Abstract
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a chronic progressive disease of unknown etiology, is characterized by fibrosis and strictures involving the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts [1, 2]. PSC is a distinct entity from IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC), but some IgG4-SC masquerades as PSC by way of similar manifestations, such as frequent stenosis of both intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, bile ductal wall thickening, male predominance, cholestatic liver dysfunction, and initial mild symptoms [3–7]. The differential diagnosis between PSC and IgG4-SC is clinically important because their treatment modalities and prognosis are very different [2, 7, 8]. Timely diagnosis of IgG4-SC can lead clinicians to prescribe adequate corticosteroid therapy that can reverse bile duct strictures/wall thickening and cholestatic liver dysfunction and could potentially prevent future advanced liver disease [2]. A proper diagnosis of PSC, in turn, is crucial for optimizing the surveillance of the disease progression to hepatic decompensation and the need for liver transplantation.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
- IgG4-related Sclerosing Cholangitis (IgG4-SC)
- Cholestatic Liver Dysfunction
- Bile Duct Wall Thickening
- Frequent Stenosis
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a chronic progressive disease of unknown etiology, is characterized by fibrosis and strictures involving the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts [1, 2]. PSC is a distinct entity from IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC), but some IgG4-SC masquerades as PSC by way of similar manifestations, such as frequent stenosis of both intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, bile ductal wall thickening, male predominance, cholestatic liver dysfunction, and initial mild symptoms [3,4,5,6,7]. The differential diagnosis between PSC and IgG4-SC is clinically important because their treatment modalities and prognosis are very different [2, 7, 8]. Timely diagnosis of IgG4-SC can lead clinicians to prescribe adequate corticosteroid therapy that can reverse bile duct strictures/wall thickening and cholestatic liver dysfunction and could potentially prevent future advanced liver disease [2]. A proper diagnosis of PSC, in turn, is crucial for optimizing the surveillance of the disease progression to hepatic decompensation and the need for liver transplantation.
Interval screening for cholangiocarcinoma is also recommended for patients with PSC, because this disorder is associated with a lifetime risk of cholangiocarcinoma of around 7–14% [9]. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma does not correlate with the duration of the PSC period, and approximately one-third of detected cholangiocarcinomas in PSC are identified within the first year of PSC diagnosis [10, 11]. A misclassification of PSC as IgG4-SC may result in inadvertent corticosteroid treatment and delay of the optimal surveillance, whereas a misclassification of IgG4-SC as PSC may result in missing the window for the steroid treatment and subsequent reversal of the disease progression. Discernment of the differences in the features of IgG4-SC versus PSC is therefore essential.
Differentiation by Clinical Features
Age
Age of presentation is a very important factor for differentiation between IgG4-SC and PSC (Table 12.1). PSC tends to be a disease of young adult and middle-aged persons, whereas IgG4-SC tends to be a disease of the elderly. The median age at diagnosis ranged from 35 to 45 years in patients with PSC [2, 7, 10, 12, 13], whereas this range was 60 to 70 years in patients with IgG4-SC [5, 7, 14]. Interestingly, very few cases of IgG4-SC have been reported in young adults less than 40 years of age [2, 5, 7, 15]. A Japanese PSC cohort showed a second age peak at 65 years, but the diagnosis of PSC is uncommon over the age of 60 years in most populations. Patients with sclerosing cholangitis who are under the age of 40 years and who have no evidence of secondary causes are almost always afflicted with PSC, whereas those aged more than 60 years favor an IgG4-SC diagnosis.
Gender is generally not helpful for differentiation, as both of these sclerosing cholangiopathies show male predominance. The ratio of male predominance is 1.5:1 in PSC and 4-7:1 in IgG4-SC [8].
Association with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
The ratio of association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) differs somewhat between Western and Eastern countries, which probably reflects the basic prevalence of IBD. IBD is associated with majority of PSC patients, at a ratio of 60–80% in Western countries and 30–50% in Japan and Korea [1, 2, 7, 16,17,18]. By contrast, IBD is seldom associated with IgG4-SC, at a ratio of 5% in Western countries and 0% in Japan and Korea [2, 5, 14, 15, 19]. Patients with sclerosing cholangitis of unknown origin may show a presence of IBD that favors the diagnosis of PSC rather than IgG4-SC, especially in the areas with a low prevalence of IBD.
