Abstract
Issues relating to privacy over social media websites have been hotly debated for some time. It is widely believed that the privacy policies of these websites are not completely transparent. This chapter considers the latest trends on two popular social media websites and one mobile application, viz., Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat. For our purposes, these three together will be considered as social media platforms. Privacy policies continue to be a contentious issue at the present time with social media platforms not always fulfilling the requirements of data protection principles , although we see a desire to make such policies a lot more transparent than they used to be. The chapter identifies the tools that help users to control dissemination of personal information over these platforms. It concludes by noting that existing controls are marred by complications, since users are still not sure of what to expect from existing privacy settings.
The author acknowledges the valuable contribution of Mr. Dipesh Ashok Jain of O.P. Jindal Global University as a Research Assistant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (accessed 28 June 2017); https://about.twitter.com/company (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 2.
https://www.facebook.com/about/ (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 3.
https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 4.
https://www.facebook.com (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 5.
https://www.facebook.com/help/211513702214269 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 6.
https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 7.
https://www.facebook.com/help/405183566203254 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 8.
https://www.facebook.com/help/www/227699513911093 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 9.
https://www.facebook.com/help/214376678584711 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 10.
https://www.facebook.com/help/168229546579373 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 11.
https://www.facebook.com/help/232620513462357 (accessed 28 June 2017).
- 12.
https://www.facebook.com/help/168229546579373 (accessed 12 July 2017).
- 13.
https://www.facebook.com/about/control (accessed 21 August 2017).
- 14.
https://www.facebook.com/help/168229546579373 (accessed 12 July 2017).
- 15.
https://www.facebook.com/help/290450221052800 (accessed 21 August 2017).
- 16.
https://support.twitter.com/articles/14606 (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 17.
https://twitter.com/signup (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 18.
https://twitter.com/signup (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 19.
https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949#3 (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 20.
https://support.twitter.com/articles/14016 (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 21.
https://support.twitter.com/articles/18906 (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 22.
https://www.snapchat.com/privacy-center/our-approach (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 23.
https://www.snapchat.com/privacy (accessed 11 July 2017).
- 24.
https://support.snapchat.com/en-US/a/privacy-settings (accessed 11 July 2017).
References
Adams, A. A. (2014). Facebook code: Social network sites platform affordances and privacy. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 23(1), 158–168.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2009). Opinion 5/2009 on online social networking. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp163_en.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Baloun, K. M. (2007). Inside Facebook: Life, work and visions of greatness. Victoria, B.C.: Trafford.
BBC. (2012, 8 March). Irish privacy watchdog calls for Facebook changes. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-16289426. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Bonneau, J. & Preibusch, S. (2009). The privacy jungle: On the market for data protection in social networks. In Tyler Moore, David Pym, and Christos Ioannidis (Eds.), Economics of information security and privacy (pp. 121–167). Boston: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6967-5
Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Boyd, D. & Hargittai, E. (2010, 2 August). Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday, 15(8). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Boyd, D. & Marwick, A. (2011). Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. Paper presented at A decade in internet time: symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society, Oxford, 21–24 September. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1925128. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Century 21 Canada Limited Partnership v. Rogers Communication Inc. (2011). BCSC 1196 (BC.).
CIPPIC (Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic) (n.d.). Facebook (2008–2010). https://cippic.ca/Facebook. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Clarke, M. C. (2010, 19 April). Controlling privacy on social networking services. UXmatters. http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2010/04/controlling-privacy-on-social-networking-services.php. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Cocozza, N. (2015). Instagram sets a precedent by an “insta” change in social media contracts & users’ ignorance of Instagram’s terms of use may lead to acceptance by a simple “snap”. Journal of High Technology Law, 15(2), 363–394.
Colao, J. J. (2014). The inside story of Snapchat: The world’s hottest app or a $3 billion disappearing act? http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2014/01/06/the-inside-story-of-snapchat-the-worlds-hottest-app-or-a-3-billion-disappearing-act/2/#743049673a38. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Davies, C. (2015). 7 out of 10 Brits change their social media privacy settings. Kantar UK Insights. http://uk.kantar.com/tech/social/2015/social-media-privacy-statistics/#sthash.0dOvZFE4.dpuf. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Dewayne Hubbert v. Dell Corp. (2005). 359 Ill. App. 3d 976, 835 N.E.2d 113 (Ill App 5 Dist), app. denied, 217 Ill. 2d 601, 844 N.E.2d 965 (Ill.).
Dey, R., Jelveh, Z., & Ross, K. (2012, 19 March). Facebook users have become much more private: a large-scale study. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Security and Social Networking, Lugano, Switzerland. http://cis.poly.edu/~ratan/facebookusertrends.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2017.
D’hulst, T. (2015, 21 December). Brussels court orders Facebook to cease registration of personal data of non-Facebook users. http://www.mondaq.com/x/453018/data+protection/Brussels+Court+Orders+Facebook+To+Cease+Registration+Of+Personal+Data+Of+NonFacebook+Users. Accessed July 12, 2017).
Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/. Accessed July 12, 2017).
Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2011). Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online (pp. 75–89). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, Pub. L. No. Directive 95/46/EC (1995).
Facebook (2016). Data policy, 29 September. https://www.facebook.com/full_data_use_policy. Accessed June 18, 2017.
Frier, S. (2016). Snapchat’s Spiegel to investors: we have 8 billion video views a day. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-29/snapchat-s-spiegel-to-investors-we-have-8-billion-video-views-a-day. Accessed July 12, 2017).
Greenleaf, G. (2012). The influence of European data privacy standards outside Europe: implications for globalization of Convention 108. International Data Privacy Law, 2(1), 68–92.
Grimmelmann, J. (2008, 3 September). Saving Facebook. NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08/09-7. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1262822. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Hoffmann, B. C. (2012). An exploratory study of a user’s Facebook security and privacy settings. Cornerstone, Minnesota State University, Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects. http://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=etds. Accessed July 12, 2017).
Hoofnagle, C. J. & King, J. (2007). Consumer information sharing: where the sun still don’t shine. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1137990. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Hull, G., Lipford, H. R., & Latulipe, C. (2011). Contextual gaps: privacy issues on Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 289–302. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1427546. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Jain, S. (2014). Social networking sites—an emerging threat to online privacy? http://ssrn.com/abstract=2463136. accessed July 12, 2017.
Johnston, A. & Wilson, S. (2012). Privacy compliance problems for Facebook. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 31(2), 59–64. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2609068. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Kagal, L. & Abelson, H. (2010, June). Access control is an inadequate framework for privacy protection. W3C Privacy Workshop. http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2010/Papers/w3cprivacy/paper.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Levin, A., & Abril, P. S. (2009). Two notions of privacy online+. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11(4), 1001–1051.
Liu, Y., Gummadi, K. P., Krishnamurthy, B. & Mislove, A. (2011, November). Analyzing Facebook privacy settings: User expectations vs. reality. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 61–70). doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2068816.2068823
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A. & Beaton, M. (2013, 21 May). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/. accessed July 12, 2017.
Major v. McCallister. (2009). Missouri Court of Appeals, No CD29871 (Mo.).
Mal, A., & Parikh, J. (2011). Facebook and the right to privacy: Walking a tight rope. NUJS Law Review, 4, 299–321.
Marwick, A. E., Diaz, D. M. & Palfrey, J. (2010). Youth, privacy and reputation. Harvard Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series, no. 10-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1588163
Milazzo, M. J. (2014). Facebook, privacy, and reasonable notice: The public policy problems with Facebook’s current sign-up process and how to remedy the legal issues. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 23(3), 661–688.
Montes, D. H. (2010). Living our lives online: the privacy implications of online social networking. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy, 5(3), 507–531.
Narayanaswamy, R., & McGrath, L. (2014). A holistic study of privacy in social networking sites. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 17(1), 71–86.
Nel, S. (2007). Online defamation: The problem of unmasking anonymous online critics. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 40(2), 193–214.
Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1–4). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2775/2432. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Rizk, H. (2013). Fundamental right or liberty? Online privacy’s theory for co-existence with social media. Howard Law Journal, 56(3), 951–982.
Sacco, D., Argudin, R., Maguire, J., Tallong, K. & Cyberlaw Clinic. (2010). Sexting: Youth practices and legal implications. Youth and media policy working group initiative. Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, no. 2010-8. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661343. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Snapchat (2014). Find friends abuse. https://www.snap.com/fi-FI/news/post/find-friends-abuse/. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Social Times (2008). Live notes from Mark Zuckerberg’s keynote at F8 Developer Conference. http://www.insidefacebook.com/2008/07/23/live-notes-from-mark-zuckerbergs-keynote-at-f8-developer-conference/. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Solove, D. J. (2003). Identity theft, privacy, and the architecture of vulnerability. Hastings Law Journal, 54, 1227–1276. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.416740.
Solove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Boardfirst LLC. (2007). Civ. Act. No. 3:06-CV-0891-B (N.D. Texas).
Terenzi, R. (2010). Friending privacy: Toward self-regulation of second generation social networks. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 20(3), 1049–1106.
Tsaoussi, A. (2011). Facebook, privacy and the challenges of protecting minors on social networking sites. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Information Law, Thessaloniki, pp. 20–21 May. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1878035
Twitter. (2016). Twitter privacy policy, version 11, 27 January 2016. https://twitter.com/privacy. Accessed July 12, 2017.
Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook. Information Communication and Society, 16(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757.
Zhao, J., Binns, R., Kleek, M. Van. & Shadbolt, N. (2016). Privacy languages: are we there yet to enable user controls? In WWW’16 Companion Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 799–806. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2872518.2890590. Accessed August 21, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, I. (2018). User Control Over Personal Information: A Case Study of Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat. In: Sahni, S., Jain, G. (eds) Internet Infidelity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5412-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5412-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5411-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5412-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)