Abstract
This chapter builds on Kuroda’s (1988) observation that a Japanese sentence may contain, for example, two accusative theme arguments. It demonstrates that this kind of argument doubling is found extensively in the language and provides solid evidence against the θ-criterion, which implies that a thematic role can be assigned to only one argument. Then, it examines the conditions imposed on argument doubling. It argues that one of the doubled arguments must be construed as a focus and the other must serve to specify the set of alternatives for the focus. This requirement, it suggests, should ultimately be derived from Full Interpretation.
I am happy to contribute this paper to the volume in honor of Prof. Amritavalli, who has been a wonderful leader and has provided constant inspiration to the younger scholars in the linguistic community in Asia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
When the matrix predicate is individual level, the sentence-initial nominative phrase is interpreted as the focus, as shown in the translation of (3). This holds for the subsequent examples although I do not always indicate this in the translations. See Kuno (1973) and Heycock (2008) for detailed discussion on this interpretive property of matrix sentences with individual-level predicates.
- 2.
The degraded status of (11a) indicates that there is a surface constraint against multiple occurrences of a postposition in a simple sentence, similar to the ban on multiple accusative and multiple dative phrases. I return to this in the following section.
- 3.
This raises the question why argument doubling does not obtain in many languages, including English. Although I do not discuss this question in this chapter, a possible answer is given in Saito (2014). There, I mainly consider the major subject construction and argue that the labeling algorithm, in the sense of Chomsky (2013), accounts for why it is possible in Japanese and not in English. As far as I can see, the account extends to the cases of argument doubling discussed in this chapter.
- 4.
An example of PP doubling is employed here because an NP topic may be licensed by the “aboutness” relation as Kuno (1973) demonstrates, and hence, it is not clear that it participates in argument doubling.
References
Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.
Harada, S.-I. 1973. Counter equi NP deletion. Annual bulletin 7: 113–147. Research Laboratory of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, University of Tokyo.
Heycock, C. 2008. Japanese -wa, -ga and Information Structure. In The oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Shigeru Miyagawa, and Mamoru Saito, 54–83. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuno, S. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of english and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1978. Case-marking, canonical sentence patterns and counter equi in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, ed. John Hinds, and Irwin Howard, 30–51. Kaitakusha: Tokyo.
Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural language semantics 1: 75–116.
Saito, M. 2014. Case and labeling in a language without φ-feature agreement. In On Peripheries, ed. Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, and Yoshio Endo, 269–297. Hituzi Syobo: Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saito, M. (2017). Argument Doubling in Japanese with VP-Internal Focus. In: Sengupta, G., Sircar, S., Raman, M., Balusu, R. (eds) Perspectives on the Architecture and Acquisition of Syntax. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4295-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4295-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4294-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4295-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)