Concurrent or History of IgG4-Related Disease
IgG4-SC lies within a spectrum of IgG4-related diseases, with the pancreas most commonly affected. IgG4-related pancreatitis, or so-called type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), is commonly associated with the IgG4-SC patient population, at a ratio of 70–92% [2, 5, 15]. Although other autoimmune conditions coexist, PSC is seldom associated with pancreatic involvement [20]. Patients with sclerosing cholangitis of unknown origin may have concurrent or a history of AIP-/IgG4-related disease that may lead directly to a diagnosis of IgG4-SC. In the clinical setting, when differentiating between IgG4-SC and PSC, a meticulous evaluation of extrabiliary manifestations of Ig4-related disease should be performed when reviewing computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance images.
Differentiation by Serology
Serum IgG4
Despite the disease nomenclature of “IgG4”-SC, the assessment of serum IgG4 in isolation does not straightforwardly differentiate IgG4-SC from PSC. Recent research has shown that 9–26% of patients with classic PSC had elevated serum IgG4 levels (>135 mg/dL or >140 mg/dL) [2, 7, 12, 21,22,23,24]. Among patients with IgG4-SC, 60–90% had elevated serum IgG4 levels [2, 5, 7, 8]. Application of a cutoff value for serum IgG4 of 560 mg/dL, which is four times the upper limit of normal (ULN), gives a specificity of 100% for IgG4-SC [21]. For mildly elevated serum IgG4 levels (1–2 × ULN), a ratio of serum IgG4/IgG1 > 0.24 might be helpful for the differentiation of PSC from IgG4-SC [21].
pANCA
The most prevalent autoantibody in PSC is a particular type of perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) [18]. This pANCA is not typically used for the diagnosis of PSC because it is not specific for PSC; it is also observed in ulcerative colitis and autoimmune hepatitis [1, 18]. However, pANCA may have a role in the differentiation of PSC from IgG4-SC because it is observed in 40–60% of patients with PSC but in less than 10% of patients with IgG4-SC [2, 8].
Differentiation by Imaging
Cholangiogram
Characteristic cholangiographic features might also allow differentiation between IgG4-SC and PSC. The typical cholangiographic features for PSC are a beaded appearance, diverticulum-like outpouching, and a pruned tree appearance [25, 26]. The distinctive cholangiographic features of IgG4-SC that differentiate it from PSC are a distal CBD stricture, longer stricture, and more prestenotic dilatation [25,26,27]. However, these cholangiographic features can be observer dependent. A blinded multicenter study by worldwide specialists revealed that the cholangiogram had a high specificity (88%), poor sensitivity (45%), and slight interobserver agreement (kappa 0.18) for the diagnosis of IgG4-SC [28]. This poor sensitivity of cholangiographic findings suggests that many patients with IgG4-SC may be misdiagnosed with PSC or cholangiocarcinoma if the cholangiogram is used in isolation for the diagnosis. Apart from cholangiography, an endobiliary biopsy should be routinely performed at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the setting of obstructive jaundice/cholangitis or a dominant stricture.
Cholangioscopy/Intraductal Ultrasonography
Direct endoscopic visualization of the biliary tree may aid in the differentiation between PSC and IgG4-SC. Characteristic cholangioscopic features of PSC include scarring and pseudodiverticula, whereas dilated and tortuous vessels are characteristic in IgG4-SC [29]. These dilated and tortuous vessels in IgG4-SC can be differentiated from the tumor vessels of cholangiocarcinoma by assessment of the patterns of proliferative vessels [29].
The intraductal ultrasonographic findings also differ between IgG4-SC and PSC [30]. Irregular inner margins, diverticulum-like outpouching, and the disappearance of the three layers are specific intraductal ultrasonographic findings for PSC, when compared with IgG4-SC [30]. By contrast, intraductal ultrasonography of IgG4-SC shows a symmetrically thickened bile duct wall with smooth margins and preservation of the three layers [30].
