in the 1898 Barotse Agreement between Lewanika and John Cecil Rhodes; see Bruce and Dorner (1982).
- 4.
The BSA Co. was a chartered company that administered Northern Rhodesia on behalf of the British Government from 1889 to 1924.
- 5.
- 6.
It must be noted here that it is not only the state that is promoting land alienation but some traditional leaders are actively engaging in land deals, which has created conflict in communities between the people and traditional leaders (Sitko 2010).
- 7.
See ‘US, UAE firms eye Zambian farming land’ (Reuters Africa, 12 June 2009), http://af.reuters.com/article/investingNews/idAFJOE55B0MB20090612, accessed on 28 June 2017.
- 8.
There are reports that most of the investors are actually refusing land far away from developed infrastructure and preferring land which is closer to communication facilities, mainly rail and road routes (German et al. 2011).
- 9.
Although it is widely held that conversion of customary land to leasehold title began with the 1995 Lands Act, customary land conversion has been ongoing since 1985, when the Administrative Circular No. 1 of 1985, was published, which allowed conversion of customary, conditional upon approval by the Chief and the district councils (Chizyuka et al. 2006). There are no recent figures on the rate of conversion. Figures for the period 1985–97 suggest a sharp rise of fivefold (see Fig. 1, below).
- 10.
- 11.
One example is of a South African investor who acquired land at no cost in Chief Nkanya’s area, along the Luangwa Valley, to develop a Safari lodge, only to sell the land 2 years later for US$70,000, without even touching the land; see Brown (2005: 92), for more such examples.
- 12.
There have been several stories, especially in the print media, reporting that an increasing number of traditional leaders are being bribed into selling away land to foreign investors who have money. One example is an article in the Pots Newspaper of Monday (10 January 2011), which claims that many chiefs have become corrupt and selfish.
References
Adams, M. (2003). Land tenure policy and practice in Zambia: Issues relating to the development of the agricultural sector. Unpublished manuscript.
Adams, M., & Palmer, R. (2007). Independent review of land issues in eastern and southern Africa. Mokoro: Oxford.
AfDB [African Development Bank] (2011). The middle of the pyramid: Dynamics of the middle class in Africa, Market Brief. https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid_The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
Brown, T. (2005). Contestation, confusion and corruption: Market-based land reform in Zambia. In S. Evers, M. Spierenburg, & H. Wels (Eds.), Competing jurisdictions: Settling land claims in Africa (pp. 79–102). Boston, MA: Brill.
Bruce, J., & Dorner, P. (1982). Land Tenure in Zambia: Perspectives, Problems and Opportunities. Land Tenure Centre Research Paper No. 76, University of Wisconsin-Maidson.
Bruce, J. W., & Migot-Adholla, E. (1994). Introduction: Are indigenous African tenure systems insecure? In J.W. Bruce & E. Migot-Adholla (Eds.), Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: World Bank.
CAL [Committee on Agriculture and Land] (2009). Second report of the committee on agriculture and land. Prepared for the Tenth Session of the National Assembly. Lusaka: Zambia National Assembly.
Chitonge, H. (2012). Land resource ownership and use in ‘Africa of the labour reserves’ (southern African development community). In C. Ben (Ed.), Land relations policy in southern African development community (pp. 57–88). London: Routledge.
Chitonge, H. (2015). Customary land at a crossroads: Contest for the control of customary land in Zambia. SADC Law Journal, 4(1), 45–67.
Chizyuka, R., Kamona, R. M., Ufwenuka, C., & Phiri, M. (2006). Policies and strategies for agrarian reform and rural development to secure and improve access to natural resources: National report—Zambia. Paper prepared for the International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Development (ICARRD), March 7–10, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cotula, L. (2011). The outlook on farmland acquisition. International Land Coalition (ILC). http://www.landcoalition.org/en/resources/outlook-farmland-acquisitions. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
CSO [Central Statistical Office] (2011). Population census preliminary results, 2010. http://www.mcaz.gov.zm/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/2010-Census-of-Population-Summary-Report.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
Deininger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999). The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experiences and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2), 247–276.
Deininger, K., Derek, B., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H., & Sticker, M. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?. New York, NY: World Bank.
FRSP [Food Security Research Project] (2010). The status of customary land and how it affects the rights of indigenous local communities, submission to the Committee on Agriculture and Land Study.
Fundanga, C., & Mwaba, A. (1996). Privatization of public enterprises in Zambia: An evaluation of policies, procedures and experiences. Economic Research Papers, 35. Tunis: African Development Bank.
