Abstract
Globalization has been normalized as a dominant ideology that extols the virtues of neoliberalism such as individualism, efficiency, competition and minimal state intervention through instruments of deregulation, liberalization and privatization. Transnational chains increasingly make markets, sets prices and determine the worldwide distribution of labour. This has radically altered the nature of work, the labour–capital relationship and the composition of the working class. Increasing transnationalization has contributed to a growing unevenness of labour standards and “a race to the bottom”, posing a significant challenge to trade unions. Thus, given this context of the neoliberal project, critical perspectives have greater relevance now as compared to earlier, with the need to focus on attaining a more equitable resource distribution. Critical perspectives on work and employment call into question the established social order and are particularly pertinent to India. The “Make in India” programme has become the cornerstone for India’s development plan. To achieve this, the Government of India has focused its efforts on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) and facilitating the ease of doing business. However, the essential element of the “Make in India” vision is labour. Taking a critical view of these policy changes, it is clear that the “Make in India” programme is a low-road approach that seeks to revise labour laws and exempt industry from their ambit, resulting in the further informalization and precariousness of the Indian workforce. Terms such as “Make in India” and “Shramev Jayate” and issues related to the consolidation of labour laws, employment generation, trusting citizens and cooperative federalism are used by the government in a bid to camouflage ongoing complexities associated with India’s workforce.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Currently, India is ranked 134th among 189 countries on the World Bank’s 2016 Ease of Doing Business index, much below Brazil, China and Russia (World Bank 2016).
References
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2011). Introduction. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies, (Vol. 1). London: Sage.
Alvesson, M., Willmott, H., & Bridgman, T. (2011). Introduction. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman & H. Willmott (Eds.), Oxford handbook of critical management studies. London: Oxford University Press.
Anukoonwattaka, W. (2011). Driving forces of Asian international production networks: A brief history and theoretical perspectives. In W. Anukoonwattaka & M. Mikic (Eds.), India: A new player in Asian production networks? Studies in trade and investment 75 (pp. 7–22). Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
Cantin, E. (2008). Offshore production, labour standards and collective organization in the globalizing US garment industry. In M. Taylor (Ed.), Global economy contested: Power and conflict across the international division of labour (pp. 98–116). London: Routledge.
Chua, J. (2016). Does automation change the trend of offshoring to low cost regions? In Citi Global Perspectives and Solutions, Technology at work v2.0: The future is not what it used to be. New York: Citi Group.
Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2015). The global trade slowdown: Cyclical or structural? (International Monetary Fund/IMF Working Paper No. 15/6). Washington, DC: IMF.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Frost, P. (1980). Toward a radical framework for practicing organization science. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 501–507.
Gabriel, Y. (2005). Glass cages and glass palaces: Images of organization in image-conscious times. Organization, 12(1), 9–27.
Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9–37.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. (2001). Introduction: Globalization, value chains and development. IDS Bulletin, 32(3), 1–8.
GOI. (2015). Economic Survey 2014–15. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2014-15/echapter-vol1.pdf.
ILO. (2008). World of work report. Geneva: ILO.
Jenkins, R. (2004). Labour policy and the second generation of economic reform in India. India Review, 3(4), 333–363.
KPMG-CII. (2014). Ease of doing business in India May 2014. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from https://www.kpmg.com/IN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/KPMG-CII-Ease-of-doing-business-in-India.pdf.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S Guba (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Livemint. (2016). Waging a battle in the labour market. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/PITfPiGOPGVCLMgueSzkKK/Waging-a-battle-in-the-labour-market.html.
LLR. (2015). Draft ‘Labour Code on Industrial Relations Bill 2015’. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.labourlawreporter.com/draft-labour-code-on-industrial-relations/.
Mansharamani, V. (2016, February 18). ‘Make In India’ promises manufacturing jobs for millions. Here’s why it won’t work. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/make-in-india-promises-manufacturing-jobs-for-millions-heres-why-it-wont-work.
Mittelman, J. H. (2004). The power of globalization. Whither globalization?: The vortex of knowledge and ideology. London: Routledge.
Moore, M. (2013). Late twentieth-century globalization: The evolution and differentiation of states and forms of public authority. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: Contemporary theories (pp. 17–28). London: Routledge.
Nanda, P. K. (2014, August 21). Labour market reforms: Can Modi govt pull off what no earlier regime has attempted? Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/BVhf7QbiY10fDbs2M3IT3M/Labour-market-reforms-Can-Modi-govt-pull-off-what-no-earlie.html.
Nanda, P. K. (2015a, January 19). NDA nudge to states on labour reforms. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/X6YElL574bTWVo2hHYXzNL/NDA-takes-a-giant-step-towards-cooperative-federalism.html.
Nanda, P. K. (2015b, April 30). Government to create single industrial relations law. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/n0NI4jZ8DyVZbQlKxqN4uN/Govt-to-create-single-industrial-relations-law-by-merging-th.html.
Novelli, M., & Ferus-Comelo, A. (2010). Globalization, knowledge and labour: Education for solidarity within spaces of resistance. New York, NY: Routledge.
PMO. (2014). PM’s remarks at the Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Shramev Jayate Karyakram. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=110582.
Steffy, B. D., & Grimes, A. J. (1986). A critical theory of organization science. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 322–336.
Taylor, M. (2008). Power, conflict and the production of global economy. In M. Taylor (Ed.), Global economy contested: Power and conflict across the international division of labour (pp. 11–31). London: Routledge.
Thompson, P. (2004). Brands, boundaries and bandwagons: A critical reflection on critical management studies. In S. Fleetwood & S. Ackroyd (Eds.), Critical realism in action in organization and management studies (pp. 54–70). London: Routledge.
World Bank. (2016). Doing business in India—World Bank Group. Retrieved September 7, 2016, from http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/india/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noronha, E., D’Cruz, P. (2017). The World of Work in Contemporary India: The Relevance of a Critical Lens. In: Noronha, E., D'Cruz, P. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment in Globalizing India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3490-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3491-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)