Differentiation by Histology
If a resected specimen is available, histologic differentiation is mostly possible. The characteristic features of PSC include onion-skin fibrosis and periportal sclerosis [8]. The surface epithelium of the thickened bile duct, when infiltrated by lymphoplasmacytes in PSC, is often inflamed and shows edema, sloughing, erosion, and neutrophilic infiltration [24]. By contrast, the transmural lymphocyte infiltration in IgG4-SC spares the biliary lining epithelium [24]. The characteristic features of IgG4-SC include dense and richly IgG4-postive lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, marked fibrosis with a storiform pattern, and obliterative phlebitis in accordance with type 1 AIP [24]. Recent research has revealed that liver explants from classic PSC show IgG4 positivity in 23% of the tissues [24]. A consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease stipulates >10/HPF as the cutoff for the number of IgG4+ plasma cells in pancreas and bile duct for biopsy and >50/HPF for surgical specimens [31]. Moreover, the ratio of IgG4+ to IgG+ plasma cell >40% is mandatory for histologic diagnosis of IgG4-related disease [31].
An endoscopic intraductal forceps biopsy obtained from the biliary stricture in most cases does mostly not show these histologic features due to its small sample size. Variable sensitivities of IgG4 immunostaining of an endobiliary biopsy for diagnosing IgG4-SC have been reported, ranging from 18 to 88% due to the small sample size and possible patchy involvement [5, 32,33,34]. IgG4 immunostaining of endobiliary biopsy specimens was positive for IgG4-SC patients, independently of the presence of elevated serum IgG4 levels [35]. However, IgG4 immunostaining of endobiliary biopsy specimens from patients with PSC also showed up to 18% positivity for tissue IgG4 [2, 33]. This tissue IgG4 positivity should therefore be viewed in conjunction with the entire clinical, imaging, and serological features of each individual patient.
Differentiation by Steroid Trial
The use of steroid responsiveness as a diagnostic tool may be important, as steroid responsiveness is the most distinguishing clinical feature between IgG4-SC and PSC [2]. Some researchers have argued that a small portion of patients with PSC show positive steroid responsiveness, but the positive steroid responsiveness of PSC is only an isolated biochemical response, especially in patients with overlap syndrome between PSC and autoimmune hepatitis [22, 36,37,38]. The resolution of biliary strictures following corticosteroid treatment alone is not observed in PSC, but is typically seen with IgG4-SC. The reversal of the biliary strictures of PSC can be obtained by balloon dilatation and/or biliary stenting [22]. For differentiation of IgG4-SC from PSC by a steroid trial (steroid use as a diagnostic trial), the definition of steroid responsiveness is of utmost importance. Positive steroid responsiveness can be defined as radiographic resolution or a marked improvement in the bile duct strictures and wall thickening in response to steroid therapy [2]. A biochemical response alone after steroid therapy should not be designated as a positive steroid responsiveness for the purposes of this differentiation.
Proposal of Strategy for Differentiation by Combination of Features
The interpretation of serum/tissue IgG4 and the cholangiographic and histologic features as a means of differentiating between IgG4-SC and PSC may occasionally require a substantial amount of experience by the clinician, especially when a serum/tissue IgG4 is elevated in a patient with presumed PSC or when IgG4 is normal in a patient with presumed IgG4-SC. Our group has overcome this difficulty through the development of a simple scoring system for the discrimination of IgG4-SC from PSC that we can use in daily clinical practice [2]. The selected variables (estimated scores) include other organ involvement (yes, 3 points; no, 0 points), beaded appearance on cholangiography (yes, 0 points; no, 2 points), and age (<30 years, 0 points; 30–39 years, 1 point; 40–49 years, 2 points; 50–59 years, 3 points; ≥60 years, 4 points). The patients are classified, according to the sums of each score, into three categories: 0–4 points, probable PSC; 5–6 points, indicating a steroid trial; 7–9 points, probable IgG4-SC.
Our scoring system can be used as a basis for a clinical algorithm for patients with multifocal intrahepatic/hilar biliary strictures, with a focus on the differentiation between IgG4-SC and PSC (Fig. 12.1). The exclusion of cholangiocarcinoma is the step of utmost importance, because some imaging features of IgG4-SC overlap those of cholangiocarcinoma and because PSC is associated with a potential risk of cholangiocarcinoma. An endobiliary biopsy should be routinely performed at the time of ERCP in the setting of obstructive jaundice/cholangitis or dominant stricture. A liver biopsy can be performed in the presence of a tumefactive periductal nodule/mass. Serum CA 19-9 should be serially measured at baseline and during follow-up.