German, L., Schoneveld, G., & Mwangi, E. (2011). Processes of large-scale land acquisition by investors: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa. A paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, April 6–8, 2011. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Havnevik, K. (1997). Land question in sub-Saharan Africa. In N.-I. Isaksson (Ed.), Land question in sub-Saharan Africa. Uppsala: Department of Rural Development Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Hichaambwa, M., & Jayne, S. T. (2014). Poverty reduction potential of increasing smallholder access to land. Working Paper, No. 83. Lusaka: Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI).
Honig, L., & Mulenga, B. (2015). The status of customary land and the future of smallholder farmers under current land administration system in Zambia. Working Paper, No. 101. Lusaka: Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI).
Hudson, J. (2007). The empty country. Journal Platform for Public Policy Analysis. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/resources/ZIPPALand_3rd_Quarter2007.pdf. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
ILUA [Integrated Land Use and Assessment]. (2008). ILUA report, 2005–2008. Lusaka: Department of Forestry and FAO.
Jacoby, H., & Minten, B. (2007). Is land titling in sub-Saharan Africa cost-effective? Evidence from Madagascar. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 461–485.
Jorgensen, S., & Loudjeva, Z. (2005). A poverty and social analysis impact of three programmes: Land, fertiliser and infrastructure. Social Development Papers, No. 49. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kabilika, E. (2010). The status of customary land and how it affects the rights of indigenous local communities. Zambia: Caritus.
Kajoba, G. M. (1997). The landmarks of Zambia’s land tenure system: From protectionism to empowerment. Presented at the Conference on ‘Land Tenure in Development Cooperation, January 27–29. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
Kanyanta, C. (2014). The institution of chiefs is on slippery ground—Chitimukulu. Lusaka Times, July 3. https://www.lusakatimes.com/2014/07/03/institution-chiefs-slippery-ground-chitimukulu/. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
Mafeje, A. (2003). The agrarian question: Access to land and peasant response in sub-Saharan Africa. Civil Society and Social Movement Programme, UNRISD, Paper No. 6.
Moyo, S. (2010). Prospect for agrarian reform in southern Africa. Opening society through advocacy. Johannesburg: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA).
Mudenda, M. M. (2006). The challenges of customary land tenure in Zambia. Presented at the XXIII FIG Congress, October 8–13, Munich, Germany.
Place, F. (2009). Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: a comperative analysis of the economic literature and recent policy strategies and reforms. World Development, 37(8), 132–136.
Platteau, J.-P. (1996). The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment. Development and Change, 27(1), 29–86.
Republic of Zambia. (2006). Draft land administration and management policy. Lusaka: Ministry of Lands.
Roth, M., Khan, A. M., & Zulu, M. C. (1995). Legal and administration of land policy in Zambia. In M. Roth (Ed.), Land tenure, land markets and institutional transformation in Zambia (LTC Research Report, No. 124) (pp. 1–46). Madison, WI: Land Tenure Centre, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Shipton, P., & Coheen, M. (1992). Understanding African land-holding: Power and meaning. Journal of International African Institute, 62(3), 307–325.
Simutanyi, N. (1996). The politics of structural adjustment in Zambia. Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 825--839.
Sitko, N. (2010). Fractured governance and local frictions: The exclusionary nature of a clandestine land market in southern Zambia. Africa, 80(1), 36–54.
USAID (2010). Property rights and resource governance: Zambia country profile. www.usaid.org. Retrieved August 11, 2011.
Van den Brink, R., Thomas, G., Bruce, J., & Byamugisha, F. (2006). Consensus, confusion and controversy: Selected land reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
ZDA [Zambia Development Agency (2011). Pledged land investment. Unpublished.
ZDA [Zambia Development Agency] (2010). ‘Development and commercialisation of Nansanga farm block’, a Memorandum by the Multi-Sectoral Committee on Farm Block, Lusaka.
ZLA [Zambia Land Alliance] (2002). Initial position paper on the draft land policy, civil society land policy review committee. Presented to the Zambian Government Land Policy Technical Committee, Lusaka Province Workshop, December 16–21, Lusaka.
ZLA [Zambia Land Alliance] (2008). Land policy options for development and poverty reduction: Civil society views for pro-poor land policies and laws in Zambia. Lusaka: Civil Society Consultative Forum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chitonge, H. (2019). Customary Land in Zambia: The New Scramble and the Evolving Socio-political Relations. In: Moyo, S., Jha, P., Yeros, P. (eds) Reclaiming Africa. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5839-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5840-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)