Abstract
The chapter provides a historical account of the integration of the textiles and clothing sector into the GATT and the WTO. It offers an insider’s account of the key role played by the industry stakeholders such as Texprocil in bringing trade issues in this sector before the WTO dispute settlement body (DSB). This chapter provides a comprehensive discussion of all the key textiles and clothing disputes involving India and how Texprocil played a proactive role in ensuring India’s success.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
GATT (1989) Negotiating Group on Textiles and Clothing: Communication from the European Communities, MTN.GNG/NG4/W/24.
- 2.
The “Green Room” is a phrase given to the Director General’s conference room usually meant for meetings at the level of Heads of Delegations.
- 3.
The fast track authority is given under the provisions of the Trade Promotion Act.
- 4.
The sight of a relieved yet triumphant Peter Sutherland, Director General of the WTO, emerging from the “Green Room” with a cigar at around 3.00 am (CET) is still vividly etched in the author’s mind.
- 5.
WTO (1995) EC—Turkey Agreement as notified to the WTO, WT/REG22/N/1.
- 6.
Official Journal of the European Communities, L 275, 8 November 1993.
- 7.
Appellate Body Report on Turkey—Restrictions on Imports of Textiles & Clothing Products, WT/DS34/AB/R (Hereinafter Turkey—Textiles), at paragraph 58.
- 8.
Ibid, at paragraph 59.
- 9.
Ibid.
- 10.
Ibid, at paragraph 62.
- 11.
Ibid.
- 12.
Ibid.
- 13.
Ibid.
- 14.
Ibid.
- 15.
Ibid.
- 16.
These issues were brought up by TEXPROCIL on behalf of its members who felt targeted by these actions on the part of Turkish Authorities.
- 17.
Letter dated 30 November 2001 by the then Joint Secretary (Exports), Ministry of Textiles to Indian Ambassador, Turkey: No.19/1/98/Exports-III/900 & 901.
- 18.
Communication of 22 January 2001 from Indian Ambassador, Ankara to Joint Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, accessed in the files with TEXPROCIL.
- 19.
Summary of the case prepared by the WTO Secretariat, available at www.wto.org/dispute settlement/DS34.
- 20.
The author had the privilege of being associated with all the stages of the proceedings.
- 21.
Panel Report on Turkey—Textiles.
- 22.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.164.
- 23.
Ibid, at paragraph 9.152.
- 24.
Appellate Body Report on Turkey—Textiles, at paragraph 62.
- 25.
Ibid, at paragraph 63.
- 26.
Ibid, at paragraph 65.
- 27.
Letter dated 15 September & 7 November 2000 sent by the Director General of AEPC to Ministry of Textiles available with the Council.
- 28.
An oft quoted expression heard in the ante-rooms of the WTO at Geneva.
- 29.
Ibid, at paragraph 308.
- 30.
Differential and More Favourable Treatment, Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries; decision of 28 November 1979 (known as “Enabling Clause”).
- 31.
Generalized System of Preferences, June 25, 1971, GATT/ BISD (18th Supp.) at 24 (1972).
- 32.
The details of the GSP schemes are explored in detail in Atul Kaushik’s chapter in this book.
- 33.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 3281/94 of 19 December 1994 applying a four-year scheme of generalized tariff preferences (1995-1998) in respect of certain industrial products originating in developing countries.
- 34.
Appellate Body Report on EC—Tariff Preferences.
- 35.
The Author himself was witness to these banners during his visit to the Fair in 2002.
- 36.
Letter from the Chairman of Texprocil to the Indian Ambassador in Brussels on 12 December 2001.
- 37.
Proceedings of the meeting of the Committee of Administration held on 12 June 2002.
- 38.
Panel Report on EC—Tariff Preferences, at paragraph 9.20.
- 39.
Ibid, at paragraph 9.21.
- 40.
Ibid, at paragraph 7.42.
- 41.
Appellate Body Report on European Communities—Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, WT/DS/AB/R at paragraph 32.
- 42.
EU Regulation (EU) No 1/2014 of 28 August 2013 establishing Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 978/2012.
- 43.
Panel Report on United States—Rules of Origin for Textiles and Apparel Products, WT/DS243/R (Hereinafter, U.S.—Textiles Rules of Origin), at paragraph 6.2.
- 44.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.4.
- 45.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.5.
- 46.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.6.
- 47.
WTO (1995) Japan—Measures Affecting the Purchase of Telecommunications Equipment: Request for Consultations by the European Communities, WT/DS15/1; G/L/23.
- 48.
On the files of Texprocil.
- 49.
Panel Report on US—Rules of Origin at paragraph 6.73.
- 50.
India’s Statement at the DSB Meeting.
- 51.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.77.
- 52.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.84.
- 53.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.84.
- 54.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.92.
- 55.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.98.
- 56.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.117.
- 57.
Panel Report on US—Rules of Origin at paragraph 6.148.
- 58.
Part of India’s Statement at DSB Meeting.
- 59.
Ibid, at paragraph 6.159.
- 60.
Going through the Panel Report a dozen years later, one cannot but feel that it was more a case of “taking away” than “getting away” from India.
- 61.
Commission Regulation No.2208/96 OJL295/3 of 20 November 1996.
- 62.
Commission Decision 96/167/EC, OJL42/16 of 20 February 1996.
- 63.
Notice of Initiation of anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of unbleached cotton fabrics originating in China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey 97/C 210/12, Commission Regulation No.773/98 OJ C210/12,199 of 11 July 1997.