In the next stage of the evaluation, patients should undergo serum IgG4 measurement. If the serum IgG4 level shows an elevation greater than twofold, a steroid trial is indicated. If the serum IgG4 level is normal or shows an elevation of less than twofold, our scoring system is applied to these patients. For a steroid trial, prednisone 0.6–1.0 mg/kg (body weight) is administered for 2 weeks. Steroid responsiveness should be assessed based on follow-up imaging and the CA 19-9 level. When a steroid trial results in no response on imaging, an endobiliary/liver biopsy with IgG4 immunostaining could be considered. When the serum CA 19-9 rises even after biliary decompression, cholangiocarcinoma should be differentiated by means of a meticulous rebiopsy.
Conclusion
Discernment of the differences between IgG4-SC and PSC is essential for clinicians. PSC tends to be a disease of young adult and middle-aged persons (median 35–45 years), whereas IgG4-SC is a disease of the elderly (median 60–70 years). The presence of IBD favors the diagnosis of PSC rather than IgG4-SC. A concurrent or history of AIP may lead to a straightforward diagnosis of IgG4-SC. Serum IgG4 is elevated in some patients with PSC; however, an elevation of more than 4x ULN is specific for IgG4-SC. Typical cholangiographic features for PSC include a beaded appearance, diverticulum-like outpouching, and a pruned tree appearance, whereas distinctive cholangiographic features of IgG4-SC, which differentiate it from PSC, are a distal CBD stricture, longer stricture, and more prestenotic dilatation. Tissue IgG4 should be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context on the basis of clinical features, imaging, and histopathological appearance. Positive steroid responsiveness is defined as radiographic resolution or a marked improvement in the bile duct strictures and wall thickening in response to steroid therapy. A correct diagnosis occasionally requires a constellation of multidisciplinary investigation.
References
Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Harrison ME. ACG clinical guideline: primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:646–59.
Moon SH, Kim MH, Lee JK, Baek S, Woo YS, Cho DH, et al. Development of a scoring system for differentiating IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:483–93.
Bjornsson E, Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Lindor K. Immunoglobulin G4 associated cholangitis: description of an emerging clinical entity based on review of the literature. Hepatology. 2007;45:1547–54.
Chapman R, Fevery J, Kalloo A, Nagorney DM, Boberg KM, Shneider B, et al. Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:660–78.
Ghazale A, Chari ST, Zhang L, Smyrk TC, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis: clinical profile and response to therapy. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:706–15.
Karlsen TH, Boberg KM. Update on primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013;59:571–82.
Tanaka A, Tazuma S, Okazaki K, Tsubouchi H, Inui K, Takikawa H. Nationwide survey for primary sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:43–50.
Culver EL, Chapman RW. IgG4-related hepatobiliary disease: an overview. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:601–12.
Bonato G, Cristoferi L, Strazzabosco M, Fabris L. Malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis - a continuing threat. Dig Dis. 2015;33(Suppl 2):140–8.
Boonstra K, Weersma RK, van Erpecum KJ, Rauws EA, Spanier BW, Poen AC, et al. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk, and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013;58:2045–55.
Takakura WR, Tabibian JH, Bowlus CL. The evolution of natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33:71–7.
Benito de Valle M, Muller T, Bjornsson E, Otten M, Volkmann M, Guckelberger O, et al. The impact of elevated serum IgG4 levels in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:903–8.
Molodecky NA, Kareemi H, Parab R, Barkema HW, Quan H, Myers RP, et al. Incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;53:1590–9.
van Buuren HR, Vleggaar FP, Willemien Erkelens G, Zondervan PE, Lesterhuis W, Van Eijck CH, et al. Autoimmune pancreatocholangitis: a series of ten patients. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2006;243:70–8.
