Abstract
Research is being conducted on the geomechanical properties of methane hydrate bearing soil due to increasing global energy demands. Mechanical behaviors of MHBS are greatly influenced by the temperature and pore pressure and it can only exist under a condition of low temperature and high pressure. It is of great significance to investigate such influences for the safe exploration of methane hydrate. This paper presents a numerical approach to study the mechanical properties of pore-filling type of MHBS under the influences of temperature and pore pressure by conducting DEM drained triaxial compression tests. The results show as the temperature decreases or pore pressure increases, the strength and elastic modulus of MHBS gradually increase, and the volumetric response switches from contractive to dilative. The direction of the contact between the particles forwards a vertical deflection with the development of the axial strain. The evolution rule of deviator fabrics of the strong contact \(F_{{_{11} }}^{s} - F_{{_{33} }}^{s}\) is similar to that of stress ratio \(q/p\)-axial strain. The macro behavior changes along with the micro response.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Methane hydrate bearing soil (MHBS), a specific natural soil deposit containing methane hydrate (MH) in its pores, is referred as one of the potential sources of green energy for solving the current global energy crisis. MHBS occurs in abundance under permafrost regions and deep seabed [1]. MH can be formed in soil pores under high pressure and low temperature .
In the commercial exploration of MH, the strength of MHBS may deteriorate after changing temperature –pressure conditions using thermal stimulation, depressurization, or inhibitor injection [2]. This can trigger a series of geotechnical engineering disasters, like the collapse mining platforms and auxiliary facilities, even potentially inducing submarine landslide or tsunami [3]. Therefore, it is of great importance to investigate the influence of temperature and pore pressure on the mechanical properties of MHBS to successfully achieve exploitation of MH.
Previous studies show that the mechanical properties of MHBS depend highly on different hydrate morphology (e.g., pore-filling, load bearing and cementation) [1, 4, 5]. Marine sandy sediments containing pore-filling MH particles can be considered as a class of special granular materials that present apparent obvious discontinuity characteristics. The distinct element method (DEM ) [6] can be used by modeling MH particles as agglomerates of spheres cemented together and filled into the pores of soil skeleton based on the specific MH saturation. In this study, a pore-filling type of MHBS with specific MH saturation is generated by using a novel technique. Then, the drained triaxial compression tests with different pore pressures and temperatures are conducted to analyze its stress-strain and volumetric responses and contact fabric.
2 Numerical Simulation
MH saturation is defined by the ratio of MH volume to the total pore volume. Namely:
where \(V_{mh}\) is the volume occupied by MH; and \(V_{v}\) is the total pore volume.
A new technique for generating the pore-filling type of MHBS has been proposed by He and Jiang [7]. We briefly introduce this method in this paper to simplify the reader’s understanding.
As illustrated in Fig. 1a, a homogeneous DEM cubic sample with an initial void ratio of 0.84 was generated by using the multi-layer under-compaction technique [8]. The size of the cubic specimen is \(5.445 \times 5.445 \times 5.445\,{\text{mm}}^{3}\). The particle size distribution of soil used in the DEM simulations, as shown in Fig. 1b, is close to Toyoura sand particle size in order to better simulate the real situation. The range of particle diameter is 0.1–0.42 mm, and the number of soil particle is set to be 10,000.
MH particles are generated within the scope of a sphere with radius of \(R_{a}\), and then cemented together as a whole, forming a cluster of MH. Meanwhile, the void ratio \(e_{a}\) in the sphere can be calculated as follows:
where r is the radius of MH particle; n is the number of MH in the sphere.
Then, \(R_{a}\) can be obtained by (3):
In the MHBS specimen, the following equations are satisfied:
where \(V_{a}\) is the volume of a single MH cluster; N is the number of MH clusters in the pore of soil sample.
Based on (4a, b), the number of MH clusters N can be calculated by (5).
The void ratio \(e_{a}\), radius r of MH particle and the number of MH particles n are set to be 0.82, 0.024 and 60 mm, respectively. Firstly, N spherical particles are randomly generated in the pore of soil sample, subsequently, 60 small MH particles with the radius of 0.024 mm are generated in the scope of a sphere, and then cemented together to form a cluster of MH, as illustrated in Fig. 2. The parallel bond model (PBM) is used in this paper. For \(S_{mh} = 1 5\,{\% }\) of MHBS, the number of MH clusters N is 1728. Table 1 lists the adopted material parameters used in our simulations.
3 Numerical Results
The mechanical behavior of MHBS is greatly influenced by the existing environment, i.e., temperatures and pore pressures . In [9], the cementation parameters of PBM are determined under the condition of a given temperature and pressure state. The different values of cementation parameters of PBM can be chosen to represent different temperatures and pore pressures of MHBS. A serial of drained triaxial compression tests was then conducted to simulate the mechanical response of MHBS under different temperatures and pore pressures .
3.1 Effect of Pore Pressure
Figure 3 shows the influence of different pore pressures (i.e., 2, 3 and 6 MPa) on the deviator stress, axial strain, and volumetric strain relations for MHBS with \(S_{mh} = 1 5\,{\% }\) under condition of effective confining pressure of 1.5 MPa and temperature of −30°. As illustrated in Fig. 3a, the deviator stress and elastic modulus of MHBS gradually increase with the increases of Pore pressure . The deviator stress increases to a peak value and exhibits a slight post-peak strain softening. As axial strain increases, the MHBS experiences a transition from volumetric compression to volumetric dilatancy, as shown in Fig. 3b.