- 64.
Council Regulation (EC) No.773/98 OJ L111/19 of 7 April 1998.
- 65.
Council Regulation (EC) No.773/98 OJ L154/37 of 28 May 1998.
- 66.
Panel Report on European Communities—Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas WT/DS27/R (Hereinafter EC—Bananas), at paragraph 5.12.
- 67.
This was in line with the Appellate Body ruling in the EC—Banana dispute.
- 68.
WTO (2001) Ministerial Decisions on Implementation—Related Issues and Concern, WT/MIN(01)/17.
- 69.
WTO (2002) Submission by the European Communities concerning the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994 (Anti-dumping Agreement), TN/RL/W/13.
- 70.
Ibid.
References
Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/19-adp.pdf.
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/16-tex_e.htm.
Appellate Body Report on European Communities—Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, WT/DS/AB/R.
Appellate Body Report on European Communities—Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-type Bed Linen from India, WT/DS141/AB/R.
Appellate Body Report on United States—Measures Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India, WT/DS33/AB/R.
Appellate Body Report on European Communities—Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, WT/DS27/AB/R.
Appellate Body Report on United States—Measures Affecting Imports of Women’s and Girl’s Wool Coats, WT/DS32/AB/R.
Appellate Body Report on Turkey—Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products, (WT/DS34/AB/R).
Communication dated 22 January 2001 from Indian Ambassador, Ankara to Joint Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, accessed in the files with TEXPROCIL.
Dhar B & Majumdar A (2006) The India-EC GSP Dispute: The Issues and the Process (ICTSD Working Draft) available at http://ictsd.org/downloads/2008/06/dhar.pdf 9.
European Communities—Anti-Dumping Investigations Regarding Unbleached Cotton Fabrics from India: Request for Consultations by India, WT/DS 140/1.
GATT (1988) Negotiations Group on Textiles & Clothing: Communications from the European Union, MTN/GNG/NG11/W/24.
GATT (1989) Arrangement Regarding International Trade in Textiles, MT/TNC/11.
Geithner T and Nankani G (2002) Market Access for Developing Country Exports—Selected Issues, IMF and the World Bank. https://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/ma/2002/eng/092602.pdf.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 1948 https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_e.pdf.
Hindley B (1988) Dumping and the Far East Trade of the European Community. World Economy 11(4).
Hoda A and Prakash S (2011) Is the GSP scheme of the EU benefiting India’s exports. ICRIER Policy Research Series No. 6, 2011.
Howse R (2003) India’s WTO challenge to Drug Enforcement conditions in the European Community Generalized System of Preference: A Little known case with Major Repercussions for “Political conditionality in US Trade Policy. Chicago J Intl L 4(2).
Keesing DB and Wolf M (1980) Textile Quotas against Developing Countries (Thames Essays No. 23, Trade Policy Research Centre, London).
Letter from Chairman of 12 December 2001 TEXPROCIL to the Indian Ambassador in Brussels.
Letter from Chairman of 12 December 2001 TEXPROCIL to the Indian Ambassador in Brussels.
Letter dated 15 September & 7 November 2000 sent by the Director General of AEPC to Ministry of Textiles available with the Council.
Letter of 30 November 2000 by the then Joint Secretary (Exports), Ministry of Textiles to Indian Ambassador, Turkey: No.19/1/98/Exports-III/900 & 901.
Neufeld IN (2001) Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Procedure—Use or Abuse? Implications for Developing Countries. UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 9.
Panel Report on United States—Rules of Origin for Textiles and Apparel Products, WT/DS243/R.
Panel Report on European Communities—Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, WT/DS246/R.
Panel Report on Turkey—Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products, (WT/DS34/AB/R).
Panel Report on United States—Rules of Origin for Textiles and Apparel Products, WT/DS243/R.
Panel Report on European Communities—Anti-Dumping Investigations Regarding Unbleached Cotton Fabrics from India, WT/DS140/R.
Panel Report on European Communities—Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-type Bed Linen from India, WT/DS141/R.
Request for Consultations by India, Brazil—Anti-Dumping Duties on Jute Bags from India, WT/DS229/R.
Regulation (EC) No. 3281/94 of the Council of 19 December 1994 applying a four-year scheme of generalized tariff preferences (1995–1998) in respect of certain industrial products originating in developing countries.
Regulation (EC) No.773/98 of the Council of 7 April 1998 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain unbleached cotton fabrics originating in China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Pakistan and Turkey.
Ravindra Pratap (2003) WTO & Rules of Origin—Issues for India. Economic and Political Weekly 38:33.
Wolf M (1990) How to Cut the Textile Knot: Alternative Paths to Liberalization of the MFA, The Uruguay Round—Textiles Trade and the Developing Countries—Eliminating the Multi-Fibre Arrangement in the 1990s, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. 20433, USA.
WTO (1995) EC—Turkey Agreement on notified to the WTO, WT/REG22/N/1.
WTO (2001) Doha Ministerial Declarations and Decisions: Implementation-related issues and concerns, 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/17.
WTO (2002) EC—Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries: Request for Consultations by India, March 2002, WT/DS246/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Centre for WTO Studies (CWS), Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), New Delhi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siddhartha Rajagopal (2016). Recollections and Reflections of a Stakeholder in WTO Disputes. In: Das, A., Nedumpara, J. (eds) WTO Dispute Settlement at Twenty. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0599-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0599-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0598-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0599-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)