Huggett MT, Culver EL, Kumar M, Hurst JM, Rodriguez-Justo M, Chapman MH, et al. Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is associated with extrapancreatic organ failure, malignancy, and mortality in a prospective UK cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1675–83.
Hirschfield GM, Karlsen TH, Lindor KD, Adams DH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2013;382:1587–99.
Eaton JE, Talwalkar JA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:521–36.
Karlsen TH, Schrumpf E, Boberg KM. Update on primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:390–400.
Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Kawa S, Kamisawa T, Shimosegawa T, Uchida K, et al. Establishment of a serum IgG4 cut-off value for the differential diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis: a Japanese cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1247–51.
Gardner CS, Bashir MR, Marin D, Nelson RC, Choudhury KR, Ho LM. Diagnostic performance of imaging criteria for distinguishing autoimmune cholangiopathy from primary sclerosing cholangitis and bile duct malignancy. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:3052–61.
Boonstra K, Culver EL, de Buy Wenniger LM, van Heerde MJ, van Erpecum KJ, Poen AC, et al. Serum immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin G1 for distinguishing immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2014;59:1954–63.
Bjornsson E, Chari S, Silveira M, Gossard A, Takahashi N, Smyrk T, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis associated with elevated immunoglobulin G4: clinical characteristics and response to therapy. Am J Ther. 2011;18:198–205.
Mendes FD, Jorgensen R, Keach J, Katzmann JA, Smyrk T, Donlinger J, et al. Elevated serum IgG4 concentration in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2070–5.
Zhang L, Lewis JT, Abraham SC, Smyrk TC, Leung S, Chari ST, et al. IgG4+ plasma cell infiltrates in liver explants with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:88–94.
Nakazawa T, Naitoh I, Hayashi K, Okumura F, Miyabe K, Yoshida M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis based on cholangiographic classification. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:79–87.
Nakazawa T, Ohara H, Sano H, Aoki S, Kobayashi S, Okamoto T, et al. Cholangiography can discriminate sclerosing cholangitis with autoimmune pancreatitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:937–44.
Moon SH, Kim MH. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:645–56.
Kalaitzakis E, Levy M, Kamisawa T, Johnson GJ, Baron TH, Topazian MD, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography does not reliably distinguish IgG4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis or cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:800–803 e802.
Itoi T, Kamisawa T, Igarashi Y, Kawakami H, Yasuda I, Itokawa F, et al. The role of peroral video cholangioscopy in patients with IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:504–14.
Naitoh I, Nakazawa T, Hayashi K, Miyabe K, Shimizu S, Kondo H, et al. Comparison of intraductal ultrasonography findings between primary sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1104–9.
Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, Yi EE, Sato Y, Yoshino T, et al. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1181–92.
Oh HC, Kim MH, Lee KT, Lee JK, Moon SH, Song TJ, et al. Clinical clues to suspicion of IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis disguised as primary sclerosing cholangitis or hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1831–7.
Kawakami H, Zen Y, Kuwatani M, Eto K, Haba S, Yamato H, et al. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune pancreatitis: histological assessment of biopsies from Vater’s ampulla and the bile duct. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1648–55.
Naitoh I, Nakazawa T, Ohara H, Ando T, Hayashi K, Tanaka H, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary intraductal ultrasonography and biopsy in the diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:1147–55.
Deheragoda MG, Church NI, Rodriguez-Justo M, Munson P, Sandanayake N, Seward EW, et al. The use of immunoglobulin g4 immunostaining in diagnosing pancreatic and extrapancreatic involvement in autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1229–34.
Boberg KM, Chapman RW, Hirschfield GM, Lohse AW, Manns MP, Schrumpf E. Overlap syndromes: the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) position statement on a controversial issue. J Hepatol. 2011;54:374–85.
Parkes M, Booth JC, Pillai G, Mee AS. Do steroids help jaundice caused by primary sclerosing cholangitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:319–22.
Zenouzi R, Lohse AW. Long-term outcome in PSC/AIH “overlap syndrome”: does immunosuppression also treat the PSC component? J Hepatol. 2014;61:1189–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moon, SH., Kim, MH. (2019). Differential Diagnosis from Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. In: Kamisawa, T., Kim, MH. (eds) IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4548-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4548-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4547-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4548-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)