3.2 Effect of Temperatures
Figure 4 shows the effect of temperatures (i.e., \(T = - 10^{ \circ } , - 20^{ \circ } , - 30^{\circ }\)) on the deviator stress, axial strain, and volumetric strain relations for MHBS with \(S_{mh} = 1 5\,{\% }\) at the effective confining pressure of 1.5 MPa and pore pressure of 3 MPa. In Fig. 4a, the deviator stress reaches a peak value and exhibits a slight post-peak strain softening. The deviator stress of MHBS gradually decreases with temperatures increase. All the specimens experience an overall dilation during shear, as shown in Fig. 4b.
3.3 Macro-Micro Relationship
The unit normal vector for all contacts is defined based on Satake [10]:
where \(N_{c}\) is the number of contacts; \(n_{i}^{k}\) is the component of the unit vector \(n^{k}\) at a contact; and d is equal to 3 for 3D.
The unit normal vector for the strong contacts is described by Kuhn [11]:
where \(N_{{_{c} }}^{s}\) is the number of the strong contacts; and \(n_{{_{i} }}^{s}\) is the component of the unit vector \(n^{s}\) at a strong contact. It refers to as a strong contact if the normal contact is greater than the average normal contact force \(f_{ave}^{n}\). The average normal contact force is calculated by the following equation.
where \(f_{i}^{n}\) is the normal contact force.
Figure 5 presents the evolution of the strong contact (i.e., \(F_{11}^{s} ,F_{22}^{s}\), and \(F_{33}^{s}\)) for pore-filling type of MHBS with \(S_{mh} = 1 5\,{\% }\) under pore pressure of 3 MPa and effective confining pressure of 1.5 MPa at \(T = - 30^{^\circ }\). With axial strain increases, \(F_{11}^{s}\) reaches a peak value and then decreases to a steady value, while \(F_{22}^{s}\) and \(F_{33}^{s}\) gradually decrease to a minimum, then slight increase to a constant. The evolution of \(F_{11}^{s}\) represents the direction of the contact between the particles forwards a vertical deflection with the development of the axial strain.
Figure 6 shows relations between the stress ratio \(q/p\), deviator fabrics of the strong contact \(F_{11}^{s} - F_{33}^{s}\), and axial strain under the same condition (i.e., \(S_{mh} = 1 5\,{\% },T = - 30^{^\circ }\), pore pressure of 3 MPa, and effective confining pressure of 1.5 MPa). As shown in Fig. 6, the evolution rule of deviator fabrics of the strong contact \(F_{11}^{s} - F_{33}^{s}\) is similar to that of stress ratio \(q/p\)-axial strain. The macro behavior changes along with the micro response.
4 Conclusions
The DEM simulation can effectively capture the macro-mechanical response of stress–strain and volumetric strain of MHBS in different temperature and pore-pressure conditions. As the temperature decreases or pore pressure increases, the strength and elastic modulus of MHBS gradually increase, and the volumetric response switched from contractive to dilative. \(F_{11}^{s}\) reaches a peak value and then decreases to a steady value, while \(F_{22}^{s}\) and \(F_{33}^{s}\) firstly decrease to a minimum, then slight increase to a stable value. The direction of the contact between the particles forwards a vertical deflection with the development of the axial strain. The macro behavior changes along with the micro response. The evolution rule of deviator fabrics of the strong contact \(F_{11}^{s} - F_{33}^{s}\) is similar to that of stress ratio \(q/p\)-axial strain.
References
Soga, K., Lee, S.L., Ng, M.Y.A., Klar, A.: Characterisation and engineering properties of methane hydrate soils. In: Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 4, pp. 2591–1642. Taylor and Francis, London (2006)
Demirbas, A.: Methane hydrates as potential energy resource: Part 2—Methane production process from gas hydrates. Energ. Convers. Manage. 51, 1562–1571 (2010)
Sultan, N., Cochonat, P., Foucher, J.P., Mienert, J.: Effect of gas hydrates melting on seafloor slope instability. Mar. Geol. 213, 379–401 (2004)
Brugada, J., Cheng, Y., Soga, K., Santamarina, J.: Discrete element modelling of geomechanical behaviour of methane hydrate soils with pore-filling hydrate distribution. Granul. Matter 12, 517–525 (2010)
Jiang, M.J., He, J., Wang, J.F., Chareyre, B. Zhu, F.Y.: DEM analysis of geomechanical properties of cemented methane hydrate bearing soils at different temperatures and pore pressures. Int. J. Geomech. (ASCE) (2015). (SCI Source J.). http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000612
Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29, 47–65 (1979)
He, J., Jiang, M.J.: Three-dimensional distinct element novel sample-preparing method and mechanical behavior of pore-filling type of methane hydrate-bearing soil (2016, accept for publication)
Jiang, M.J., Konrad, J.M., Leroueil, S.: An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies. Comput. Geotech. 30, 579–597 (2003)
Jiang, M., He, J.: Three-dimensional distinct element simulation of macro triaxial compressional strength characteristics of methane hydrate through uniaxial compressional test. Rock Soil Mech. 35(9), 2692–2701 (2014). (In Chinese)
Satake, M.: Fabric tensor in granular materials. In: Vermeer, P.A., Luger, H.J. (eds.) Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Deformation and Failure of Granular materials, Balkema, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 63–68 (1982)
Kuhn, M.R.: OVAL and OVALPLOT: programs for analyzing dense particle assemblies with the discrete element method (2006)
Acknowledgments
The research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China with grant Nos. 51179128, 51579178, Project of State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, of China with grant No. SLDRCE14-A-04. All the supports are greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
He, J., Jiang, M.J., Liu, J. (2017). Effect of Different Temperatures and Pore Pressures on Geomechanical Properties of Pore-Filling Type of Methane Hydrate Soils Based on the DEM Simulations. In: Li, X., Feng, Y., Mustoe, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Discrete Element Methods. DEM 2016. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 188. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1926-5_86
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1926-5_86
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1925-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1926-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)